| Series | Countries | Live Scores | Fixtures | Results | News |
Features
|
Photos | Video & Audio | Blogs | Statistics | Archive | Games | Mobile | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
The selectors have put their faith in youth and must now see that vision through, regardless of immediate results
January 20, 2008
|
|
![]()
| ||
How inconsiderate of the Indian selectors to deflect the attention from a glorious Test win to the triviality of choosing a team for that utter irrelevance known as the CB Series. But the wheel must move on, and the selectors have decided to move on too. There is no place for Sourav Ganguly in the side, no recall for Rahul Dravid and not even a thought for VVS Laxman. Sachin Tendulkar remains the only link with the past but then, after all, he is Sachin Tendulkar. And he has been India's best batsman in one-day cricket in the last year.
There are two ways of looking at the selection. One, it can be described as a brave march towards the future with a firm eye on the World Cup in 2011. Not many of the golden brigade of India's batsmen are expected to last that long, and the time to build is now. And from all indications available, the selection has the enthusiastic support of Mahendra Singh Dhoni, the man expected to lead India towards that future. A man entrusted with one of the most challenging jobs in world cricket deserves the support of the selectors at the beginning of his tenure.
One thing can be said about the team that has been picked. It will not be lacking in energy and spring on the field, a noticeable difference between India and Australia in the ongoing Test series. They will field significantly better and run harder between the wickets. The difference could be as much 30 runs, often the margin between victory and defeat. There will be public reactions to the omissions of the big names but selection is a tough job in which popular sentiment should never be a factor.
The other view is that a balance must be maintained between building for the future and safeguarding the present. Should the phasing out be a gradual process or a one-stroke blow? Is a tour of Australia the right place to throw the young guns into the cauldron? Could a mix of youth and experience have been managed? Would it not have been preferable to keep back a couple of the batsmen who have familiarised themselves with the conditions in Australia to provide a cushion for the new ones to ease in?
It is apparent that, barring Tendulkar, the selectors have more or less sought to graduate the team that won the ICC World Twenty20 into the one-day arena. It might seem a logical step forward at one level, but it is also naïve to assume that the skills required in the shortest form of the game can be automatically transferred to the 50-over version. It's another level and it requires a different set of skills.
The gulf isn't quite as large as it is between Tests and ODIs but there is a gulf nevertheless. One-day cricket provides the space and scope for construction of an innings that needs to be paced to match the tempo of the game; it requires at times for the batsman to see off a spell, bat through tough periods and, most importantly, hold his nerve for a longer duration. The immediate reaction to the team chosen to battle Australia and Sri Lanka is that the batting resources are thin both on pedigree and experience.
| Having bitten the bullet, the selectors must show strength and resilience to stick by their vision. If they have chosen a team for the future, they must not abandon it on the basis of immediate results | |||
Let's look at the possible order. It is likely that Virender Sehwag, who has shown glimpses of recapturing his form, will open with Tendulkar; Yuvraj Singh, despite his abysmal showing in the Tests, will bat at number four; and Dhoni will bat at six. Which leaves numbers three, five and seven. Three and five are vital positions, occupied at various times by Dravid. Against Australia, and with Brett Lee in sublime form, an early wicket is always a possibility, and it is hard to pick out a batsman from the squad who has the technical proficiency and the temperament to weather an early storm. Ricky Ponting bats at number three for Australia, Kumar Sangakkara for Sri Lanka, Jacques Kallis for South Africa and Ian Bell for England. Somehow, it is difficult to visualise Gautam Gambhir in that league.
Suresh Raina is a welcome addition to the squad. He has the gift of being able to hit the ball in the right areas and is perhaps the best fielder in the team, and has fought his way back into the limelight after being dumped. But does he have the composure to hold a chase together from number five?
Of course, the best way to find this out is to plunge them into the challenge. Having bitten the bullet, the selectors must show strength and resilience to stick by their vision. If they have chosen a team for the future, they must not abandon it on the basis of immediate results. Quite likely this team will lose and perhaps lose badly. But if the selectors consider this to be the nucleus of the team that will represent India at the next World Cup, they must allow them to grow and learn from their failure. Otherwise, it will be going neither here nor there.
© ESPN EMEA Ltd.
|
Do you think the selectors made the right move by backing youth over experience?
| ||||||
| Comments have now been closed for this article |
||||||

Aakash Chopra: Getting away with deceit can provide a certain high. For some, the rewards of cheating will always outweigh the potential consequences
'Srinivasan's position hopelessly untenable'
Sharda Ugra, Jayaditya Gupta and Nitin Sundar discuss what the BCCI can do to clean up the system
In Root, England have something special to savour
Mark Nicholas: With a mix of David Gower, Graham Thorpe and Michael Vaughan, Joe Root can capture hearts and minds
Wisden Almanack: From Grace to the IPL: in its 150th edition, Wisden looks at the most seminal events in cricket
Paul Ford: A strong sense of nostalgia, grimy Yorkshire skies, confetti showers, and dress-up day - a Kiwi misses his time in Leeds
Even at the height of his success with the national side, Sreesanth was a lonely cricketer who felt hard done by
Mumbai Indians still have a better head-to-head record against Chennai Super Kings, but once again on the big occasion, they came second
Spirited Sunrisers exceed expectations
Sunrisers began this tournament as one of the underdogs, but fought impressively to reach as far as the Eliminator
Vijay slips, Ashwin does a Sahara
Plays of the day from the IPL qualifier between Chennai Super Kings and Mumbai Indians in Delhi
Another season in the bottom half
With some of their big names stumbling this season, Kings XI Punjab were rarely serious contenders for a playoff place
Spirited Sunrisers exceed expectations (90)
Sunrisers began this tournament as one of the underdogs, but fought impressively to reach as far as the Eliminator
Mumbai Indians still have a better head-to-head record against Chennai Super Kings, but once again on the big occasion, they came second
Even at the height of his success with the national side, Sreesanth was a lonely cricketer who felt hard done by
Anderson's magic not to be missed (50)
None of the other three England bowlers with 300 Test wickets - or many other of the game's finest swing merchants - could have bowled better than James Anderson at Lord's
A case of peaking too early (42)
Royal Challengers began the season in full steam, but failed to replicate their consistency away from home
ICICI Bank M2I. Register Now and Get A Gift Offer.
Safe & simple online money transfer. Apply Now!
Buy Wisden 2013 & get a FREE Playfair
Available now at Cricshop
kudos to the selectors to make a brave move by selecting players like Raina,Rohit and Chawla. Rather than criticizing the selectors we should trust the youth and back them. Gambhir should open with the experience of Sachin.Raina can bat at 3 and Yuvraj at 4, Rohit at 5 ,Dhoni at 6 with Irfan playing as an all rounder Harbhajan,Chawla can be the spinners and we have plenty of fast bowlers coming up so it is up to how they perform in Australia which will tell future of Indian cricket . "JUST DO IT" My message for the youth.
Posted by TeamIndiafan on (January 22, 2008, 22:14 GMT)Fielding is important in a one day game and will effect the result of the game if its a matter of 5 to 10 runs but not when its 30 or 40 runs.. You need runs against this Australian batting line up to seriously challenge them otherwise they are going to flay your bowling anyways to get to the target so the reason of younger legs does not make sense. Also as the article mentioned if india loose a early wicket which more often than not they will i dont think Gambhir or Yuvraj will be able to handle Brett Lee and co. You need a solid middle order and in this line up i dont see any. Suresh Raina has not proved anything yet so to take him ahead of Ganguly is below stupidity. If this is the team which Dhoni thinks will win him matches i am sorry to say he is delusional. I think Dravid and Ganguly have done so much for Indian cricket that they deserve a better farewell and nothing better than playing against Australia in Australia.
Posted by PraveenK on (January 22, 2008, 15:24 GMT)A team always should have both experienced and young legs, that is the way to sucess. Every one understands fielding is important,but those so called good fielders need to score runs also.I strognly believe atleast in Australia, we should have given a No.3 position to Laxman atleast in one day matches. Now, every one can see how Yuvraj and Dhoni struggling in oz pitches. They are very good on flat pitches, but not on live pitches.Our selectors won't understand the equation, every time they learn hard way. Now, they are going to learn by loosing very badly in one day matches.
Posted by tansher on (January 22, 2008, 7:38 GMT)dude they should have gangully insted of the out of touch denesh karthik. He is the most attacking batsman in the indian team remember his double centuary vs pakistan how freakin agressive was dat.
Posted by aruntheselector on (January 22, 2008, 7:32 GMT)The time has come to look ahead.It was proved in T20 that India has the ability to win with the fresh legs.The selectors have done the right thing by leaving out the seniors barring Sachin.Maybe after 2-3 series the even he can make a graceful exit from ODI.Now that India has 2 captains,the focus in one dayers must be on the next world-cup for which the preparation begins now.Secondly in the next 2 years India has the potential to become the No.1 Test team for which it is important to have the stalwarts.Moreover,a tough series against Australia and Sri Lanka (champions and runners-up)is the time to give opportunity to youngsters and test their potential unlike what used to happen in the past where youngsters were given opprtunities against teams like Bangladesh and Zimbabwe.I hope the selectors stick to their plans as there are more promising players like Tiwary,Rohit Sharma,Uthappa,Badrinath,Raina,Y Pathan and the young fast bowlers, who need to be given the break.
Posted by Anil1986 on (January 22, 2008, 7:08 GMT)Getting all the rookies to play against the mighty Australians in their home ground, i dont think is a wise gamble. Except Sachin no one in the squad is in the best of their forms, including the captain. I feel the biggest injustice has been done to DRAVID. The reason given by the selection panel is the senior players were not considered b'coz of their poor fielding, and poor running between the wickets. We all know that Dravid is a good fielder and also questioning about his running between the wickets is insane. As said in the article, there is absolutely no way of filling the places of Dravid and Ganguly by the young side. There has to be a gradual phase change. In this way even the younger side is going to learn to face bigger challenges.
Posted by EssEss on (January 22, 2008, 5:55 GMT)The timing of the announcement is absolutely inappropriate with India getting into the Adelaide test on a high. If the selectors can't get the selection right the least they could do is to get the timing of the announcement right! Or maybe that is too much to ask these Boardwallahs who are the helm!! All they care is to fill their coffers - everything else to them is immaterial!!
Posted by iqbalqidwai on (January 22, 2008, 4:11 GMT)There is no substitute for experience,if you look at the batting performances as a whole in the last three tests only the experienced people have actually delivered barring a few exceptions. The selectors should have erred on the side of caution by playing the old stalwarts atleast during this ODI series to stamp authourity on Aussies and to make the Indian team climb to number one in ranking.
Posted by frozeninusa on (January 21, 2008, 23:27 GMT)In my view Ganguly and/or Laxman should have been in the team to provide some experience in the batting line-up. However, now that the team is selected, let's rise above all the zonal politics and support the team India. Do also keep in mind that despite all the personal statistics, India has not really achieved anything remarkable in ODIs over last 20 years. We made it to 2003 world cup finals but we don't really have anything else to show for. A new attitude is needed and we saw glimpses of it in South Africa even though it was only T20. The players played without worrying too much about failure and I think that is what is needed with the talent we have got. Let's not apply too much pressure on the new team and make them feel like a sword is always hanging on their necks. Let's give them a good opportunity.
Posted by manodavid on (January 21, 2008, 22:18 GMT)Dravid and Ganguly has to give way for the Gennext. Aussies have built their team by not succumbing to emotion.The youngsters are to fine -tune their talent in australia as they will learn many nuances of the game .Building a team always involves a few losses both on and off the field and let us wish our youth brigade all the best