Interviews InterviewsRSS FeedFeeds

Cheteshwar Pujara interview

'I try being honest to the game'

Cheteshwar Pujara on his approach to playing spin, on facing the England fast bowlers, and how his batting continues to evolve at domestic and international level

Interview by Abhishek Purohit

January 10, 2013

Comments: 28 | Text size: A | A

India's best batsman in the recent home Tests against England, with a standout century on a turner in Mumbai. Selected in the ODI squad to face England, after having made his Test debut in 2010. Racking up aggressive centuries in the Ranji Trophy. Suddenly, Cheteshwar Pujara is everywhere, but it is only now that he is getting all-round recognition for having spent years building his game. ESPNcricinfo spoke to Pujara in his hometown of Rajkot.


Cheteshwar Pujara plays a square-cut, India v New Zealand, 1st Test, Hyderabad, 1st day, August 23, 2012
Cheteshwar Pujara on playing the cut: "When you have time, you can free your arms. I am there at the right time. If you are late, then you can't play it." © Associated Press
Enlarge

Against England, you were quick to use your feet against the spinners. Is that something you carry over from first-class cricket? How much have you worked on it?

I think it is because of all the first-class cricket I have played. I have tried doing it continuously at that level - coming down the wicket. It makes it difficult for the spinners. They try to flight the ball and hit the good-length area. When you step out, it is hard for them to adjust their line and length.

There is a difference between charging or jumping out and stepping out. You seem to be in control when you come down the pitch. How do you keep yourself focused at that time?

It is about judging the right length. When you see the release of the ball, you get to know whether it is on a good length. If it is, you can step out and reach there. I try and look at the release of the ball when I am batting against spin.

As far as technique against spin is concerned, very few batsmen are able to keep their wrists flexible when they push forward. When you come forward, it does not seem that your wrists are locked. You are able to guide the ball to say, third man. Have you always batted like that?

Yes, this has been my technique since my Under-19 days. It is easier to get singles when you have free wrists, you can play the ball either side of the wicket. I have been working on this in the nets since I was young - just try to see the gap and place the ball there. During your innings, you always look to get singles. When I had to be successful at the first-class level initially, I knew that you should be able to rotate the strike. As a youngster four-five years ago, that was my plan - to be able to rotate the strike. If you want to do that, you have to be very wristy. (This way) when you don't want to play shots and be in the defensive mode, you still end up getting the singles.

Do flexible wrists also help you play with soft hands? You don't jab at the ball a lot when you are looking to defend.

My defence is very strong. I would say that is my strength. I have worked on it, I have never quite focused on keeping the hands soft, but my father is very particular about me playing all balls correctly in the nets. So whenever I push at the ball or make some other mistake, he tells me, 'this is not the way to go about it. You might give a catch to short leg,' and so on. He believes it is about practising perfectly.

You have spoken about the hands and the wrists. What about the body position? Many times, when you are beaten in the flight, you are still able to avoid silly point or short leg.

All that is natural. I have never paid any attention to it. It is again about practising perfectly, then all things come naturally. What I try and do is look at the ball till it hits the bat, so whenever there is a bit of turn or at times the ball goes straight, you can adjust.

Does balance at the crease also come naturally to you?

It is because of the experience. The more matches you play, the more you learn about the game.

Let's talk about the cut. You don't just play the cut, you give it a good old whack, and are in the air at times as you play it. Have you always played it so strongly?

I think it is natural. It is also about playing the shot over a period of time. I believe I have more time when I play off the back foot. That is the reason I can play it strongly. When you have time, you can free your arms. You know you are in the correct position. I am there at the right time. If you are late, then you can't play it.

 
 
A single is important. A boundary is also important. It is about playing on the merit of the ball. If it is a half-volley, you have to hit it for four, no matter what the situation is. Even if the score is 50 for 6, the half-volley is a half-volley.
 

A lot of experts have spoken about your playing the hook shot. You have this reputation of being a very safe batsman but still you play the hook quite regularly.

It is instinctive. When I see a short ball, I know I can hit it. And when you have an opportunity to score a four, why not take it? I got out playing the hook against New Zealand, and I realised, it is not my strength. I can play the pull properly. So I started leaving balls which were above shoulder height and I was successful doing that in the Ahmedabad and Mumbai Tests against England.

So from now on you will try to duck under the short ball?

Yeah, when you are not comfortable playing that shot… I am ready to leave the ball and if it is in my range, I'll go for it.

How has your batting developed against fast bowling? That is not something you must have faced a lot at first-class level.

Playing (James) Anderson and (Steven) Finn was a different experience. Finn played only the Kolkata Test, but he was quick, and accurate. Anderson is one of the best when it comes to reverse swing. Facing them has helped me a lot and given me confidence. Whenever I bat at first-class level, there is difference in the speeds. That is maybe the reason why I was able to hit Ishwar Pandey for five fours (in an over, against Madhya Pradesh).

Would you say playing the short ball is your stronger suit compared to playing swing bowling?

I am very good at playing the short ball. Against New Zealand, I wasn't leaving it. Whenever I got the opportunity, I started playing the pull. After that, I have practised playing the short one a lot. In 2010, when we toured South Africa, I knew the bounce was different compared to Indian wickets. I worked with Gary Kirsten on how to go about playing the short one. Gary helped me a lot.

How do you develop your game against quality swing bowling?

If I continue playing at the first-class level, we have decent bowlers there. I don't need to compare their speed with international bowlers but Indian bowlers are good at swinging the ball. So I don't need to worry about swing bowling.

But isn't there a difference between someone swinging the ball from off to leg at 122 kph and someone doing it at 140 kph?

There is not a major difference, obviously there is a bit of difference, but that is how it goes. You have to learn to deal with it. Even in the nets, I try and find a ball that swings a bit more so that I can get good practice. It is about finding the right ways. Nobody gets the best bowling in the nets.

Somehow, and a bit unfortunately, you have always been compared with Rahul Dravid from your early days. He had this tendency at times to go into a shell while batting. We have hardly seen that happen with you. How important is positivity to you as a batsman?


Cheteshwar Pujara top scored for Saurashtra with 80, Gujarat v Saurashtra, Vijay Hazare Trophy 2011-12, Mumbai, February 28, 2012
"For the past couple of years, I have improved a lot in the one-day format and have scored many runs. That has helped a lot." Pujara averages 56.71 in the List A matches in the last two years. © Fotocorp
Enlarge

Whenever I go out to bat, what I decide is I have to play on the merit of the ball. If it is there to be hit, I am going to hit it. As far as the comparison is concerned, I don't want to compare myself with someone who scored so many runs and is a legend of the game. I am just proving myself.

Say the score is 20 for 3, or 20 for 4. What are you thinking in that situation? How important is the single to you?

A single is important. A boundary is also important. It is about playing on the merit of the ball. If it is a half-volley, you have to hit it for four, no matter what the situation is. Even if the score is 50 for 6, the half-volley is a half-volley. I know how to hit it, so why not play on the merit of the ball and get the runs if you can. If it is not there to be hit, I am going to defend it, as my defence is strong.

Do you remember instances when you got bogged down and were searching where the next run will come from, or have you always been free-flowing?

I have always been free-flowing. If I stay at the crease, I have got enough shots. I have never struggled to score runs. So far I haven't been in that situation. I always try and learn new shots. If you have the shots, you don't need to get worried about getting bogged down. In Test cricket, you will always find the gaps.

As a limited-overs batsman, when you compare yourself to being a Test batsman, where do you think you can improve? Or are you equally confident in both the formats?

At the moment, I am very confident (in both). For the past couple of years, I have improved a lot in the one-day format and have scored many runs. That has helped a lot. Once you start playing at the international level and get experience and talk to the coach and senior players, they can always guide you as to how to go about this format.

I have done it at the domestic level. I believe I can also do it at the international level. It is about waiting for the right time, which will come. I am very confident about that. I don't need to worry.

How different is it playing first-class cricket now that you have faced some of the best Test attacks in the world?

Mentally there is no pressure for sure but at times you are not motivated enough. Even if you fail, you think it is ok, I have scored many hundreds at that level. But it does not go that way. I don't like to get out. When I failed in two innings against Rajasthan and got out early in the first innings against Madhya Pradesh, something was telling me, this is not the way I play. I want to prove myself and whether it is first-class or whatever level, I should be doing my best for the team. Even against Rajasthan, I was confident but at times you become over-confident when you have faced good bowlers, and when you have average bowlers, you end up playing many shots and get out.

You batted for five hours for Saurashtra during your double-century against Madhya Pradesh. It must have taken a lot of strength to hit all these boundaries. After a five-minute break, you were back on the field. Is that love for Saurashtra cricket? How do you keep going?

It is about being honest to the game. I think that is also where fitness comes into play. Since I had injuries on both my knees, I have worked hard on my fitness. That is the reason I could be back soon on the field after scoring a double-hundred. I am very happy that my fitness is shaping up well. It is going to help me play cricket for a long period of time.

It is one thing to be fit, but this honesty that you talk about, has that always been you, that you are answerable to the game?

Yes. At times you don't want to go on the field because you are tired, or you might be fooling around. But that does not happen all the time. I try and be honest most of the time. I would not say that I am 100% honest but I do try and keep myself as honest as possible.

Abhishek Purohit is a sub-editor at ESPNcricinfo

RSS Feeds: Abhishek Purohit

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by luks on (January 11, 2013, 18:26 GMT)

Pujara is part of the Saurashtra team, which means that he must play most of his matches in Rajkot. Going by the recent ODI game, the pitch seems to be a flat pitch and the outfield is very quick. I'm not sure if runs on this pitch should be treated the same as runs on a more bowler-friendly pitch. I would be interested to know what Pujara's average is in his home ground Rajkot and how much it is outside. Even Jadeja has scored triple hundreds in Rajkot. Looks to me that runs in Rajkot shouldn't be taken seriously.

Posted by sameer111111 on (January 11, 2013, 17:31 GMT)

@ProdigyA: Just because you like Pujara is no reason to insult Dravid, who remains the best test batsman who ever played for India. You don't get more than 10000 runs in both forms of the game by "block, block, block and boring the hell out of you". The youngsters today would do well to try his approach to the game.

Posted by murali_88 on (January 11, 2013, 12:30 GMT)

i <3 pujara, the comparsions with dravid are fair in terms of runs, i think there is an expectation for him to score 10,000 odd test and odi runs. What he will mean to us after that (like what dravid means to us now) is a different matter.

Posted by RajitD on (January 11, 2013, 11:19 GMT)

What I like about this guy is that he comes across as someone who has thought a lot about his game. His clarity should stand him in good stead if he were to continue carrying it on overseas. All the best! We need you to take forward Indian cricket!

Posted by   on (January 11, 2013, 8:08 GMT)

Yes Pujara is in great form but let this guy prove his mettle. Yes it would be nice to see him get a chance but even Rahane had to wait to get into the team. You cannot have all young blood in the team as that would leave you clueless in pressure scenarios. Gambhir is a big match player and is capable of turning a game on his own. Yes he is not in the best of form but you still need a balanced side. And for those looking to drop Raina, well he is the 2nd highest ODI run-getter for India post WC

Posted by   on (January 11, 2013, 6:25 GMT)

dhoni does not pick pujara....defines and personifies insanity..

keep doing the same thing over and over and expect different results...

I thought shami ahmed did better than dinda so far..so why the change ?

dhoni is just leading by luck.....no analytical thinking behind his selections..

Posted by aativas on (January 11, 2013, 5:49 GMT)

It it too early to speak kid! Let him sustain and then he can give loads of interviews. It is time to play (if of course given chance by Dhoni) and let the bat speak!

Posted by   on (January 11, 2013, 3:35 GMT)

Would not It be nice for a change that all these writers get a real job rather than dig into Pujara. After all He score all these runs in a total of 3 series , what SMG before him score in one partial Series. Leave the Kid alone!

Posted by howzzattt on (January 11, 2013, 0:55 GMT)

Cheteshwar Pujara is a good batsman and he's been in the domestic circuit performing in the domestic circuit for over 5 years now, however one must also not forget that international arena demands more. Right now, yes he looks a good enough player to play for India at least for another 10 years.

In the late 90s I watched two batsman around the age of Pujara do well for India at both domestic and international level and they were Rahul Dravid and VVS Laxman. Now I'm watching Virat Kohli (as Rahul Dravid, especially after that fight hundred on a difficult pitch in the 2nd innings of the Nagpur Test against England) and Cheteshwar Pujara (as VVS Laxman). I really hope these guys take Indian Cricket forward because there is no shortage of talent in these guys and they're hard working. Rohit Sharma however is a pure domestic wonder and an international failure. Also, Shikhar Dhawan could be ideal in place of Gautam Gambhir. Time to ring in a few changes before it is too late.

Posted by Cricketfan101 on (January 10, 2013, 20:51 GMT)

Guys all you forgetting one guy that would keep Pujara out any day rohit the most "talented"and the best in the nets and HE KNOWS HOW TO GET OUT SO GRACEFULLY. LOL

Comments have now been closed for this article

FeedbackTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Abhishek PurohitClose

    Trott's torment

Mark Nicholas: Cricket - batting specifically - defines Jonathan Trott, which makes his continued suffering all the more painful

    'Commentators must stop stating the obvious'

Bowl at Boycs: Geoff Boycott on hyped-up TV coverage, and the appointment of Peter Moores

    All change in Pakistan's domestic structure. Again

Osman Samiuddin: A recent proposal to shake up the first-class set-up reinforces that change is the only constant in Pakistan

    The cricket tragic who bowled Bradman

Former Australian PM Bob Hawke loved cricket. And he once left the Don speechless with the force of his political convictions

Moores and the shadow of the past

Jon Hotten: His second spell as England coach might be nothing like his first, but memories of it will hover nevertheless

News | Features Last 7 days

Crunch time for Sehwag and Gambhir

The former Indian openers haven't been shining lately, but the IPL presents an opportunity for them to show their class

England's Pietersen folly

They were making good progress in building a world-class side, but not getting rid of Kevin Pietersen after the texting saga in 2012 cost them greatly

The world record that nearly wasn't

Twenty years ago this week, Brian Lara became Test cricket's highest scorer, but he almost didn't make it

'Sri Lankan fans embrace the team, not just icon players'

Mahela Jayawardene and Kumar Sangakkara go over their World T20 win, and feel grateful to have fans whose support remains unwavering in victory and defeat

The captain's blunder

Plays of the day from the IPL match between Chennai Super Kings and Kings XI Punjab in Abu Dhabi

News | Features Last 7 days