Corruption in IPL

Mudgal Report not likely to hurt Srinivasan yet

Amol Karhadkar

February 11, 2014

Comments: 7 | Text size: A | A

N Srinivasan speaks at the annual Mansur Ali Khan Pataudi lecture, Mumbai, November 13, 2013
N Srinivasan's position in the BCCI is solid © BCCI
Enlarge

Despite the IPL probe committee finding Gurunath Meiyappan, the son-in-law of BCCI president N Srinivasan, to have indulged in corrupt practices in his proven capacity as a team official of Chennai Super Kings, the feeling within the board is that Srinivasan is unlikely to be affected, unless the Supreme Court steps in.

Usually, a faction within the BCCI uses such an opportunity to pounce on the people in power. However, with Srinivasan being the undisputed leader, many members believe he will see off this turbulent period as well. "Had there been some sort of a pressure group within the Board, it could have been a different tale," an official who did not want to take sides told ESPNcricinfo. "But with most units happily supporting him, the issue won't have any bearing on the Board's affairs, at least till the next hearing."

While most BCCI members termed the probe committee report, which was submitted to the Supreme Court on February 10, "based on assumptions," some admitted that it could affect the future of the Chennai Super Kings franchise and the IPL. "We cannot undermine the fact that it's a court-appointed committee headed by a reputed former judge that has submitted its findings," a seasoned BCCI member said. "If the court admits the report, then it could lead to an upheaval within the BCCI."

The Supreme Court will hear the corruption case next on March 7 and its ruling on the Mudgal report will be important for the Chennai Super Kings because of a clause in the IPL franchise agreements. Clause 11.3 (c) says the agreement can be terminated if, "the Franchise, any Franchise Group Company and/or any owner acts in any way which has a material adverseeffect upon the reputation or standing of the League, BCCI-IPL, BCCI, the Franchise, the team (or any other team in the League) and/or the game of cricket." The term "material adverse effect," however, isn't defined in the agreement.

Some BCCI members are of the opinion that until Gurunath's involvement in betting is established, Chennai Super Kings cannot be terminated. "The clause will be applicable only if Meiyappan is found guilty of betting. And as the report itself says, Meiyappan's so-called involvement is based on the assumption that the voice samples sent to the forensic lab are his. In this case, it would be difficult to apply the clause and oust the franchise," an administrator said, referring to the additional comments made in the report by committee member Nilay Dutta.

When asked whether Gurunath's arrest by Mumbai police and the probe committee's finding that he was involved in illegal better had not brought the IPL into disrepute, BCCI vice-president Rajiv Shukla said it was a matter for the court. "We should wait for the Supreme Court verdict. The panel has given its report to the apex court," he said. "Let the court decide."

Lalit Modi, the former IPL chairman and a vocal critic of Srinivasan, however, called for the termination of Chennai Super Kings. "Given these developments, I would like to see the CSK team annulled from all future IPL activity including the forthcoming auctions and the 2014 season as per rules," Modi, said in a statement. "Additionally I think the time is also ripe to make some deep, incisive and sweeping changes to ensure that there is no systemic failure in the future.

"First and foremost I think it is time to disband the IPL Governing Council to ensure that any and all elements of bias are removed. It is time for a new Supervising Board with all the stakeholders of the IPL on it to take charge, run and govern the league. The new Supervising Board with all stakeholders on board should be responsible for conducting and running the tournament albeit at an arm's length. Next and more importantly the immediate need of the hour is to re-auction a new Chennai team. Even more important is to redo the player auction without any player retention.."

Despite Modi having held several posts in the BCCI and fighting a court battle to return as Rajasthan Cricket Association president, not many board members pay heed to his remarks. "Whatever he says is borne out of a personal fight with Srinivasan, so we shouldn't pay too much attention to it," a BCCI official said.

Amol Karhadkar is a correspondent at ESPNcricinfo

RSS Feeds: Amol Karhadkar

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by thinkgood on (February 12, 2014, 18:28 GMT)

Scrap IPL 2014. Start new in 2015 with new franchises. Anyway the upcoming parliamentary elections do not need this distraction .

Posted by xunaed on (February 11, 2014, 22:33 GMT)

So, he is like a superman, right? what is his power? Is this because he represents the richest cricket board?

Posted by haq33 on (February 11, 2014, 15:27 GMT)

Question: what is the definition of "conflict of interest"? Answer in India: you lost me after "of".

Posted by Cricket_Man on (February 11, 2014, 14:45 GMT)

If this is not going to hurt his chances then what will? Is BCCI so dominant and ICC so spineless that at the least not even an inquiry would be opened up at the ICC level? Do we have any idea how much degraded cricket would be if Mr. Srinivasan is made the chairman of ICC and it is later found out that he was involved in the spot-fixing saga of IPL. I have nothing against Indian cricket but increasing its power of influence over ICC so suddenly and quickly just makes me wonder whether Mr. Srinivasan knew something bad was coming so he decided to go All Mighty to tackle the heat. I hope this is not true but ICC needs to keep an eye on things rather than run away from its responsibilities. Because if Cricket in general is degraded through any such circumstances then only ICC and the people in it would be held responsible in the history books. Hoping that things go in the direction which is for the betterment of Cricket.

Posted by Leggie on (February 11, 2014, 14:02 GMT)

@Cpt.Meanster - I share the same views as you - except the last line "Time to save the IPL". In my view, right from it's inception, IPL has not given the comfort of being pure - be it in terms of cricket or administration. I hope the Mudgal report really becomes the beginning of the end of IPL. No need to save it any further. We've paid a heavy price already. Indian cricket and it's administration has become a subject a ridicule and let's stop IPL - which IMHO is the rool cause of all evil!

Posted by   on (February 11, 2014, 7:02 GMT)

it happens only in india :P

Posted by Cpt.Meanster on (February 11, 2014, 4:32 GMT)

He should resign as BCCI chief immediately and restrain from taking up the ICC role. CSK needs to be run by a new group of people whose primary goal is the well being of the team and most importantly upholding the integrity of cricket. For too long has the IPL been run by Bollywood movie stars and businessmen who don't even know the ABCD of cricket. I would also like former players like Tendulkar, Dravid, Laxman, Ganguly and Kumble to speak up in this regard. World cricket and Indian cricket are in turmoil. If people like Srinivasan are given even more power, then we could lose the game of cricket as we know it. A lot of people may argue betting is not a big deal BUT if they even bothered to read the Justice Mudgal report, Meiyappan's actions clearly breached the code of conduct that is expected and required of a team official/owner. Time to save the IPL and Indian cricket as a whole.

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Amol KarhadkarClose
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days