| Series | Countries | Live Scores | Fixtures | Results | News |
Features
|
Photos | Video & Audio | Blogs | Statistics | Archive | Games | Mobile | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
A look at country-wise stats in a franchise-based tournament, and the IPL teams which have most relied on foreign players
May 11, 2012
![]()
|
|||
|
Related Links
Numbers Game : Last week's column: The IPL's most and least productive overs
Players/Officials:
AB de Villiers
| Chris Gayle
| Lasith Malinga
| Morne Morkel
| Sunil Narine
| Cameron White
Series/Tournaments:
Indian Premier League
|
|||
One of the key aspects of the IPL is the concept of putting together top-class international players from different countries with domestic cricketers, some of whom have hardly played much first-class cricket. For the foreign players, the challenge is to live up to their top billing, and justify the amounts invested in them, as also to get used to conditions that some of them may not be familiar with. Players from some countries have been a bigger success than others, and have greatly impacted the fortunes of their sides. Here's a look at the country-wise batting and bowling numbers in the IPL, and the amount that each franchise has relied on its overseas stars.
It's obvious that overseas players are expected to contribute significantly, since many of them are among the best in the business. Not surprisingly, the overseas stars have put in plenty of game-changing performances: in ESPNcricinfo's analysis of best displays (updated till May 6), 31 of the top 50 batting performances, and 27 of the top 50 bowling ones, are by overseas players. The top run-getter is a foreign player (though there are plenty of Indian names among the top few as well), while the three best bowlers in the tournament are all overseas ones - Lasith Malinga, Morne Morkel and Sunil Narine.
Among the various foreign players, the Australians and the South Africans are the ones who've had the most impact on the IPL so far, with both bat and ball. Australia didn't have a full presence in the early part of the IPL since some of their players were away on tour to the West Indies, but despite that they've scored the highest number of runs among foreign players, and taken the second-highest number of wickets. Several of them have made strong cases to be included in the World Twenty20 in Sri Lanka later this year.
The most consistent from Australia in this IPL has been Cameron White. He hasn't always enjoyed the IPL, but this season he has been the one bright spot in a sea of misery for Deccan Chargers, with 410 runs - the sixth highest - at 45.55 and a strike rate of almost 152. Steven Smith, Shaun Marsh, David Hussey and Brad Hodge have done pretty well too, and with Shane Watson and David Warner showing terrific form, the Australian contribution could be even more in the last couple of weeks of the tournament.
The two other national sides that have contributed 1000-plus runs are South Africa and West Indies, thanks largely to the outstanding form of Faf du Plessis, AB de Villiers and Chris Gayle. New Zealand, on the other hand, have been largely disappointing, with both Ross Taylor and Brendon McCullum struggling for runs.
All stats updated till May 9
| Batsmen from | Batsmen* | Innings | Runs | Average | Strike rate | % of runs |
| India | 93 | 463 | 8033 | 22.50 | 119.81 | 53.95 |
| Australia | 23 | 96 | 2200 | 28.95 | 129.18 | 14.77 |
| South Africa | 15 | 82 | 1401 | 24.58 | 128.30 | 9.41 |
| West Indies | 7 | 44 | 1083 | 32.82 | 139.20 | 7.27 |
| New Zealand | 6 | 42 | 769 | 22.62 | 106.51 | 5.16 |
| Sri Lanka | 8 | 37 | 655 | 21.83 | 113.91 | 4.40 |
| England | 3 | 22 | 603 | 37.69 | 142.55 | 4.05 |
| Pakistan# | 1 | 6 | 101 | 20.20 | 144.28 | 0.68 |
| Bangladesh | 1 | 3 | 24 | 8.00 | 109.09 | 0.16 |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3 | 21 | 10.50 | 100.00 | 0.14 |
| Total | 158 | 798 | 14890 | 24.29 | 122.94 | 100.00 |
Among the bowlers, though, South Africa have been the biggest overseas contributor, with 71 wickets, of which 41 have been taken by Morne Morkel, Dale Steyn and Jacques Kallis. Sri Lanka's numbers are outstanding because of Lasith Malinga and Muttiah Muralitharan, while Sunil Narine's mystery spin has propped up the numbers for West Indies.
The Indians have contributed 52% of the total wickets taken by bowlers in the tournament, which is slightly lower than their percentage contribution of runs.
All stats updated till May 9
| Bowlers from | Bowlers* | Wickets | Average | Econ rate | % of wkts |
| India | 69 | 285 | 33.36 | 7.85 | 52.20 |
| South Africa | 13 | 71 | 24.76 | 7.40 | 13.00 |
| Australia | 18 | 62 | 22.26 | 7.49 | 11.36 |
| West Indies | 7 | 53 | 21.49 | 7.32 | 9.71 |
| Sri Lanka | 6 | 39 | 17.26 | 6.73 | 7.14 |
| New Zealand | 4 | 14 | 30.36 | 7.33 | 2.56 |
| Pakistan | 1 | 8 | 25.62 | 7.50 | 1.47 |
| England | 3 | 7 | 26.00 | 7.58 | 1.28 |
| Bangladesh | 1 | 6 | 10.67 | 5.81 | 1.10 |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1 | 24.00 | 8.00 | 0.18 |
| Total | 123 | 546 | 28.12 | 7.63 | 100.00 |
Gayle and de Villiers have been outstanding with the bat for Royal Challengers, while Tillakaratne Dilshan has played a fine supporting role, but the Indian batsmen have contributed little to the team, apart from Virat Kohli's innings against Mumbai Indians. That's clear from the table below too, which shows the runs scored by Indian and overseas players for each team. The Indian players have scored only 637 runs for Royal Challengers at an average of 16.76 and a striker rate of 111, while the foreign players have scored more than 1000 runs, averaging almost 41 at a strike rate of 145. In fact, they're the only team for which the overseas contribution has topped 1000 runs.
On the other hand, for Mumbai Indians and Kolkata Knight Riders, the home batsmen have scored more runs at a better rate than the overseas ones. Mumbai Indians haven't had one outstanding batsman, but most of their runs have come from Rohit Sharma, Ambati Rayudu and Sachin Tendulkar, while Gautam Gambhir has been by far the key man for Knight Riders.
| Team | Ind bat-runs | Average | Strike rate | Overseas-runs | Average | Strike rate |
| Royal Challengers Bangalore | 637 | 16.76 | 111.36 | 1062 | 40.85 | 145.08 |
| Deccan Chargers | 698 | 17.45 | 116.53 | 897 | 30.93 | 128.33 |
| Kings XI Punjab | 801 | 19.54 | 115.92 | 916 | 26.17 | 124.62 |
| Chennai Super Kings | 914 | 20.31 | 116.43 | 722 | 30.08 | 133.46 |
| Mumbai Indians | 1073 | 22.35 | 117.65 | 534 | 16.18 | 107.44 |
| Pune Warriors | 963 | 24.07 | 114.23 | 873 | 22.97 | 122.10 |
| Kolkata Knight Riders | 973 | 25.61 | 123.95 | 480 | 18.46 | 107.14 |
| Delhi Daredevils | 834 | 28.76 | 145.55 | 668 | 29.04 | 118.02 |
| Rajasthan Royals | 1140 | 30.00 | 120.63 | 705 | 32.04 | 149.05 |
The overall bowling averages are much better for the overseas bowlers - they average 22.41 per wicket, compared to 33.36 for the Indian bowlers - and for four teams they have taken more wickets than the Indian bowlers. The difference is most stark in the case of Knight Riders - the overseas bowlers, led by Sunil Narine, have taken 42 wickets at 19.28, compared to 19 wickets by the Indian bowlers. In the case of Royal Challengers, their Indian bowlers have taken 32 wickets, but at a poor average of 40.41 and an economy rate of almost nine; the overseas bowlers have conceded only 26.85 runs per wicket, and have a much better economy rate too. Similarly, Malinga and Morne Morkel have significantly improved the averages for Mumbai Indians and Daredevils.
| Team | Ind bowl-wkts | Average | Econ rate | Overseas-wkts | Average | Econ rate |
| Kolkata Knight Riders | 19 | 33.79 | 7.20 | 42 | 19.28 | 6.64 |
| Chennai Super Kings | 22 | 34.59 | 7.44 | 31 | 27.00 | 8.05 |
| Mumbai Indians | 32 | 30.84 | 7.23 | 40 | 17.52 | 7.46 |
| Royal Challengers Bangalore | 32 | 40.41 | 8.99 | 20 | 26.85 | 7.06 |
| Delhi Daredevils | 33 | 32.76 | 7.35 | 26 | 17.35 | 7.16 |
| Rajasthan Royals | 34 | 31.03 | 8.27 | 35 | 21.34 | 6.98 |
| Deccan Chargers | 35 | 31.40 | 8.25 | 20 | 32.35 | 7.92 |
| Pune Warriors | 38 | 33.29 | 7.86 | 21 | 30.14 | 7.11 |
| Kings XI Punjab | 40 | 33.70 | 7.81 | 26 | 17.81 | 7.43 |
| ||||||
| Comments have now been closed for this article |
||||||
Stats editor Every week the Numbers Game takes a look at the story behind the stats, with an original slant on facts and figures. The column is edited by S Rajesh, ESPNcricinfo's stats editor in Bangalore. He did an MBA in marketing, and then worked for a year in advertising, before deciding to chuck it in favour of a job which would combine the pleasures of watching cricket and writing about it. The intense office cricket matches were an added bonus.

ESPNcricinfo at 20: Could the world live without the site's favourite stats-spewing thingummybob? By Andy Zaltzman
Rob Steen: While players are pulled up for various deeds of misconduct, administrators get away
Switch Hit: Mark Butcher joins the team to preview the Champions Trophy semi-finals
'He was going to run all over you'
My XI: Allan Donald on the most intimidating bowlers he has seen. Right up there: Malcolm Marshall
Mahesh Sethuraman: Every time Karthik looked set to cement his spot, Dhoni seemed to emerge as an obstacle. Until now
India prepare quietly ahead of big clash
India look at ease as they train quietly and purposefully on the eve of their semi-final against Sri Lanka in Cardiff
Why India have had success in this Champions Trophy
The unexpected conditions in England have favoured India's adventurous batting
Lots of rumour, but no hard evidence
The words of a former England captain turned commentator have sparked a controversy around the Champions Trophy hosts but, as yet, there is no hard evidence
Pakistan were cheered fanatically to three defeats and an embarrassing Champions Trophy exit
A contest that brings cricket alive
The game can often seem dreary, predictable and endless. Not when India and Pakistan play each other
India prepare quietly ahead of big clash (182)
India look at ease as they train quietly and purposefully on the eve of their semi-final against Sri Lanka in Cardiff
Why India have had success in this Champions Trophy (87)
The unexpected conditions in England have favoured India's adventurous batting
The day the laughter died (70)
Pakistan were cheered fanatically to three defeats and an embarrassing Champions Trophy exit
Pakistan have always looked wistfully at the batting riches produced across the border
Batting trips up Pakistan again (48)
The Champions Trophy debacle was just another example of how frail Pakistan's batting has been over the last few years
Online Money Transfer, 3 easy steps
Confirmed exchange rates. Register now!
Buy Wisden 2013 & get a FREE Playfair
Available now at Cricshop
This is strange analysis having no real meaning in the larger extent of the game....you twist spaghetti but it will look like spaghetti again. The classical cricket fans understand that IPL is not cricket. Please write IPL-T20 only & not cricket with this kind of statistical data. Beside, this could be interesting only for IPL fans and not for real cricket fans. Just a small feedback for Mr. Rajesh that please include a statistical analysis covering each IPL Franchise a player played for..... & then imagine the results.....just headache..... no real analytical outcome......
Posted by lee_man on (May 12, 2012, 22:56 GMT)Interesting analysis. however, the number of players per country was not taken into account in the tables. The averages per player per country would give a different picture of the impact of each country. The way it is determined now seems to give SA and the OZ the advantage since they have the larger number of participating players.
Posted by Bruisers on (May 12, 2012, 21:33 GMT)"I think it would be better if you could split the data of the Indian players into two categories : Players who have won Team India caps, thereby earning a spot in the auction and a higher salary, AND the other domestic players." I totally agree with people who have the same idea. This data is nonsense as you have mixed world class Indian players with players who are yet to make a mark in domestic cricket. Maybe next time you will come up with something much more sensible Mr. Rajesh.
Posted by swingstowin on (May 12, 2012, 19:06 GMT)I was watching one of the games of IPL..and the stadium was full to the capacity!! I know its big in India,but this big i didnt know...it goes unnoticed here in Pakistan( because of obvious reasons!) must say the match was a cracker!! The future looks great for IPL...All the best!!!
Posted by Zahidsaltin on (May 12, 2012, 18:29 GMT)If Azhar Mahmood is taken as a pakistani player while being a British national then KP should be included among the South Africans.
Posted byI totally agree with sweetspot. Well put !!!! Some people don't use their brains while commenting, comparing uncapped Indian players with some of the best foreign players. :P
Posted byThis statistics seems to be illogical ! Most of the international players from abroad are well experienced and they had shown their skills internationally !!! Here the comparison is made with Indian players which includes a large number of domestic players. Mr. SR RAJESH , please think about something which is sensible !!!
Posted by Farce-Follower on (May 12, 2012, 11:49 GMT)RCB has the worst Indian contingent. The batsmen in that team have completely outsourced it to overseas batsmen, while continuing to pocket their Millions. Lucky Kohli, Tiwary and gang. Getting money from Mr. Mallya, despite doing no work is indeed an achievement.
Posted by soorajiyer on (May 12, 2012, 9:45 GMT)Its hilarious to read some comments here :)
@Pakspin - mate, if IPL is a joke, may I know why you are bothered and commenting on it? Any T20 league will have supporters and haters.. How is Gambhir getting $2M - because a franchise is ready to pay for him. Simple!!!
Posted by cool2cool on (May 12, 2012, 9:25 GMT)@Kathy McKenzie: DC is at bottom because as a team they have not performed at crucial situations. And as far as fielding is concerned even the likes of Sanga, White and Steyn have dropped catches and I don't think they are Indians, are they?