S Rajesh
Numbers Game Numbers GameRSS FeedFeeds  | Archives
ESPNcricinfo's stats editor S Rajesh looks at the stories behind the stats

Ishant Sharma and his ODI problems

Last year's sensation has had his stats in one-dayers fall away this year, and the main difference has been his effectiveness at the start of the innings

S Rajesh

October 16, 2009

Comments: 32 | Text size: A | A
Ishant Sharma is cock-a-hoop after sending back Chris Gayle in the first over, West Indies v India, 4th ODI, St Lucia, July 5, 2009
Ishant Sharma has been among the wickets this year, but most of those have come during the slog overs © Associated Press
Enlarge

The 18 months from June 2007 to the end of last year was an excellent time to be Ishant Sharma - the wickets and accolades were coming thick and fast, and his stature as an international cricketer grew as quickly as his fan following did. The year 2009 hasn't been as kind, though: the pace has dropped, as has the confidence, seemingly, and the ball has been sprayed around far too often for the captain's liking. Ishant is still taking wickets - 22 from 15 ODIs this year - but he isn't giving the team the kind of confidence he used to with his control.

Just how far has Ishant's performance dropped in ODIs in 2009? The overall numbers, interestingly, suggest only a marginal decline: in his first 20 matches he took 27 wickets at an average of 31.48 and an economy-rate of 5.34. In his 15 ODIs this year, the wickets have actually come at a slightly quicker rate and a marginally better average, but the economy-rate has dropped off to 6.16. If you were to ignore everything else and just look at the overall stats, you'd wonder what the fuss was all about.

Ishant Sharma before and in 2009
Period ODIs Wickets Average Econ rate
Before 2009 20 27 31.48 5.34
In 2009 15 22 31.31 6.16

Dig a little deeper, though, and some worrying signs emerge. In the first 18 months of his career, Ishant specialised in dismissing top-order batsmen early in the innings in ODIs, thus giving India an attacking option in the first 20 overs, and making it easier for the spinners to exercise control during the middle overs. In 104 overs that Ishant bowled between overs 1 and 20 in an innings in that period, he took 18 wickets - an average of a wicket every 35 deliveries. The CB Series match against Australia in Melbourne early last year was a perfect example of the firepower he added in the team - after Australia had won the toss and opted to bat, Ishant removed Matthew Hayden, Ricky Ponting and Andrew Symonds, blows Australia couldn't recover from. They were bundled out for 159, and Ishant won his first Man-of-the-Match award in ODIs.

His disconcerting pace and lift troubled even the top-class batsmen, and his effectiveness early in the innings more than made up for the fact that he wasn't as lethal during the last few overs. Of the 27 wickets he took in his first 20 matches, two-thirds came in the first 20 overs of opposition innings.

Break-up of Ishant's ODI wickets before 2009
Period Runs Balls Wickets Average Econ rate
Overs 1-20 499 624 18 27.72 4.79
Overs 21-40 131 150 4 32.75 5.24
Overs 41-50 221 181 5 44.20 7.32

In 2009, though, the break-up of Ishant's ODI wickets are a complete contrast. In the 64 overs he has bowled in the first 20 overs of the innings, he has only taken five wickets, each costing him more than 75 runs. The strike-rate has dropped from 35 to almost 77 deliveries per wicket, while the economy rate has risen to almost one run per ball. The lack of effectiveness early has put more pressure on other bowlers to take wickets with the new ball, while also giving the spinners less of a cushion to work with, due to the lack of new-ball wickets.

Most of Ishant's ODI wickets in 2009 have coming during the slog overs, when batsmen are usually looking out for quick runs: 12 out of 22 wickets have come during this period, while the percentage of wickets taken in the first 20 has dropped from 66 to a paltry 23.

Break-up of Ishant's ODI wickets in 2009
Period Runs Balls Wickets Average Econ rate
Overs 1-20 377 384 5 75.40 5.89
Overs 21-40 127 116 5 25.40 6.56
Last 10 overs 185 171 12 15.41 6.49

His numbers in 2009 make Ishant the most expensive ODI fast bowler this year (among those who've bowled at least 500 balls), and he is also the only one with an economy-rate of more than six. Off 671 balls, he has conceded 86 fours and nine sixes, an average of 7.06 balls per four or six, which is the lowest among all fast bowlers this year - again an indication of his lack of control and an inability to maintain pressure.

Worst economy-rates for fast bowlers in ODIs in 2009 (Qual: 500 balls)
Bowler ODIs Wickets Average Econ rate 4s/ 6s conceded Balls per boundary
Ishant Sharma 15 22 31.31 6.16 86/ 9 7.06
Stuart Broad 13 26 24.23 5.73 77/ 13 7.32
Elton Chigumbura 15 17 32.47 5.43 62/ 10 8.46
Ben Hilfenhaus 12 15 35.73 5.39 62/ 6 8.76
Mitchell Johnson 24 37 29.51 5.09 114/ 11 10.29
Umar Gul 13 22 25.40 5.05 60/ 7 9.91
Paul Collingwood 15 13 36.15 5.05 21/ 6 20.67
James Anderson 16 26 25.57 4.94 71/ 8 10.22

Comparing Ishant's numbers with those of other Indian fast bowlers in 2009, there's another factor that comes to the fore - the lack of a regular pace partner for him. India have played 20 ODIs during this period, and Ishant has played 15 of those, the most by an Indian fast bowler. Next in line are Ashish Nehra and Praveen Kumar, with 10 each. Zaheer Khan and RP Singh have only played seven each. The constant changing of the pace line-up, due to injuries or loss of form, hasn't helped the bowlers either.

The numbers for the other bowlers also reveal that most of them have done better than Ishant. Nehra has been among the wickets, with 18 in 10 games, while Praveen is the only one among the lot with an economy-rate of less than five. RP Singh's numbers don't flatter him, though - an average of more than 50 and an economy-rate of almost six.

Indian fast bowlers in ODIs in 2009 (Qual: 100 balls)
Bowler ODIs Wickets Average Econ rate 4s/ 6s conceded Balls per boundary
Ishant Sharma 15 22 31.31 6.16 86/ 9 7.06
Ashish Nehra 10 18 20.44 5.24 39/ 2 10.27
Praveen Kumar 10 12 29.58 4.82 38/ 6 10.02
Zaheer Khan 7 7 46.28 5.31 34/ 2 10.17
RP Singh 7 5 53.20 5.91 35/ 1 7.50

And here's how Ishant's numbers compared with those of the other Indian fast bowlers from the time he made his debut to the end of 2008: there were three bowlers who had a higher economy-rate, with Sreesanth being the worst. During that period, Ishant conceded a boundary every 9.46 balls, which is 34% better than his current rate.

Indian fast bowlers in ODIs from June 28, 2007 to Dec 2008 (Qual: 500 balls)
Bowler ODIs Wickets Average Econ rate 4s/ 6s conceded Balls per boundary
Sreesanth 11 21 25.14 6.11 59/ 5 8.09
Irfan Pathan 31 33 44.03 5.65 160/ 5 9.35
RP Singh 25 33 33.93 5.61 128/ 11 8.61
Ishant Sharma 19 27 31.51 5.34 95/ 6 9.46
Praveen Kumar 15 21 30.57 4.84 74/ 4 10.19
Munaf Patel 15 20 26.90 4.73 56/ 6 11.00
Zaheer Khan 29 36 33.33 4.69 132/ 9 10.88

S Rajesh is stats editor of Cricinfo

RSS Feeds: S Rajesh

© ESPN EMEA Ltd.

Comments: 32 
Posted by Vikram_Maingi on (October 19 2009, 06:02 AM GMT)

I agree with Hydpearl that Ishant is missing Zaheer. Zaheer was performing supremely great during the last couple of years, and the pressure built by him at one end was providing a great help to Ishant at the other. Secondly, there is one more factor that needs to be taken into consideration for this comparison. The period in which Ishant performed well, he was kinda unexposed to maximum batsmen in the world and he played his maximum matches outside the sub-continent. Whereas, in 2009 he played most of his cricket in sub-continent. The line and length on the flat sub-continnent pitches, it altogether different from the one required in Australia. Ishant lacks the speed and he tries to hit the deck hard. This may not work on the pitches in India/SriLanka/Westlndies, where he has played his maximum matches in 2009. He needs to focus on the long-term solution to his problem and not for any workaround. Probably, he needs a rehab at NCA and should play some more domestic cricket.

Posted by boris6491 on (October 19 2009, 00:31 AM GMT)

I really think Mr. Rajesh has hit the nail on the head when explaning Ishant's dip in form is due to his lack of effectiveness at the beginning of the innings. At their peak, I think Zaheer and Ishant are among the best opening bowling pairs in the world. Zaheer's injury impacted Ishant as it put a lot more responsibility upon him but his response hasn't been too emphatic. Dhoni puts a lot of faith into Ishant but he is turning more into a stock bowler rather than the shock option with his distinctive extra bounce and hurried pace. His performance against Australia in the recent CT was telling. Two years ago, he terrorised our batsmen, not least the great Ricky Ponting. In that game, he was battered, whilst Ponting had absolutely no issues in countering him. I really feel he is still one of the best fast bowling talents India have come up with and they need to nurture him, everyone will go through a rough patch, he needs the guidance of a great to help him rediscover his potential.

Posted by JackJak on (October 18 2009, 18:54 PM GMT)

Build up competition. The Indian team and the board functions like the Indian govt. If Ishant Sharma's performance is dipping then it certainly is not the end of the world. Let him work on his bowling. Certainly there are promising bowlers like Pradeep Sangwan, Sudeep Tyagi, Kamran Khan, Abid Nabi Ahengar, Sidharth Trivedi, and Atul Sharma around. So lets not begin to think Ishanth Sharma is the only bowler around. It can only benefit inidan cricket if the talent pool of pacers is bigger.

Posted by JackJak on (October 18 2009, 18:47 PM GMT)

How about selecting a few more promising pacers for starters. The problem with India and Indian cricket is once we find someone then we go on praising them and make it look like that they are the best in the world until the truth becomes too obvious that they arent the best. For starters pick up these pacers Kamran Khan, Abid Nabi Ahengar, Sidharth Trivedi, Atul Sharma. And along with the other familiar names they can be included and should be given a feel of international cricket and not make the one bowler we get into the greatest prospect ever and forget that there are others too who should be given a try. In fact the more the bench strength things can only get better and certainly not worse.

Posted by mahavir.rawat on (October 18 2009, 03:04 AM GMT)

Dropping him will not do any good to his confidence.. I think Ishant needs a proper mentor.. He jumped to the International arena with bang.. Now that his surprise factor is over, he has to evolve as a bowler.. there is no doubt about his talent and potential.. But those who know cricket also know that 'talent' or 'potential' are very frivalous words.. He needs a good partner at other end and a good person to talk to who can monitor his progress.. But then there is the fear of going the Irfan way.. the perfect case of too much advice from too many people.. I think we all have be disappointed by Ishant.. Then how much have we invested in him.. He has not come from any academy..neither anyone is ready to take care of him.. BCCI just wants to encash him as much as possible.. Its time like these that young players need calm head around them... Hope, Ishant realises this in time and gets his act together...

Posted by Nampally on (October 17 2009, 23:43 PM GMT)

Ishant needs to warm up properly before he takes the field so that he is fully loosened. Secondly, he needs to focus more on a plan of action for each batsman that he bowls.Thirdly he must bowl to the field set. These are important aspects for every bowler. Currently, Ishant is not doing any of these. His very first ball is a loose one which shows that he does not warn up properly. His direction is often erratic & he is not bowling to the field set for him. Ishant should practice bowling at marked areas and learn to hit the target consistently. This is what great bowler like McGrath does. Pace bowling is not just bowling fast but learning to control length, direction and swing. This is expected of any test fast bowler.Unless Ishant learns to do this he will never be a good bowler. This applies to all Indian pace bowlers who have been very poor. RP Singh, Kumar, Sreesanth, Munaf and Irfan should all be focusing on these fundamentals so that India is well supplier with good bowlers.

Posted by Mark00 on (October 17 2009, 15:30 PM GMT)

I feel sorry for Ishant Sharma. He's being turned into a stock bowler. What a waste of talent. What a loss for India. Atleast Srinath, India's first genuinely fast bowler, didn't have the self-belief to cut loose until much too ate in his career. Even then, knowing the number of overs he would have to bowl, he tended to bowl within himself to conserve energy. The tragedy with Sharma, who also natural pace and movement, is that he knew early in his career that he could me more than just another medium pace stock bowler. Instead of using him sparingly to break up partnerships Ishant Sharma is being used as a stock bowler. If they continue to flog him his delicate physique will break down irreparably.

Posted by nsidd75 on (October 17 2009, 14:10 PM GMT)

The Indian players are tired. They are playing too much cricket leading the burn out. 20/20 cricket will destroy them in the long run. Ishant started off really well but the amount of cricket he is playing and the adjustments he has to make for each format is difficult so early in his career. India need to select horses for courses and sideline a few players for the good of their game. Problem is that the BCCI is only thinking about money and not the long term future of the team and players.

Posted by basam on (October 17 2009, 13:25 PM GMT)

guys i have a question...why the indian fast bowlers r losing their pace in time? ishant ,munaf,...............? can any one explain this phenomena for me ....

Posted by Gilliana42 on (October 17 2009, 10:05 AM GMT)

I wonder why Sreesanth is kept out of the Indian team, other than for indiscipline and Isant Sharma brought in. I am sure this errant youngster can perform better than Ishant at the moment. Sreesant performed well in the English league this season, I hear. I hope it is not the old politics of Indian cricket that keeps this lad away.

Comments have now been closed for this article

FeedbackTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
S RajeshClose
S Rajesh Stats editor Every week the Numbers Game takes a look at the story behind the stats, with an original slant on facts and figures. The column is edited by S Rajesh, ESPNcricinfo's stats editor in Bangalore. He did an MBA in marketing, and then worked for a year in advertising, before deciding to chuck it in favour of a job which would combine the pleasures of watching cricket and writing about it. The intense office cricket matches were an added bonus.

    Which teams are the worst travellers?

Numbers Game: A look at how Australia, South Africa and England have fared in Asia, and vice versa

    Cricket's not all greek to the Greeks

In Corfu and Athens it's catching on. Locals get countrymen from all over to visit and play. By Firdose Moonda

Afghanistan's remarkable rise achieves new heights

Afghanistan cricket will reach a new high when they take on an ICC Full Member for the first time. By George Dobell

    'You need to change the way the batsman plays'

Tony Greig, Mark Waugh and Brian Close on the art of fielding close in. Interviews by Dan Brettig and Nagraj Gollapudi

Younis' defining innings

Pak Spin: a masterclass from Pakistan's unassuming warrior

News | Features Last 7 days

Dhoni and Sehwag share a moment

ESPNcricinfo presents the Plays of the Day from the second Twenty20 international between Australia and India, in Melbourne

Swann v Ajmal: clash of the offspinners

They're the two best spinners in Test cricket over the last 30 months, and while their overall stats are similar, the break-ups are quite different

Kohli's dive in vain

Plays of the Day from the second ODI of the CB series, between India and Sri Lanka at the WACA

Overdue win, unusual method

India were on tonight. It was like it was all coming back to someone who had lost his memory in the first half of a Bollywood film. Simple things but somehow forgotten

Unravelling the mystery of Ajmal

The ICC have explained the science behind the offspinner's action after a TV interview caused confusion

News | Features Last 7 days
  • Cricinfo Widgets
Sponsored Links

Access your Indian Rupee earnings from anywhere in the world.

on registering and transfer of USD 250 and above.

At Cricshop.com