|Photos||Video & Audio||Blogs||Statistics||Archive||Shop||Mobile|
Just after Rahul Dravid had square-driven Brad Williams for his first four, Shane Warne took his eyes off the television set on which he has been following golf, and bellowed, as if to exhort Steve Waugh, "come on, bring on Stuart MacGill." There
December 13, 2003
Stuart MacGill: the second fiddle conducts his orchestra
© Getty Images
Just after Rahul Dravid had square-driven Brad Williams for his first four, Shane Warne took his eyes off the television set on which he has been following golf, and bellowed, as if to exhort Steve Waugh, "come on, bring on Stuart MacGill." There were two messages there. One, Warne reckons Dravid is suspect against legspin. Two, he rates MacGill as a legspinner.
Warne and MacGill, merchants of the same craft, peddling their ware in a market where there is room for only one, share a complex relationship, based on mutual respect and fierce competitiveness. Had he been playing for any other country, MacGill, with 137 wickets from 27 Tests at an average of 26, would have been a treasure. In Australia, he is a spare tyre for Warne, under whose towering shadow he is condemned to conduct his career.
A couple of days ago, I asked MacGill about how he dealt with this denial, whether he managed to avoid bitterness about his condition? MacGill smiled wryly. "I would have been really bitter if it was a lesser bowler keeping me out. But Shane is a colossus. Arguably the greatest spinner ever. It is just unfortunate that my career happened to coincide with his."
A couple of months from now, MacGill will be competing with Warne for his Test berth again, and that Warne will win his place back is almost a forgone conclusion. MacGill admits it himself, but he says that the pressure hasn't been any less in Warne's absence. "When Shane started his 12-month holiday, I felt more pressure because I became the number one spin bowler [in Australia]. Now if Shane does come back for the first Test in Sri Lanka that would mean I have three Tests to go and I probably wouldn't play again. Shane Warne is the best wristspinner to walk the planet."
A admirable philosophy certainly, but ask him if he has had to play second fiddle to Warne because he doesn't possess Warne's variety, and MacGill can't help a hint of sarcasm about his rival's supposed repertoire. "As much as spin bowlers like to talk about mystery balls and things, the fact is that there are only a certain amount of deliveries that you can produce. Your wrist has probably 270 degrees of angle that you can maneovre and that is the variety. I think I have a reasonable command over the angles of the wrist. If I choose not to bowl certain deliveries, it is because I don't believe that they will contribute to my cause. For instance, people asked me why I didn't bowl more googlies in the last Test. It is because I did not think it was a good idea at the time.
"I am happy with the way I am bowling and I am struggling to find any other area I can improve on. I don't really know what else I can do to improve my position. If Shane comes back and plays instead of me, that will be a real shame. But that is just the way it goes."
It is a matter of record that in the matches that they have bowled together MacGill has outshone Warne. But he wouldn't read too much into it. "To be honest, whenever we have bowled together, Shane has either been coming back from an injury, or going out with one," he says. But he believes that the idea of two spinners bowling together is not an outrageous one. "We have showed on a few occasions that it can work."
Honesty doesn't desert him when you ask him to rate his chances against the touring Indians. "The only thing that might work in my favour is that the Indian batsmen like to dominate spin bowlers. If they feel the need to get on top of of me, I might have a bit of a sniff. Otherwise I will have to look for some wickets from the tailenders. As long as I raise an eyebrow amongst their batsmen from time to time, it will be great for me. That is all I am trying to do.
"Great players of spin bowling are not deceived off the wicket. People talk about how much I turn the ball. But in this particular series, I believe that will be inconsequential. Maybe, only the tail will be deceived off the pitch. A great player of spin bowling will only be deceived if there is subtle variation. It will really test me out because generally speaking I am not all that subtle."
Sambit Bal, the editor of Wisden Asia Cricket magazine and Wisden Cricinfo in India, will be following the Indian team throughout this Test series.
Modern Masters: Playing in a weak team, his single-minded focus is to be the best he can be
ESPNcricinfo XI: A look at the side's international highlights: from shocking Pakistan in 1999 to whitewashing New Zealand
Firdose Moonda: Ahead of the first-class season, we look at the players the selectors will be watching closely
Ian Chappell: Kids mimic the cricket heroes of the day, so the problem of throwing must be tackled below the first-class level
Ahmer Naqvi: A look at two bowlers and two batsmen who could be crucial to their campaign in Incheon
The thrills are rather low-octane, the skills are a bit lightweight, and the tournament overly India-centric
Twenty years on, Shivnarine Chanderpaul continues to be understated, underestimated. And that doesn't bother him. What's not to like?
Also, high scores and low averages, most ducks in international cricket, and the 12-year-old Test player
Of the 85 Tests that Bangladesh have played so far, they've lost 70 and won just four. Those stats are easily the worst among all teams when they'd played as many Tests
Former New Zealand seamer Gavin Larsen talks about wobbly seam-up bowling, the 1992 World Cup, and his role in the next tournament
Kids mimic the cricket heroes of the day, so the problem of throwing must be tackled before players reach the first-class level
Both teams face contrasting opponents in their next Test series. While West Indies will be tested against stronger teams, Bangladesh have it easier but without much to gain