Features FeaturesRSS FeedFeeds

Down Under? Point up

How come Australians prefer to catch the ball with their hands reverse-cupped? Steve Rixon and Ian Chappell weigh in

Sidharth Monga

March 5, 2012

Comments: 29 | Text size: A | A

Michael Hussey took a stunning catch in the deep, Australia v Sri Lanka, CB series, Melbourne, March 2, 2012
Hussey pulls one off on the boundary, fingers upwards: recommended when you're right back by the boards and have no room to move © Getty Images
Enlarge
Related Links
Teams: Australia

For much of the 1990s, cricket in India was infatuated with Australia. The team was on its way to becoming the best in the world, and games played there provided the best television product in India - the quality of pictures, the commentary. Kids in playgrounds - I was one - would run in a few extra feet when taking outfield catches, so that they could take them with fingers pointing up. During international matches in India, when a fielder caught the ball that way, the Indian commentator would say: "That is the Australian way of catching."

Like other kids back then, I dropped a few. I got hit in the face once because I covered my eyes with the "reverse cup", losing sight of the ball. Then I stopped, going back to what came naturally to me, believing the Australian way of catching was some sort of idiosyncrasy that belonged to them alone. Like the inverted scores. Like their own cricket dictionary. Like the eight-ball over. When I finally got to Australia, though, I just had to try to trace the history and the logic behind the practice.

I ask Ian Chappell, a brilliant slip fielder and someone who has watched most top-level cricket in Australia from the '70s onwards, about the "Australian way of catching" with the fingers pointing up.

"That's not my way of catching, I can tell you that much," he says, to my shock. He turns to Mark Taylor and asks, "Ever heard any Australian player call this the Australian way of catching?" Taylor says no, but adds, "I liked to catch that way, but not everyone does."

"I think the other nations might talk about it," Chappell says. "I have never heard one Australian player say that."

Why do the Aussies catch that way, though? How did it start? I ask a few players from older eras, but they can't pinpoint how the reverse cup became the preferred way. A possible explanation could be the influence of baseball, which is quite popular in Australia, but Chappell quashes that notion too.

"I can remember the first time I ever caught in baseball. I was about 11 years old," he says. "And first time it popped up, and I went like that [gestures with fingers pointing up], and I dropped it. I was walking up to pick the ball up and throw it back to the pitcher. I looked at my glove and said, 'Ian you are an idiot. Have a look at the shape of your glove. It's much better [fingers] down.' I don't remember my father telling me [either way]. He probably did, but I don't remember it."

It was not all uniform in the Chappell family. Ian and Greg preferred the traditional method; Trevor caught with fingers pointing up.

Taylor offers a plausible explanation. "I think it comes from the fact that some of the Australian players have also played Australian Rules football in the past," he says. Fingers pointing up is how you catch in footy. "Typically the Western Australian blokes. Graeme Wood used to catch it that way," Taylor says. At which point Chappell chips in and says, "[Simon] Katich is terrible. Ricky Ponting too."

Steve Rixon, Australia's current fielding coach, is not entirely convinced footy is the key influence, but can see the logic. "I wouldn't have thought that is the reason they catch it that way, but that's not a bad summation," he says. "I reckon there is merit in that."

Rixon, a wicketkeeper himself, preferred catching the ball with fingers up. The idea for him, and for Michael Hussey, another Western Australian, is to get the eyes in line with the ball, bend the knees and use that foundation to absorb the catch.

"Either side of the body there is [a risk of losing] the ability to watch the ball closely," Rixon says. "When the ball is round about eye level, all the way into your hands, people find it much easier. I haven't seen Mike Hussey drop ever with fingers up. I have occasionally seen him drop some when the fingers are down."

There is merit to catching with fingers up but only if you do it as well as Hussey does, where you don't risk losing the ball in the background: you are just waiting for it to come at you.

This technique also obviously helps when you are at the edge of the boundary and can't push further back. We watch Peter Forrest take one such during a game against India, and Taylor immediately brings up his background. "He is a rugby league player. New South Wales. His dad was a first-grade rugby league player."

I ask Rixon, how the average Aussie father teaches his kid to catch the ball. "Try both," Rixon says. "With the understanding that if the ball is at chest level, [you] bend your knees, bring your eyes to the level of the ball, and just see how it feels. If it feels extremely uncomfortable that way, try the other way.

 
 
Chappell liked to move to the side and take chest-high catches in a normal cup. Bob Simpson would let the ball hit him full force and then take the rebound. Most modern Australian fielders get down low to make sure they catch with fingers pointing up
 

"What he will then find, like a lot of people, who play differently with a bat in their hands, a lot of people do things differently with a ball in their hand - ot is no different to a fieldsman, when it comes to the specifics of catching.

"The safe way of catching the ball is to obviously cup your hand, but a lot of people find it easier to catch it the other way, and my advice to young cricketers is, try both, find out for yourself which feels comfortable, find out which feels safer. I know if I ask Mike Hussey right now right here, he would say he feels safer with his fingers pointing up."

A source of ire to Chappell and concern to Rixon is the chest-high catch taken in close-in positions. The overhead ones you can take with fingers pointing up, and the low ones you can cup your hands under, but what about the in-between height? Chappell liked to move to the side and take them in a normal cup. Bob Simpson would let the ball hit his chest full force and then take the rebound. Taylor used to get his hands together, with palms facing the chest, as if hugging the ball. Most modern Australian fielders get down low to make sure they catch with fingers pointing up.

"I mean, it's abysmal the way Ricky does it down here," Chappell says. "For the obvious reason - lots of catches in the slips, the ball is looping down."

"Makes me a little nervous, yes, but he has got beautiful hands," Rixon says.

The chat with Chappell and Taylor also busts the myth that the Australians prefer catching with fingers up because it lets them have a second grab. "The whole basis isn't about if you drop, you get a second chance," Rixon says. "That's just an outcome of bad execution of the catch. The reason is, you are bringing your eyes to the same level of the ball coming to you."

Catching the ball with fingers pointing up has become more and more popular in Australia with time. Rixon sees a lot more players employ the method than did in his own playing days.

Australia continue to be up there among the best fielding sides. They seems to remain casual and natural with how they catch, but to outsiders, especially those who grew up watching cricket in the '90s, it is the "Australian way of catching".

Sidharth Monga is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo

RSS Feeds: Sidharth Monga

© ESPN EMEA Ltd.

Posted by   on (March 6, 2012, 20:12 GMT)

Fingers up for high catches, fingers down for low. I prefer fingers up for high catches and taking it in front of the eyes because on the chance you do miss it you have a better chance for a second grab. Took a nice very high one in my last game fingers up, walk underneath it watch it straight into the hands without having to drop the eyes at the last second. Im from NZ and was never taught it being anyone's technique in particular, just up for high and down for low.

Posted by Seychellian on (March 6, 2012, 18:06 GMT)

Despite what Chappell and Taylor say about it not being for the second grab I personally see this as being a very big advantage to the technique. If the ball bobbles out, which they do, then anyone with half decent reactions can often get their hands down and around for another attempt.

Posted by   on (March 6, 2012, 12:47 GMT)

I'm currently (11.43pm) watching highlights of a ODI match between Aus and NZ in Hobart in 1990/91 and just saw a catch by the NZer called Latham with "Fingers Up", so it's not just an Aussie thing and it dates back over 20 years by the looks of it.

Posted by notvery on (March 6, 2012, 0:39 GMT)

When i played cricket in the uk in the late 70's early 80's as a kid it was certianly considered to be the Aussie way of catching... I much prefer fingers up and will slide on my knees to get a catch fingers up rather than the other method...which no longer works for me but that could be the eyesight going rather than anything else. At the club i represent one of the best (possibly the best) catchers of a ball if its in his 1.5meter zone, sorry Muddo!, uses the crocodile method... i guess whatever works for you is best

Posted by D.V.C. on (March 5, 2012, 23:44 GMT)

For me (yes, I'm Australian), fingers down for low catches, a fast ball above the head has to be caught fingers up, but everything else I use a method that is half and half: left hand fingers point to the right, right hand fingers point to the left, right thumb matches up with the outside of the palm of my left hand. I was coached fingers down, and always tried to catch that way unless the ball was over my head. I'm not quite sure how I discovered this current method, but it cemented itself for me when I played a season in England. My catching success rate has improved hugely since.

Posted by   on (March 5, 2012, 21:12 GMT)

Hot Rod Henry says yes atul jajoo, Bob Simpson did catch the ball after letting it bounce off his chest. It is quite a good technique because you have the ball covered, you brace your chest and gain plenty of time to take a direct rebound in front of your eyes,you are in a position while your body is collapsing to judge where and when to take the catch. When I first heard of Simpson using this technique In the late 60's I adopted it and found it came quite natural, you can use it for specific types of catches. Fast snicks directly at you above tummy height. Where you may not have enough time to drop to a low level and your hands can neither point up or down. Coaches should explore this practice, most are keen to be innovative these days!

Posted by Digimont on (March 5, 2012, 19:57 GMT)

What the article does not specifically mention about the fingers up method is that you are supposed to take the catch with your hands above either your right or left shoulder. If you put your hands between the ball and your eyes, you WILL drop them and you WILL get hit. Simple really. While I didn't get past club cricket level, I did coach and I taught fingers up whenever you have the time, personal position and ball position to allow it. When you can't, fingers down. For slips catches of flat balls in the awkward height zone, get side on to the ball and catch under either shoulder with fingers pointing to the side. As always a firm foot base wherever possible and soft hands (ie give a little with the impact). Oh, and practice - don't discard a technique because it doesn't feel right immediately. If it did, you'd already be using it!

Posted by   on (March 5, 2012, 19:32 GMT)

come on siddarth you worte and article just to write it. people catch as they feel comfortable !!!

Posted by   on (March 5, 2012, 15:56 GMT)

Why not ask Mark Waugh? The best Australian catcher of modern era.

Posted by   on (March 5, 2012, 14:30 GMT)

The old fashioned method (from MCC Masterclass manuals of yore) of taking a high catch (with palms facing you) still involves fingers going up. Straight up. The problem with the old method for high catches is that it leaves a blind spot at the last split second (not good). With reversed hands you see the ball going all the way in to your hands, therefore, the average person, is less likely to drop it. The advantage of reversing your hands is that it allows the head and the eyes to align with, and get much closer to the ball, much more easily. With the old way of catching, your elbows are blocked by your chest, which locks your shoulders and your neck, which keeps your head much further from the ball. Reversing the hands makes your elbows stick out, away from your chest, so they can't be blocked, allowing you to get your head much closer. As we know from batting, the closer your head is to the ball, the easier it is to judge and control. It's no different when fielding.

Comments have now been closed for this article

FeedbackTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Sidharth MongaClose

    From nobody to IPL star

Aakash Chopra: Apart from luck, you need to pick your team wisely, get to bat at the top, and have your captain's support

    Fixing? It's people like us doing it

Ed Hawkins: It's convenient to blame the underworld for every instance of fixing, but it's ordinary punters behind many of them

    The perils of scoffing at failure

Rob Steen: Excessive success can destroy inhibition, and hence the capacity for shame

New Zealand shaken and stirred

Andrew Alderson: The second-innings collapse at Lord's has revived concerns about New Zealand's top order

'Being an NZ fan is like being in an abusive relationship'

Beige Brigade: Taylor Swift's songs would speak to any Kiwi cricket fan right now

News | Features Last 7 days

A talent that didn't know its own worth

Sreesanth wasn't the most likeable team-mate or opponent, but he had skill beyond doubt, which we might have seen the last of

Him against the world

Even at the height of his success with the national side, Sreesanth was a lonely cricketer who felt hard done by

Pollard sledges Watson, Dravid is angry

Plays of the day from the IPL match between Mumbai Indians and Rajasthan Royals in Mumbai

A time for anger, a time for action

Out of the shattered lives of three young men caught up in allegations of fraud, newer and stronger players must emerge

All fizz, no kick

Mumbai Indians still have a better head-to-head record against Chennai Super Kings, but once again on the big occasion, they came second

News | Features Last 7 days
Sponsored Links

Safe & simple online money transfer. Apply Now!

Available now at Cricshop