| Series | Countries | Live Scores | Fixtures | Results | News |
Features
|
Photos | Blogs | Statistics | Archive | Video & Audio | Games | Mobile | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
What will Australia's quick bowlers need to do to succeed in India? We asked a few experts
Nagraj Gollapudi
October 7, 2008
|
|
![]()
|
Third ball after tea on the third day of the tour game against the Board President's XI, Stuart Clark bent his back and pitched one back of a length. Aakash Chopra quickly got into position to fend it off but the ball zipped, almost like a shooter, into his back pad. Chopra walked back shaking his head at his misfortune. The next two balls, to S Badrinath, pitched on the same spot, lifted and had the batsman jumping. That half over summed up the nature of Indian pitches.
The challenges of bowling in this part of the world are well known: there isn't usually as much bounce on offer as there is overseas, what bounce there is is often variable, and there isn't much carry through to the wicketkeeper - or much movement off the pitch or through the air either.
Patience and pace
How are fast bowlers to approach India then? Brett Lee, Jason Gillespie and Michael Kasprowicz, who have done their share of bowling in the country, with varying degrees of success, all speak of the importance of the two Ps: persistence and patience.
Gillespie, a veteran at the art of bowling long spells, who is now playing in the ICL, says, "You just need to be prepared to bowl a lot of overs to get your wickets. Unless you are a genuine, genuine fast bowler, who's going to blast anyone out with pace, it is better to go out there, bowl good line, good length, set appropriate fields and be very patient."
Getting the batsman to play is vital. "I always bowled reasonably straight," Gillespie says. "But the key is to never give him a length where he can drive through the line, like a half-volley."
Speaking of genuine fast bowlers, Australia have Brett Lee, perhaps the best of his breed in the world at the moment. Last summer in Australia, Lee steamed in tirelessly, bowled at a consistently breathtaking speed, and was the Man of the Series for his 24 wickets at a little over 22 per. Australian pitches are slower these days than they used to be, but Lee managed to get both pace and bounce. Will he be looking to approach the series in India the same way? "Pace still plays a major role," Lee agrees. "The thing I've done in the last couple of years is pitched it right and built pressure and the wickets have come through."
| As a bowler you are attacking the batsman's weakness normally. What we did last time was bowl to his strengths and set smart fieldsMichael Kasprowicz | |||
Fast bowling has been crucial in Australia's recent campaigns in India. During the 2000-01 series, which Australia lost, and three and a half years later, when Adam Gilchrist led Australia past the final frontier with a 2-1 victory, the quick bowlers left a strong imprint, especially Kasprowicz and Gillespie, who bowled long spells, setting things up for Glenn McGrath and Shane Warne.
Containment is key
Kasprowicz, who is the only bowler to have featured in Australia's last three series in India, says the one reason Australia won in 2004 was because they went against the grain tactically. "As a bowler you are attacking the batsman's weakness normally. What we did last time was bowl to his strengths and set smart fields." The plan was worked out by the fast bowlers with John Buchanan, the coach, on the plane to India. As the tour went along the strategy was refined but the basics remained constant throughout.
The Australians set in-out fields with a couple of sweepers - deep square leg, deep point or third man - to cut off the boundaries, working on the traditional weakness of subcontinental batsmen, their tendency to rely on boundaries, rather than on rotating the strike, to score. "If you are trying to build pressure you have to minimise the run-rate," Gillespie says. "If you can have a strategically placed fielder, like down at deep square leg, and you bowl straight on middle and leg stump and if he clips it to the leg side he's only going to get one run. That adds pressure to score boundaries and creates opportunities for you to get wickets."
The reverse swing thing
The use of the wearing ball is important. In India the ball tends to lose its shine in less time than it takes to play a regulation-time football match. That makes the use of variations, and reverse swing, especially important.
|
|
![]()
|
Manoj Prabhakar, the former India medium-pace bowler, to whom swing came naturally, thinks that unless the Australians tweak their bowling actions they will not be able to produce the sort of reverse swing that is necessary to be effective on Indian wickets. "You can see Wasim Akram or the other Pakistan fast bowlers, like Shoaib Akhtar, and you will notice when they bowled reverse swing it was with a round-arm action and not the usual upright wrist and straight arm." Of the current Australian line-up, Prabhakar thinks only Mitchell Johnson has that sort of action.
"Your length is the customary back-of-a-length but you should hit the ball hard to get late swing off the pitch", Prabhakar says. He brings up the example of South Africa's Dale Steyn, who managed to produce reverse swing by landing the ball hard on the seam on the dry, grassless pitches South Africa's series in India earlier this year were played on.
Trial and error
Gillespie thinks bowlers need to be open to experimenting. "I've always learned from my bowling coaches that you don't always need to hold the seam upright," he says. "Try to hold the ball in different ways and then see how it behaves. This can definitely surprise the batsman and play on his mind."
Both Gillespie and Kasprowicz believe Stuart Clark, with his smart changes of pace, will play a big role in the series. "Clark is outstanding with his variations, can move the ball both ways, and has a great ability to pick up crucial wickets" Kasprowicz says.
Gillespie's formula would be to bowl Lee in short spells, so he can be more effective, and have Clark and Johnson bowl longer. "Lee can always come back and surprise the batsman with his bounce, while Clark can control things with his accuracy and surprise the batsman from time to time with his movement as well as bounce."
| ||||||
| Comments have now been closed for this article |
||||||

Watson should remain at the top of the order
Ian Chappell: His batting skills are too good for him to be saddled with a frontline bowler's job too
You may not get many homegrown cricketers in Canada but you can get a homegrown bat. By Liam Herringshaw
'I did not have a lethal weapon'
Sarfraz Nawaz mastered the art of swing - conventional and reverse - by trial and error, and formed a formidable partnership with Imran Khan
Aakash Chopra: Why the idea of having those in the top order take turns at playing is flawed
Someone, please explain the D/L method
Michael Jeh: India's target at the MCG didn't make sense
Afghanistan's remarkable rise achieves new heights
Afghanistan cricket will reach a new high when they take on an ICC Full Member for the first time
Which teams are the worst travellers?
A look at how Australia, South Africa and England have fared in Asia, and vice versa
Plays of the Day from the second ODI of the CB series, between India and Sri Lanka at the WACA
Unravelling the mystery of Ajmal
The ICC have explained the science behind the offspinner's action after a TV interview caused confusion
Plays of the Day from the third ODI of the CB series, between Australia and Sri Lanka at the WACA
Which teams are the worst travellers? (142)
A look at how Australia, South Africa and England have fared in Asia, and vice versa
Pakistan rewarded for smart rebuilding (137)
After the events of 2010 Pakistan cricket could have withered away, but due to a combination of determination and desire they are now flourishing
Unravelling the mystery of Ajmal (114)
The ICC have explained the science behind the offspinner's action after a TV interview caused confusion
India beaten in battle of strategies (101)
The plan to go in with a spin-strong attack is fraught with risk in Australian conditions, as India were made to realise at the MCG
Does rotation work for India? (85)
Why the idea of having those in the top order take turns at playing is flawed
Access your Indian Rupee earnings from anywhere in the world.
ICICI Bank Money2India brings " locked exchange rate" and a free gift
on registering and transfer of USD 250 and above.
FREE copy of Playfair with Wisden pre-order
At Cricshop.com
Yeah the good thing about Jhonson is his slingy action which will cause problems on Indian tracks as it won't be easy to pick him on slowish tracks, also it will help him getting reverse.
Posted by 68704 on (October 06 2008, 17:11 PM GMT)To anyone who had watched the West Indian series that Australia won recently, it was apparent that Brett Lee was a transformed bowler , so prodigious was his reverse swing. Of course it would be too much to expect Indian experts and commentators {with the exception of Sanjay Manjrekar} to watch any cricket other than the matches that they are commentating in!Troy Cooley has been widely credited with England"s reverse swinging resurgence and he is the bowling coach of the Australian cricket team.Stuart Clarke and Brett Lee have been the most successful fast bowling competition in world cricket in the last year and if Indian pitches are not the dust bowls of yore, Indian batting can be in for a surprise or two.
Posted by Aditya_mookerjee on (October 06 2008, 13:39 PM GMT)Kasprowicz, Fleming, and Gillespie, were great bowlers. Stuart Clarke, Johnson, and Tait are rated better, but the three mentioned bowlers did invaluable service for Australian cricket. Ask the Indian team, who played against them, how good they were. I am surprised, that Gillespie has not played for a longer duration. How many summers have passed, since he was born? Is his age the reason, for his absence from international cricket?
Posted by MISMATCH-MYK on (October 06 2008, 08:09 AM GMT)The Australian bowlers are going to have very hard time on these slow indian pitches. Of the present lot, I feel Mitchell Johnson is extremely talented and will make an impact. All bowlers talk of good line and length but there are few who can implement for long periods