I Was There I Was ThereRSS FeedFeeds
Great games relived by those who featured in them

England in India flashback: 1972-73

Eight for nothing

When Chandra took the best figures of his career, only for India to lose the match to England

Nagraj Gollapudi

November 8, 2012

Comments: 21 | Text size: A | A

Bhagwath Chandrasekhar bowls, 1974
Bhagwath Chandrasekhar took nine wickets in the match © Getty Images
Enlarge

"Not just confident, we were a little bit over-confident," Ajit Wadekar said of the Indian team's mindset on the eve of the 1972-73 home series against England, who were led by Tony Lewis.

India were perhaps encouraged in their complacency by the fact that, for England, it was not a tour many wanted to be on. Ray Illingworth, who was England captain when Wadekar's Indians won the series in England the previous year, six months after their historic win in West Indies, had decided not to make himself available, and so had Geoffrey Boycott. Lewis, who was 34 years old, had enjoyed a successful three years as captain at Glamorgan, but he took up the England job knowing he was not going to be in it for long.

"The side involved several experiments because the selectors were building up to the next Australian tour in 1974," Lewis recalled. "That left some older players back home. The selectors choose an embryo team." Indeed, no one in the England squad had played in India. Only Alan Knott and Derek Underwood had played more than 20 Test matches. Only Knott had made a Test century.

The teams started the series with contrasting mindsets. "We had not had much practice, not having a camp where we could have been together, which would have helped team bonding," Wadekar said. "We did ask for a camp but the BCCI did not take it seriously. After our return from the wins the previous season, our feet were not on the ground."

England did well to draw the three warm-up matches before the first Test in Delhi, but their ambitions were modest. "The dominant feeling was a defensive one," Lewis wrote in his book Playing Days. "We should make the Indians fight for their runs and we should be happy with a draw in the first Test. It would buy time until we are on top of our game in foreign conditions."

Lewis had made his first-class debut 17 years before and now stood on the brink of not only playing his first Test but also leading England. However, an injury now put his place in doubt. "I had pulled a small muscle in the middle of my calf fielding during the warm-up match in Indore. Bernard Thomas, the team physio, had strapped me from ankle to knee. He had put layers of rubber padding under the heel in my shoe so that I wouldn't pull the muscle again," he recollected. He had asked his deputy, Mike Denness, to be prepared to fill in, but Lewis passed his fitness test come match day.

He had his team in his head. He told Norman Gifford and Jack Birkenshaw that they would be benched in favour of the first-choice spin combination of Pat Pocock and Derek Underwood. The pair took it in their stride and even showed good spirit, telling their captain that they were prepared "to offer a special service to anyone who admits to being a Test batsman". They even had business cards printed, reading "Messrs Gizzard and Birkenshaw Ltd - Net Bowlers".

Wadekar elected to bat first. The pitch was brown but Geoff Arnold, the England fast bowler, made good use of seam-friendly conditions in the first session. India were 20 for 3 in no time.

"It was overcast. The pitch was rolled mud without any grass. The ball after pitching made some indentations, which assisted in some movement," Arnold recalled. Ramnath Parkar was caught in the deep, hooking. Sunil Gavaskar, who had been among the heroes in the series in England, did not last long, edging to slip, and Wadekar was beaten by the swing. Arnold also got Dilip Sardesai immediately after lunch.

"Horsey [Arnold] got good movement with his pace," Wadekar said. "I was trying to play him on the back foot, trying to put it in the off side, but the ball came in sharply and I got an inner edge and got bowled. He was swinging the ball extremely well."

India finished on 173, a low score, but England had to tackle the might of the Indian spin trio of Bhagwath Chandrasekhar, Bishan Bedi and S Venkataraghavan.

They started well: the opening pair of Barry Wood and Dennis Amiss seemed comfortable, raising a half-century stand. But as the ball lost its shine, the spinners came into play and Chandrasekhar imposed himself steadily.

When Lewis walked in, he was nervous. "It felt strange to be Welsh and yet playing for Englnad. All my life at home, England has been the opposition," he wrote in his diary. He lasted just two balls, adjudged lbw to Chandrasekhar. Lewis felt he was robbed. "It was disappointing because I couldn't possibly have been out. Even Tiger Pataudi, who I think was a spectator in the press box, said I couldn't have been out," he said. "Chandra was bowling these googlies, which came in to the bat. I swept one of them from outside the off stump. And, you know, if the ball hits the pad outside off and you are playing a shot, you can't be out. So it was a bit of a shock for me; that lasted for a few days."

Only Tony Greig, who was enjoying his first tour of India, gelling with the excited crowds, played the Indian spinners confidently. He read Chandra, who finished with career-best figures of 8 for 79, better than his team-mates. According to Lewis, Greig's long stride helped him stretch further and get to the pitch of the ball, unlike the rest of the England batsmen, who would plunge forward too late. Greig was instrumental in England gaining a 27-run lead.

By now the pitch was taking increasing amounts of turn. England had already seen S Venkatraghavan, not a huge tweaker of the ball, bowl from the around the stumps and get good spin. When their turn came, Pocock and Underwood dominated the Indians, with a tight line and no width. "We had done our research and we worked quite hard and made it difficult for them," Lewis said. The only significant resistance England encountered was a 103-run partnership for the sixth wicket between Farokh Engineer and Eknath Solkar.

With 207 for victory England had to go for the win. "It was very tense with the ball doing much more for the spinners," Lewis said. "And there was plenty there to keep India optimistic and going hard for victory, and they probably expected to [win]. But we batted particularly well."


Tony Lewis sweeps on his way to 70*, India v England, 1st Test, December 1972
Tony Lewis during his 70 in the second innings © The Cricketer International
Enlarge

His top order failed him again, though. Bishan Bedi got to the landmark of 100 Test wickets, accounting for Amiss and Keith Fletcher, who was out for a duck.

England needed 101 runs with seven wickets in hand on the final day - Christmas Monday. Lewis, unbeaten on 17, spent a restless Sunday night. He had started off on an edgy note, taking six overs to get off the mark. The first run, a push toward mid-off, had seemed endless to him: as if the stumps at the non-striker's end had been pushed back to the boundary rope. But he remained positive.

Lewis had been the highest run scorer in a Commonwealth team led by Richie Benaud to Pakistan in 1968. He had been brought up on uncovered pitches and was used to the turning ball at Glamorgan. And he had Greig for company. The two milked the slow bowlers, steering clear of doing anything flashy.

"If you have a haze of close fielders, you play the strokes through them and pretend as if the fielder is not there," Lewis said. "By staying there and taking the singles, we knew that Wadekar would eventually feel the heat of not having enough runs and withdraw a bit."

Engineer kept up a steady chirping from behind the stumps, but Lewis was not to be distracted. He eventually entered the history books as a winning captain on Test debut. "It was quite a mature performance from a team that was totally underrated. It could be that the Indians had underestimated us," Lewis said.

"They were overjoyed," Wadekar remembered. "They never expected to take the series lead. We never expected Arnold and England to play so well. We were taken aback. Our batting did not click and our senior batsmen did not perform, but we managed to bounce back and win the series."

As he sat quietly sipping champagne after the match, Lewis raised a toast to the man in the corner - Thomas, who had a glass of orange juice in hand - for the Christmas miracle. "What I do every Christmas morning is wake up with a smile on my face," Lewis said. "Even now. It lasts forever. It has been 40 years."

Thanks to the MCC Library at Lord's

Nagraj Gollapudi is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo

RSS Feeds: Nagraj Gollapudi

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by indianpunter on (November 10, 2012, 5:11 GMT)

@nutcutlet. I have said it before on this forum. I love your objectivity and reasoning. However, i cant muster much enthusiasm about this series, which i fear will be a damp squib, with India dishing out dust bowls to the leaden footed english batsmen ( bar Bell).The bad old days of the 90s, it would seem so, again. I fear that Indian cricket is going to take a retrogressive step this series. A step which will see India s performances abroad, wither again. And, this will be Tendulkar's waterloo too.

Posted by   on (November 9, 2012, 5:11 GMT)

@bonobo: Even till early 1970s, a lot of English player would not prefer travelling to India to play. It was only in 1976-77 when a full strength English team travelled to India, after they had been grovelled by the might of the Windies in 1976. Tony Greig, Underwood, Amiss, Willis were all there.

Posted by bonobo on (November 8, 2012, 23:00 GMT)

I always find it interesting, how modern players, with three formats and excessive touring, are lambasted if they choose to sit one out. But back in the day it was quite common for players to choose not to tour.Like Illy, the England captain even. I understand some circumstances are different, that when you toured back then it was three months on the road, whilst now people fly back and forth. But it would be good to see a bit old school tolerance and sense applied, when guys today want to take a time out

Posted by Dannov747 on (November 8, 2012, 20:40 GMT)

Nvm, got it now xD I really like these flashback articles.

Posted by Nutcutlet on (November 8, 2012, 20:38 GMT)

@aby_prasad: thank you. Very best wishes! Let's hope that the series is full of high quality play & top levels of sportsmanship from the players on both sides. @Snehil Taparia: You're right! It's always fun trying to make converts to the cause, but the one-eyed brigade keep us on our toes & test our sense of humour! BW.

Posted by Nampally on (November 8, 2012, 20:24 GMT)

I see this article as a lesson to the Indian selectors to have a balanced set of spinners rather than fill it up with out of form & "Past it" guys. Yes England fought back & shocked an over confident India by chasing the runs down. That is the second lesson - don't be too cocky. Yes, there are some Indian fans who keep on harping a 4-0 win for India even before the series has started. Similar outpouring also occurs from some English Fans. There are also sensible guys who know that Cricket is a game of "glorious chance". So bit of humility on both sides helps in getting a meaningful forum. India had a chance to select a balanced set of spinners.Instead they leant towards picking their favourites in the squad. If the XI is also based on personal bias, India cannot win the first 2 Tests. The squad for the next 2 tests has to focus on Form & performance. On the other hand, England has a good team but the batting relies on top 4.It will be close series if the batting of both teams shows up!

Posted by Nampally on (November 8, 2012, 20:05 GMT)

A fine flashback article, Nagraj! Chandra was a fine leg spinner with high arm action resulting in lot of bounce off the wicket. He was one of the guy who trapped even the best batsmen in his leg trap with amazing fielders like Solkar in the cordon. I thought India will develop Rahul Sharma into a second Chandra. But Dhoni calmly killed that hope by benching Rahul about 20 times. Rahul is a quick leg spinner too(Not as quick as Chandra) who had the potential of being like Chandra. India squandered a great chance. The present squad with Dhoni should watch the video of Chandra, Bedi, Venkat acting in trio under Pataudi & learn what spin bowling is. Bedi was great with his accuracy & very difficult to hit. Venkat mostly had to play a second fiddle to these 2. India should take a page from the past & use a similar combo with Ashwin, Ojha & Rahul - vs. England. Replace Harbhajan with Rahul - right arm wrist leg spinner to have a balanced XI. Even Tiwary is a better choice than Harbhajan.

Posted by Dannov747 on (November 8, 2012, 16:32 GMT)

Eight for nothing? What? Such a misleading title... Great article though.

Posted by aby_prasad on (November 8, 2012, 15:44 GMT)

@nutcutlet., have to admit u are not just right, but overwhelmingly right. i apologise on behalf of him..i mean as an indian fan.

Posted by Match-winner on (November 8, 2012, 14:00 GMT)

I agree with Nutculet. Even for a second if you do take the message that you did out of this article, do you think that's going to shatter the confidence of the Indian Cricket team or give the English team a morale booster? Come on, it was a tripdown the memory lane, which ended highlighting that the Indians bounced back to win the series, so let it be what it was - a trip down the memory lane of England Vs India series'...

Posted by davidatlas999 on (November 8, 2012, 12:39 GMT)

@antikato me too hehehe

Posted by Pelham_Barton on (November 8, 2012, 12:20 GMT)

@englishpropagandoo on (November 08 2012, 08:50 AM GMT): At the top of this page, I found a menu bar for Cricinfo Magazine. Moving the mouse over "Highlights" gave a drop down list including "I Was There". Clicking on this gave a list of past articles in this series. You may be interested in the one published on 6 August 2011, between the second and third Tests of India's last tour of England. It was all about India's win at the Oval in 1971.

Posted by antikato on (November 8, 2012, 11:19 GMT)

Clicking the Pieterson headline brought me here.

Posted by Green_seamer on (November 8, 2012, 11:09 GMT)

@englishpropagandoo You sir , are a true cricket fan, I loved the fact that you showed some concern towards test cricket. This article here is to take us back to the days just to remind us how exciting the Series is going to be & to bring a sense of anticipation.Looking for a great contest here. Just don't expect temperature in the 40s , it's winter & we will be lucky if we get over 25 degrees :)......

Posted by   on (November 8, 2012, 10:36 GMT)

@Nutcutlet - Couldn't agree more with you. I was having this same argument with a friend of mine recently - what he had to say was also interesting. He said that we need such passionate and sometimes inadvertently blind fans to keep the game alive and at the level where it is today - otherwise a chess tourney would also have attracted the same amount of hype and activity... I guess what i am saying is that as 'true cricket lovers', we are in the minority - and I see no point in trying to 'educate' other folks on the merits of enjoying the nuances of the game and not follow it with blind passion - because hey, that is what makes this more than a game, and so much fun to follow... Think about it... :)

Posted by dork29 on (November 8, 2012, 10:23 GMT)

It harks back to a bygone era when televisions were not around and there was only radio commentary. There were no T20s then and no ODIs. Just plain, honest to God test matches.The element of mystique was accentuated by the exotic names of the players and one sat on the verandah where a watered down sun was having a playful banter with the nippy morning.The disembodied voices of Dicky Rathnagur, Sushil Trivedi and Jasdev Singh would bring the ball by ball commentary. One feels sorry for guys like englishpropagandoo for for indulging in cheap innuendo and seeking to demystify a glorious moment in our history.

Posted by   on (November 8, 2012, 9:59 GMT)

englishpropagandoo - what a sad ill informed individual you must be. Cricket survives despite the Indian Board not because of it. Indian supporters are great their adminstration by not embracing technology are behind the times

Posted by Nutcutlet on (November 8, 2012, 9:42 GMT)

@englishpropagandoo: this article is a piece of interesting nostalgia, not part of some diabolical plot to unhinge the blinkered Indian supporters of 2012 prior to the upcoming series! The deeds of 1972-73 can hardly be trying:'...to convince the readers that England team is better than it really is and that the indian team worst.' (sic) Are you someone who only reads articles that conform to your own mindset & confirm your own rather limited vision of the world? Are you someone who will not appreciate that the game of cricket itself is a sport that has a heritage, a literature & a history that is constantly acknowledged by its true fans? That is all that Nagraj Gollapudi is doing here! Meanwhile, I hope that you enjoy all that the Test v England have to offer, appreciating the skilful play from all the participants on both sides with both eyes open! If you do, then you are a true cricket fan who happens to be Indian, just as I am a true cricket fan who happens to be English!

Posted by englishpropagandoo on (November 8, 2012, 8:50 GMT)

i don'ts seem to recall reading such articles when India tours the pastures of England (or Australia/South Africa for that matter). Just exactly why is this article being written at the eve of this series? There appears to be this propaganda machine who is trying to convince the readers that England cricket team is better than it really is and that the indian team worst. The headlines are all slighted, the live commentary is even more slighted against the Indians and the moderation of the comments calling it out -forget about it. If it wasn't for India - this sport would actually be done and dusted by now. Lets hope the curators have the gumption to produce a dry dusty beauty - and hope the temperature is in the 40s so the fit players can shine.

Posted by Des_65 on (November 8, 2012, 8:21 GMT)

arvin, the same team had won abroad (WI & Eng).

Posted by arvin on (November 8, 2012, 4:01 GMT)

6 batsmen from mumbai in the team... india were destined to lose...

Comments have now been closed for this article

FeedbackTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Nagraj GollapudiClose

    A year of triumph and disaster

Martin Crowe: Misbah, McCullum, and the ICC's efforts against chucking were the positive highlights in a year that ended with the tragedy of Phillip Hughes' death

    Two fortresses called Brisbane and Centurion

Numbers Game: Australia haven't lost at the Gabba since 1988, while South Africa have a 14-2 record in Centurion

Zimbabwe's decade of hurt

The Cricket Monthly: Ten years ago 15 white Zimbabwean cricketers went on strike. The game has not been the same since
Download the app: for iPads | for Android tablets

    'Lara v McGrath was a great battle of our generation'

Dravid and Manjrekar discuss Brian Lara's adaptability

Would Brearley have picked Cook as captain?

Nicholas Hogg: Cook lacks certain qualities the ex-England captain listed as those fitting of an ideal leader, in particular, charisma

News | Features Last 7 days

The perfect Test

After the tragedy of Phillip Hughes' death, this match showed that cricket and life will continue to go on. This time Test cricket dug in and got through to tea.

Kohli attains batting nirvana

Virat Kohli's innings on the final day transcended the conditions, the bowlers and his batting partners, and when it was all in vain, he displayed remarkable grace in defeat

Australia in good hands under proactive Smith

The new stand-in captain has the makings of a long-term leader, given his ability to stay ahead of the game

What ails Rohit and Watson?

Both batsmen seemingly have buckets of talent at their disposal and the backing of their captains, but soft dismissals relentlessly follow both around the Test arena

Karn struggles to stay afloat

The failed gamble of handing Karn Sharma a Test debut despite him having a moderate first-class record means India have to rethink who their spinner will be

News | Features Last 7 days

    BCCI's argument against DRS not 100% (164)

    Turning your back on a system that the whole cricketing world wants a discussion on, refusing to discuss it because it is not 100%, is not good enough

    Karn struggles to stay afloat (114)

    The failed gamble of handing Karn Sharma a Test debut despite him having a moderate first-class record means India have to rethink who their spinner will be

    Kohli attains batting nirvana (110)

    Virat Kohli's innings on the final day transcended the conditions, the bowlers and his batting partners, and when it was all in vain, he displayed remarkable grace in defeat

    When defeat isn't depressing (57)

    After a long time we have seen an Indian team and captain enjoy the challenge of trying to overcome stronger opposition in an overseas Test

    What ails Rohit and Watson? (50)

    Both batsmen seemingly have buckets of talent at their disposal and the backing of their captains, but soft dismissals relentlessly follow both around the Test arena