IPL 2016 May 23, 2016

Malinga-less Mumbai patchy despite strong line-up

Sirish Raghavan
Despite having most bases covered and unearthing an exciting young talent, defending champions Mumbai Indians endured a frustrating, stop-start season

Krunal Pandya was at the centre of much that was good in Mumbai Indians' campaign this year © BCCI

Where they finished

Fifth, with seven wins and as many defeats

How they got there

Mumbai Indians entered the tournament as defending champions and one of the favourites to win the title. They had retained the core of their title-winning side from the previous season - including Rohit Sharma, Ambati Rayudu, Kieron Pollard, Harbhajan Singh and Mitchell McClenaghan - while adding Jos Buttler, Tim Southee and Krunal Pandya to their ranks. It looked a well-balanced side, packed with batting firepower, boasting pace and spin resources, and carrying a lot of good memories and experiences from seasons past. What could possibly go wrong?

Quite a lot, actually. The side was struck by injury blows early in the season. Lendl Simmons played only the opening match before being ruled out for the rest of the season by a back injury. Lasith Malinga, Mumbai's star pacer and the highest wicket-taker in IPL history, was ruled out without playing a match due to continuing struggles with his left knee. An opening loss to debutants Rising Pune Supergiants kicked off another slow start to a season as Mumbai lost four of their first six matches.

Three wins on the bounce left Mumbai decently placed by the end of April, rekindling hopes that they would once again shrug off early stutters and peak at the right time. It was not to be. The shift to Visakhapatnam as their home venue in May did not work well for them. The batting unit struggled to adapt to the stickier surfaces and turned in two limp performances that led to two heavy defeats. That punctured Mumbai's momentum at just the wrong time.

Mumbai lost their last league match to close out a patchy, stop-start season that never really kicked into top gear. They certainly had their moments and only narrowly missed out on a berth in the playoffs on the last day of the league stage.


With promising India allrounder Hardik Pandya already in the squad, Mumbai paid INR 2 crore in this year's auction to recruit his brother Krunal. And what a buy it was. Krunal impressed from the outset with his sparkling strokeplay, his effective left-arm bowling and his energy in the field. He was the centre of many of the best moments in Mumbai's campaign. Against Royal Challengers Bangalore at the Wankhede Stadium, Krunal dismissed Virat Kohli and AB de Villiers in the same over to help limit the target to 171, which Mumbai chased down comfortably. In a crunch match against Delhi Daredevils, Krunal's 37-ball 86 and two wickets were instrumental in Mumbai's big win. Mumbai seem to have unearthed an exciting young allrounder who could serve them well in seasons to come.


Mumbai's principal shortcoming this season was their opening partnership. While Rohit did well - scoring 484 runs at 48.40 while opening - he did not find a reliable partner at the top. Parthiv Patel played 10 matches but managed just one innings of note - a 58-ball 81 against Kings XI Punjab - and, on that occasion, Rohit bagged a second-ball duck. Martin Guptill, drafted in as Simmons' replacement, played just three matches and registered one decent knock. The upshot was a string of poor starts, which often put the middle order under pressure.

Key stats

  • Mumbai's average opening partnership of 16.07 was the worst among all teams this IPL. They had just one half-century stand
  • Mumbai lost 25 wickets in the Powerplays - the highest among all teams. Their Powerplay run rate of 7.14 was better than only Daredevils'
  • When bowling in the closing overs (overs 16-20), Mumbai conceded a run rate of 9.87, joint third-best in the tournament

Best win

Mumbai's penultimate league match, against Daredevils in Visakhapatnam, was a crucial encounter as defeat would have all but ended their playoff chances. They had underperformed in their two previous "home" matches at the venue. This time, they were dominant from the start. Rohit and Guptill put on 46 - Mumbai's second-best opening stand of the season - before Krunal made a blistering 86 that propelled the side to 206. This was followed by a strong bowling performance, headlined by Jasprit Bumrah and Krunal, who took 5 for 28 between them. The 80-run win was not only a statement of intent, but also a timely boost to their net run rate.

Worst defeat

Mumbai's first match in Visakhapatnam was an unmitigated disaster. Poor, indisciplined bowling enabled Sunrisers Hyderabad to score 177 on a sticky wicket where batting was not straightforward. Then the chase went horribly wrong as Mumbai lost half their side for 30. Only some late resistance from Harbhajan helped them limp to a still-embarrassing 92 all out.

What they need most next season

Jos Buttler scored 255 runs this season; Kieron Pollard scored 207. Both averaged in the 20s and had strike-rates around 140. Both chipped in with a few bright cameos, in chases and when batting first. Overall, their returns this season were commendable, but not commanding. If these two overseas stars could find another gear and become regular match-winners next season, it could provide Mumbai with the inspiration and intensity that they mostly lacked this time around.

Sirish Raghavan is a sub-editor at ESPNcricinfo

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • mukesh on May 24, 2016, 20:52 GMT

    Rohit Sharma playing in wankhade most of his games and Rahane playing in Pune have not much difference in stats. 14 games 489 by sharma and 480 for Rahane. 3 Not outs strike rate also similar 368 and 379 balls played. On long run both these Mumbai based openers can be termed as success(if Wankhade is ignored). Both end up as top 4th and 5th run scorers in IPL. Rohit on basis of playing as opener in Wankhade was expected to score slightly more not bradmanesque (viratesque) but playing in smallest flat pitches this is base of expectations. Relatively Gambhir score 473 from 383 deliveries which by Kolkata pitch standards is pretty high. Gambhir might be discarded from team India but being 6th highest scorer by end of regular IPL this is indeed an achievement. Commentators only see special Rohit , Public here hates Rahane , Everyone misses out on GG. Fans need to understand pitch conditions when comparing players especially if everyone is coming in at same positions for different team

  • neevmo0732680 on May 24, 2016, 13:55 GMT

    Too much coaching staff some time confusing...sachin ponting robin bond jonty and msny more

  • neevmo0732680 on May 24, 2016, 13:54 GMT

    They should play nathu singh over southee and guptil instead of patel ..then openig worry solved ...hardik need to be consiontrate on cricket rather than unusual too much exitement ...i want to see nathu singh play a game or two ...he is geniun quicky and young ...rana ..krunal ..bumrah ..rohit ..positive for mumbai

  • sachin on May 24, 2016, 5:10 GMT

    Our positives were Rohit, Bumrah and Krunal. Rana showed potential. We had baffling non inclusion of Corey. Even Kamath the leg spinner and Unmukt were wasted. We lacked a genuine match winning bowler. So a bit of a surprise when we didnt pick somebody like Ish Sodhi over Jerome Taylor who had no chance in hell to play with Marchant De Lange already warming the bench.

  • sachin on May 24, 2016, 5:07 GMT

    Our positives were Rohit and Krunal,

  • sachin on May 24, 2016, 5:05 GMT

    Mumbai always comes up with confusing decisions...courtesy a over packed coaching team. That talented players such as Krunal and Rana were played after exhausting other options makes u question what they reviewed in the nets?

  • ziaul on May 24, 2016, 4:01 GMT

    Mumbai should take Mahmudullah or Sabbir Rahman from BD next year, they are good players in the middle order, or take Nabi from Afgan

  • urmi.n5133911 on May 24, 2016, 3:26 GMT

    MI need to find a local talent who can open the innings with RS because their batting was the major problem this entire season. Unmukt could have been given another chance. Guptill is inconsistent at best. Quite enjoyed the bowling unit with the likes of Bumrah and Southee. McClenaghan, for all that hype, is still a par/below-average bowler. Name me one instance when he stood up when he really needed to. So instead of just saying that it was the absence of Malinga that hurt MI, it was also the over reliance on MM. He and Southee did form a good new ball partnership, which allowed him to go take the wickets. Once Southee was not there, he didn't have the same impact. That's why it's important to look at bowling in tandem, which the two kiwis could strike up. Anderson should have been a direct replacement for Pollard who clearly has had a poor season. And Nitish Rana should have been given more chances. Hard luck MI. Come back stronger/smarter next time.

  •   Nick Sah on May 24, 2016, 1:48 GMT

    Since 2009 MI had starting problem yet they never learnt their lesson. They won in 2013 & 2015 as they stuck with Dwayne Smith and Lendl Simmons. This time too, they never got in a good opener, so they lost. Period. And who will win when you have an old man called Pollard.

  • Debra on May 23, 2016, 23:04 GMT

    seriously, that's all? how about the dysfunctional Hardik Pandya? the worst team buying by team owner, the insistence on keeping R.Sharma, despite him being well and truly no-hit? Pollard, now, seriously? By the way, I agree with Travis Bickle's comments. cheers.

  • No featured comments at the moment.