India v Australia, 1st ODI, Vadodara

Teams exposed by batting Powerplay

In a close match, the one passage of play which exposed both teams' weaknesses was the implementation of the batting Powerplay

Sidharth Monga in Vadodara

October 25, 2009

Comments: 19 | Text size: A | A

Mitchell Johnson got rid of a set Gautam Gambhir, India v Australia, 1st ODI, Vadodara, October 25, 2009
The Australians nailed Gautam Gambhir off the first ball of the batting Powerplay © Getty Images
Enlarge

The concept of the Free Hit doesn't seem to have caught on with the Vadodara crowd. In the 21st over of the Australian innings, when Ishant Sharma bowled a no-ball, the next delivery, short and wide, was upper-cut by Cameron White, and was caught pretty well at sweeper cover by Harbhajan Singh. Harbhajan then tried to get the ball back as soon as possible, but the crowd behind him went delirious. They looked confused when White scampered through for a couple. Would you blame them, though, when you see the teams, with laptops, coaches, and consultants to help them out, still haven't come to terms with another new concept - the batting Powerplay - as we saw today?

When Australia took their Powerplay, in the 43rd over, both Michael Hussey and White were well set, having started scoring at more than a run a ball without much trouble, and Australia looked good for a score in the region of 325. White then perished off just the second delivery of the fielding restrictions. Australia collected 33 runs in those five overs, lost three wickets, and ended up with 292.

India went for their license to kill in the 35th over, right after the mandatory ball change, to ensure they didn't waste the Powerplay on the soft ball - one that can cause a few tricks if maintained well by the fielding side. India needed 126 from 96 balls. Gautam Gambhir and MS Dhoni had added 64 and looked good to bring the equation in their favour. Gambhir went first ball, and soon after, India lost Suresh Raina, and then Dhoni rather unnecessarily, trying to clear mid-on while the field was still up.

When the freak partnership between Harbhajan Singh and Praveen Kumar - and what a partnership it was - took India close, it was clear that the real difference between the teams on the day was the Powerplay, as to which team made a bigger mess of it. The numbers are similar. Australia managed 33 for 3 in the those five overs, while India made 32 for 3. India's misadventure, though, left a lot to do for the lower order, hard as Harbhajan and Praveen tried.

The Powerplay is a dynamic innovation. Batsmen find it hard to resist adventurous shots with the field up. Captains are, time and again, thrown out of their comfort zones. When you ask for something, you better use it. And it's fair to say that more often than not, teams have erred in both aspects. One can almost sense the captains resisting this set of restrictive overs, because it interferes with the flow of their innings. Why, otherwise, would we see most teams going for it in the last 10 overs, when they are anyway going to be adventurous?

Take Australia's example. They could have easily opted for it when Dhoni, already struggling to get through his main bowlers' quotas, introduced Ravindra Jadeja. Australia were 91 for 1 in 17 overs then, and would have delayed the introduction of spin by five overs had they taken the Powerplay. That would have meant the fifth bowler would have had to bowl ten out of the last 28 overs, as opposed to 33. Sachin Tendulkar did exactly that in Christchurch during his 163 not out earlier this year, when the fifth bowler, offspinner Jeetan Patel, was introduced. India were 121 for 2 after 21 overs then, similar to Australia's position today. India blazed 69 in the next five overs. Patel managed only five overs that day, conceding 37, but the bowler who completed the fifth-bowler quota, Jesse Ryder, leaked 56.

Tendulkar's use of the Powerplay remains the only masterpiece out-of-the-box employment of this resource that comes to mind. Teams have tended to show complete disregard for this attempt by the ICC to make the middle overs more dynamic. But that's not where the trouble ends. The batsmen, too, react in a funny manner once the field comes up. They suddenly feel obliged to shift the momentum, against their will.

Ricky Ponting knows it's a problem with his side, currently the best in ODIs. "We have been guilty of it in the last few games that we have played," Ponting said. "When we target our Powerplay, we have generally lost a wicket in the first over. We lost one to the second ball of our Powerplay, India lost one first ball, so as soon as you lose wickets in a Powerplay, it slows you right down and almost makes the Powerplay irrelevant."

Ponting attributes this to the mindset of the batsmen in the middle. "Once the field comes in, you think you have to hit a six every ball," he said. "If you still play normal cricket shots, like you do in Test matches, you can still hit the ball through the field and it travels pretty quickly. Quite often you bat through a one-day innings with the field in, but you put a little bit more pressure on yourself when it's your Powerplay. You have got to get it right because it's going to cost you games pretty quickly as we saw today."

Dhoni seems to have specialists chalked out for Powerplay situations. "It depends on who you are batting with, as each and every one has a role in the side," Dhoni said. "If you are batting with Yuvraj Singh, then you don't take too many risks because it is Yuvraj who does it. If the batsman at the other end is not really a big striker of the ball and if I am in, then I would like to take the strike more."

But risks have to be taken, as Dhoni did today. Raina's case was even more compelling because he walked in with 29 Powerplay deliveries left. What does a new batsman do in case his team loses a wicket early in the Powerplay? It's almost like opening an innings, the difference being that the ball isn't as hard and that the restrictive overs are fast running out of hand.

This is where Ponting's view comes into play: why not play normal cricket? The better batsmen are more likely to be around in the middle overs than in the last 10. Having said that, they wouldn't want the flow to be interrupted by taking risks. It's a vicious circle that has led to improper use of the tool. With time, captains might become bolder and batsmen more used to the idea. But until then, captains will continue to find themselves in tangles over how to use the Powerplay. The ICC's cricket committee must be chuckling.

Sidharth Monga is a staff writer at Cricinfo

RSS Feeds: Sidharth Monga

© ESPN EMEA Ltd.

Posted by ListenToMe on (October 26, 2009, 15:57 GMT)

Hello mysay, this article is posted under analysis. that means the author has posted his analysis on this match. I have commented my own opinion about the match. It is not a Q/A article so that you should comment only on the topic.

Posted by critek on (October 26, 2009, 14:18 GMT)

Would be interesting to see what is the avg runs scored in last 15 overs of the innings (especially first innings) based on when the powerplay was taken to determine which overs are the best to take powerplay(something like avg of batsman at each position).... I feel that you've wickets in hand, starting powerplay between 40-43 makes most sense.

Posted by sunalsk80 on (October 26, 2009, 13:07 GMT)

I could agree more to what KrishnaKapadia said below. I feel Yusuf should be brought back and should be used for powerplays. May be he could also be used as a pinch hitter and score some useful runs. He should be given some pep talk and should be allowed to play his natural game; something which was given to Sanath Jayasurya by Arjuna Ranatunga. Yusuf should be used carefully and should be well taken care of. He is undoubtedly an asset. But the message should be clear for him to perform more consistently.

Posted by popcorn on (October 26, 2009, 12:10 GMT)

The Batting Powerplay is a gimmick which rarely benefits the batting side. It should be done away with. Ricky Ponting is right - just play normal cricket! Don't take the batting Powerplay just because it is available. This is ODI Cricket, not SLOGGERS PARK, Twenty20 Alternately, make it Overs 45 to 50 MANDATORILY.

Posted by cantbatcantbowl on (October 26, 2009, 10:32 GMT)

Australia is the hot team of the moment in the 50/50 game. India put in a very poor performance in the Champions Trophy and played well below their potential. The Indian team is too inconsistent and for that you have to blame the players. On paper they are a good enough side in reality it's SNAFU.

Posted by Zmahs on (October 26, 2009, 8:02 GMT)

I seriously think that Ravindra Jadeja should be dropped from the side. The man is clearly unable to finish off a game for India. He can't even clear the boundary, which I believe all middle order batsmen should be able to do. I think the selectors are wasting time with him. I too would opt for Yusuf Pathan. I understand he has been very inconsistent in the past, but these are problems which can be overcome. A lack of talent (as in Jadeja's case) however, cannot!

Posted by nawwabsahab on (October 26, 2009, 7:08 GMT)

can anybody justify australia's bowling line and length at the death overs...specially in the second last over ..full toss balls all out side the off stump..and before that wayward bowling outside leg...dont tell me nobody noticed it or it was pressure...plz take a look at highlights if you dont get my point right now...there must be very fishy things in it....

Posted by mysay on (October 26, 2009, 7:04 GMT)

What on earth are GirishE, MSGNSG & Krishna Kapadia on about. I think it's blokes like you are the sort of ones that go delirious for running off a no ball which are caught. The talk here is the powerplay and you guys are babbling about team selections. As for the powerplay it is a waste if they are kept till the last overs even if the top order is still around. I think Mr. Monga makes a good point as to what happens if a wicket falls in the powerplay overs if they are taken at the depth. The new batsmen is surely not going to have a go, or maybe not even as a set batsmen would. Take it in the initial overs, make this form of the game a little more exciting in these periods, and if you lose a wicket, the new batsmen can play themselves in and have a go at the latter stage, if not the whole concept of batting PP is USELESS.

Posted by s_h_a_z_y on (October 26, 2009, 6:56 GMT)

I still don't understand why are they not brining back kaif he is still a better bet than virat. If you say that he is not perfoming then if you the current indian team except gambhir nobody is performing. Raina has got more chanes now and he still can't find the form for hwihc he has been selected.

In place of jadeja bring yousuf / irfan atleast they are power hitters, we just hope that the selectors choose a better team for next 5 ODI's

Posted by sandman2203 on (October 26, 2009, 6:55 GMT)

bring dravid back... he is the one who used to finish the game with yuvraj singh... he has proved himself in CT... raina should be groomed and grilled harder to fit in the 11. stability in middle overs in essential as short partnerships can't help... virat kohl still acts like novice and he tries too much with his stroke play... aggression is good but over is worst... Dravid is the man india needs at present...i

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Sidharth MongaClose
Tour Results
India v Australia at Mumbai - Nov 11, 2009
Match abandoned without a ball bowled
India v Australia at Guwahati - Nov 8, 2009
Australia won by 6 wickets (with 49 balls remaining)
India v Australia at Hyderabad (Deccan) - Nov 5, 2009
Australia won by 3 runs
India v Australia at Mohali - Nov 2, 2009
Australia won by 24 runs
India v Australia at Delhi - Oct 31, 2009
India won by 6 wickets (with 10 balls remaining)
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days
Sponsored Links

Safe & simple online money transfer. Apply Now!

Available now at Cricshop