September 23, 2011

The left-hand advantage in Sri Lanka

Overseas left-hand batsmen have been far more successful in Sri Lanka than their right-hand counterparts

In the recently concluded three-Test series in Sri Lanka, Michael Hussey was easily Australia's leading man: he scored almost twice as many runs as Australia's next-best player, Shaun Marsh, who was terrific too, averaging 80. In the process, Hussey became only the second overseas batsman to score 400-plus runs in a series in Sri Lanka. The first player to do so was Brian Lara in that unforgettable series in 2001, when he scored 688 in six innings. His highest score in that series was 221, which at the time was the highest score by a visiting batsman in Sri Lanka. Since then, two batsmen have gone past it: Stephen Fleming scored an unbeaten 274 in 2003, and Chris Gayle hammered 333 last year.

The above paragraph lists plenty of achievements and numbers, but the one connecting factor is that they've all scored heavily in Sri Lanka, and they're all left-hand batsmen. Overall in the history of Test cricket, left-handers in the top order (Nos.1-7) have done slightly better than their right-hand counterparts, averaging 38.22 to 35.13. When Sri Lankan batsmen have batted at home, the difference is even lesser: right-hand batsmen in the top seven average 41.77, while left-handers average 42.85.

When overseas batsmen travel to Sri Lanka, though, the difference is huge: left-handers in the top order average 42.08, and their right-hand counterparts a mere 29.45. The difference of 12.63 is easily the highest when compared with the numbers in other overseas countries over the last three decades. Pakistan, South Africa and Australia are the other countries where the difference in averages is greater than five, but the Sri Lankan case is still a unique one: the average for left-handers is next only to those in Bangladesh and Zimbabwe, while for right-handers it is second from bottom. South Africa's difference is the second-highest, but it's the country where both right and left-handers have the poorest averages.

Right- and left-hand top-order batsmen* in overseas conditions in Tests since Jan 1980
Host country Tests Left - average 100s/ 50s Right - average 100s/ 50s Ave diff
Sri Lanka 105 42.08 34/ 77 29.45 43/ 141 12.63
Pakistan 109 39.21 28/ 69 31.53 51/ 149 7.68
South Africa 95 34.01 26/ 62 27.80 32/ 96 6.21
Australia 176 36.83 49/ 94 31.73 79/ 265 5.10
Zimbabwe 46 42.92 12/ 26 40.71 30/ 60 2.21
India 126 37.63 32/ 86 35.84 71/ 175 1.79
West Indies 130 35.16 30/ 76 33.37 81/ 170 1.79
New Zealand 115 37.80 35/ 77 36.58 63/ 156 1.22
England 199 36.81 60/ 136 36.02 108/ 269 0.79
Bangladesh 34 51.92 13/ 28 51.80 29/ 45 0.12
* Batsmen batting in positions 1 to 7

The table above indicates that the deviation in Sri Lanka is far more than in other countries. The overall numbers since 1980 show that for all batsmen in overseas Tests, right-handers score 33.83 runs per dismissals while left-handers manage 37.82 (for batsmen in the top seven only). The difference of nearly four runs is far lesser than the Sri Lankan difference of 12.63.

It's clear that Sri Lankan bowlers find it much easier to bowl against right-handers in Sri Lanka, but when they travel the numbers even out: in Tests outside Sri Lanka, right-hand top-order batsmen average 43.12 against them, compared to the left-handers' 41.30.

Which brings us to the Murali factor. Most offspinners prefer bowling to left-handers since they get the ball to turn away from them, but Muttiah Muralitharan was anything but a regular offspinner. Especially after adding the doosra to his armoury, Murali was more lethal against right-handers. Of his 800 Test wickets, 609 were right-handers; and since the middle of 2001, (from which period ESPNcricinfo has complete ball-by-ball data), Murali averaged 17.79 versus right-hand batsmen and 28.07 against left-handers. At home the corresponding numbers read 14.10 and 25.72.

These numbers tend to suggest that the Murali factor had a large hand to play for the poorer batting averages of right-hand overseas batsmen in Sri Lanka. However, the table below shows that in the home matches in which Murali didn't play, the gap between the averages for right- and left-handers doubled, to 21.61. Clearly, there seems to be something about the Sri Lankan pitches and conditions that suit left-hand batsmen, while causing right-handers to struggle a lot more.

Versus Sri Lanka at home, plus with and without Murali
  Tests Left-average 100s/ 50s Right - average 100s/ 50s Ave diff
Outside Sri Lanka 99 41.30 26/ 65 43.12 79/ 141 -1.82
In Sri Lanka, with Murali 73 38.01 21/ 55 27.46 26/ 88 10.55
In Sri Lanka, without Murali 31 55.53 13/ 19 33.92 16/ 47 21.61
Stats for batsmen batting in the top 7

Among the left-hand batsmen who scored plenty of runs in Sri Lanka was the former New Zealand captain Fleming, who struck two big unbeaten hundreds in ten innings: 174 in 1998, and 274 in 2003. The most remarkable performance in a series, though, was Lara's in 2001, when he scored 688 in six innings; overall, he averaged more than 100 in his seven innings in Sri Lanka.

The table below lists some of those who enjoyed playing in Sri Lanka, but there were others too: Vinod Kambli scored 249 runs in three innings, while more recently, Darren Bravo showed early signs of his potential, scoring 206 runs at 68.67.

Among all the left-hand successes, there were a few failures too. Justin Langer only managed 292 in ten innings, but an even bigger surprise was Zimbabwe's Andy Flower: he was an excellent player of spin and averaged 117.14 in India, but in 14 innings in Sri Lanka, he managed only 304 runs at 23.38. (Click here for the full list of left-hand top-order overseas batsmen in Sri Lanka.)

Top-order left-handers* who thrived in Sri Lanka
Batsman Tests Runs Average 100s/ 50s Career ave
Stephen Fleming 5 733 104.71 2/ 3 40.06
Brian Lara 4 706 100.85 3/ 1 52.88
Michael Hussey 3 463 92.60 2/ 2 53.26
Richard Hadlee 3 226 75.33 1/ 0 27.16
Saeed Anwar 5 446 74.33 2/ 2 45.52
Darren Lehmann 3 375 62.50 2/ 1 44.95
* Includes innings played in the top 7 only

If most left-handers have thrived in Sri Lanka, then the right-handers haven't had it so good. Mark Waugh scored runs in almost every country he played in, but in ten innings in Sri Lanka his scores read thus: 5, 56, 0, 0, 0, 0, 6, 0, 10, 13 - a grand total of 90 runs at an average of 10.00. In all, Waugh scored 19 ducks in 128 Tests, of which five came in six matches in Sri Lanka.

Among others who haven't enjoyed Sri Lankan conditions much are Rahul Dravid, Jacques Kallis, and Mohammad Yousuf. All of them have career averages of more than 50, but their Sri Lankan average is in the 30s, with none of them managing more than once century. The top two overseas run-getters in Sri Lanka, though, have no such complaints - both Sachin Tendulkar and Virender Sehwag have been prolific, averaging more than 65 in Sri Lanka. (Click here for the full list of top-order right-hand overseas batsmen in Sri Lanka.)

Top-order right-handers* who have struggled in Sri Lanka
Batsman Tests Runs Average 100s/ 50s Career ave
Mark Waugh 6 90 9.00 0/ 1 41.81
Kevin Pietersen 3 126 25.20 0/ 0 50.48
Michael Atherton 4 144 18.00 0/ 0 37.69
Martin Crowe 6 262 32.75 1/ 0 45.36
Rahul Dravid 12 662 33.10 1/ 4 53.00
Mohammad Yousuf 7 338 33.80 1/ 1 52.29
Jacques Kallis 5 318 35.33 0/ 3 57.43
* Includes innings played in the top 7 only

S Rajesh is stats editor of ESPNcricinfo. Follow him on Twitter

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Dummy4 on September 26, 2011, 23:29 GMT

    Person must bare in mind that statistics don't lie and both left hand bowler and batsmen have had success in certain conditions, which should be acknowledge rather than be denied or ignore.Persons must remember that if Brian Lara had played the same amount of games like Tendulkar the picture would been different do the maths your self. I am not taking anything away from Tendulkar but it any deserves it is him because he is a complete package on and off the field. But just know onces any debate comes up on great bastmen , Brian Lara will come up why ? Simple because the way he bats is with art, precision, class, beauty and pure genius . Say what you want both lara and tendulkar are both are legends but should be always compare every time lets remember the good times and look forward to what new cricketer might emerge.

  • Ross on September 26, 2011, 9:59 GMT

    Bowlers fear batsmen who can dominate them. Sachin they couldn't get out, which creates annoyance and frustration, not fear. They don't fear Sachin, Kallis, Cook. They fear Sehwag, Viv, Lara. I heard Alan Donald say it once - he credited Tendulkar as the best batsman he ever bowled to, but he also said that if Lara had the fire in him on the day, there was nothing you could do.

  • Mradul on September 26, 2011, 3:35 GMT

    @Clint: Well, the ability of Brian Lara to strike fear in bowlers made him score 34 centuries but the bowlers are not afraid of someone who has scored 51 test centuries, hard to digest. Sachin has been a part of more test Wins than Brian Lara, Sachin has a much better overseas record than either of Brian Lara or Viv Richards specially in Aus, Eng and SA (Fast and Bouncy Pitches). Sachin has been the World Cup Top run getter twice (more than anyone else) Lara never featured in that list. Sachin has 33000 international runs but still no bowler is afraid of him, that's just so logical.

  • muhammad on September 25, 2011, 14:10 GMT

    strange thing is that pakistan have played more tests in sri lanka than sri lanka itself

  • Dummy4 on September 25, 2011, 13:10 GMT

    The only reason why I put Sobers and Lara (two left handers) before Sir Don Bradman (a right hander), is because I saw Sobers and lara in their prime, while I nevr saw Bradman. Another right hander whom I saw and think he is equally as good as these three is Viv Richards (a right hander). I also heard about Graham Pollock (a left hander) but I've never seen him, so I don't know how to rate him. Another name that crops up regularly is Scahin Tendulkar; but those of us who have seen them all know that Sachin is good, but his over meticulous demeanour, his inflexible and dogmatic attitude and his lack of the ability to create real fear in bowlers has definitley eliminate him from the class of the big four.

  • Dummy4 on September 25, 2011, 0:57 GMT

    @Clint: While I generally agree with you that these statistics seem to suggest lefties are better than right-handers, in the discussion of all-time greatest it seems you're forgetting one Donald Bradman - a right hander! I don't think there is any doubt - at least amongst serious cricket fans - that Bradman qualifies as the greatest batsmen of all time.

    I also think you need to dig deeper than the statistics in this case as to whether right-handers are indeed better than lefties. I think that one thing that could contradict that is the fact that there have simply been a lot more right-handed batsmen, which gives the statistics a chance to level out... But it does seem as though these stats are suggesting left-handers are, in general, better, doesn't it?

  • Johnathon on September 24, 2011, 5:36 GMT

    This is very misleading. Left Handers in the game have an advantage over right handers in almost everything. Left Arm Spin is very defensive type of bowling and very hard to make runs off of. Left arm batsman generally do very good in the game, but are unusually prone to left arm seamer (don't believe me, look how many left hand batsman that Zaheer has had success against). Left arm seamers have a advantage in the game. Basically, if you are a left armer, you have a leg up in the game over the majority right handers. Its not that Left arm batsman are good in lanka, its that Right Hand Batsman do horrible in Sri Lanka

  • Dummy4 on September 23, 2011, 13:02 GMT

    While the table shows that the deviation in the batting averages between left handers and right handers is greater in Sri Lanka than any other country, a better 'Headline' for the table should have been: "Left Handers Are Better Batsmen than Right Handers"; because this is the fact that has been revealed by the table more than anything else. It is clear that the big story demonstrated in the table is that left handers average better than right handers 'in every test cricket playing nation'; and as a result, are better batsmen than right handers. And lots of cricket pundits still think that Gary Sobers and Brian Lara (two left handers) are the two greatest batsmen ever. Murali's 669 wickets of right handers as against 229 left handers has more to do with him playing against a significantly higher number of right handers than left handers. The last paragraph just before the final table seems somewhat confusing in the context of the theme of the article.

  • No featured comments at the moment.