The concept of a makeshift opener in India

The fall guys

Rahul Dravid's bold decision to take up a job that he has been wary of in the past surely had a lot to do with putting the team first and leading by example

Jamie Alter

January 15, 2006

Text size: A | A



Deep Dasgupta was just one of India's many makeshift openers © Getty Images
Enlarge
Rahul Dravid's bold decision to take up a job that he has been wary of in the past surely had a lot to do with putting the team first and leading by example, but for Indian cricket, it is a continuation of a rather unfortunate trend of a make-shift option for one of the truly specialized jobs in cricket.

Sometimes, it has been done for the sake of `balance'; to allow India to play the extra spinner, or an extra batsman, but mostly because India simply have not found a couple of openers who can bear comparison to the gleaming assembly of middle-order batsmen India have produced consistently. Virender Sehwag was thrust in to the opening role because a place could not be found for him in the middle order. If Dravid hadn't decided to do the brave thing, the easy option would have been to promote the wicket-keeper. After all, India have a long tradition of it.

Names such as Nayan Mongia, Parthiv Patel, MSK Prasad, Deep Dasgupta, Sameer Dighe and even Farokh Engineer and Budhi Kunderan are examples of India's makeshift wicketkeeper openers, though Kunderan and Engineer, both top class wicketkeepers, opened with more regularity on a series-to-series basis. With the norm in the 50s, 60s and 70s being to pack the side with spinners, Kundheran and Engineer were asked to open in order to give the management more options.

Mongia's 152 - his only Test hundred - proved a thorn in Australia's side as India won a one-off Test at Delhi just after the 1996 World Cup. But, as was the norm, he made way for a batsman groomed as an opener, and when he had a couple poor innings, another makeshift opener would play a couple Tests until another opener was unearthed.

Dasgupta, the Bengal wicketkeeper, had some success - including a hundred against England in which he displayed impressive composure - but shoddy work behind the stumps ended his Test claims. Sanjay Bangar also had some productive innings, most famously an impressive 68 in a famous Headingley win in August 2002, but as is the custom in India, a couple of failures sent them back to domestic cricket. With India's specialist openers failing in the first two Tests of an Australian summer, Prasad, chosen as wicketkeeper for India's three-Test tour, was made the sacrificial lamb at Sydney in January 2000. His scores: 5 and 3 - dismissed both times wafting at Glenn McGrath - in a miserable loss.

A glaring example of desperate situations calling for desperate Indian measures was the second Test against Zimbabwe at Harare in June 2001, where two makeshift openers totally out of their depth were used in both innings. In the first, Hemang Badani was made to open, and contributed just 2 and in the second he was swapped down the order in place of Dighe, who made just 4. Zimbabwe won the match by four wickets, and neither batsman ever had a successful Test career.

Patel, sent in place of an out-of-form Aakash Chopra in the third Test at Rawalpindi in 2004, contributed a fine 69 to India's historic series win in Pakistan. Displaying an admirable technique and a penchant for anything full, Patel added 128 with Dravid in good time as India completely out-classed Pakistan.

Ajay Jadeja was used as an opener in 12 of his 15 Tests, in various situations and over different stages of his career. In a rain-marred two-day Test at Antigua in 1997, India experimented with two makeshift openers - Jadeja and VVS Laxman. Jadeja was given the job simply because there was nobody else, while Laxman was a talent being fitted into the scheme without tampering with the middle order.



Irfan Pathan's promotion to opener worked wonderfully, but it may remain an experiment © Getty Images
Enlarge

Under Greg Chappell, India have made significant experiments in both forms of the game, but perhaps the finest Test move was sending Irfan Pathan to open the innings. With Sehwag recovering from a throat infection and flu, Pathan was sent in with Gautam Gambhir on the third day of the second Test against Sri Lanka at the Feroz Shah Kotla and stroked his way to 93 with 10 fours and two sixes. Just 21, Pathan produced an innings that mixed an impressive defense with some aggressive shots - those two sixes were clouted off a certain Muttiah Muralitharan - and helped India deflate the Sri Lankan attack. This move by the team management may remain an experiment, however, with Chappell himself saying that Pathan would not be batting that high regularly.

Barring a couple examples, what these haphazard decisions indicate is a fallibility on the part of the system. Collaged solutions are not acceptable any longer, and India need to decide on one policy. Makeshift openers for India have either failed miserably, performed credibly and been dumped after a couple failures, or relegated someplace else following the return of a `specialist' opener. In short, they have for long been the bane of Indian cricket. Groomed, thrust into the role, or sacrificial lamb, the makeshift opener has never lasted very long and India face a similar problem in this Test. If Ganguly fails, then India can go back to opening with Sehwag and either Gambhir or Wasim Jaffer, the specialist openers selected for this tour. If not, then India may well have to experiment further. With Dravid reluctant and Yuvraj Singh having failed in his one appearance as opener, India would do good to play one of the two benched openers. With India, however, everyone keeps their pads on.

Jamie Alter is editorial assistant of Cricinfo

RSS Feeds: Jamie Alter

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

FeedbackTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Jamie AlterClose
Jamie Alter Senior sub-editor While teachers in high school droned on about Fukuyama and communism, young Jamie's mind tended to wander to Old Trafford and the MCG. Subsequently, having spent six years in the States - studying Political Science, then working for an insurance company - and having failed miserably at winning any cricket converts, he moved back to India. No such problem in Bangalore, where he can endlessly pontificate on a chinaman who turned it around with a flipper, and why Ricky Ponting is such a good hooker. These days he divides his time between playing office cricket and constant replenishments at one of the city's many pubs.
Related Links

    Top dog of the underdogs

My Favourite Cricketer: Jack Russell brought a neatness to the keeper's art that was matched by his meticulous scruffiness in other regards. By Scott Oliver

    Rewarding times for Hashim Amla

Numbers Game: The rate at which he has accumulated ODI hundreds and MoM awards is among the fastest in history

'Ponting was an instinctive, aggressive player'

Modern Masters: Rahul Dravid and Sanjay Manjrekar discuss Ricky Ponting's technique

    MacLeod spells hope for Scotland

Allrounder Calum MacLeod's return from a faulty action is key to Scotland's World Cup hopes. By Tim Wigmore

How boring is boring cricket?

Probably not as much as boring periods in the likes of rugby, football and tennis, Ruseel Jackson thinks

News | Features Last 7 days

Manic one-day chases, and daddy partnerships

Also, most brothers in a Test XI, and the fastest to 20 ODI centuries

Has international cricket begun to break up?

The gap between the haves and the have-nots is growing wider, and the disenchantment is forcing a devaluation of Test cricket among weaker teams

Well worth the wait

Zulfiqar Babar missed five seasons between his first two first-class matches, and was 34 when he finally made his Test debut, but he is quickly making up for all the lost time with his artful left-arm spin

Younis Khan and the art of scoring hundreds

Out of 70 batsmen who've scored 15 or more Test hundreds only five are from Pakistan, but Younis Khan's appetite for hundreds matches that of some of the top contemporary batsmen

Australia outdone in every way

Surviving into the final session of the last day cannot disguise the fact that Australia's continued inability to play spin contributed to an all-round thrashing

News | Features Last 7 days

    Has international cricket begun to break up? (83)

    The gap between the haves and the have-nots is growing wider, and the disenchantment is forcing a devaluation of Test cricket among weaker teams

    Lyon low after high of 2013 (51)

    The offspinner was Australia's highest wicket-taker in 2013, but his form has dipped sharply this year

    Australia outdone in every way (51)

    Surviving into the final session of the last day cannot disguise the fact that Australia's continued inability to play spin contributed to an all-round thrashing

    Well worth the wait (36)

    Zulfiqar Babar missed five seasons between his first two first-class matches, and was 34 when he finally made his Test debut, but he is quickly making up for all the lost time with his artful left-arm spin

    No Ajmal, no problem for Pakistan (33)

    When a team loses its best bowler, it is expected that the team's performance will suffer. As usual, Pakistan defied the expectations