Peter Roebuck
Peter Roebuck Peter RoebuckRSS FeedFeeds  | Archives
Former captain of Somerset; author of It Never Rains, Sometimes I Forgot to Laugh and other books

Wright and Donald could do Australia good

The back-room team that guided New Zealand at the World Cup would not be a bad bet for the former champions as they look to rebuild

Peter Roebuck

May 11, 2011

Comments: 22 | Text size: A | A

John Wright and Allan Donald watch New Zealand train, Colombo, March 27, 2011
Wright and Donald are old school, but are open to new methods William West / © AFP
Enlarge
Related Links
Players/Officials: Allan Donald | John Wright
Teams: Australia

John Wright and Allan Donald ought to be high on the list of candidates as the Australia think tank ponders changes to its coaching staff.

That changes are needed was apparent from the team's fragile performances last summer. One scribe, writing a book about the campaign, contemplated calling it Going, Going, Gone!, only to be told that it lacked the required pizzazz. However, its accuracy could not be faulted. In a trice the Ashes and the World Cup were lost.

Admittedly it'd be foolish to put all the blame on the shoulders of luckless assistants. As eminent observers have often remarked, coaches don't take wickets or score runs. Nor do they arrange fixture lists, choose teams or cause injuries. Still, it was not so much the defeat that rankled as its manner. The Australians lacked snap, crackle and pop.

That the only casualty so far has been the captain, and that voluntarily, confirms that the cricket community is in dire straits. A board that is itself under scrutiny, and whose very existence has been called into question, is poorly placed to change anything, let alone confront the flaws that came to light in the summer. Defeat is always more illuminating than victory and the challenge is to analyse its causes correctly and apply the proper remedies. Dentists are expected to pull out the right tooth.

Nevertheless it was hard to avoid comparing the coherence of England's display with the disarray detected among the Australians. England strode towards their destiny while their hosts were desperately trying to avoid their fate. For decades it was the other way around. England's fielding was sharper and their tactics more penetrating and more precisely applied. Every move the visitors made was part of a plan. At times their opponents seemed to be thrashing about in the dark.

Undoubtedly those given responsibility for these matters ought to be called to account. Already the previous bowling advisor has moved to the high performance centre in Brisbane. By and large bowling coaches don't last long. They are responsible for only one aspect of the team's performance. Except that it is unnatural and features many moving parts, bowling is not an especially complicated activity, and a coach blessed with the gift of the gab can convey his expertise in a few days. Actually he is not so much a coach as a teacher instilling an appreciation of the craft and an understanding of how a particular action works best.

Once that has been achieved the bowling coach spends his time checking that every part of the action is functioning properly. Bad habits can creep into even the most advanced technique and often the player does not realise they have taken hold. At such times the bowling coach becomes a talking mirror. To his misfortune, though, he can easily become a victim of weak thinking, whereby a struggling bowler blames not his own lack of fitness or skill or concentration but the coach's failure to provide a cure for his ailments. Harry Potter and company had plenty of magic wands, but they tend to be thin on the ground in cricket dressing rooms.

Accordingly it'd be silly to suppose that nominating new coaches will transform the Australian team. On the other hand it is important to get the best men for the job. England's fortunes have risen considerably since they started appointing African coaches. India too have realised the importance of selecting the right man and clearly expect Duncan Fletcher to continue the good work discreetly done by his immediate predecessor. Fletcher has the required knowledge and will command respect, and his success will depend on the steadiness of his temperament.

Wright and Donald are the right combination for Australia and they can work together. They forged a strong partnership at the recent World Cup, thereby helping New Zealand reach the semi-finals, whereupon they came unstuck against a vibrant Sri Lankan side playing in their own backyard and in front of their own supporters. Of course it was not the first time New Zealand surpassed expectations, and the captain and players deserve most of the credit. Still, it was a strong display and all concerned confirmed that the coaches had played their part. They were shrewd appointments made by a board that has often lacked conviction and has allowed the players' association to impose itself.

However, they were temporary appointments and these gentlemen remain open to offers. Both combine the best of the old school with a willingness to absorb new methods. Both prefer to retain simplicity in the face of the inexorable advance of complexity. Indeed, they correctly assume the existence of a simplicity beyond complexity, and to that end believe in acquiring all available knowledge, assessing it and reducing it to the bare essentials. In their eyes instruction ought to be simple, plans need to be straightforward.

Apparently Wright was able to coax superb performances from Jesse Ryder by restricting himself to two pieces of advice: don't drink too much and don't throw your wicket away. Ryder responded by producing some superb and responsible innings. Doubtless the same basic principle was applied in other cases. Wright has a way of getting to the nub of the matter.

 
 
Defeat is always more illuminating than victory and the challenge is to analyse its causes correctly and apply the proper remedies. Dentists are expected to pull out the right tooth
 

Like so many of the best coaches, he had to claw and sweat his way to success as a player. Every innings was an ordeal, and at times even fieldsmen shared his suffering as the ball squirted away or another shot was mistimed. Or they did until they noticed that once again he had reached lunch unbeaten, with 53 runs beside his name. Wright scored runs because he worried, not despite it. He fretted his way to accomplishment. A few decades ago I asked Viv Richards how to play spin bowling. He looked astonished by the question and narrowly stopped himself saying "Put your foot out and hit it for six." Wright understands doubt and difficulty and so can offer suggestions.

Wright also has the sort of track record calculated to impress players and officials alike. Besides New Zealand, he coached India and guided them towards the top of the table. He has an ability to adjust his approach to conditions and cultures and is liked by cricketers of all shapes and sides. Not that he is a soft touch. He likes players with character and a bit of mongrel in them, and is not afraid to speak his mind. Just that he is not much of a fellow for putting on public displays.

Donald is also highly regarded by the people who matter most: those operating under his wing. Although a supremely gifted athlete, he had to work at his game and understood that bowling was a fine art. Perplexed that he could surge to the crease one day and deliver thunderbolts and the next feel that his deliveries were powder puff (the difference was never as obvious at the receiving end) he took to timing his run-up on the best days and asking coaches to use stopwatches and send out messages telling him that he was running in too fast or too slow. Rhythm is everything in bowling and can be upset by footholds, slopes, wind, and all sorts of other things batsmen do not take seriously till someone puts the ball in their hand and says, "It's your turn."

Unlike some past players, Donald does not rest on his reputation as a great bowler. He knows that coaching is a specialist task that requires constancy, effort and the ability to communicate. By all accounts, too, he is a hard taskmaster prepared to listen but unwilling to waste time on weaklings and whiners. He applies himself and expects his charges to do the same.

By no means are Wright or Donald the only impressive candidates for the positions, one of which is not yet open. Some very good men, including Australians (not least England's bowling advisor), are tied up, but others remain available. Geoff Lawson and Venkat Prasad know a thing or two about bowling. Gary Kirsten has not been pinned down.

That both nominations are foreigners is beside the point. There is a time to teach and a time to learn, a time to be confident and a time to show humility. In any case misguided pride has not prevented outsiders taking charge of Australia's rugby and soccer sides. Sometimes even the best system stagnates, and then fresh blood is needed. It is not, though, a time for novices but for outstanding men capable of uplifting the morale and prospects of an ailing outfit.

Peter Roebuck is a former captain of Somerset and the author, most recently, of In It to Win It

RSS Feeds: Peter Roebuck

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by   on (May 11, 2011, 20:33 GMT)

Maaate, you're dreamin' You might have the cash to pinch Donald of us, but you're sure as hell not going to get Wright as well.

Posted by Cpt.Meanster on (May 11, 2011, 19:22 GMT)

Outside coach or not Australia's heyday is OVER ! their cricket is now played by kids who are more interested in their girl friends' dressing habits, playstation games, movies, KFC etc, EXACTLY the reason for Andrew Symonds' early retirement and birth of the world's first cricket 'MERCENARY'. Please refer back to cricinfo's video archive where he speaks in an interview with Harsha Bhogle about how 'spoiled' young Aussie cricketers are and how the old culture of winning is no longer there. Having said that, I don't think Australia will slip down as bad as the WI. The domestic structure in Australia is still very good if not the best and they have some decent guys coming through and more FRIENDLY and LOVABLE ones too: Mitchell Marsh, Shaun Marsh, Adrian Blizzard etc. So I think this is NOT the time to panic and please let Allan Donald and Wright stay back in NZ where they very much need them.

Posted by mafiasam on (May 11, 2011, 14:22 GMT)

Aussies had an indomitable team, which is a past now.. they certainly can't match up to that success in near future no matter which coach you bring. I know the expectations are high from the Aussie fans, but team is riding a wave, and now it is descending into a trough!! But one thing for sure, Australia has a great domestic system and would come back some time in the future, and would not go down like WI.

Posted by dsig3 on (May 11, 2011, 14:03 GMT)

I think getting a foreign coach for us is a good thing. If Timmy Neilsen is the best that Australia could offer then we NEED to look abroad. As simple as that. What an utter failure he has been. I dont mind losing when we suck, but at least stare the facts in the face and be real about it.

Posted by   on (May 11, 2011, 14:03 GMT)

These rants/gloats about England's superior tactics and finesse is getting old. They won only the Ashes, got thrashed in the bilateral ODI series and was humiliated by Ireland in the World Cup and cried a river about severe workload. Yes, Australia has taken a nosedive but surely England is not the example to follow. Australia has abundant talent and is a team made out of AUSTRLIANS and not South Africans or the Irish. Whoever is picked for the job, will have his work cut out as he's going to have to groom most of all permanence (of form and fitness) in the bowling unit. But most of all, Australia needs a coach who can extract the talent out of the current side and probably a non-Australian is not the way to go. But whatever it is, I hope writers like Peter and Andrew will stop the gloating over the Ashes Glory already and drawing parallels between Australian heydays and English Ashes Campaign. Rule the world of cricket for 10years running, and then let the tongues wag.

Posted by Alexk400 on (May 11, 2011, 13:40 GMT)

Wright and donald were ideal fit for newzealand not for australia. Australia is in your face fighters.

NZ is always the team that punches above their weight class.

But australian team needs aussies and no one else. Very simple. They probably need more leadership type coach ..who can mentor in tough situations for younger players.

Time to dump oldies from aussie team and bring on new blood.

Posted by harshalb on (May 11, 2011, 12:59 GMT)

Donald is reported to be considering the offer of becoming the personal bowling coach of IPL star Irfan Pathan who got paid $1.9 million by Delhi Daredevils.

Posted by fazald on (May 11, 2011, 12:10 GMT)

This is a joke. When our cricket coaches are in great demand & have been coaching overseas teams like Sri Lanka, India, West Indies, England,Pakistan, Bangladesh, Zimbabwe & New Zealand why are we turning to coaches from other countries to coach our cricket team? Sri Lanka has always persisted with coaches from Australia & have come a long way as a powerful cricket playing nation.Until very recently their head coach & assistant coach were both aussies.The problem with aussie cricket at the moment is that it is in wrong hands manned by those who have hardly excelled or represented the country at cricket. There is no room for complacency & there's hardly anytime left before the cricket season starts next summer to make the necessary changes at the helm. If the ACB doesn't have the courage to do so we could definitely end up at the bottom of the world cricket rankings by early next year with fixtures against Sri Lanka,South Africa & India to be played.

Posted by   on (May 11, 2011, 11:12 GMT)

I think you're right in this case Peter, it's time for Australia to look outside it's own

Posted by tmd1 on (May 11, 2011, 11:10 GMT)

Perhaps Australia should fill its team full of South Africans,the fact that England have and still are unable to find 11 English born players good enough to play test cricket would cause a parlimentary enquiry in Australia.An overseas coach might dent the confidence to much as there are enough talented and qualified coaches in Australia and this would be seen as going back to the dark days of the 80's.

Comments have now been closed for this article

FeedbackTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Peter RoebuckClose
Peter Roebuck He may not have played Test cricket for England, but Peter Roebuck represented Somerset with distinction, making over 1000 runs nine times in 12 seasons, and captaining the county during a tempestuous period in the 1980s. Roebuck acquired recognition all over the cricket world for his distinctive, perceptive, independent writing. Widely travelled, he divided his time between Australia and South Africa. He died in November 2011

    Catch dodgy actions early

Ian Chappell: Kids mimic the cricket heroes of the day, so the problem of throwing must be tackled below the first-class level

    Reorganising West Indies' first-class structure is only half the battle won

Tony Cozier: Pitches, umpiring, and practice facilities must be simultaneously improved

    Trading places

All Out Cricket: In a world where £50m can be staked on a single IPL game, armies of professional cricket traders work the betting markets. But who are these people?

The set-up

The Cricket Monthly: When Tony Greig was outwitted by Ashley Mallett
Download the app: for iPad | for Android tablet

A method to rate the dominance of Test teams

Kartikeya Date: Taking into account margin of victory and draws, while eliminating arbitrary decay in setting cut-off limits

News | Features Last 7 days

Champions League T20 still battling for meaning

The thrills are rather low-octane, the skills are a bit lightweight, and the tournament overly India-centric

Automaton, man, inspiration

Twenty years on, Shivnarine Chanderpaul continues to be understated, underestimated. And that doesn't bother him. What's not to like?

Busy keepers, and Waqar's bowleds

Also, high scores and low averages, most ducks in international cricket, and the 12-year-old Test player

85 Tests, 70 defeats

Of the 85 Tests that Bangladesh have played so far, they've lost 70 and won just four. Those stats are easily the worst among all teams when they'd played as many Tests

'My kind of bowling style is gone now'

Former New Zealand seamer Gavin Larsen talks about wobbly seam-up bowling, the 1992 World Cup, and his role in the next tournament

News | Features Last 7 days