February 6, 2012

'I'd have loved to play with McGrath and Warne'

Graham McKenzie was a constant in the Australian team when other bowlers struggled to hold their place
23

In the backyard of his Perth house, Graham McKenzie can tend the barbeque with one hand and catch a six with the other. There is no boundary fence between his property and the ground where the Claremont-Nedlands club plays grade cricket each weekend. He can watch a match from behind long-on without leaving his garden.

At 70, McKenzie is still surrounded by the game. A hundred metres up the road is the ground where the elite Scotch College plays its cricket. Walking there might have taken him twice as long a couple of years ago. But after a pair of knee replacements last year McKenzie is sprightly again. Making his way around a golf course holds no obstacles now.

That his knees caused him problems is hardly surprising. He finished his career with 1219 first-class wickets, a tally that is almost unheard of among Australians, especially fast bowlers. As one of the first non-resident overseas professionals in county cricket in the 1960s, McKenzie piled up the wickets. He didn't have too much competition for victims during his Test career, either.

McKenzie occupies a curious place in Australia's cricket history. When most people think of the great Australian fast bowlers, the names that come to mind are Dennis Lillee, Glenn McGrath, Ray Lindwall, Jeff Thomson, Alan Davidson. Even Fred Spofforth, whose last Test was 125 years ago, would rate a mention.

McKenzie did win some recognition in 2010, when he was inducted into the Australian Cricket Hall of Fame. His former captain Bill Lawry was given the honour on the same night. It was fitting, for these days unless Lawry is commentating, McKenzie's name is rarely heard in cricket discussions.

Yet he carried the Australian attack throughout the 1960s, a decade when they lost only two series. When he played his last match in the baggy green, he was fourth on the all-time Test wicket list, with 246, behind Fred Trueman, Brian Statham and Richie Benaud. The start of McKenzie's career overlapped with the end of Davidson's, and he narrowly missed out on playing Test cricket with Lillee.

The bulk of the support for McKenzie through most of his Test career came from men like Neil Hawke and Alan Connolly. They were solid performers, but a great deal was expected of McKenzie. Other bowlers, fast and slow, rotated through the attack - the likes of Dave Renneberg, Laurie Mayne, Eric Freeman, Tom Veivers, David Sincock, Graeme Watson, Froggy Thomson - without really holding down a spot.

At times, like during the 1965-66 Ashes, McKenzie and Hawke shared the new ball and Veivers bowled offspin, and then it was all part-timers: Doug Walters, Bob Simpson, Keith Stackpole, Ian Chappell. At other times, like on the 1964 trip to England, his workload was such that modern fast men would struggle to bowl as much over the space of two or three years.

"We used to bowl a lot of overs," McKenzie says. "Nowadays every match they play is virtually an international match. I bowled about 900 overs on a tour in 1964. It's a lot of work. Plus we had a few other two-day matches and one-day matches as well [not included in that tally]. But it was probably not as intense as now.

"Being a pace bowler is not easy. It's great if you can get good support. You can be lucky and have a couple of other good bowlers with you. If you can't get them out, the others will. A couple of times in my career it was a bit hard. I didn't have a great deal of support.

"I would have loved to have played with McGrath and Warne. To have Shane Warne playing in your team - you'd get a couple and if you couldn't get the others out, he'd come back on - it would just keep the pressure on at both ends."

That is as close as McKenzie comes to talking himself up. He is softly spoken and humble to a fault, and was said by some to have been too nice to be a great fast bowler. Sledging was not in his repertoire. He bowled when he was asked to by his captains, and he was asked to too often. Generally with McKenzie, being over-bowled didn't lead to injuries. But his Test career ended sooner than it should have.

"In 1964 I bowled a hell of a lot but I don't think I needed any treatment on the whole trip," he says. "It must have been the best fitness I was ever at. Later on I had niggles with my back. At the end of your career there's always something. But you always had to play through it. Nowadays I think they take more precautions, especially if they're younger. We probably played a lot of Tests that they wouldn't let you play now.

"I played my last Test when I was 29. I could have played on if I'd been looked after. I could have played another two or three years at least."

Not that McKenzie is bitter. Far from it. He is proud of his achievements for Australia and remembers fondly his many tours. Unusually for a fast bowler, he was particularly successful in India, where he took 34 wickets at 19.26. He took ten wickets in his first Test in India, in Madras in 1964. The lack of pace in the pitches there didn't seem to faze him.

"I liked it in England. It was a good lifestyle. I was single and had no ties, but it probably didn't help having to bowl all winter and then come back"

"I don't think the Indians were that used to playing against good pace bowlers," he says. "So if you bowled really well in India, even though the wickets didn't help much, it gave you a chance. But it was frustrating. You'd get an edge and the ball wouldn't carry to slip at times."

On his second trip to India in 1969, he was on the field in the Brabourne Test when the fans rioted. Remarkably, play kept going while smoke filled the stadium.

"That was quite amazing," he says. "In the middle of the field we couldn't see the people in one of the grandstands. The scorers couldn't see the match. But because of the problem of security, they said the best thing was to keep the game going. I think the radio scorers became the official scorers.

"If you were any further out than about square leg, a few rocks were being thrown in. They didn't have too many outfielders for that period. I don't know how long it went. We kept playing for a while there. When we came off, the dangerous time was when we went off into the change rooms. There were a few things thrown at us, but we made it."

India struggled to handle McKenzie in Australia as well. After he took ten wickets against them at the MCG in 1967-68, he was dropped for no apparent reason. It was speculated that he was too good for the Indians and that his dominance would lead to Tests that were too one-sided. As was his way, McKenzie took the demotion in his stride. He went back to Western Australia and helped them win the Sheffield Shield, a rare achievement for the state in those days.

Said to have one of the most pure actions among fast bowlers, comparable with Lindwall, McKenzie gained impressive speed from a short run-up of only 16 metres. Speed guns didn't exist, but he estimates he bowled in the high 140kph region, sometimes into the 150s. It might be a physical impossibility for a ball to gain pace off the pitch, but that's how McKenzie's bowling was described by batsmen.

He was an attractive proposition for the counties when the rules were relaxed in the 1960s and international professionals could play without living in England. Leicestershire snapped him up and after several years on their books he helped them win the County Championship for the first time, in 1975. County cricket was a valuable source of income in the pre-World Series Cricket days.

"You didn't earn any money in Australia," he says. "I liked it in England. It was a good lifestyle. I was single and had no ties, but it probably didn't help having to bowl all winter and then come back. It wasn't like now, there wasn't a lot of money if you played in Tests."

McKenzie started as a phys-ed teacher but was rarely able to spend enough time in a school to hold down a job, due to the demands of the touring lifestyle. He entered the financial world in the mid-1960s and worked in that industry after his playing days ended.

"It was quite hard when I finished," he says. "Your friends are in their mid-30s and they're pretty established in their jobs, and all of a sudden you don't have any job - you had to start afresh and you didn't have a lot behind you.

"But I don't regret it. There are some things you can't buy."

Like the privilege of wearing a baggy green for Australia in 60 Tests. These days the game plays a secondary role in McKenzie's life, but he should not be forgotten to Australian cricket.

"I'm on one of the smaller committees at the WACA, dealing with memorabilia and history and honours, new life members, that type of thing," he says. "I follow cricket with interest these days but I'm not too involved."

Unless a six lands in his backyard on a Saturday.

Brydon Coverdale is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo. He tweets here

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • twofer on February 7, 2012, 17:57 GMT

    @Carlos I like your XI because it would be a joy to watch them play. Then I thought what an added pleasure it would be to swap Simpson for Stackpole or Langer at their most belligerent. Only one person could ever be picked at 3 in a best Australian side so some pretty good players miss out. My 5 would be Mark Waugh rather than Steve just because he was prettier to watch, although Dougie Walters would be a fair pick in there as well. Maybe I'd move Gilly up to 6 to make room for Rod Marsh, sorry Alan. Marshy gets the nod because he is the best keeper standing back and he would get a heap of work with those three quicks. Warnie could spend some time working on his batting because the shame is that he wouldn't get to bowl much.

  • on February 7, 2012, 12:46 GMT

    A great fast bowler of his time, feared by even all top class batsmen of his time.l

  • on February 7, 2012, 7:22 GMT

    I agree with previous comments. Garth was a great bowler - beautiful fluid action & he virtually carried the Australian attack for years. He deserves more recognition for his exploits. He was poetry in motion when bowling . The only action superior to his that I have seen was Lillees

  • Baddabing on February 7, 2012, 4:44 GMT

    Bowling 900 overs on a tour is hard to imagine these days, I'm not going to look up the exact stats but I doubt that anybody in the Australian or any other team would bowl any more than 250-300 overs on a tour, and even then half of them would have a regular reserved seat on the injury bench.

  • on February 7, 2012, 1:49 GMT

    Nice story, Byron, but you are wrong when you say McKenzie retired too early for WSC. He was contracted to the WSC Australian side and appeared in a number of games for the Cavaliers.

  • canadaaussie on February 6, 2012, 23:25 GMT

    As a young boy growing up in Cottesloe, Western Australia, having a very local hero like Graham McKenzie was a wonderful thing. Western Australia was fairly new to Sheffield Shield cricket in the 60's. It was still quite a significant event to travel to Perth from the Eastern states - the highway (though the cricketers didn't have to worry about that) was still not paved all the way between Western Australia and South Australia. The mining boom hadn't transformed the local economy and Perth was still a quiet backwater. The famous WACA pitch was relatively unknown to the cricket world at large. And Alan McGilvray was the voice of Australian cricket. Sporting heroes on a national level from WA were few and far between. Only a few West Australians had played a handful of test matches up to that point in time. So McKenzie's selection for test cricket (a bit of a surprise at 19) was a very proud moment for WA. And what a great representative he was - what a hero.

  • Peterincanada on February 6, 2012, 22:27 GMT

    It is an overused phrase to say someone carried the attack but he really did after Davidson retired. From 1963 until 1971 the cupboard was unbelievably bare. Hawke and Connolly, while decent bowlers, had not very good fitness records and until Mallett arrived there was no spin option. The other bowlers used were nowhere near test calibre. The greedy cricket board had a 10 match 5 test tour of India followed immediately by 4 tests in South Africa. It was stuff like this that ultimately caused the Packer revolution. This finished poor Garth. By the SA leg he lost his nip off the pitch and never really recovered. It also finished Lawry who made enemies on the board by his fight for better work conditions. Modern cricketers just wouldn't understand.

  • gujratwalla on February 6, 2012, 20:39 GMT

    Mr.Mckenzie was a kind natured gentleman who bowled at lighting speed from a absurdly short run-up.I remember him from the 1968 Ashes series when he was a little off-form but the magic was there in glimpses.Majid Khan rated him very highely because he was successful in Pakistan too.As in this interview the essence of a most humane person then and now.Nice to hear from you Garth.

  • hhillbumper on February 6, 2012, 19:16 GMT

    A great bowler and great servant for Leics.But why is he not remembered more.Funny how some bowlers get attention and some don't.He bore the brunt of Aussie bowling for years and deserved better than he got.

  • 9-Monkeys on February 6, 2012, 15:49 GMT

    I didn't see him play (I am too young) but I have heard much of his greatness from those who did and whose opinions I value. I have met him however and can confirm that he is a wonderful bloke. Given he achieved so much with so little support he really should be considered amongst Australia's best fast bowlers (no doubt he's not in the same class as Lillee and McGrath, but for mine he is the equal of many who stand behind them) and it is great to see him remembered here. Well done Cricinfo!

  • twofer on February 7, 2012, 17:57 GMT

    @Carlos I like your XI because it would be a joy to watch them play. Then I thought what an added pleasure it would be to swap Simpson for Stackpole or Langer at their most belligerent. Only one person could ever be picked at 3 in a best Australian side so some pretty good players miss out. My 5 would be Mark Waugh rather than Steve just because he was prettier to watch, although Dougie Walters would be a fair pick in there as well. Maybe I'd move Gilly up to 6 to make room for Rod Marsh, sorry Alan. Marshy gets the nod because he is the best keeper standing back and he would get a heap of work with those three quicks. Warnie could spend some time working on his batting because the shame is that he wouldn't get to bowl much.

  • on February 7, 2012, 12:46 GMT

    A great fast bowler of his time, feared by even all top class batsmen of his time.l

  • on February 7, 2012, 7:22 GMT

    I agree with previous comments. Garth was a great bowler - beautiful fluid action & he virtually carried the Australian attack for years. He deserves more recognition for his exploits. He was poetry in motion when bowling . The only action superior to his that I have seen was Lillees

  • Baddabing on February 7, 2012, 4:44 GMT

    Bowling 900 overs on a tour is hard to imagine these days, I'm not going to look up the exact stats but I doubt that anybody in the Australian or any other team would bowl any more than 250-300 overs on a tour, and even then half of them would have a regular reserved seat on the injury bench.

  • on February 7, 2012, 1:49 GMT

    Nice story, Byron, but you are wrong when you say McKenzie retired too early for WSC. He was contracted to the WSC Australian side and appeared in a number of games for the Cavaliers.

  • canadaaussie on February 6, 2012, 23:25 GMT

    As a young boy growing up in Cottesloe, Western Australia, having a very local hero like Graham McKenzie was a wonderful thing. Western Australia was fairly new to Sheffield Shield cricket in the 60's. It was still quite a significant event to travel to Perth from the Eastern states - the highway (though the cricketers didn't have to worry about that) was still not paved all the way between Western Australia and South Australia. The mining boom hadn't transformed the local economy and Perth was still a quiet backwater. The famous WACA pitch was relatively unknown to the cricket world at large. And Alan McGilvray was the voice of Australian cricket. Sporting heroes on a national level from WA were few and far between. Only a few West Australians had played a handful of test matches up to that point in time. So McKenzie's selection for test cricket (a bit of a surprise at 19) was a very proud moment for WA. And what a great representative he was - what a hero.

  • Peterincanada on February 6, 2012, 22:27 GMT

    It is an overused phrase to say someone carried the attack but he really did after Davidson retired. From 1963 until 1971 the cupboard was unbelievably bare. Hawke and Connolly, while decent bowlers, had not very good fitness records and until Mallett arrived there was no spin option. The other bowlers used were nowhere near test calibre. The greedy cricket board had a 10 match 5 test tour of India followed immediately by 4 tests in South Africa. It was stuff like this that ultimately caused the Packer revolution. This finished poor Garth. By the SA leg he lost his nip off the pitch and never really recovered. It also finished Lawry who made enemies on the board by his fight for better work conditions. Modern cricketers just wouldn't understand.

  • gujratwalla on February 6, 2012, 20:39 GMT

    Mr.Mckenzie was a kind natured gentleman who bowled at lighting speed from a absurdly short run-up.I remember him from the 1968 Ashes series when he was a little off-form but the magic was there in glimpses.Majid Khan rated him very highely because he was successful in Pakistan too.As in this interview the essence of a most humane person then and now.Nice to hear from you Garth.

  • hhillbumper on February 6, 2012, 19:16 GMT

    A great bowler and great servant for Leics.But why is he not remembered more.Funny how some bowlers get attention and some don't.He bore the brunt of Aussie bowling for years and deserved better than he got.

  • 9-Monkeys on February 6, 2012, 15:49 GMT

    I didn't see him play (I am too young) but I have heard much of his greatness from those who did and whose opinions I value. I have met him however and can confirm that he is a wonderful bloke. Given he achieved so much with so little support he really should be considered amongst Australia's best fast bowlers (no doubt he's not in the same class as Lillee and McGrath, but for mine he is the equal of many who stand behind them) and it is great to see him remembered here. Well done Cricinfo!

  • Behind_the_bowlers_arm on February 6, 2012, 15:19 GMT

    I can assure everyone that he certainly isnt forgotten in Perth ...Garth McKenzie is a legend who helped bring in the dominant WA era of Lillee , Marsh, Inverarity etc. Good to hear this true gentleman and great cricketer is doing well and still involved in the game. Reckon his backyard is pretty safe if Claremont Nedlands are batting though.

  • on February 6, 2012, 14:11 GMT

    Graham McKenzie would be in my best Australian Eleven of all time. The team would be : Hayden, Simpson, Bradman, Greg Chappell, Steve Waugh, Border, Gilchrist, Warne, McKenzie, Lillee and McGrath. Simpson would captain.

  • FieryFerg on February 6, 2012, 13:05 GMT

    @ lien. Please explain to me how the laws of physics work in your universe because in this one, for a ball to gain pace from the pitch it has to gain energy, and that is physically impossible.

  • Partog on February 6, 2012, 9:49 GMT

    Graham McKenzie's bowling shone like a beacon during the 1960s, when he carried the Australian attack for years. I (and many other youngsters at the time) tried to emulate his bowling style - I well remember the athletic, strong approach to the wicket, and the fluent action which led to deliveries that surprised batsmen with their pace. He also bowled a mean bouncer. A couple of years ago I sent him a letter asking him to sign some memorabilia, which he most kindly did, and returned with a most pleasant note. A true gentleman of the game. Good health, Garth!!

  • on February 6, 2012, 9:29 GMT

    He sounds like a legend pure and simple. Very few gentleman sportsmen nowadays.

  • lien on February 6, 2012, 8:25 GMT

    A great fast bowler and an absolute gentleman. Had the privilige of getting to know him a little and play against him when he lived in South Africa. It is not a physical impossibilty for a ball to gather speed off the pitch,which is why the speed gun is a farce.

  • on February 6, 2012, 6:09 GMT

    He was a really,unsung hero. I have watched him with great admiration. The match he spoke about at Madras, I was there and I remember him getting Jaisimha in the first ball of the second innings when India was chasing 333. They went down . I remember his batting in the first Ashes test he played , when he played an important innings. His was a generation before the Australian bowlers spat fire , brimstone and curses at batsmen. He was a genial fast bowler however strange that may seem today. He did not have to work himself into a frenzy to get wickets. He was the classic workhorse, bowling tirelessly and winning test matches for Australia. No media attention, no IPL contracts, no money but a player who gave his best for his country. sridhar

  • jrg_from_oz on February 6, 2012, 5:43 GMT

    One of nature's gentlemen. I have fond memories of Garth taking 6 for not many at Adelaide in 1965 and setting up the innings win, after that shocker in Sydney in the previous test.

  • on February 6, 2012, 5:43 GMT

    I remember watching Garth bowling at the SCG in 68/69. I was a schoolboy from across the road (Sydney Boys High) and got in at tea for nothing. I later tried to model my own bowling action on one player I saw bowl. No, not Wes Hall, nor Charlie Griffith. I wanted to bowl like Graham McKenzie. You gave us guys a lot of enjoyment and I for one think you deserved a little better than you got. You are as great as the rest.Thanks

  • harikeshan on February 6, 2012, 5:11 GMT

    Great article and insight about a player. We dont see many bowlers bowl 900 overs on tour let alone 90. They breakdown even before the series begins.

  • on February 6, 2012, 4:59 GMT

    He's the kind never to talk himself up, neither would his record strike you as imposing in an era where 400+ test wickets aren't a necessary benchmark of greatness anymore. Yet, he was a bonafide achiever, his humility, fitness and work ethic making you wish such men were playing today. Respect!

  • aus_trad on February 6, 2012, 4:55 GMT

    Graham McKenzie: truly one of the forgotten men of Australian cricket. I came in right at the end of his career: the first test series I followed closely, 1970-71, was his last (also the first for Lillee, Marsh and Greg Chappell). Tremendous physique, shortiish, galloping run, all shoulders through delivery: he was probably simply burnt out by the end, given that he had to virtually carry the Australian attack for most of the '60s, after the retirement of Davidson and Benaud. As the article points out, the Aus attack really was astonishingly thin in the mid-to-late '60s. No wonder there were all those high-scoring, boring draws! I remember a comment made by a writer concerning the 1966-67 series in S. Africa: "When McKenzie wasn't bowling, the Australian attack wore its mediocrity like a badge" (or words to that effect). As McKenzie himself says, he probably would have played tests longer if he'd been better looked after: not a lot of workload management in those days!

  • stripykitteh on February 6, 2012, 4:13 GMT

    Whilst McKenzie didn't play Tests with Lillee they did play together for a bit for WA. When Lillee first played Sheffield Shield he had to bowl into the wind if McKenzie wasn't away on Test duty.

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • stripykitteh on February 6, 2012, 4:13 GMT

    Whilst McKenzie didn't play Tests with Lillee they did play together for a bit for WA. When Lillee first played Sheffield Shield he had to bowl into the wind if McKenzie wasn't away on Test duty.

  • aus_trad on February 6, 2012, 4:55 GMT

    Graham McKenzie: truly one of the forgotten men of Australian cricket. I came in right at the end of his career: the first test series I followed closely, 1970-71, was his last (also the first for Lillee, Marsh and Greg Chappell). Tremendous physique, shortiish, galloping run, all shoulders through delivery: he was probably simply burnt out by the end, given that he had to virtually carry the Australian attack for most of the '60s, after the retirement of Davidson and Benaud. As the article points out, the Aus attack really was astonishingly thin in the mid-to-late '60s. No wonder there were all those high-scoring, boring draws! I remember a comment made by a writer concerning the 1966-67 series in S. Africa: "When McKenzie wasn't bowling, the Australian attack wore its mediocrity like a badge" (or words to that effect). As McKenzie himself says, he probably would have played tests longer if he'd been better looked after: not a lot of workload management in those days!

  • on February 6, 2012, 4:59 GMT

    He's the kind never to talk himself up, neither would his record strike you as imposing in an era where 400+ test wickets aren't a necessary benchmark of greatness anymore. Yet, he was a bonafide achiever, his humility, fitness and work ethic making you wish such men were playing today. Respect!

  • harikeshan on February 6, 2012, 5:11 GMT

    Great article and insight about a player. We dont see many bowlers bowl 900 overs on tour let alone 90. They breakdown even before the series begins.

  • on February 6, 2012, 5:43 GMT

    I remember watching Garth bowling at the SCG in 68/69. I was a schoolboy from across the road (Sydney Boys High) and got in at tea for nothing. I later tried to model my own bowling action on one player I saw bowl. No, not Wes Hall, nor Charlie Griffith. I wanted to bowl like Graham McKenzie. You gave us guys a lot of enjoyment and I for one think you deserved a little better than you got. You are as great as the rest.Thanks

  • jrg_from_oz on February 6, 2012, 5:43 GMT

    One of nature's gentlemen. I have fond memories of Garth taking 6 for not many at Adelaide in 1965 and setting up the innings win, after that shocker in Sydney in the previous test.

  • on February 6, 2012, 6:09 GMT

    He was a really,unsung hero. I have watched him with great admiration. The match he spoke about at Madras, I was there and I remember him getting Jaisimha in the first ball of the second innings when India was chasing 333. They went down . I remember his batting in the first Ashes test he played , when he played an important innings. His was a generation before the Australian bowlers spat fire , brimstone and curses at batsmen. He was a genial fast bowler however strange that may seem today. He did not have to work himself into a frenzy to get wickets. He was the classic workhorse, bowling tirelessly and winning test matches for Australia. No media attention, no IPL contracts, no money but a player who gave his best for his country. sridhar

  • lien on February 6, 2012, 8:25 GMT

    A great fast bowler and an absolute gentleman. Had the privilige of getting to know him a little and play against him when he lived in South Africa. It is not a physical impossibilty for a ball to gather speed off the pitch,which is why the speed gun is a farce.

  • on February 6, 2012, 9:29 GMT

    He sounds like a legend pure and simple. Very few gentleman sportsmen nowadays.

  • Partog on February 6, 2012, 9:49 GMT

    Graham McKenzie's bowling shone like a beacon during the 1960s, when he carried the Australian attack for years. I (and many other youngsters at the time) tried to emulate his bowling style - I well remember the athletic, strong approach to the wicket, and the fluent action which led to deliveries that surprised batsmen with their pace. He also bowled a mean bouncer. A couple of years ago I sent him a letter asking him to sign some memorabilia, which he most kindly did, and returned with a most pleasant note. A true gentleman of the game. Good health, Garth!!