Tributes TributesRSS FeedFeeds

The mentor, the seeker, the fighter

Peter Roebuck was a man of many parts, one who combined qualities that appeared to be at odds with one another

Fabian Muir

November 22, 2011

Comments: 19 | Text size: A | A

Somerset  captain Peter Roebuck at a special meeting of club members over the decision to sack Viv Richards and Joel Garner, 8 November 2011
Roebuck would seek out the strengths and weaknesses of his students and work on both
Enlarge

I met Peter Roebuck at boarding school when I was nine years old. It was his first summer in Sydney, having come from England in the off season to teach at Cranbrook School, where he was also a tutor in the junior boarding house.

Even then it was clear that Peter was different. Although already playing for Somerset, this thin, bespectacled Englishman seemed more bookworm than sportsman.

He would wander the halls with his hands behind his back, admonishing boys for saying they were "good" rather than "well". When he was meant to be supervising the students, he could often be found on a nearby bench, his well-developed nose buried in a tome. In the boarding house, a hostile world in which a book-burning never seemed far away, this already marked him as eccentric.

His liking for the unorthodox was further underlined by his instant friendship with another tutor, Mr Griffiths, a nutty professor with messy hair, who played the organ like Lon Chaney and crunched on bulbs of garlic as others do on apples. To this young schoolboy, they were beacons in an otherwise bleak environment.

One holiday weekend I was the only boy left in the house and Peter was "master on duty", giving him the dubious distinction of supervising me for three days. In retrospect I think he used those days to test me.

First we went to a dusty tennis court to play cricket. Subcontinental conditions, no pads, hard ball. It was a scorching summer's day, the kind that exists only in a childhood memory. Peter faced my pale imitations of Dennis Lillee and graciously allowed me to dismiss him once or twice, but I would never be one of his leatherflingers.

When it was my turn to bat, he showed less mercy. He bowled spin unlike anything I had seen before, the ball fizzing through the air like a hornet and skittling me repeatedly. We repeated the exercise in the days that followed, but my enthusiasm outweighed my talent. I failed the test.

So he tried another route. Over dinner he asked me how I felt about War and Peace, a classic question to any nine-year-old. By chance I knew the story, having taken a fancy to Natasha Rostova after seeing the epic Russian film version with my father. Peter's eyes lit up with impish enthusiasm and he began to discuss the novel. He extolled the writing and expressed his own admiration for the character of Pierre. This makes sense to me now, for Pierre was also a seeker, slightly out of place everywhere, yet deeply sympathetic.

This was the way Peter operated. He would search out your strengths and weaknesses, then work on both.

Believing he had identified a strength of mine, he nurtured it in years to come, first with reading, later with writing. He would visit the dormitory and pass me "subversive" literature, samizdat-style, to help me on my way. Narziss and Goldmund was one. His standard greeting became, "Hello Fabes, what are you reading at the moment?" I had to have a good answer ready.

I did not understand it then, but in short he was becoming a mentor, a word mentioned often in the tributes that have flowed since his death. He was naturally suited to this role, because he came from that breed of teacher who takes a genuine interest in individuals and thrills in their development. He cared.

His ability to build a very personal rapport made him born to share knowledge, be it in the classroom, on the field or in the commentary box. This is the reason why many readers and listeners felt they knew him, and this is the reason he went on to maintain contact with many students once they had completed their schooling. Our own friendship would last for over 30 years.

Mine was by no means an exceptional case. Peter built long-term friendships with a great number of former pupils, charting their growth and proud to think that he might have played a role. He often became close to their families as well. In reverse, we took equal pleasure observing Peter's own progress, first as a cricketer, coach and teacher, later as a writer, commentator and philanthropist.

Having had the benefit of reading the articles since his passing, it seems a number of professional colleagues found Peter somehow inaccessible. Many of his students and those he coached would feel differently. That is not to say they knew him fully, but it is possible that his guard was lower with people he had known from an early age.

By nature he was shy, but to say he was aloof or reclusive is to misunderstand the man. In fact the reverse was the case, for Peter's love for and curiosity about humanity gave him an insatiable appetite for new people and experience. Far from being withdrawn or, worse, elitist, he was in his element chatting to strangers. An Antiguan fruit seller, Mumbai chaiwallah or Sydney taxi driver - he would talk to anyone. More importantly, he treated them all as equals, honoured their opinions and feasted on their stories. He loved life's colour and different cultures, and understood that the big picture is about ordinary people, not celebrities. His pieces were more likely to contain a quote from his local Italian than from a player.

It was this humanist approach that so often set Peter's writing apart. It was this humanist approach that legitimised the decision to read the newspaper from the back page. Cricket, a dramatic sport that ruthlessly exposes a player's resolve and frailties, a sport that reveals more about the human condition than any other, was tailor-made for Peter's sensibilities.

Fascinated by the triumphs and follies of man, he was always trying to get beneath the surface and discover the causes. To meet him personally meant you had to be willing to answer a series of thoughtful, interested questions, which were sometimes direct but never intrusive. And he would absorb the answers. Often he would refer to remarks made during conversations that had taken place years earlier.

For those more accustomed to reading his columns and hearing his commentary, the skill of Roebuck the listener may come as a surprise. For it is a skill, an important one, especially in a world where so many people prefer to talk about themselves. Peter was a two-way street.

It seems he also had his demons. I never saw them. That he had made some mistakes is established fact. Sometimes he would make veiled references to the past, which showed that it had burdened, chastened and hurt him, but otherwise his view was to the future. It is possible that the charitable work he would go on to perform was in part born of a desire to wipe the slate clean.

 
 
It was an unusual experience to arrive at Roebuck's front door - always wide open - and peer down the corridor. His clear voice would penetrate the gloom, after which his physical form would slowly materialise in the shadows like the Tardis. I quipped about this once and his response was typically elliptic: "Only moths need bright light"
 

Upon reflection, perhaps something could have been read into his Bondi home, which he kept in a state of almost complete darkness. It was an unusual experience to arrive at his front door - always wide open - and peer down the corridor while announcing one's arrival. His clear voice would penetrate the gloom, after which his physical form would slowly materialise in the shadows like the Tardis. I quipped about this once and his response was typically elliptic: "Only moths need bright light."

Certainly the good he achieved far outweighed any indiscretions, but the modesty of the man meant that the broader public was unaware of much of it. Only now are people learning of the hundreds of underprivileged children who received an education through his unstinting efforts, frequently at his own expense.

This was a natural extension of his first instinct, which was always to help. Often he would do so without even asking if help were needed. He began by helping privileged children in Sydney, but moved on to the far more meaningful task of youths from Zimbabwe and India.

I asked him not so long ago whether he missed having had a family. "What do you mean?" he retorted. "I have the best family a man could want, look here." He then, glowing with pride, fetched photos of a number of his "sons" in South Africa.

For, of itself, cricket had become too small for him. Not meaningless, just small. Around 2007 we were sitting in his backyard and he said that, having become pre-eminent in his field, he had nothing left to achieve in cricket and that "my priority now is helping these kids, that's how I can really change something". If he enjoyed charting the progress of his former pupils, then charting that of the former teacher was much more rewarding.

Another word that has been recurring since his passing is "complex". It is a dangerous pastime to analyse people who are no longer able to present their own view, but it is no doubt true that he combined many qualities that appeared to be at odds with one another. Sensitive yet tough; a maverick yet a stickler for tradition; humble yet intensely proud; a great success, but with no interest in wealth; a man of coruscating intelligence, but given to faints of unexpected vagueness; an introvert with the courage to bare his opinions before millions. He was, one might say, the Morrissey of cricket writing.

In many ways he was born out of his time. Nineteenth-century England might have suited him better, where he would have dined with Sir Richard Burton or been an envoy to the Khan of Samarkand.

Perhaps the key element of the "Roebuck conundrum" was that of a private and retiring individual becoming a public figure. Had he been able to choose, he quite likely would have eschewed the limelight, but it inevitably came with the territory. More usefully, it gave him access to certain people and opportunities to pursue his humanitarian goals.

Never did the limelight's glare find him more spectacularly than when he called for Ricky Ponting's sacking in 2008. We had dinner several weeks after the article appeared and it was noticeable that a number people stared as he entered the restaurant. "I've crossed the Rubicon," he said. "People now know who I am. That was never my intention." I asked what his intention had been. "To say what I thought at that moment." In other words, to do what he always did, often as a lone voice, come hell or high water.

Peter was at times criticised for supposed inconsistency in his articles, writing one thing one week, then something rather different down the line. He also softened on Ponting. What this really showed, however, was his willingness to reconsider his initial opinion, reshape it and even admit a mistake. The same exacting standards he imposed on others he imposed twofold on himself. This was honesty not hypocrisy, a strength not a weakness.

Why was he a mystery to many who knew him? Perhaps experience of how the English media can handle public figures had made him build his walls a little higher, even in Australia. But there was a gate in those walls, which had only to be lightly pushed. Those who passed through it found themselves in a quite extraordinary garden, which revealed something new with each visit. On the 13th I wept as I was forced to accept that I had seen that garden for the last time.

I could weep again now when I think of all the lines left unwritten. Instinctively the eyes of readers will search for his column and the ears of listeners will strain for his voice - the twitches of a phantom limb. Or more accurately, the gap he leaves will hurt like a pulled tooth.

An evening with Peter was always stimulating. The wine was usually cheap but the debate was champagne. His mind was incisive, his humour oblique; his idea of a good joke was to ask Prime Minister John Howard on air whether he did yoga.

More often than not, our discussions did not concern cricket, rather literature, travel or politics. Sometimes we talked about relationships and the beauty of Russian girls. I know of at least one woman whom Peter loved and lost.

We also discussed death on numerous occasions. He was not preoccupied with it, but he was intrigued by cricketers who fall into a hole and contemplate suicide upon conclusion of their playing careers. Not for him, however. He believed that the simple solution lay in finding a worthwhile and satisfying alternative, something he had surely managed for himself in several fields.

He did not rule out life after death. He considered this presumptuous, for there was too much unexplained in a miraculous universe, where everything seemed possible. At our last meeting this year, he had no intention of discovering the answer anytime soon, declaring, "Death is about confronting your own mortality, but I don't have this problem because my starting point is that I'm immortal!"

Tragic events have proven otherwise, with draining suddenness. Truly immortal, however, are his words, which cannot be wrenched away from us so brutally and will remain as a permanent gift to all.

Fabian Muir is an Australian writer now based in Berlin

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by aarkayne on (November 23, 2011, 20:17 GMT)

Wonderful writing. So insightful into the world of the man the rest only knew as a mystery with a pen entertaining, knowledgeable and at times scathing as Peter's! RIP, alongwith whatever demons and gargoyles there may have been,and truly who does not have them?! Thank you for giving us reams and reams of wonderful newsprint.

Posted by gtmr on (November 23, 2011, 9:03 GMT)

A benign human, non-sporadic, herculean or an alien among the cricket writers of the modern era - PeterRoebuck. Well done Fabian! You made your mentor proud. Its one of the finest and greatest tributes to Peter in an utterly classic literature. You have exposed his life so well when others have attributed it as mysterious/complex. I love the way he looked at life. His vision about life is revealed better in his own words when he marked his comments about family and death. "I have the best family a man could want", "Death is about confronting your own mortality, but I don't have this problem because my starting point is that I'm immortal!" Truly, a brave warrior......RIP!

Posted by joski65 on (November 23, 2011, 9:01 GMT)

In the past week, what hurt as much as the news of his death were the columns that hinted at his 'dark' life. Thanks for setting the record straight. A lot of people, fans of his writing would say 'it doesn't matter', as I was. But it does. He was an honorable man, a fair man. A man who united worlds with his words. Who showed the west the strength of the east and in turn educated the east and coerced the east not to make the mistakes of the west. It was important to award him back his honor, to raise our hands together as we bid him adieu and tell him that yes he was a good man. Peter Roebuck played a match-winning innings and deserves a standing ovation.

Posted by Scgboy on (November 23, 2011, 1:55 GMT)

As one old Cranbrook boy to another , well done mate. Beautifully written.Great tribute.Though I have to wonder just which House , he was involved in ?

Posted by JM03 on (November 23, 2011, 1:28 GMT)

Great piece of writing Fabian

Posted by RohanMarkJay on (November 22, 2011, 20:31 GMT)

A fine tribute Fabian Muir. It seems Peter Roebuck was a very multi-talented individual. A writer of high intelligence, I am sure he could write well on anything not just cricket. He was very unlucky not to get an England Test cap in the 1980s, he was clearly one of the best cricketers out of England in that decade, no doubt another victim of the muddled selectorial policy for England cricket team at the time. Which hit rock bottom in the 1990s by then he had moved to Australia disillusioned at his lack of opportunity to be given a Test cap for England which I am sure is what he really wanted. I am sure if he decided to become a businessman or lawyer or doctor or even a film director or television producer he would have excelled at that too. He is one of life's winners. RIP Peter Roebuck

Posted by Bilbo on (November 22, 2011, 19:29 GMT)

Gorgeous piece of writing. Peter would have been proud!

Posted by nyc_missile on (November 22, 2011, 18:07 GMT)

A great showpiece of how a testimonial should end! Pure brilliance ,one of the best articles ever written for the sheer poignancy,portrayal and reflection of a human character!

Posted by soze_keyser on (November 22, 2011, 17:41 GMT)

A scintillating remembrance of an extraordinary gentleman.. I must say this article was a bit of a revelation.. !!

Posted by   on (November 22, 2011, 16:51 GMT)

fantastically well written piece..very touching and poetic..full of literature and the writer has bared his soul pouring his encomiums like no one!one of the best tributes yet on Peter Roebuck!The line i liked the most"I could weep again now when I think of all the lines left unwritten. Instinctively the eyes of readers will search for his column and the ears of listeners will strain for his voice - the twitches of a phantom limb. Or more accurately, the gap he leaves will hurt like a pulled tooth.An evening with Peter was always stimulating. The wine was usually cheap but the debate was champagne. His mind was incisive, his humour oblique"

Posted by   on (November 22, 2011, 15:17 GMT)

great article Fabian, thank you for bringing the side of Peter you were aware of ....

Posted by RD270 on (November 22, 2011, 15:10 GMT)

Brilliant! The best piece written on Roebuck since his passing.

Posted by dwblurb on (November 22, 2011, 10:07 GMT)

A beautiful and enlightening article, Fabian. Brought tears to my eyes, not for the first time over the past week and a bit.

Posted by   on (November 22, 2011, 9:10 GMT)

Thank you, sir. Your tribute really did make me think that Peter Roebuck was some sort of character out of a 19th century Russian novel, or perhaps from Joseph Conrad...Lord Jim?.

Posted by Antwall7 on (November 22, 2011, 7:09 GMT)

Fabian - thanks for an excellent tribute. Enlightening and poignant.

Posted by Agnihothra on (November 22, 2011, 7:04 GMT)

Of all the Obits and tributes on Peter Roebuck, this seems to be the finest!!

Posted by Nduru on (November 22, 2011, 7:01 GMT)

The most insightful, sensitive and poetic tribute yet.

Posted by InsideHedge on (November 22, 2011, 6:45 GMT)

Beautifully written, Fabian.

Posted by Mob_King on (November 22, 2011, 6:39 GMT)

Beautiful tribute, Fabian! The best testimonial to the great man and his legacy.

Comments have now been closed for this article

FeedbackTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print

    Test cricket needs fewer teams, not more

Ian Chappell: It's clear that for the ICC votes mean more than results

    Lara's peaks

Tony Cozier: While the 375 had a sense of inevitability to it, the 400 came amid a backdrop of strikes and the threat of a whitewash

    The world record that nearly wasn't

Rewind: Twenty years ago this week, Brian Lara became Test cricket's highest scorer, but he almost didn't make it

    An archaelogical probe into the state of the game

Review: Gideon Haigh comes out with another set of essays that sound uncannily prescient about the way the game is headed

The home invasion

Hassan Cheema: The Emirates have been Pakistan's home away from home for three decades. To see the IPL being played there must feel like betrayal

News | Features Last 7 days

UAE all set to host lavish welcoming party

The controversy surrounding the IPL has done little to deter fans in UAE from flocking the stadiums, as they gear up to watch the Indian stars in action for the first time since 2006

Attention on Yuvraj, Gambhir in IPL 2014

ESPNcricinfo picks five players for whom this IPL is of bigger significance

The watch breaker, and Malinga specials

The Plays of the day from the match between Kolkata and Mumbai, in Abu Dhabi

India: cricket's Brazil

It's difficult to beat a huge talent base exposed to good facilities, and possessed of a long history of competing as a nation

The captain's blunder

The Plays of the day from the match between Chennai and Punjab in Abu Dhabi

News | Features Last 7 days