|Photos||Video & Audio||Blogs||Statistics||Archive||Shop||Mobile|
Their particular circumstances and their manner of playing make two cricketers especially worth watching in the India-England series
November 9, 2012
A character at the height of his powers and a legend winding down his career will be the ones to watch out for over the next six weeks. Kevin Pietersen and Sachin Tendulkar have more in common as batsmen than is immediately apparent, but it is the manner in which they have chosen to live that they tread different paths.
Tendulkar admitted recently that he doesn't have a lot of cricket left in him. We know that and so do his ardent fans; they speak as if they are in denial, but even they know. For him to admit it just draws it closer.
Watching Tendulkar has been the one constant in our lives over the last 23 years. Much has changed. Nations have been created, the world economy has gone boom and bust and boom and bust again, music has evolved, young people drawn to him when he started might have children who are now married. He has been a wonderful habit, spreading cheer when gloom is the market leader.
And we don't know how much longer we will see that walk down the ground, the push through cover, the flick through square leg, the straight drive, the quirky problem with sightscreens, the boyish smile, the occasional legbreak... we don't know. It could be this series, it could be another, it could be longer; but suddenly Tendulkar the cricketer feels finite. And so I am going to go to the next four Tests and just enjoy watching him bat. I hope he is nimble on his feet and chooses to play shots rather than drop anchor, though who's to say he isn't the best judge of his own cricket? But his best batting in recent years has been when he has sought to dominate, whether it was the tussle with Dale Steyn in South Africa or against the Australians in Melbourne and in Sydney.
You can tell the fire burns bright, as it always has done. He batted against Railways with food poisoning, and the Mumbai coach says he faced 300 balls an hour in the nets. That second fact is quite something. In a match situation you get at best 90 balls an hour, of which you might face 50. It will always be quicker in the nets because every bowler is at the top of his mark waiting for the one before him to deliver, but to play five balls a minute for 60 minutes means Tendulkar is on to something. He won't want to go quietly; that's not him.
|It will not be like Pietersen to grind out a hundred. He will attack, he will seek to dominate, and it is the thrill of that contest that could well define how England go in this series|
It will be fun. And if after four Tests he has made enough, the next four will be fun too. The thespian will be delivering his lines and you won't know which will be the last. Isn't that enough to grab your attention?
Meanwhile a slightly younger man with a much more stormy existence will also seek to dominate this series. I was in an airport lounge recently, grabbing a quick breakfast, when the highlights of Pietersen's 149 against South Africa came on. The idli stayed in my spoon for two minutes. It was breathtaking batting and it reminded me of two Tendulkar hundreds: one at Edgbaston, when he was but 23, and another three years later, in Melbourne. Remember, there are at least ten inches separating the two; the stride therefore is different and the bounce affects them differently. But in both instances the batsmen were looking to attack, cutting and pulling, not afraid to go down the ground or to hit in the air. It was gladiatorial. If you wanted an innings from the last 12 months to showcase cricket, it would be this one from Pietersen; and maybe Michael Clarke's in South Africa.
But India will be very different for Pietersen. He cannot camp on the back foot and get on top of the bounce. He will have to crouch, he might have to advance towards the ball rather than watch it come quiveringly towards him. The ball will snake its way around, and those darn left-arm spinners will be swarming around him. I've never understood that: a batsman so astonishingly gifted, so brutal, and yet so transfixed by little fellows who toss a ball up to him left-handed.
It will not be like Pietersen to grind out a hundred against them; a Gongura chutney might more likely find its way onto a delicate pasta. He will attack, he will seek to dominate, and it is the thrill of that contest that could well define how England go in this series. On the last four occasions they have toured India, only once, back in 1993, when Graeme Hick was playing, has a player scored more than 300 runs in a series. If Pietersen can be the player to erase that sorry number, we will have seen some thrilling cricket.
There will be other stars, and they will demand our attention too, but I can already feel the thrill of the little giant and the massive dueller walking out with bat in hand.
Harsha Bhogle is a commentator, television presenter and writer. His Twitter feed is hereFeeds: Harsha Bhogle
© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.
|Comments have now been closed for this article
Modern Masters: Rahul Dravid and Sanjay Manjrekar discuss Kevin Pietersen's un-English technique
Martin Crowe: Bowlers with dodgy actions must not be given leeway to maintain a balance between bat and ball
Couch Talk: Jim Maxwell talks about his early days, and why commentators need to stay in touch with cricketers
My XI: Martin Crowe on Tendulkar's finely calibrated footwork
Michael Jeh: Why do columnists look for conspiracy theories every time a visiting team collapses abjectly?
His rapid improvement with the ball has been integral to England coming from behind to lead the series - but that is just one area where Moeen Ali continues to impress
Why does the man who is possibly England's greatest fast bowler occasionally turn into Mr Hyde on the field?