Matches (15)
IPL (2)
Pakistan vs New Zealand (1)
WT20 Qualifier (4)
County DIV1 (4)
County DIV2 (3)
PAK v WI [W] (1)
Numbers Game

Pakistan's huge middle-order loss

When Pakistan's big three - Inzamam, Yousuf and Younis - were around, their middle order was among the best in the world. Now, they'll have to build from scratch

S Rajesh
S Rajesh
16-Jul-2010
Mohammad Yousuf was one of two Pakistan middle-order batsmen to average more than 60 in the last five-and-a-half years  •  Ryan Pierse/Getty Images

Mohammad Yousuf was one of two Pakistan middle-order batsmen to average more than 60 in the last five-and-a-half years  •  Ryan Pierse/Getty Images

When Pakistan took the field at Lord's for the first Test against Australia, they went in with a middle order that looked decidedly lightweight: Azhar Ali, Umar Amin and Umar Akmal slotted in at positions three to five; the first two were debutants, and the third had played all of six Tests coming into the match. For a team that has boasted stars like Inzamam-ul-Haq, Mohammad Yousuf and Younis Khan in the middle order in the very recent past, it was a huge difference in class and calibre, especially because Pakistan have relied on these positions for a bulk of their runs in recent years: since 2005, these three middle-order positions for Pakistan have been among the world's best, and even more successful than the more acclaimed middle orders of Australia and India.
The table below indicates just how successful Pakistan's Nos. 3 to 5 have been in the last five-and-a-half years. Their openers haven't done them too many favours during this period, with only seven centuries in 40 Tests and an average that is much lower than those of India and Australia, but despite that handicap, Pakistan's middle order has pushed itself to emerge among the best. They average 51.85, which is next only to Sri Lanka's 55.15, and their tally of 31 centuries in 40 Tests means that, on average, there is one centurion among Pakistan's Nos. 3, 4 and 5 in three out of four Tests.
India's relative lack of success is also pretty interesting, considering that their middle order is the most talked about aspect of their cricket. Their average of 45.72 is still pretty good, but four teams have done better. In 15 Tests more than the number Pakistan have played, India's batsmen have managed only two more hundreds. The slight dip in form of their middle order can be gleaned from the fact that in the previous five-year period, from January 2000 to December 2004, they were on top of the table with an average of 52.76.
Team-wise middle-order stats (Nos. 3-5) in Tests since 2005
Team No. of players Tests Runs Average 100s/ 50s
Sri Lanka 13 45 11,582 55.15 36/ 44
Pakistan 17 40 10,579 51.85 31/ 45
Australia 14 60 14,112 51.50 44/ 64
South Africa 13 59 12,703 47.22 41/ 54
India 14 55 11,797 45.72 33/ 60
England 16 70 14,754 42.88 41/ 61
West Indies 22 50 10,216 41.02 29/ 48
New Zealand 22 42 7802 36.97 14/ 41
Bangladesh 17 34 4452 22.59 3/ 24
Zimbabwe 8 8 941 20.02 0/ 6
Not surprisingly, all three of Pakistan's heavyweights find a place among the world's best middle-order batsmen since 2005. Younis and Yousuf have similar averages, of just over 60, while Inzamam isn't far behind with 57.40. Sri Lanka's two jewels lead the way, but India and England go completely unrepresented in the top 12. India's best during this period has been Sachin Tendulkar (average 51.10), while Kevin Pietersen has topped for England with an average of 49.91.
Best middle-order batsmen (Nos. 3-5) in Tests since 2005 (Qual: 1500 runs)
Batsman Tests Runs Average 100s/ 50s
Kumar Sangakkara 43 4103 62.16 14/ 14
Mahela Jayawardene 45 4333 61.90 15/ 13
Younis Khan 32 3273 60.61 10/ 11
Mohammad Yousuf 33 3364 60.07 12/ 11
Shivnarine Chanderpaul 46 3531 57.88 10/ 21
Inzamam-ul-Haq 20 1550 57.40 5/ 8
Ricky Ponting 60 5480 57.08 19/ 25
Jacques Kallis 55 4627 55.74 17/ 19
Thilan Samaraweera 33 2500 55.55 7/ 15
Brian Lara 19 1859 53.11 8/ 2
Michael Clarke 47 3468 51.76 11/ 15
Michael Hussey 47 3467 51.74 10/ 18
The partnership stats for the middle-order wickets tell a similar story: Sri Lanka lead the way with an average of 55.23, while Pakistan follow at 51.17. That average means Pakistan's three middle-order wickets put together about 153 runs; in the first innings of the Lord's Test, those three wickets only managed 38.
Team-wise partnership stats for wickets 3-5 in Tests since 2005
Team Innings Runs Average stand 100/ 50 p'ships
Sri Lanka 224 11,875 55.23 41/ 38
Pakistan 217 10,695 51.17 31/ 48
India 278 12,718 47.81 35/ 55
Australia 296 13,483 46.81 36/ 58
South Africa 299 13,279 46.75 33/ 56
England 361 15,569 44.73 46/ 61
West Indies 271 10,859 40.97 28/ 49
New Zealand 219 7736 36.49 16/ 31
Zimbabwe 48 1185 24.68 1/ 8
Bangladesh 199 4455 22.50 4/ 24
It'll be a tall order for any of the current Pakistan batsmen to replicate the feats of that trio (though they've all displayed enough sparks of talent to warrant a decent run at Test level). When Younis and Yousuf got together, for example, they were more prolific than any other middle-order pair, averaging more than 100 runs per completed partnership. In the 24 innings they batted together, they added at least 50 runs on 15 occasions, and went on to a century stand seven times. The Indian bowling attack was clearly their favourite: in nine innings against them, the pair added a whopping 1372 runs and averaged 171.50, with six century stands. They're the only Pakistan pair in the top eight, though; Australia and Sri Lanka have two representatives each.
Best pairs for wickets 3-5 in Tests since 2005 (Qual: 1000 runs)
Pair Innings Runs Average stand 100/ 50 p'ships
Mohammad Yousuf-Younis Khan 24 2358 107.18 7/ 8
Michael Clarke-Marcus North 13 1026 78.92 5/ 0
AB de Villiers-Jacques Kallis 28 1967 78.68 9/ 5
Mahela Jayawardene-Thilan Samaraweera 26 1808 72.32 8/ 2
Michael Clarke-Ricky Ponting 16 1082 72.13 3/ 3
Mahela Jayawardene-Kumar Sangakkara 43 2839 66.02 6/ 13
Sourav Ganguly-Sachin Tendulkar 19 1175 61.84 4/ 5
Paul Collingwood-Kevin Pietersen 40 2404 61.64 8/ 9
While Pakistan's strength over the last five-and-a-half years has been their batsmen at positions three to five, their opening combinations and their No. 6 batsmen have hardly kept pace. At No. 6, Pakistan's batting average is an ordinary 32.04, and only West Indies, New Zealand and Bangladesh have done worse. Pakistan have tried 11 batsmen at that position, but most of them have struggled. Shoaib Malik's 19 innings have fetched only one century, and an average of 34, while Faisal Iqbal's 10 innings brought him meagre returns of 184 runs.
On the other hand, batsmen from other teams have done much better, with India leading the way. Of the nine batsmen they've tried at that slot, VVS Laxman and MS Dhoni have been exceptional, with both averaging more than 50. Yuvraj has a 40-plus average as well - a number he'll want to improve on during the series in Sri Lanka. Tillakaratne Dilshan has been the Sri Lankan star in that position: in 31 Tests he averages nearly 54, with 13 scores of 50 or more.
Team-wise stats of No. 6 batsmen in Tests since 2005
Team No. of players Tests Runs Average 100s/ 50s
India 9 55 3323 45.52 6/ 23
Sri Lanka 10 45 2745 44.27 6/ 12
South Africa 12 59 3307 39.36 5/ 18
Australia 13 60 3316 38.11 8/ 18
England 11 70 3886 38.09 11/ 21
Zimbabwe 4 8 490 35.00 1/ 2
Pakistan 11 40 2083 32.04 4/ 11
West Indies 15 50 2517 29.96 2/ 14
New Zealand 15 42 1845 28.82 4/ 4
Bangladesh 9 34 1496 24.12 2/ 4
All stats exclude the ongoing Lord's Test between Australia and Pakistan.

S Rajesh is stats editor of Cricinfo