January 7, 2013

Dial Z for ...

Cricketers who'd be bottom of the pile if sorted alphabetically
19

Zulqarnain Haider
A brief international career for this feisty wicketkeeper, but enough incidents to pad out a TV drama: given out for a pair on Test debut but reprieved on review to score 88; a handful of limited-overs caps, but none since a moonlight flit from Dubai, claiming match-fixers were after him for refusing their advances. Since then Zulqarnain has sought asylum in Britain (but later returned home), been briefly banned from domestic cricket, offered psychiatric help... but he's back playing now. However, there's a queue of Akmals to get past before he can get the Pakistan keeping gloves back.

Zaheer Khan
India's very own "Zed", the left-arm quick bowler Zaheer has been the spearhead of the attack for some years - although recently, now 34, there have been worrying signs of a decline, not helped by injury niggles: it felt like a seminal moment when he limped out of the first Test at Lord's in 2011, and India have rarely looked right in Tests since. Still, Zaheer is close to 300 wickets in both Tests and one-day internationals.

Tim Zoehrer
A combative wicketkeeper from Perth, Zoehrer had a brief run behind the stumps for Australia', including the 1986-87 Ashes series, before slipping behind Ian Healy in the pecking order. Still "Ziggy" made his presence felt, doing well enough as a legspinner to push for a Test place on a couple of tours. It never quite happened, though.

Adam Zampa
One of the latest Australian legspinning prospects to be saddled with the "new Warne" tag, 20-year-old Zampa made a good start in first-class cricket, taking five cheap wickets for New South Wales against Queensland in Canberra last November. He's had some decent Big Bash performances for Sydney Thunder since, and has an outside chance of selection for the Ashes tour... unless cricket's most famous "W" makes that comeback, of course.

Sultan Zarawani
The captain of the United Arab Emirates team in their first World Cup, Zarawani assured himself of a footnote in history by strolling out to bat against South Africa in a sunhat rather than a helmet. Allan Donald was predictably unamused, and his first ball smacked Zarawani on the head. Although groggy, he got to his feet and batted on, but survived only seven more balls before falling for a duck, and going to hospital for a check-up. Zarawani was captain almost by default: he was the only UAE-born player in the side, although his great wealth (he owned more than a dozen luxury cars) possibly helped too.

Andrew Zesers
Australia seemed to have unearthed a young star when the barrel-chested Zesers, a 20-year-old medium-pacer of Latvian descent, was part of the squad that won the 1987 World Cup. But he was dogged by shoulder problems and, despite becoming the youngest Australian to take 100 first-class wickets, was forced to retire before he turned 23. A South Australia team-mate at the time was the batsman Rob Zadow, and there were a few instances of "c Zadow b Zesers" to cheer up trivia-lovers. (Sadly none involved Tim Zoehrer, although Zesers did get him out a few times.)

Zulfiqar Ahmed
The first of the Z-men to make much of a mark in Tests, offspinner Zulfiqar had stunning figures of 37.2-19-37-5 and 46.3-21-42-6 as Pakistan crushed New Zealand in Karachi in October 1955. However, Zulfiqar's other eight Tests brought him only nine wickets, and he soon faded away, even though Abdul Hafeez Kardar, Pakistan's first captain and a great influence on their early cricket, was his brother-in-law.

Monde Zondeki
It couldn't have been Brian Johnston who gave Monde Zondeki the nickname "All Hands", but it really should have been. Zondeki, a South African medium-pacer, who took a wicket (Marvan Atapattu) with his first ball in one-day internationals, then surprised everybody by batting for three hours and scoring 59 on his Test debut at Headingley in August 2003. But he proved not quite quick enough for international cricket, although he's still active on the South African domestic scene.

Nuwan Zoysa
A big left-arm paceman from Colombo, Zoysa took a hat-trick with his first three balls in a Test against Zimbabwe in Harare in November 1999: after Chaminda Vaas started the match with a maiden, Zoysa pinned opener Trevor Gripper and the No. 4, Neil Johnson, in front, and in between had Murray Goodwin caught behind. It was the earliest hat-trick in any Test at the time, but has since been surpassed by Irfan Pathan's in the very first over for India against Pakistan in Karachi early in 2006.

Zulqarnain
Before there was Zulqarnain Haider, there was Zulqarnain: he also kept wicket for Pakistan, in three Tests in Sri Lanka early in 1986. "The latest in Pakistan's efforts to find a regular successor to Wasim Bari kept wicket well," reported Wisden. He toured England in 1987, but hardly got a game, as the noisier Salim Yousuf, a better batsman, made the place his own.

Zaheer Abbas
And finally the "Zed" who was so well known that that was what he called his 1983 autobiography. Abbas was a beautiful batsman to watch, for Pakistan or Gloucestershire, and specialised in big scores: there were two silky Test double-centuries against England, and a record eight instances of two hundreds in the same first-class match. And all this while (usually) wearing glasses, which did perhaps make him a little susceptible to extreme pace. Still, Zaheer averaged over 50 in first-class cricket, a respectable 45 in Tests, and a lofty 47 in one-day internationals. He had to be in here, much as I wanted to end this XI with Gratney Rodolph Zwilchenbart-Erskine (who played for Eton in the 1880s) or Georgina Zucchini-Watts of Leeds Women.

Steven Lynch is the editor of the Wisden Guide to International Cricket 2013. Ask Steven is now on Facebook

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • MrKricket on January 8, 2013, 21:55 GMT

    I thought you'd missed Bob Zadow but he got a mention with Zesers.

    How about a column of players with the same name (or homophones at least) - there was once a "Dennis Lillie" who was a spinner for QLD in the early 80s. He was a bit older than the real Dennis. Wayne Phillips also played for Australia as two people.

    A team of Y players would also be interesting although probably dominated by Pakistan!

  • AmissWasGreat on January 8, 2013, 16:30 GMT

    @Nutcutlet. Yes, 'L's are one of the letters that have improved since my day. Lara, Laxman and Lloyd hadn't appeared then, so the batting was carried by Leyland. I daydreamed many a Latin lesson away constructing such teams and imagining Tests between them.

  • SachinIsTheGreatest on January 8, 2013, 6:31 GMT

    @BoonBoom , hahaha and despite useless mediocre bowlers India's won as many tests in SA, Eng and Aus in the last 15 years as Pak have!

  • SachinIsTheGreatest on January 8, 2013, 6:28 GMT

    @HawksEyeFocused, brilliant post! Supremely relevant to the article! You managed just ONE reference to "Z"!

  • Meety on January 8, 2013, 1:17 GMT

    @ Nutcutlet on (January 07 2013, 23:39 PM GMT) - you forgot Nathan Lyon for the Ls!!!!

  • Nutcutlet on January 7, 2013, 23:39 GMT

    A Zed (Zee) as an initial may be rare, at least outside Pakistan, but how about an X? I give you, or recall to mind, Xenophon Constantine Balaskas, a leg-break googly bowler for SA in the 1930s, largely responsible for SA's first win on English soil, at Lord's in 1935. As for which letter of the alphabet would raise the strongest team (@AmissWasGreat), I'd put up the Ls against the Hs & the Bs, although there are, IMO, only four or five genuinely great L bats: Lara, Clive Lloyd, Maurice Leyland & VVS Laxman & Bill Lawry (possibly). The L's bowling, however, is awesome & the selectors would have a huge problem finding the right combination! (Larwood, Lillee, Lindwall, Lohmann, Lockwood, Laker & Lock)

  • BoonBoom on January 7, 2013, 21:34 GMT

    @Jack Slater: come on buddy, 295 wickets in 88 test at 32.35 does not make him a great bowler. I would just rate him stock bowler who took wickets at a pathetic rate of less than 3.4 wickets per test. Such bowlers can only play for a team like India that has not produced even a SINGLE FAST BOWLER who has taken at least 100 test wickets at less than 25.00 per wicket. Indeed Zaheer is a mediocre bowler.His only achievement is that he played 88 test despite of being so ordinary.

  • HawksEyeFocused on January 7, 2013, 20:02 GMT

    All my sympathies are with Indian team as Pakistan crushed them down to earth with a style in their own backyard!!! Sachin unlike Sehwaq was wise enough he took retirement before Pakistani bowlers could force him to retire !!! He knew that he wont face Junaid Khan, Irfan, Umer Gul and above all his old bunny SAEED AJMAL!!! Now according to my humble opinion India should invite Kenya or Zimbabwe for test and ODI series to improve their rankings and regain their form!!! I don't think with their current team they can even beat BD ,Ireland or Afghanistan!!! Mark my words... India in 2013 will lose matches against all the minnows especially Afghanistan and Ireland !!! BD is no more minnow!!!!

  • TheScot on January 7, 2013, 14:33 GMT

    Cricinfo, Another prospective list: XI who never played any form of professional cricket, worked for British Telecom, and their son's names start from S and end with K.

    With due respect, there is no need for another list of XI, if there is not one.

  • on January 7, 2013, 14:16 GMT

    @Naveed Hashmi why because he is INDIAN? Zaheer won India a series in England and New Zealand and tests in the other countries. do you even know that? that is nearly the same what your greats have done for Pakistan. Zaheer does not deserve remarks like yours.

  • MrKricket on January 8, 2013, 21:55 GMT

    I thought you'd missed Bob Zadow but he got a mention with Zesers.

    How about a column of players with the same name (or homophones at least) - there was once a "Dennis Lillie" who was a spinner for QLD in the early 80s. He was a bit older than the real Dennis. Wayne Phillips also played for Australia as two people.

    A team of Y players would also be interesting although probably dominated by Pakistan!

  • AmissWasGreat on January 8, 2013, 16:30 GMT

    @Nutcutlet. Yes, 'L's are one of the letters that have improved since my day. Lara, Laxman and Lloyd hadn't appeared then, so the batting was carried by Leyland. I daydreamed many a Latin lesson away constructing such teams and imagining Tests between them.

  • SachinIsTheGreatest on January 8, 2013, 6:31 GMT

    @BoonBoom , hahaha and despite useless mediocre bowlers India's won as many tests in SA, Eng and Aus in the last 15 years as Pak have!

  • SachinIsTheGreatest on January 8, 2013, 6:28 GMT

    @HawksEyeFocused, brilliant post! Supremely relevant to the article! You managed just ONE reference to "Z"!

  • Meety on January 8, 2013, 1:17 GMT

    @ Nutcutlet on (January 07 2013, 23:39 PM GMT) - you forgot Nathan Lyon for the Ls!!!!

  • Nutcutlet on January 7, 2013, 23:39 GMT

    A Zed (Zee) as an initial may be rare, at least outside Pakistan, but how about an X? I give you, or recall to mind, Xenophon Constantine Balaskas, a leg-break googly bowler for SA in the 1930s, largely responsible for SA's first win on English soil, at Lord's in 1935. As for which letter of the alphabet would raise the strongest team (@AmissWasGreat), I'd put up the Ls against the Hs & the Bs, although there are, IMO, only four or five genuinely great L bats: Lara, Clive Lloyd, Maurice Leyland & VVS Laxman & Bill Lawry (possibly). The L's bowling, however, is awesome & the selectors would have a huge problem finding the right combination! (Larwood, Lillee, Lindwall, Lohmann, Lockwood, Laker & Lock)

  • BoonBoom on January 7, 2013, 21:34 GMT

    @Jack Slater: come on buddy, 295 wickets in 88 test at 32.35 does not make him a great bowler. I would just rate him stock bowler who took wickets at a pathetic rate of less than 3.4 wickets per test. Such bowlers can only play for a team like India that has not produced even a SINGLE FAST BOWLER who has taken at least 100 test wickets at less than 25.00 per wicket. Indeed Zaheer is a mediocre bowler.His only achievement is that he played 88 test despite of being so ordinary.

  • HawksEyeFocused on January 7, 2013, 20:02 GMT

    All my sympathies are with Indian team as Pakistan crushed them down to earth with a style in their own backyard!!! Sachin unlike Sehwaq was wise enough he took retirement before Pakistani bowlers could force him to retire !!! He knew that he wont face Junaid Khan, Irfan, Umer Gul and above all his old bunny SAEED AJMAL!!! Now according to my humble opinion India should invite Kenya or Zimbabwe for test and ODI series to improve their rankings and regain their form!!! I don't think with their current team they can even beat BD ,Ireland or Afghanistan!!! Mark my words... India in 2013 will lose matches against all the minnows especially Afghanistan and Ireland !!! BD is no more minnow!!!!

  • TheScot on January 7, 2013, 14:33 GMT

    Cricinfo, Another prospective list: XI who never played any form of professional cricket, worked for British Telecom, and their son's names start from S and end with K.

    With due respect, there is no need for another list of XI, if there is not one.

  • on January 7, 2013, 14:16 GMT

    @Naveed Hashmi why because he is INDIAN? Zaheer won India a series in England and New Zealand and tests in the other countries. do you even know that? that is nearly the same what your greats have done for Pakistan. Zaheer does not deserve remarks like yours.

  • wikkey-pedia on January 7, 2013, 14:11 GMT

    South Africa would most likely own the letter "K". Kallis, Klusener, the Kirstens, Kuiper, Kepler (Wessels), Kleinveldt, Kemp, and Rudi Koertzen (umpire), to name just a few...

  • AmissWasGreat on January 7, 2013, 13:13 GMT

    Interesting article. As a boy I amused myself by picking all-time Test teams beginning with initial letters, but never had a full team of 'Z's. I seem to remember that B and H were the strongest teams - Bradman, SF Barnes etc versus Hobbs, Hammond, Hutton etc. It may have changed since then because of so many new Test players in the last 50 years.

  • on January 7, 2013, 12:42 GMT

    Saleem, I think that Xavier Doherty, for all his short span as an international, would probably claim the "X"!

    As for Z, I'm a little surprised Zin Harris didn't make the list - a useful cricketer in his own right, he's perhaps better known as the father of both Chris (Christopher Zinzan) Harris, New Zealand's one-day-international caught & bowled specialist of the 1990s, and Ben Z. Harris, a useful domestic first-class player. As the unusual name suggests, the Harris family is also distantly related to rugby union great Zinzan Brooke.

  • on January 7, 2013, 12:13 GMT

    I am not too sure what inspired the list, but the common factor being one letter makes it one of the most boring articles in this series ever. It didn't interest me one bit even though my last name starts with 'Z', come on Steven, you can do much better than that!

  • on January 7, 2013, 9:39 GMT

    Cephas Zhuwawo of Zimbabwe...

  • trex1981 on January 7, 2013, 9:18 GMT

    Bas Zuiderent from the Netherlands is another recent 'Zed'

  • jonesy2 on January 7, 2013, 8:44 GMT

    hmm i found it interesting that you described averaging 45 in test cricket as merely "respectable". some of the greats averaged about that give or take a couple and even less, damian martyn, justin langer, adam gilchrist, gary kirsten, mark taylor, VVS laxman, david gower, mark waugh just to name a few. i heard ian healy say in commentary a few years ago i think in about 06 as monde was bowling "south africa need all hand zondeki here"

  • on January 7, 2013, 7:28 GMT

    Even if the list is not sorted alphabetically, Zaheer Khan would still be at the bottom of pile of bowlers :)

  • on January 7, 2013, 6:47 GMT

    Dear Steven, what a wonderful article.

    As the caption of Zaheer Abbas said 'owns the letter Z', it made me think about other letters owned by cricketers. But, alas, I could not think beyond B for Bradman and T for Tendulkar. Can you please write such articles for all oter alphabets (A-Y)?

    Thanks in advance.

    Regards Saleem

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • on January 7, 2013, 6:47 GMT

    Dear Steven, what a wonderful article.

    As the caption of Zaheer Abbas said 'owns the letter Z', it made me think about other letters owned by cricketers. But, alas, I could not think beyond B for Bradman and T for Tendulkar. Can you please write such articles for all oter alphabets (A-Y)?

    Thanks in advance.

    Regards Saleem

  • on January 7, 2013, 7:28 GMT

    Even if the list is not sorted alphabetically, Zaheer Khan would still be at the bottom of pile of bowlers :)

  • jonesy2 on January 7, 2013, 8:44 GMT

    hmm i found it interesting that you described averaging 45 in test cricket as merely "respectable". some of the greats averaged about that give or take a couple and even less, damian martyn, justin langer, adam gilchrist, gary kirsten, mark taylor, VVS laxman, david gower, mark waugh just to name a few. i heard ian healy say in commentary a few years ago i think in about 06 as monde was bowling "south africa need all hand zondeki here"

  • trex1981 on January 7, 2013, 9:18 GMT

    Bas Zuiderent from the Netherlands is another recent 'Zed'

  • on January 7, 2013, 9:39 GMT

    Cephas Zhuwawo of Zimbabwe...

  • on January 7, 2013, 12:13 GMT

    I am not too sure what inspired the list, but the common factor being one letter makes it one of the most boring articles in this series ever. It didn't interest me one bit even though my last name starts with 'Z', come on Steven, you can do much better than that!

  • on January 7, 2013, 12:42 GMT

    Saleem, I think that Xavier Doherty, for all his short span as an international, would probably claim the "X"!

    As for Z, I'm a little surprised Zin Harris didn't make the list - a useful cricketer in his own right, he's perhaps better known as the father of both Chris (Christopher Zinzan) Harris, New Zealand's one-day-international caught & bowled specialist of the 1990s, and Ben Z. Harris, a useful domestic first-class player. As the unusual name suggests, the Harris family is also distantly related to rugby union great Zinzan Brooke.

  • AmissWasGreat on January 7, 2013, 13:13 GMT

    Interesting article. As a boy I amused myself by picking all-time Test teams beginning with initial letters, but never had a full team of 'Z's. I seem to remember that B and H were the strongest teams - Bradman, SF Barnes etc versus Hobbs, Hammond, Hutton etc. It may have changed since then because of so many new Test players in the last 50 years.

  • wikkey-pedia on January 7, 2013, 14:11 GMT

    South Africa would most likely own the letter "K". Kallis, Klusener, the Kirstens, Kuiper, Kepler (Wessels), Kleinveldt, Kemp, and Rudi Koertzen (umpire), to name just a few...

  • on January 7, 2013, 14:16 GMT

    @Naveed Hashmi why because he is INDIAN? Zaheer won India a series in England and New Zealand and tests in the other countries. do you even know that? that is nearly the same what your greats have done for Pakistan. Zaheer does not deserve remarks like yours.