| Series | Countries | Live Scores | Fixtures | Results | News |
Features
|
Photos | Video & Audio | Blogs | Statistics | Archive | Games | Mobile | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
The SSC has consistently produced pitches that are loaded in favour of batting. Shouldn't this be questioned, just as Galle was last year?
July 6, 2012
![]()
|
|||
|
Related Links
Numbers Game : Last week's column: The fourth-innings story for Pakistan and Younis Khan
Players/Officials:
Mahela Jayawardene
| Kumar Sangakkara
Series/Tournaments:
Pakistan tour of Sri Lanka
Teams:
Sri Lanka
Grounds:
Galle International Stadium
| Sinhalese Sports Club
|
|||
In September last year, Sri Lanka Cricket were slapped with an official warning after the Galle pitch which was served up for the Test against Australia was termed 'poor' by Chris Broad, the match referee, for excessively assisting spinners. The decision was a controversial one. The Australian batsmen seemed to agree with the ICC's move; Ricky Ponting equated it to Mumbai's dustbowl of 2004, while Michael Clarke thought it unfortunate that the toss had determined the result: "It's really hard, I hate to see a Test match result determined by the toss, but that was one of the toughest wickets I've played Test cricket on." Others believed the decision was too harsh, given that the pitch had produced such riveting cricket.
The match itself was a curious one. While there was indeed plenty of assistance for spinners on the opening day, even opening session, it didn't become unplayable as the game went along: Mahela Jayawardene scored 105 and Angelo Mathews 95 in the fourth innings, in which only one wicket fell to a spinner. Sri Lanka lost because of their limp first-innings display, in which they crumbled for 105.
Fast forward ten months to July 2012, and to another Test in Sri Lanka, this time one which drew no censure from the ICC. It didn't produce a result either: Pakistan scored 551 for 6, and Sri Lanka, coasting at 367 for 5 at lunch on the final day, were bowled out for 391. What the match did produce was the first instance of two batsmen scoring 190s in the same Test. Till lunch on the final day, the average runs per wicket in the match was 83.45, the third-highest ever in a Test in Sri Lanka (with a 200-over cut-off). By the end of the game, that average dropped to a still-meaty 56.40, the fifth-highest in a Test in Sri Lanka.
Admittedly, this was a Test in which Colombo's weather played its part too, ensuring that more than 150 overs were lost. Hence, it might be unfair to pull up the SSC and the pitch on this evidence alone. However, there's a trend here that deserves closer examination: of the 11 matches with highest batting averages in Sri Lanka, seven have been at the SSC. There've been 100 Tests with more than 200 overs in Sri Lanka, and 36 of them at the SSC; of those, 21 SSC Tests figure among the top 40 in terms of batting averages, while only 15 Tests at that ground feature in the other 60. (Click here for the full list of 100 Tests in Sri Lanka with 200-plus overs.)
It's clear that SSC has generally been a good venue for batting, but the recent record at the ground is even more skewed. Since the beginning of 2006, there've been ten Tests at the SSC, and in those matches, the average runs per wicket has been 46.12, with 32 centuries, and seven totals of more than 500 (including four of 600 or more). In terms of averages, it's easily the highest among the 23 venues which have hosted at least five Tests during this period; the draw percentage at this ground is 60 in these six-and-a-half years, in a phase when Test cricket the world over has generally yielded more results: the overall draw percentage in all Tests during this period is 28%; in Sri Lanka excluding the SSC, it's 24%. And yet, an SSC fixture is the most regular one on the Sri Lankan calendar: no other venue in the country has hosted as many Tests since 2006. Obviously, the ICC has seen no reason to react to the pitches that have been served up here.
| Venue | Tests | Results/ Draws | Runs per wkt | 100s/ 50s |
| SSC, Colombo | 10 | 4/ 6 | 46.12 | 32/ 49 |
| Adelaide Oval | 6 | 4/ 2 | 42.22 | 18/ 30 |
| McLean Park, Napier | 6 | 2/ 4 | 39.58 | 15/ 33 |
| Sydney Cricket Ground | 7 | 7/ 0 | 38.51 | 17/ 34 |
| Lord's | 14 | 7/ 7 | 37.91 | 36/ 69 |
| Kensington Oval, Barbdos | 5 | 3/ 2 | 37.67 | 8/ 29 |
On the other hand, Galle has been among the most bowler-friendly during this period, with an average of 30.63 runs per wicket. In nine Tests there have been seven results, and only 16 hundreds, exactly half the number of centuries that SSC has produced in ten. In terms of averages, only Trent Bridge and Wanderers has been more bowler-friendly.
Collectively, in the 68 Tests that have been played in the ten venues mentioned below, only six have been drawn. Contrast that with the corresponding stats for the six venues mentioned in the first table above: 21 draws in 48 Tests.
| Venue | Tests | Results/ Draws | Runs per wkt | 100s/ 50s |
| Wanderers, Johannesburg | 7 | 7/ 0 | 27.54 | 7/ 34 |
| Trent Bridge, Nottingham | 6 | 6/ 0 | 27.98 | 9/ 26 |
| Galle International Stadium | 9 | 7/ 2 | 30.63 | 16/ 39 |
| Melbourne Cricket Ground | 6 | 6/ 0 | 30.77 | 7/ 33 |
| Kingsmead, Durban | 7 | 7/ 0 | 30.84 | 16/ 30 |
| Basin Reserve, Wellington | 9 | 6/ 3 | 31.00 | 12/ 44 |
| WACA, Perth | 6 | 6/ 0 | 31.45 | 9/ 39 |
| SuperSport Park, Centurion | 7 | 6/ 1 | 31.80 | 12/ 30 |
| Headingley, Leeds | 5 | 5/ 0 | 31.82 | 10/ 16 |
| Seddon Park, Hamilton | 6 | 6/ 0 | 32.56 | 10/ 36 |
Among Sri Lankan venues too, the stats at the SSC stand out for their high scoring: since 2006, as many hundreds have been scored there in ten Tests as at all other Sri Lankan venues put together in 21 Tests. Also, there've been more draws there in ten matches (six) than in 21 Tests at the other Sri Lankan grounds (five). At the P Sara Oval, for instance, all six Tests have produced decisive results, and no team has touched 500 during this period.
| Venue | Tests | Results/ Draws | Runs per wkt | 100s/ 50s |
| SSC Colombo | 10 | 4/ 6 | 46.12 | 32/ 49 |
| Pallekele Int. Cricket Stadium | 2 | 0/ 2 | 38.87 | 2/ 8 |
| P Sara Oval, Colombo | 6 | 6/ 0 | 33.04 | 10/ 32 |
| R Premadasa Stadium, Colombo | 1 | 0/ 1 | 31.77 | 1/ 3 |
| Galle International Stadium | 9 | 7/ 2 | 30.63 | 16/ 39 |
| Asgiriya Stadium, Kandy | 3 | 3/ 0 | 28.86 | 3/ 12 |
The stats for Sri Lanka's top batsmen at the SSC and Galle reflect the pitch and conditions at the two grounds. At the SSC, both Mahela Jayawardene and Kumar Sangakkara average more than 100, while Thilan Samaraweera and Tillakaratne Dilshan have 65-plus averages. Jayawardene has scored 27% of his Test runs at just this one ground since 2006 (1415 out of 5211), while for Sangakkara the percentage is 23.
In Galle, on the other hand, three of these four batsmen average less than 50, with Jayawardene the only one to consistently score heavily. Before Sangakkara's unbeaten 199 against Pakistan in Galle last month, his Test average here was only 29.50 in 14 innings.
| Batsman | SSC-Tests | Runs | Average | 100s/ 50s | Galle-Tests | Runs | Average | 100s/ 50s |
| Mahela Jayawardene | 10 | 1415 | 101.07 | 5/ 5 | 9 | 1017 | 67.80 | 4/ 4 |
| Kumar Sangakkara | 10 | 1389 | 115.75 | 6/ 2 | 9 | 613 | 40.86 | 2/ 2 |
| Tillakaratne Dilshan | 9 | 732 | 66.54 | 2/ 4 | 9 | 718 | 47.86 | 2/ 5 |
| Thilan Samaraweera | 6 | 528 | 66.00 | 2/ 3 | 8 | 499 | 38.38 | 1/ 2 |
As you'd expect, there isn't much to cheer for the bowlers at the SSC, except if you're named Muttiah Muralitharan. Murali took 48 wickets at 17.68 in the six Tests he played here during this period, due to which the overall average of Sri Lankan spinners here is a highly respectable 29.04. Excluding his stats, the other Sri Lankan spinners average 39.94. Even that, though, is much better than what the overseas bowlers have managed here. (Click here for the list of highest wicket-takers in Tests at the SSC since January 2006.) The bowlers are a much happier lot in Galle, where both spinners and fast bowlers, from Sri Lanka and abroad, have respectable averages.
| SSC-Wkts | Average | Strike rate | Galle-Wkts | Average | Strike rate | |
| Sri Lanka - pace | 64 | 46.06 | 80.0 | 56 | 30.96 | 56.7 |
| Others - pace | 48 | 61.83 | 105.7 | 68 | 37.10 | 63.7 |
| Sri Lanka - spin | 98 | 29.04 | 62.3 | 97 | 26.32 | 54.7 |
| Others - spin | 48 | 63.43 | 118.0 | 59 | 36.66 | 69.9 |
| ||||||
| Comments have now been closed for this article |
||||||
Stats editor Every week the Numbers Game takes a look at the story behind the stats, with an original slant on facts and figures. The column is edited by S Rajesh, ESPNcricinfo's stats editor in Bangalore. He did an MBA in marketing, and then worked for a year in advertising, before deciding to chuck it in favour of a job which would combine the pleasures of watching cricket and writing about it. The intense office cricket matches were an added bonus.
'You can't taint the whole IPL'
Bowl at Boycs: Geoff Boycott on spot-fixing, Adil Rashid's future, and yorkers in Test matches
Harsha Bhogle: The spot-fixing controversy teaches us about the pitfalls of insecurity and of the desire to keep up with the Joneses
The new Harmison? Or is it the new Caddick?
Numbers Game: Stuart Broad is destructive at his best, but at other times his bowling average is unusually high
Aakash Chopra: Apart from luck, you need to pick your team wisely, get to bat at the top, and have your captain's support
Less cricket on TV? Hallelujah
Matt Cleary: Why Channel Nine should be applauded for not broadcasting domestic cricket in Australia
Even at the height of his success with the national side, Sreesanth was a lonely cricketer who felt hard done by
A talent that didn't know its own worth
Sreesanth wasn't the most likeable team-mate or opponent, but he had skill beyond doubt, which we might have seen the last of
Mumbai Indians still have a better head-to-head record against Chennai Super Kings, but once again on the big occasion, they came second
A time for anger, a time for action
Out of the shattered lives of three young men caught up in allegations of fraud, newer and stronger players must emerge
Vijay slips, Ashwin does a Sahara
Plays of the day from the IPL qualifier between Chennai Super Kings and Mumbai Indians in Delhi
Spirited Sunrisers exceed expectations (83)
Sunrisers began this tournament as one of the underdogs, but fought impressively to reach as far as the Eliminator
Even at the height of his success with the national side, Sreesanth was a lonely cricketer who felt hard done by
Mumbai Indians still have a better head-to-head record against Chennai Super Kings, but once again on the big occasion, they came second
Anderson's magic not to be missed (50)
None of the other three England bowlers with 300 Test wickets - or many other of the game's finest swing merchants - could have bowled better than James Anderson at Lord's
A case of peaking too early (42)
Royal Challengers began the season in full steam, but failed to replicate their consistency away from home
ICICI Bank M2I. Register Now and Get A Gift Offer.
Safe & simple online money transfer. Apply Now!
Buy Wisden 2013 & get a FREE Playfair
Available now at Cricshop
@S.Jagernath Mahela is a great batsman and that is why he is a part of 3 world record partnerships in test matches. If you cant admit it something is wrong with you. Only a world class batsman can score at Galle. Mahela will pass Dravid's aggregate by the time he retires and I know that an anti Lankan like you cant fathom the truth.
Posted by S.Jagernath on (July 8, 2012, 11:37 GMT)@Bob Bing...Thanx for that!Hope Sinhaya is reading the comments now.
Posted by@S.Jagernath Mahela's batting average drops to 32 if you exclude matches in the subcontinent!!
http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/player/49289.html?class=1;filter=advanced;host=1;host=2;host=3;host=4;host=5;orderby=start;template=results;type=batting;view=innings
For comparison, if you run the same query for Sachin, his average is 50
http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/player/35320.html?class=1;filter=advanced;host=1;host=2;host=3;host=4;host=5;orderby=start;template=results;type=batting;view=innings
Posted by Sinhaya on (July 7, 2012, 16:24 GMT)@S.Jagernath Sri Lankans are good at green tops. Forgot how Michael Vandort scored a century at Edgbaston in 2006. Forgot how Sangakkara scored 182 at Hobart in 2007? Forgot how Thilan Samaraweera also scored a ton this year in Cape Town? Thilan was on 87 not out at the Rose Bowl last year when rain came down and was destined for a ton. We can play anywhere in the world. Sri Lanka has won 6 tests in Pakistan in comparison to India who have only won 2 tests in Pakistan!! Also Mahela is excellent in Galle which is a spinner's paradise. Galle is the best test match surface in the world.
Posted by S.Jagernath on (July 7, 2012, 8:54 GMT)@jb633...Sri Lankan batsmen are good greentops?where did you get this evidence from?The only century by a Sri Lankan on a greentop is by Kumar Sangakkara at The Rose Bowl.The last greentop they encountered was at Centurion.Mahela Jayawardene's statistics need to be reviewed,I wonder what his average would be if his matches at the SSC were excluded!
Posted by B.C.G on (July 7, 2012, 8:16 GMT)Why are chaps criticizing Rajesh?He is taking stats from recent tests;searching for recent trends.Not selecting data.
Posted by@Balumekka, Kosaldesilva, I dont think 10 years data need to analysis to check the status of the ground now! past 3-4 years would be sufficient, then there wont be many matches to get sufficient data, so Rajesh choose 6year window, if you guys agree featherbeds like SSC not good for test cricket, why complain against him? show us where he twisted the data ! also if you guys know better then give us proper reasons and statistics , its as simple as that ! flat pitches no matter which country it located is bad for the game , so far England and South Africa and some extent Aus and NZ are the only countries with good grounds. I say Aus to some extent caz they do have sporting pitches to back up a dull draw so no 3,4,5 test series become full of bore. Windies pitches is mostly below avg recently but still bowlers get some help there.
Posted by Balumekka on (July 7, 2012, 5:14 GMT)@ Kosala de Silva: You are spot on! This is so called statistics. When the writer wants to highlight a certain point in his mind, he 'select' data (based on a time frame with no justification at all) and twist it according to his wishes. I think what Rajesh should do is to look at the all time records of grounds, rather than 'picking' time windows to support his stories. Having said that, I do not want to see featherbeds like SSC as cricket pitches. Cricket pitches should be produced giving chances to both the bat and ball.
Posted by HadleeCrowe on (July 7, 2012, 2:35 GMT)well said ... this is what is killing test cricket ....lame draws on pitches with no life .... far more exciting to see the ball spitting and real class batsmen prosper than average players pump up their averages on roads...
Posted bywat a whiney bunch of ppl commenting here...again bringing india and indian pitches into a discussion where they were not needed...i mean, the stats r there...in the top grounds with the highest runs per wicket, indian pitches arent on the list...so, pls let us be...