Ian Healy March 18, 2012

'Keeping is a bit lonely'

The former Australian keeper on what attracted him to the gloves, giving up weekends for his kids, getting stared at by David Boon, and more

I don't miss wicketkeeping. I miss the practice for the feeling of fitness that it gives you.

The way not to make a mistake is to think properly and put your fear aside. The good players are able to do that, to just turn the fear into a little bit of anxiety.

Cricket gave me the chance to travel and become more worldly.

With wicketkeeping you need to repeat the fundamentals every ball: being in a good body position and watching the ball. Not the bat, just watch the ball and react to the ball. You'll react to anything that's gonna happen if you're in a good body position.

I grew up in a little town, Biloela, in the centre of Queensland which didn't have too many outside influences.

Wicketkeeping is a bit thankless and a bit lonely: if you're doing badly, you have to work it out yourself a lot of the time.

Sledging is not a positive thing; you can't condone it. But I also don't mind seeing it happen at times - just isolated outbursts, because that tells me that international cricket is still very important to people.

I was nine years old, watching another kid during practice for a team we were trying out for, and something clicked. I liked what I saw: might've been the extra attention he was getting or the extra catching he was getting. I took up wicketkeeping from then onwards.

You get what you deserve. You don't get what you want.

The crouched position is not very important in wicketkeeping; it's the one where you come out of the crouch that's important. That's hard to maintain for long periods because you need leg strength and you need to make sure you're not putting too much stress on your back.

It's tradition that sportsmen are role models, and also a little unfair. I'll have no problems with a cricketer saying, "Listen, kids, don't follow my lead. I want you to watch my cricket, but I am not a role model to follow." Something like Dennis Rodman in basketball.

The bowler I liked keeping to best was Shane Warne. There was always something happening.

My parents just gave up their weekends, basically, for our cricket, and I have only realised that, having become a parent - how hard it is to give up your weekends, to give up your life for your kids. They did it every weekend, winter and summer, for cricket and football.

I didn't take defeat too badly. If you can compete and prepare very well and play even pretty well and come close to doing your job, well then, I've got no problems if we lose.

Wicketkeeping is unknown and that's why it can be perceived as underrated.

My definition of Australianism: prepare very well, play really hard, and commiserate and celebrate very well.

When I started my career David Boon used to stand at short leg and just stare at me and the batsman. And I thought, "Oh, I don't think Boonie likes me." He didn't say much at all and it distracted me. He could bluff the opposition with his body language.

Directness is a virtue of mine.

It's great to have some defeats that you can remember, and things that hurt because it makes the good times sweeter.

Once Dad took us to a game in which Keith Stackpole scored a double-hundred. I ran out on the field and patted him on the back and was trampled on my way back. That was fun.

Money has to be secondary otherwise you won't last long in the game.

Discipline in minor things is extremely important. Things like punctuality, wearing the right uniform as a team, making the bus on time and making it to meetings on time are really important. Make sure everyone is on the same page so that when the team comes under pressure, they'll be together.

Merv Hughes was a very effective larrikin. He had the ability to create noise and relax the whole dressing room.

Young cricketers today are more dependent on coaches than they were earlier. I just hope we don't form a dependence on coaches because one thing that has fallen by the wayside is good captains.

Cricket is such a small part of my life; I hope I will be remembered for more than cricket.

If you have fun, you have half a chance of being successful.

Nagraj Gollapudi is an assistant editor at Cricinfo

This interview was first published in the print version of the Cricinfo Magazine

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • ygkd on March 21, 2012, 10:36 GMT

    The question was asked by Busie1979 about what is done today that is not as good as it was? Well, I'd point to the hoover technique - spreading your gloves like a Japanese fan in order to stop the ball. The fielder who used to stop the ball was called a backstop. Keepers are suposed to take it. They used cupped hands partly because with old-style gloves you'd be more likely to break your fingers with the fan technique and partly because it is a surefire way of lacking the necessary softness of hands and allowing the ball to bobble around or pop out, at least if over-used. The best overseas keepers only partly use such a technique, but some in Oz seem to know no other way. So that and poor footwork are the two things, oh and poor rising from a squat to make it three, I'd say have changed since "keepers couldn't bat". Except when was that? The 1st ever Test 200 - made by a batsman who would have kept but for an exceptional alternative. Then there was Les Ames, Clyde Walcott....

  • Riders2966 on March 20, 2012, 11:24 GMT

    @ youngkeepersdad - my memory is fading, and I don't have any materials where I am (they may be stored away somewhere else that I can't easily access right now - I'm overseas), but I think it was something like 4 for a stumping, 1 for a catch and -0.1 for a bye ... and we probably averaged a stumping a game together - so not hard to do the maths - all else being equal - and they were very thankful to me when they got their award! But leaving the "leg spin bias" aside, the fact that they had an award was a great encouragement for wicketkeepers to keep at it! I hope, with or without awards, your young bloke gets the support and encouragement he needs - and hey, maybe one day we'll be speaking of him alongside of Healy and Gilchrist!

  • ygkd on March 20, 2012, 11:21 GMT

    Ian Smith was an exceptional keeper who could give the ball a thump when batting. Best Kiwi wk I've ever seen. Early movement was his thing. Too many today chuck themselves around because they never learnt to read the ball well. Smith reads keepers as well as he read the ball, that's why he says interesting things. I'd be interested in his opinion on whether or not keeping standards have declined. I certainly reckon they took a thumping from all the limited overs stuff and may take a second one later this decade, in Oz at least. Mind you, the Oz selectors could help more. Why is Hartley not in the Windies?

  • Meety on March 20, 2012, 2:33 GMT

    @Busie1979 - don't know that it so much about dropping standards, but more about an emphasis on batting skills > keeping skills? Also - as far as commentating, this summer we have had a bit of Ian Smith, & I would say he knows a thing or two about keeping.

  • Busie1979 on March 19, 2012, 23:39 GMT

    There is an assumption that the standard of keeping is not as good as it used to be when keepers couldn't bat. This is an assumption with little hard evidence and many people who make these statements don't point to anything specific or objective. I think it is hard to compare keepers unless one is obviously making a lot of mistakes. If keepers are not as good now, what were they doing 20 years ago that they are not doing today? I would imagine with the emphasis on fielders hitting the stumps rather than throwing the ball to the keeper to take the bails off means that they have less opportunity to use these skills. But then, batsman are more likely to take risky runs so there is probably more run out opportunities. Is it a question of technique? If so, what is wrong with the technique of current keepers? Are keepers dropping more catches? Not getting to catches? Letting through more byes?

  • hhillbumper on March 19, 2012, 19:16 GMT

    best wicket keeper in the world after jack Russell.Some of his stumpings were phenomenal. Shame the standard went down after him.

  • dummy4fb on March 19, 2012, 15:05 GMT

    The way Healy kept in the 90's to guys like Warne & Bevan was brilliant. In those days Warne had a bigger arsenal of deliveries and really ripped it, whilst Bevan got huge turn but lacked control in both cases making Healy's job tougher than Gilchrist's (not taking anything away from Gilly). The fact that it was Gilchrist that took over from Healy, I believe has meant that Healy's ability has often been overlooked when people talk about the great keepers of the modern era. He was also a very handy batsman who often made his runs when the chips were down.

  • stormy16 on March 19, 2012, 12:44 GMT

    Unfortunately for me Healy is the guy who kept out Gilly till Gilly was over 25 to make his debut for Aus - not that its Healy's fault, he was very good which is why Gilly didnt get a look in but I felt the Australians should have got Gilly in earlier. Healy was a great player and made handy runs in the context of his time where the old fashioned keeper was at best a handy batsman.

  • vertical on March 19, 2012, 11:00 GMT

    Man,keeping is so tough...you really need good strong leg and back muscles to prop up every time and its also the most important position just look at Pakistan's keepers and how many games they have lost because of them.(Sydney test comes to mind)

  • ygkd on March 19, 2012, 10:58 GMT

    cont: The hardest thing for a 15/16yo wk making their way in serious seniors is opening the batting as well. And everyone expects it, post Kalu and Gilchrist. Try 70 overs keeping, then go out and face the best opening bowlers in the league and see them off to stumps... Yeah that deserves an award.

  • No featured comments at the moment.