S Rajesh
Numbers Game Numbers GameRSS FeedFeeds  | Archives
ESPNcricinfo's stats editor S Rajesh looks at the stories behind the stats

The fourth-innings story for Pakistan and Younis Khan

A look at how no other Pakistan batsman has managed 1000 fourth-innings runs in Tests

S Rajesh

June 29, 2012

Comments: 36 | Text size: A | A

Younis Khan punches one through the off side, Sri Lanka v Pakistan, 1st Test, Galle, 4th day, June 25, 2012
Younis Khan has scored 15.58% of his total Test runs in the fourth innings; the corresponding percentage for Zaheer Abbas was only 5.79 © AFP
Enlarge
Related Links

When Younis Khan eased Rangana Herath past mid-off for a single to reach 72 in Pakistan's second innings of the Galle Test, he became the first Pakistan batsman to reach the 1000-run mark in fourth innings of Tests. In terms of overall aggregate, Younis is only fourth on the all-time list of run-getters for Pakistan: he's more than 2300 runs behind Javed Miandad and Inzamam-ul-Haq, and more than 1000 behind Mohammad Yousuf. Yet, in fourth innings he has been more prolific, scoring 1015 runs at an outstanding average of 59.70, and is one of only five batsmen to score four hundreds in the last innings. It's obvious that fourth-innings batting brings out the best in him, but has he also benefited from Pakistan's tendency to leave themselves with a lot to do in the last innings in recent times? How have the stats for fourth-innings batting changed over the decades - has it become easier now, compared to the 1980s and '90s? Here's an attempt to answer some of those questions.

First, a look at fourth-innings averages over the decades: like all batting stats, these numbers too have seen an upward trend since 2000, with the average in the 2000s going up to 29.36 from 25.72 in the 1990s. However, the difference between averages in the first three innings and the fourth has largely stayed within a narrow band since the 1970s. It dropped to 3.04 in the 2000s, a reflection of the fact that batting last became a slightly easier proposition during this period: 20 out of 57 successful 250-plus chases in the fourth innings of Tests came during this period. The average number of innings per century has also stayed in the 40s through most of the last four decades. Also, in no decade has the fourth-innings average touched 30 - the highest it has been is 29.36, in the 2000s. (These averages have been calculated using runs scored off the bat only, excluding extras.)

The percentage of runs scored in the fourth innings is also an interesting stat. The last column in the table below shows that number as a percentage of the runs scored in the first three innings during each decade. In the 1980s, that percentage dropped to 9.28 (because so many drawn Tests didn't even go into a fourth innings?), but generally it has stayed at around 12-13% through most of the decades.

Decade-wise fourth-innings batting stats in Tests since 1950
Decade Innings Average 100s/ 50s 1st 3 inngs ave Ave diff % of runs
1950s 691 25.42 11/ 55 27.61 2.19 10.57
1960s 923 28.84 13/ 107 31.08 2.24 12.48
1970s 1040 27.17 27/ 99 31.31 4.14 13.29
1980s 1040 26.22 21/ 68 30.92 4.70 9.28
1990s 1715 25.72 37/ 163 29.99 4.27 12.51
2000s 2315 29.36 53/ 277 32.40 3.04 13.06
2010s 554 28.67 13/ 62 32.65 3.98 13.74

Since the difference in averages between the first three and the fourth innings have been fairly constant since the 1970s, let's look at the stats for each team between 1970 and 1999 - which was also a period of much success for Pakistan's Test side. The fourth-innings averages for all sides are pretty similar for most teams, with only West Indies and Australia going beyond 26.20; for the others, it ranges between 23.79 and 26.15. The difference is more in the averages in the first three innings - the better batting sides averaged in the early 30s.

Pakistan's batsmen scored most of their runs in the first three innings, with fourth-innings runs at about 10% of the runs they scored in the first three. These stats, combined with their high win-loss ratio during this period - they won 37 Tests and lost 24 - indicates that Pakistan's batsmen did most of their work in the first three innings during this period.

In these 30 years, the only Pakistan batsman who scored more than 500 fourth-innings runs was Miandad - he scored 765 in 20 innings at an average of 51. The next-best run-getter was Moin Khan, with 493. (Click here for the full list of batsmen.) Zaheer Abbas, for instance, scored only 293 fourth-innings runs in his entire career, which is a mere 6% of the runs he scored in the other three innings. His was an extreme case, however: he averaged more than 55 in the first innings, and only 22.53 in the fourth.

Fourth innings batting stats for all teams between 1970 and 1999
Team Innings Average 100s/ 50s 1st 3 inngs ave Ave diff % of runs
Zimbabwe 66 23.79 1/ 7 24.46 0.67 8.89
Sri Lanka 215 26.15 5/ 22 27.49 1.34 12.25
England 691 26.12 12/ 64 28.81 2.69 11.45
New Zealand 491 24.81 9/ 33 27.61 2.80 13.99
West Indies 568 29.07 13/ 62 31.87 2.80 13.16
Australia 676 27.03 19/ 54 32.35 5.32 11.05
India 489 25.72 13/ 40 32.64 6.92 11.37
Pakistan 443 24.98 10/ 32 32.58 7.60 10.38
South Africa 156 24.97 3/ 16 33.03 8.06 9.95

Looking at the same numbers since 2004, however, a few differences emerge, especially with respect to Pakistan. To begin with, their winning percentages have dipped considerably - they have a 23-27 win-loss record during this period, compared to an 18-12 record between 2000 and 2003. Clearly their batting in the early part of matches has dipped, leaving them with plenty of work to do in the fourth innings. As the table below shows, Pakistan's fourth-innings runs as a percentage of their first three amount to 20.15; in the period between 1970 and 1999, it was 10.38, which means the percentage has almost doubled.

Some of that is also because of the times they've fielded first in a Test during this period: in 69 Tests, they've fielded first 44 times, which means their batsmen have had to bat fairly often in the fourth innings. Then there's the matter of their first-innings scores: in the 1970-1999 period, their average in the first three innings was among the top ones, at 32.58. Since 2004, their average has remained more or less the same, at 32.79, but the other sides have improved their numbers significantly, with South Africa, Australia, England and India all averaging more than 36. Thus Pakistan's below-par batting performances early in matches have left them with more to do at the finish. Younis has scored 926 fourth-innings runs in 21 innings during this period alone, while Yousuf and Imran Farhat have also scored more than 400.

Fourth innings batting stats for all teams since 01 Jan 2004
Team Innings Average 100s/ 50s 1st 3 inngs ave Ave diff % of runs
Bangladesh 107 28.46 5/ 12 21.34 -7.12 15.60
Zimbabwe 22 23.30 1/ 3 22.24 -1.06 7.62
New Zealand 181 28.44 3/ 21 29.18 0.34 16.39
Australia 201 36.22 7/ 26 37.09 0.87 10.89
West Indies 275 26.59 5/ 32 28.83 2.24 19.01
South Africa 225 34.60 7/ 38 36.95 2.35 15.96
Sri Lanka 158 30.95 5/ 21 35.41 4.46 10.65
Pakistan 281 26.67 6/ 30 32.79 6.12 20.15
England 276 29.75 7/ 30 36.37 6.62 12.73
India 255 28.93 4/ 33 37.40 8.47 12.84

All these second-innings opportunities, though, have given Younis the chance to hoard fourth-innings runs, and he has done a superb job of it. He has scored 15.58% of his total runs in the fourth innings; for Zaheer, the corresponding percentage was 5.79. Among batsmen who've scored at least 1000 fourth-innings runs, Younis' average is the highest, while he is also among the rare breed of batsmen whose fourth-innings average is better than his average in any other innings, even if marginally. (In second innings, he averages 59.12.) Geoff Boycott is another batsman in this group.

Batsmen with 1000-plus runs at 50-plus averages in the fourth innings in Tests
Batsman Innings Runs Average 100s/ 50s
Younis Khan 25 1015 59.70 4/ 5
Geoff Boycott 34 1234 58.76 3/ 7
Sunil Gavaskar 33 1398 58.25 4/ 8
Graeme Smith 35 1504 57.84 4/ 9
Gordon Greenidge 38 1383 53.19 3/ 6
Ricky Ponting 42 1454 51.92 4/ 6
Mahela Jayawardene 29 1006 50.30 3/ 5

Pakistan's recent tendency to bat in fourth innings also means that Taufeeq Umar and Mohammad Hafeez are among their top seven all-time run-getters in the last innings. Hafeez has scored 503 of his 1668 Test runs in the fourth innings - a staggering 30%. In the all-time run-getters' list for Pakistan, Hafeez is only 32nd, but in the fourth-innings list, he vaults into seventh place. Younis is currently 20th in the all-time fourth-innings runs list, but given Pakistan's tendency to bat last, he should end up much higher in the chart by the time he is done.

Highest run-getters for Pakistan in the fourth innings
Batsman Innings Runs Average 100s/ 50s
Younis Khan 25 1015 59.70 4/ 5
Inzamam-ul-Haq 30 867 39.40 1/ 6
Mohammad Yousuf 25 817 43.00 0/ 6
Javed Miandad 22 816 54.40 2/ 5
Moin Khan 17 514 36.71 1/ 3
Taufeeq Umar 22 511 28.38 0/ 3
Mohammad Hafeez 18 503 38.69 1/ 2

S Rajesh is stats editor of ESPNcricinfo. Follow him on Twitter

RSS Feeds: S Rajesh

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by harshthakor on (July 1, 2012, 12:37 GMT)

Tribute to Younus Khan,one of the greatest batsmen to have played for Pakistan and in his peak,the best Pak batsman in a crisis.The analysis proves how great Sunil Gavaskar was as a batsman.I also place Greenidge in the same light,though Boycott however much a master was a bit too selfish.Justice is done to Javed Miandad who was a champion in a crisis.Sachin Tendulkar hardly consistently excelled in the 4th inings of test matches and V iv Richards,and Brian Lara performed better,or even Gary Sobers.

In the 4th innings the wickets deteriorate and it is on many occasions a greater test than the 1st innings.

Posted by Zahidsaltin on (June 30, 2012, 1:34 GMT)

Although in my books Sunil Gavesker is the best test batsman from India who averaged 50+ while facing the new ball and played in a bowling era when only 4 players could touch an average of 50+, I think the discussion here is out of contest. Tandulkar is one of the greatest batsmen ever to play this game, and that assessment is not because of his centuries at all. A batsman with a average of 50 with 7 hundreds in 100 innings is much better than another who also averaged 50 in 100 innings but with 20 centuries. The first one is more consistent and reliable. If you judge Sachine by any means he will stand taller than other players of his time. But that doesn't mean that no other player could be better than him in one specific facit of batting. Some one could be better than him while batting in 4th innings, another can be better than him in playing hook shot etc. But overall younis or any other player doesn't come close to him in batting.

Posted by   on (June 30, 2012, 0:46 GMT)

Yes Younis has been great and he does not just have 50 average in 4th innings but his overall ave in test cricket is 52.23 (before the current series). He is certainly one of the greatest batsmen of modern cricket.

To all those Indians jumping around on Sachin's worth; yes he has been great but please don't just grab one person and bring him in on every discussion. Ask yourself this: Pakistan has produced five bowlers who have been able to maintain an average of early 20z (20-25) and strike rate of early 40z (40-45) in test cricket: Imran Khan, Wasim Akram, Waqar Younis, Saqlain Mustaque and Muhammad Asif (who have taken more then 100 wickets). Has India produced a single bowler with these stats? NONE so please stop jumping

Posted by   on (June 29, 2012, 20:39 GMT)

to be fair sachin has played in 63 win matches averaged 60.75 against australia n 38.1 against s.africa has played 188 tests compared to inzis 119 for pakistan srt overall avg in winning matches is 66.59 inzi avged 78.16, avg against pak in win is 65.16 compared to inzi's 98.5 against india, against bangladesh sachin avg in win is 172.0, inzi avg in win against bangladesh is 80.8, total 100's by tendulkar in wins are 20 but remember he has played 69 tests more than inzi for india, all stats courtesy of stats guru.

Posted by   on (June 29, 2012, 20:19 GMT)

You the maaaan he is a true hero for Pakistan

Posted by   on (June 29, 2012, 19:49 GMT)

please all of u get stats straight for inzamam its very easy to use statsguru inzi played in 49 tests that pakistan won he scored 17 hundreds, yes he did not score a hundred vs aussies n s.africa but he averaged 55 vs aus when won and 93.0 againsr s.africa, he helped pakistan win the series against australia by adding more than 50 for the last wicket in karachi and in sydney scored a rescuing 50+ in the second innings. he had a phenomenal avg of 78.16 in those winning matches, there are many biased opinions here all you have to do is check statsguru at this wonderful site. Average wise Inzi is the best batsman of modern times whilst playing in a winning match period, not even lara, tendulkar or kallis matches him, the flip side was if inzi failed so did pakistan too miserably that is.

Posted by sony111 on (June 29, 2012, 17:33 GMT)

Guys everyone knows Sachin Tendulkar only plays for records...their is no point of fighting over it when things are so clear !!

Salute to younus khan,he truly is one of the great batsman of Pakistan.....when team needs,he fights like a warrior on the cricket field...!!

Posted by spiritwithin on (June 29, 2012, 16:49 GMT)

@boomboom560..>>Sachin has never scored a triple hundred in tests so it show Younis is better batsman than Sachin in tests>>Sehwag & Gayle has two triple centuries,may be they r the greatest batsman ever after Don & Lara in ur book..

Posted by   on (June 29, 2012, 16:24 GMT)

@GerrardLK who are those 'everyone' ? ALL SRT HATERS ARE STUCK IN THE GANGULY ERA WHERE SRT FAILED. SRT's maiden ton was saving a match in the 4th innings, if you don't know that then you should not make claims about him. Ponting's best 4th innings came in a lost cause in the 3rd ashes test, rest were barely challenging, he RARELY chased 250+ , RARELY faced quality spinners in 4th innings, NONE OF HIS SO CALLED BETTER 4th INNINGS HAVE COME IN SL,INDIA,AND PAK WHERE PITCHES ARE TOUGHEST TO BAT IN LAST INNINGS.

Posted by spiritwithin on (June 29, 2012, 16:22 GMT)

surprising how so many hawks started targeting sachin out of nowhere,a batsman becomes great by playing well consistently for long period of time plus playing well in all the innings be it 1st 2nd 3rd or 4th innings..just 4th innings is not the only indicator to judge a batsman if thats the case then in the above list even Viv Richard,Len Hutton,Lara and many other great batsman r also not in the list,Younis khan is a good batsman but does having 50+ average in 4th innings makes him better than Lara,sachin,Viv etc??answer is definitely no so stop targeting sachin everytime for no reason...

Comments have now been closed for this article

FeedbackTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
S RajeshClose
S Rajesh Stats editor Every week the Numbers Game takes a look at the story behind the stats, with an original slant on facts and figures. The column is edited by S Rajesh, ESPNcricinfo's stats editor in Bangalore. He did an MBA in marketing, and then worked for a year in advertising, before deciding to chuck it in favour of a job which would combine the pleasures of watching cricket and writing about it. The intense office cricket matches were an added bonus.

    'My dream is to win the World Cup for New Zealand'

Neil Wagner on being 12th man for South Africa, his baseball namesake, and who he'd least like to be stuck in a lift with

USA's spearhead moves to number one

Few fast bowlers are as canny and cagey at working batsmen over and getting them out as Usman Shuja

    Has international cricket begun to break up?

Simon Barnes: The disenchantment among the weaker teams is forcing a devaluation of Test cricket

The best batsman to watch

The Cricket Monthly: Touch artists, god's gifts, naturals, geniuses and giants: five batsmen who set the pulse racing
Download the app: for iPads | for Android tablets

Sri Lanka need to trust their own

Janaka Malwatta: There's still a tendency to look overseas when it comes to picking the coach. Are there grounds for this?

News | Features Last 7 days

How India weeds out its suspect actions

The BCCI set up a three-man committee to tackle the problem of chucking at age-group and domestic cricket, and it has produced significant results in five years

A rock, a hard place and the WICB

The board's latest standoff with its players has had embarrassing consequences internationally, so any resolution now needs to be approached thoughtfully

Twin Asian challenges await Australia

What Australia have not done since returning a fractured unit from India is head back to Asia to play an Asian team. Two of their major weaknesses - handling spin and reverse swing - will be tested in the UAE by Pakistan

WICB must tread on eggshells with care

The WICB statement should cool down emotions and allow all parties involved to take the next step forward

Has international cricket begun to break up?

The gap between the haves and the have-nots is growing wider, and the disenchantment is forcing a devaluation of Test cricket among weaker teams

News | Features Last 7 days