|Photos||Video & Audio||Blogs||Statistics||Archive||Shop||Mobile|
If Dravid's exclusion from the one-day squad is part of a process with a clear vision, then it will make some sense, for it is critical that the process must continue without compromise
October 28, 2007
If Rahul Dravid has been 'rested' after a three-week break, then he has been dropped. 'Rested' has become an interesting term in world cricket these days, especially in Indian cricket. If S Badrinath or Ajit Agarkar is left out of the Indian squad, he has been 'dropped'. But if a heavyweight has been omitted, he is said to have been 'rested'. I remember thinking how ridiculous it sounded when the word was used by India's administrative manager to describe the non-selection of Irfan Pathan in West Indies at the beginning of the 2006-07 tour.
The straight-forward interpretation of the word 'rested' is that the selectors don't have the courage to deal with the heat that comes with dropping a big player. Strong decisions will inevitably invite strong reactions, and if, as a selector, you can't take the heat, then you are in the wrong business. If all you want to do is hang on to your job as a selector for another four years, then you are unlikely to make a difference to Indian cricket. The game will carry on in its usual way and your role as a selector will only be incidental to it.
If Dravid has indeed been dropped, it is unfortunate. Dravid has been the most selfless Indian cricketer that I have seen for the last ten years. I remember a reverse-sweep he played in the final Test against Pakistan in Rawalpindi when he was on 270. It got him out, but India needed quick runs and Dravid isn't a kind of cricketer to care about his 300. And as captain, he chose to bat down the order in one-day cricket instead to taking the No. 3 position which would have got him more runs.
If anybody deserved a life jacket in troubled waters it was Dravid. But if his exclusion from the one-day squad is part of a process with a clear vision, then it will make some sense, for it is critical that the process must continue without compromise. Otherwise, Dravid would have got a very raw deal he least deserved.
|Strong decisions will inevitably invite strong reactions, and if, as a selector, you can't take the heat, then you are in the wrong business|
The next few months will tell us what kind of a chief selector Dilip Vengsarkar is: whether he is an uncompromising man with a vision for Indian cricket or just another bystander watching Indian cricket take its course.
Cricket still remains an individual sport in India as there is a tendency to put the focus on the player, with the team as a backdrop.
Even with selections, we focus so much on the scores of certain individuals that we ignore the team total. For a while now India's performance in one-day cricket has been below average. If Vengsarkar has a vision for 2011, common sense will tell him it's time to really change things and focus on the team.
Alan Davidson was a fine allrounder, who has spent his life serving Australian sport in various capacities. By Ashley Mallett
Rob Steen: Who knew the Middle East would one day become the centre of a cricket-lover's universe?
Aakash Chopra: Why the Indian opener would be well advised to shelve the hook and pull in Australia
The home of Australia's first, and possibly last, full-time dealer of his kind is a treasure trove of cricket literature amassed over 45 years. By Russell Jackson
Jon Hotten: It has taken England ages to get over its obsession with defensive batting
The serene team culture cultivated by Misbah and his men shouldn't be allowed to be disrupted by a player with a tainted past
An early start to the international season, coupled with costly tickets, have kept the Australian public away from the cricket
Mahela Jayawardene reflects on his Test career, and the need to bridge the gap between international and club cricket in Sri Lanka
In 2011, MS Dhoni helped end a 28-year wait for India and gifted Sachin Tendulkar something he had craved throughout his career - to be called a World Cup champion
Coloured clothes, black sightscreens, two white balls: the game of cricket looked so different in 1992. But writing about it now seems more fun than watching it then
Never mind cricket's absence from free-to-air TV - changes in social attitudes, the demands of work, and an individualistic age are all contributing to a decline in participation
The sickening blow that struck Phillip Hughes is a reminder of the ever-present dangers associated with facing fast bowlers, even while wearing a helmet