| Series | Countries | Live Scores | Fixtures | Results | News |
Features
|
Photos | Video & Audio | Blogs | Statistics | Archive | Games | Mobile | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Teams that won Tests despite losing wickets a significant distance away from the target
Travis Basevi and George Binoy
November 30, 2011
![]()
|
|||
|
Related Links
|
|||
After the recent Johannesburg Test, which Australia won by two wickets, a reader, Matt May, asked what has been the farthest a team has been from a target at the fall of each wicket before going on to still win the match. At the Wanderers, Australia were 95 runs away from victory when they lost their sixth wicket, that of Michael Hussey, but they went on to achieve the target of 310 to level the series.
This week's column contains lists of Tests in which a team was farthest from the target at the fall of the fifth wicket through to the ninth wicket but went on to win. Click here for the lists of matches for the first to the fourth wicket.
Bellerive Oval, Hobart, 1999. Chasing 369 for victory, Australia were 125 when they lost Ricky Ponting, their fifth wicket, against a Pakistan attack comprising Wasim Akram, Waqar Younis, Shoaib Akhtar, Saqlain Mushtaq and Azhar Mahmood. They needed another 244 runs to win with Justin Langer and one-Test old Adam Gilchrist at the crease. Akram was certain he had Langer caught at the wicket on the fifth morning but umpire Peter Parker did not agree. A fabulous partnership followed. Langer scored 127, a painstaking innings complied over seven hours, while Gilchrist blitzed 149 off 163 balls. They added 238 in 59 overs and were separated only five runs away from victory, which Gilchrist sealed in the company of Shane Warne.
| Team | FoW | Req | Score | Opposition | Ground | Start Date | Scorecard |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australia | 126/5 | 243 | 369/6 | v Pakistan | Hobart | Nov 18, 1999 | Test 1469 |
| England | 48/5 | 215 | 263/9 | v Australia | The Oval | Aug 11, 1902 | Test 74 |
| West Indies | 105/5 | 203 | 311/9 | v Australia | Bridgetown | Mar 26, 1999 | Test 1453 |
| South Africa | 89/5 | 195 | 287/9 | v England | Johannesburg | Jan 2, 1906 | Test 88 |
| Sri Lanka | 137/5 | 189 | 326/5 | v Zimbabwe | Colombo (SSC) | Jan 14, 1998 | Test 1395 |
| Australia | 95/5 | 179 | 275/8 | v England | Sydney | Dec 13, 1907 | Test 96 |
| Pakistan | 99/5 | 162 | 262/9 | v Bangladesh | Multan | Sep 3, 2003 | Test 1658 |
| West Indies | 124/5 | 158 | 282/7 | v England | Port of Spain | Feb 5, 1998 | Test 1398 |
| Sri Lanka | 201/5 | 151 | 352/9 | v South Africa | Colombo (PSS) | Aug 4, 2006 | Test 1812 |
| Australia | 165/5 | 145 | 310/8 | v South Africa | Johannesburg | Nov 17, 2011 | Test 2018 |
Old Wanderers, Johannesburg, 1906. South Africa were playing a Test after more than three years and were struggling at 105 for 6, chasing 284, against England. Gordon White and Dave Nourse revived the innings by adding 121 runs for the seventh wicket. White was dismissed for 81, with South Africa 58 runs away from victory, and the hosts soon slipped to 239 for 9. Nourse, who finished unbeaten on 93, added the required 45 runs with the No. 11, Percy Sherwell, who made 22, to give South Africa victory by one wicket.
| Team | FoW | Req | Score | Opposition | Ground | Start Date | Scorecard |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 105/6 | 179 | 287/9 | v England | Johannesburg | Jan 2, 1906 | Test 88 |
| Australia | 124/6 | 150 | 275/8 | v England | Sydney | Dec 13, 1907 | Test 96 |
| Pakistan | 179/6 | 135 | 315/9 | v Australia | Karachi | Sep 28, 1994 | Test 1268 |
| India | 122/6 | 132 | 256/8 | v Australia | Mumbai (BS) | Oct 10, 1964 | Test 567 |
| West Indies | 288/6 | 130 | 418/7 | v Australia | St John's | May 9, 2003 | Test 1645 |
| Pakistan | 132/6 | 129 | 262/9 | v Bangladesh | Multan | Sep 3, 2003 | Test 1658 |
| England | 93/6 | 128 | 221/7 | v South Africa | Johannesburg | Feb 26, 1910 | Test 108 |
| West Indies | 159/6 | 107 | 268/8 | v Pakistan | Bridgetown | Apr 22, 1988 | Test 1097 |
| England | 157/6 | 106 | 263/9 | v Australia | The Oval | Aug 11, 1902 | Test 74 |
| India | 119/6 | 97 | 216/9 | v Australia | Mohali | Oct 1, 2010 | Test 1972 |
National Stadium, Karachi, 1994. Mark Taylor was leading Australia in a Test for the first time, having succeeded Allan Border as captain. He made a pair but was well placed to begin his term with a victory because Pakistan, chasing 314, needed 131 more when they lost Basit Ali, their seventh wicket. Inzamam-ul-Haq, batting at No. 8, lifted the chase from 184 for 7, adding 52 for the eighth wicket with Rashid Latif. At 258 for 9, however, with last man Mushtaq Ahmed for company, Inzamam was battling to avert Pakistan's first defeat in Karachi. They batted aggressively against an attack depleted by injuries to Craig McDermott, who did not play the match, and Glenn McGrath. The last-wicket partnership was worth 57 in 8.1 overs, the winning runs coming through four leg-byes after Inzamam charged Warne and Ian Healy failed to collect and complete a stumping.
| Team | FoW | Req | Score | Opposition | Ground | Start Date | Scorecard |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pakistan | 184/7 | 130 | 315/9 | v Australia | Karachi | Sep 28, 1994 | Test 1268 |
| Pakistan | 164/7 | 97 | 262/9 | v Bangladesh | Multan | Sep 3, 2003 | Test 1658 |
| India | 122/7 | 94 | 216/9 | v Australia | Mohali | Oct 1, 2010 | Test 1972 |
| Australia | 185/7 | 89 | 275/8 | v England | Sydney | Dec 13, 1907 | Test 96 |
| West Indies | 180/7 | 86 | 268/8 | v Pakistan | Bridgetown | Apr 22, 1988 | Test 1097 |
| England | 198/7 | 84 | 282/9 | v Australia | Melbourne | Jan 1, 1908 | Test 97 |
| England | 187/7 | 76 | 263/9 | v Australia | The Oval | Aug 11, 1902 | Test 74 |
| New Zealand | 217/7 | 61 | 278/8 | v Pakistan | Dunedin | Feb 9, 1985 | Test 1012 |
| West Indies | 248/7 | 60 | 311/9 | v Australia | Bridgetown | Mar 26, 1999 | Test 1453 |
| South Africa | 226/7 | 58 | 287/9 | v England | Johannesburg | Jan 2, 1906 | Test 88 |
Mohali, 2010. It was the first Test of the Border-Gavaskar Trophy and India needed 216 in the fourth innings to beat Australia. At 124 for 8 that looked unlikely. Australia had not yet dismissed VVS Laxman, though, and he had Ishant Sharma at the other end. Ishant contributed 31 to an 81-run partnership for the ninth wicket before falling lbw to Ben Hilfenhaus. Laxman, who had Suresh Raina for a runner, then shepherded India to their first one-wicket victory in Tests. He finished unbeaten on 73 after showing rare emotion on the field, yelling at Pragyan Ojha because of his running between the wickets during a tense finish.
| Team | FoW | Req | Score | Opposition | Ground | Start Date | Scorecard |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| India | 124/8 | 92 | 216/9 | v Australia | Mohali | Oct 1, 2010 | Test 1972 |
| Pakistan | 236/8 | 78 | 315/9 | v Australia | Karachi | Sep 28, 1994 | Test 1268 |
| England | 209/8 | 73 | 282/9 | v Australia | Melbourne | Jan 1, 1908 | Test 97 |
| West Indies | 248/8 | 60 | 311/9 | v Australia | Bridgetown | Mar 26, 1999 | Test 1453 |
| West Indies | 207/8 | 59 | 268/8 | v Pakistan | Bridgetown | Apr 22, 1988 | Test 1097 |
| Pakistan | 205/8 | 56 | 262/9 | v Bangladesh | Multan | Sep 3, 2003 | Test 1658 |
| Australia | 219/8 | 55 | 275/8 | v England | Sydney | Dec 13, 1907 | Test 96 |
| South Africa | 230/8 | 54 | 287/9 | v England | Johannesburg | Jan 2, 1906 | Test 88 |
| New Zealand | 228/8 | 50 | 278/8 | v Pakistan | Dunedin | Feb 9, 1985 | Test 1012 |
| England | 214/8 | 49 | 263/9 | v Australia | The Oval | Aug 11, 1902 | Test 74 |
St. John's, Antigua, 2000. Justice Qayyum's report on match-fixing had been published on the eve of the third Test between Pakistan and West Indies. Wasim Akram was on fire, and finished the match with 11 for 110. It wasn't enough for Pakistan, though. They had 216 to defend in the fourth innings and were on course to do so after West Indies crashed from 144 for 3 to 197 for 9. The last pair, Courtney Walsh and Jimmy Adams, were stuck at the same end at one point but Saqlain Mushtaq fluffed the run-out opportunity. West Indies had plenty of other fortunate moments earlier in the innings as well. Walsh eventually survived 24 balls, and Adams batted 212 deliveries for his 48 without hitting a boundary, as they added the 19 West Indies needed to win the series.
| Team | FoW | Req | Score | Opposition | Ground | Start Date | Scorecard |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pakistan | 258/9 | 56 | 315/9 | v Australia | Karachi | Sep 28, 1994 | Test 1268 |
| South Africa | 239/9 | 45 | 287/9 | v England | Johannesburg | Jan 2, 1906 | Test 88 |
| England | 243/9 | 39 | 282/9 | v Australia | Melbourne | Jan 1, 1908 | Test 97 |
| Australia | 222/9 | 38 | 260/9 | v West Indies | Melbourne | Dec 31, 1951 | Test 345 |
| West Indies | 197/9 | 19 | 216/9 | v Pakistan | St John's | May 25, 2000 | Test 1497 |
| England | 248/9 | 15 | 263/9 | v Australia | The Oval | Aug 11, 1902 | Test 74 |
| India | 205/9 | 11 | 216/9 | v Australia | Mohali | Oct 1, 2010 | Test 1972 |
| West Indies | 302/9 | 6 | 311/9 | v Australia | Bridgetown | Mar 26, 1999 | Test 1453 |
| England | 168/9 | 5 | 173/9 | v South Africa | Cape Town | Jan 1, 1923 | Test 149 |
| New Zealand | 100/9 | 4 | 104/9 | v West Indies | Dunedin | Feb 8, 1980 | Test 873 |
Travis Basevi is a cricket statistician and UK Senior Programmer for ESPNcricinfo and other ESPN sports websites. George Binoy is an Assistant Editor at ESPNcricinfo
© ESPN EMEA Ltd.
| ||||||
| Comments have now been closed for this article |
||||||
Assistant Editor After a major in Economics and nine months in a financial research firm, George realised that equity, capital and the like were not for him. He decided that he wanted to be one of those lucky few who did what they love at work. Alas, his prodigious talent was never spotted and he had to reconcile himself to the fact that he would never earn his money playing cricket for his country, state or even district. He jumped at the opportunity to work for ESPNcricinfo and is now confident of mastering the art of office cricket
'You can't taint the whole IPL'
Bowl at Boycs: Geoff Boycott on spot-fixing, Adil Rashid's future, and yorkers in Test matches
Harsha Bhogle: The spot-fixing controversy teaches us about the pitfalls of insecurity and of the desire to keep up with the Joneses
The new Harmison? Or is it the new Caddick?
Numbers Game: Stuart Broad is destructive at his best, but at other times his bowling average is unusually high
Aakash Chopra: Apart from luck, you need to pick your team wisely, get to bat at the top, and have your captain's support
Less cricket on TV? Hallelujah
Matt Cleary: Why Channel Nine should be applauded for not broadcasting domestic cricket in Australia
Even at the height of his success with the national side, Sreesanth was a lonely cricketer who felt hard done by
A talent that didn't know its own worth
Sreesanth wasn't the most likeable team-mate or opponent, but he had skill beyond doubt, which we might have seen the last of
Mumbai Indians still have a better head-to-head record against Chennai Super Kings, but once again on the big occasion, they came second
A time for anger, a time for action
Out of the shattered lives of three young men caught up in allegations of fraud, newer and stronger players must emerge
Vijay slips, Ashwin does a Sahara
Plays of the day from the IPL qualifier between Chennai Super Kings and Mumbai Indians in Delhi
Spirited Sunrisers exceed expectations (75)
Sunrisers began this tournament as one of the underdogs, but fought impressively to reach as far as the Eliminator
Even at the height of his success with the national side, Sreesanth was a lonely cricketer who felt hard done by
Mumbai Indians still have a better head-to-head record against Chennai Super Kings, but once again on the big occasion, they came second
Anderson's magic not to be missed (50)
None of the other three England bowlers with 300 Test wickets - or many other of the game's finest swing merchants - could have bowled better than James Anderson at Lord's
A case of peaking too early (42)
Royal Challengers began the season in full steam, but failed to replicate their consistency away from home
ICICI Bank M2I. Register Now and Get A Gift Offer.
Safe & simple online money transfer. Apply Now!
Buy Wisden 2013 & get a FREE Playfair
Available now at Cricshop
It will be interesting to have the opposite list, which is: For each wicket fall, what was the closest a team was to their target but ended up losing?
Posted by golgo_85 on (December 1, 2011, 11:42 GMT)Hobart test - Langer didn't walk 'cause umpire Parker was the only one on the ground didn't think he was out. Antigua test - Jimmy Adams didn't walk 'cause Doctrove couldn't handle the thought of Pak winning a Test series in the Windies for the first time in history. Shameless cricketers, even more pathetic umpiring.
Posted by DrAtharAbbas on (December 1, 2011, 5:12 GMT)St. John's, Antigua, 2000. I was watching live on TV like many others. so many decisions were biased. It had become a joke. There was one clear big edge to the keeper which everyone knew was out, off Wasim Akram. Even the batsman was embarrassed to continue as it was so obvious. There were also at least 2 LBWs blatantly obvious turned down that day. This survival was more thanks to the umpire than any batting skills. In Pakistani street cricket terminology it was said about that pair "Giving them out was not part of the rules that day" (UN KA OUT NAHEEN RAKHA)
Posted by DrAtharAbbas on (November 30, 2011, 23:07 GMT)I suggest an opposite list for the bowlers: When lots of wickets are needed for victory and not many runs are there to defend for the bowlers. As an example Sarfraz Nawaz's famous 9 wicket haul at Melbourne Australia. It can be set up exactly like the above list. Least run to defend when 9 wickets are needed, then least runs to defend to take 8 wickets for victory. Let us see the bowlers this time.
Posted byThe Australia-Pakistan-India Test series was also soured by umpiring decisions and controversies. Slow motion replays on television exposed the incompetence of some of the Australian umpires. The Aussies were no doubt a gifted combination, but would they have won the twin series so convincingly if the umpiring had been better?
At several crucial points in the games, decisions always went against the visitors. The one vital decision which took away Pakistan's chances was when umpire Peter Parker declared Justin Langer not out at the beginning of the last day in the second Test at Hobart. The click was audible, the pads and the boots were nowhere near the bat and yet Langer was reprieved.
Peter Parker had erred earlier in the match when he gave Langer out caught in the first innings. The ball clearly came off the pad. Curiously, Parker apologised to Langer in a press interview and it was widely presumed that he made it up for Langer in second inning.
Posted by allblue on (November 30, 2011, 17:13 GMT)A fascinating list, thank you. It got me thinking of the 'nearlies', when the team batting fourth nearly got there. In particular the famous Ashes Test at Edgbaston in 2005, which England won by two runs. Australia were chasing 282 and they lost their 7th wicket at 137 (145 short), their 8th at 175 (107 short) and their 9th at 220 (62 short). Had Brett Lee's cover drive been a yard or two either side of Michael Vaughan on the boundary, that innings would be top of the last three lists! Such fine margins...
Posted byPlease note even NZ is not there in the list of losing teams in a close finish match..
Posted by@jockbeer I think it more shows the fact that other teams tend to play their best cricket against Australia. If their wins are deserved, as most of these were, congratulations to them. Don't be so bitter...
Posted by Gkgujpa on (November 30, 2011, 13:16 GMT)57 in 8 overs and that for the last wicket vs the australia shows inzamams composure and great match winning ability, ODI close winning stats should also be added
Posted bysri lanka too will not allow tailenders to win a match according to this LIST