IPL 2013 news May 23, 2013

Train players in anti-corruption code, suggests franchise

Following the arrest of three players for alleged spot-fixing, an official from a franchise in the IPL has indicated that the BCCI needs to be more stringent about compliance with its anti-corruption measures, and has suggested the introduction of a mandatory certification programme in the anti-corruption code for all participants in the IPL.

Franchises believe that the "deeper issue" behind the arrest of S Sreesanth, Ajit Chandila and Ankeet Chavan, under charges of cheating, fraud and criminal breach of trust, "seems to be the lack of ongoing education of the player," according to a franchise head.

Teams believe the BCCI has not been aggressive in educating franchises and players on the anti-corruption programmes outside of the IPL. The anti-corruption education during the tournament itself appears to have been cursory, according to the official's description. "There was only a short 15-minute presentation made during the IPL workshop in Jodhpur before the tournament this year. It was not an intensive programme in any way," the official said.

According to the official, accountability from the BCCI and the franchises is the need of the hour for Indian cricket to be able to negate the dangers of corruption. "When a player gets an IPL contract, the Boards hand out 'no objection certificates'," the official said. "What does that mean really? They need to take additional responsibility. I need to have some level of assurance."

Despite the BCCI setting up its own anti-corruption wing under Ravi Sawani, the former ACSU chief, allegations of corruption involving Indian players during the IPL have surfaced for two years in a row. In 2012, the BCCI banned five domestic players after Sawani probed allegations involving spot-fixing, arising out of a sting operation carried out by India TV.

Offering a solution, the franchise official suggested the BCCI and other boards should think of certifying a player by making him attend a set number of anti-corruption programmes, which could then be included in the NOC that is mandatory when a player signs an IPL contract. "Certification programmes could be an interesting way of making players more responsible," he said.

The certification process could work in many ways, according to the official. "What is anti-corruption? Why is it here? Why are you vulnerable? A lot of players are unaware, uneducated, vulnerable to these kind of things? So you have got to be able to be educate these guys," he said. "They have to be told that you are likely to be approached by a lot of people. [In such a case] what do you look out for, what are the signals being sent and, importantly, are you aware of the implications and the punishment for committing something wrong?"

He agreed that the BCCI's ACSU could facilitate the players by supplying the study material online periodically. "There are many creative ways in which you can get the point across. It is really an awareness and orientation programme, which can be done periodically," the official said. "You can have online tutorials and then monitor the progress. When they have completed [it], you can automatically certify them."

Nagraj Gollapudi is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Ashok on May 27, 2013, 19:05 GMT

    Nagaraj, Apart from training the players, they should officially rule Cricket betting as illegal. "Bookies" are like Lion's Dens where a Lion is about to pounce on unsuspecting victims, dangling all "goodies". A 15 minute training cannot imbibe the "Cricket Culture" in the players overnight. This is what I call a "Band Aid" solution. That is the biggest folly & over simplification of wide spread corrupt culture that prevails in India!I will give a simple "every day" example. Even to fast track an application or form due for approval stamp of an official, there is a bribe. Easier solution is to increase the number of people at the approval end to fast track & eliminate the temptation for corrupt practices. Only by eliminating the "Root Cause" of the problem you get a permanent solution. In this case Betting + Bookies are the root cause of this problem.

  • Dummy4 on May 24, 2013, 19:53 GMT

    Now that a team owner/principal/whatever has been implicated in this, who else needs to be given this "education"? The people involved are all adults who should be knowing the difference between right and wrong. Other Mohammed Amir, I haven't seen a single instance where education would have made a difference. If the BCCI and ICC are serious about weeding this they need empower the Anti Corruption Unit with real authority. Sort of like Interpol in football. Only good deterrents including jail time will reduce the proliferation of this malaise in the game.

  • Martin on May 24, 2013, 12:16 GMT

    Education cant hurt but seriously players AND officials know whats right and wrong. If someone offers you money to bowl x number of no balls in a certain over or whatever or if you are an official you set up an arrangement like that with a player and a bookie - YOUR GUILTY!

  • Dummy4 on May 24, 2013, 10:56 GMT

    What training do you need?

    Bookie - Will you bowl a no-ball on the thirsd ball of your 2nd over if I give you RsXXXX? Player - No.

    Simple for even Australian cricketers to understand I should imagine.

  • Keith on May 24, 2013, 6:57 GMT

    I appreciate that at least one official from one franchise is willing to offer some specific and positive proposal. I notice it is directed entirely at the players. Are there no other stakeholders who can influence betting and fixing for better ... or worse? I wonder why this franchise official insisted on anonymity, as apparently s/he must have given normal journalistic practice. If people such as the franchise official have no role to play other than disinterested onlookers with an occasional idea or two to offer, why not identify yourself and your franchise? Could it be that the situation has evolved far beyond the scope of what can be accomplished by some rhetorical or informational sessions, either in person or on the Internet? Are we not at the stage where serious, fundamental constitutional change and ethical revision are essential to the survival of IPL and indeed the wider sport of cricket? The fact that my questions have all become rhetorical suggests the obvious.

  • No featured comments at the moment.