| Series | Countries | Live Scores | Fixtures | Results | News |
Features
|
Photos | Video & Audio | Blogs | Statistics | Archive | Games | Mobile | ||||||||||||||||||||
Rules I'd Change
Feeds
Feeds
Cricket regulations that could do with a tweak
|
No free hits
Allowing a batsman to play a legitimate delivery without the fear of losing his wicket goes against the fundamentals of cricket
January 14, 2013
|
|||
The free-hit rule in limited-overs cricket, where a batsman is allowed a free pass following a front-foot no-ball, goes against the fundamentals of the game, which is that the bowler has the right to take a wicket off a legitimate delivery and that the batsman must fear losing his wicket off such balls.
The basic premise of cricket is that an error has consequences, but as a batsman if you make a mistake on a free hit, you will escape punishment.
The no-ball law penalises the bowler for missing the popping crease, even by a tiny amount, by calling the delivery illegitimate and in turn depriving the bowler the chance of getting a wicket. As long as that's acceptable, allowing a free hit to the batsman off the following delivery is unfair.
We don't crack down on batsmen for inside edges or for missing the ball completely, unless, of course, that leads them to legitimately lose their wicket, so why punish bowlers?
Let's not make the game more skewed towards batsmen than it already is.
Cricket is at its best when there's balance between bat and ball. Changing this rule will bring back some parity on the pitch.
Former India opener Aakash Chopra is the author of Out of the Blue, an account of Rajasthan's 2010-11 Ranji Trophy victory. His website is here and his Twitter feed here
Feeds: Aakash Chopra
© ESPN EMEA Ltd.
| ||||||
| Comments have now been closed for this article |
||||||
TopE-mail
Feedback
Print
Aakash Chopra
Aakash Chopra is the 245th Indian to represent India in Test cricket. A batsman in the traditional mould, he played 10 Tests for India in 2003-04, and has played over 120 first-class matches. He currently plays for Delhi in the Ranji Trophy; his book Beyond the Blues was an account of the 2007-08 season. Chopra made a formidable opening combination with Virender Sehwag, which was believed to be one of the reasons for India's success in Australia and Pakistan in 2003-04. He is considered one of the best close-in fielders India has produced after Eknath Solkar.
'We've got a good bowling attack for English conditions'
Mohammad Hafeez's resurgence, after three years in the international wilderness, symbolises that of his team
Anderson's magic not to be missed
Mark Nicholas: None of England's other 300-wickets bowlers could have bowled better than Anderson at Lord's
Anti-corruption efforts need to be proactive
Ian Chappell: Rather than relying on the police or media to uncover rot in the game, cricket has to get tough with its own
Even at the height of his success with the national side, Sreesanth was a lonely cricketer who felt hard done by. By Ajay Shankar
'A spinner must have the ability to take punishment'
The Cricket Couch: R Ashwin's coach, former Tamil Nadu spinner Sunil Subramaniam, talks about the qualities he looks for in young slow bowlers
As we go into the last week of the league games of IPL 2013, seven teams have a mathematical chance of making the last four. Here's what each of those teams needs to do
Pollard sledges Watson, Dravid is angry
Plays of the day from the IPL match between Mumbai Indians and Rajasthan Royals in Mumbai
A talent that didn't know its own worth
Sreesanth wasn't the most likeable team-mate or opponent, but he had skill beyond doubt, which we might have seen the last of
Unfortunate Sunrisers let match slip away
For 36 overs, Sunrisers painstakingly built a position of strength only for one terrible over to spoil it for them
Even at the height of his success with the national side, Sreesanth was a lonely cricketer who felt hard done by
Unfortunate Sunrisers let match slip away (73)
For 36 overs, Sunrisers painstakingly built a position of strength only for one terrible over to spoil it for them
As we go into the last week of the league games of IPL 2013, seven teams have a mathematical chance of making the last four. Here's what each of those teams needs to do
Dravid and the art of T20 captaincy (56)
Despite a small squad bereft of big names, Rajasthan Royals' captain has churned out win after win
Even at the height of his success with the national side, Sreesanth was a lonely cricketer who felt hard done by
Pollard sledges Watson, Dravid is angry (43)
Plays of the day from the IPL match between Mumbai Indians and Rajasthan Royals in Mumbai
Sponsored Links
ICICI Bank M2I. Register Now and Get A Gift Offer.
Safe & simple online money transfer. Apply Now!
Buy Wisden 2013 & get a FREE Playfair
Available now at Cricshop
As Geoff Lawson says "It's called cricket, not batting" and it seems all innovations in cricket tend to favour the batsman. This is one of them along with DRS, switch hits, limiting bouncers, no balls, tighter wides and so on. It's a wonder anyone wants to be a bowler.
Why is there a "free hit"? Because there is hardly any time for the batsman to take advantage of the illegal delivery that preceded it. Bowlers are fully capable of defending free hits, although their advantage on the no-ball might not have been great enough to increase their chances of getting a wicket. But the "free hit" is an emotionally interesting moment, and goes against the monotony in some cases. The game is essentially one of number of runs, not wickets, so we can keep the free hit and the opportunity for some abandon on the part of batsmen, but the nonsense of having to keep the same field must go! Also, if the batsman moves around in the crease, wides must be ruled differently. Most definitely, if the bowler bowls a ball that would have hit the pads in his/her original stance, that should NEVER be a wide!
Thought provoking article Akash. I agree there is some disparity withthe free hit rule but you got to remember the worst thing that could happen to bowler for a wrong delivery is to concede 6 runs. They get 23 more chances in T20 game and 59 chances in 50 over game and almost as many as they want in a test match to comeback and repreive themselves. The cruel game only offers one chance for the batsmen and they have to pay the ultimate price with thier wicket for poor shot selection. Now that the opposition team have DRS/technology to catch out even on small mistakes!!
Agreed. If you over step, the ball is not counted and you are penalized. That's enough and fair. Why punish twice for one mistake? If you allow free hit, then cancel any run scored from a miss-hit.
Posted by McGorium on (January 15, 2013, 16:56 GMT)@sweetspot: The purpose of the no-ball rule isn't to enable the batsman to take advantage of an illegal delivery (any more than he would a legal one), so that's a specious argument. The no-ball rule is intended to prevent a bowler from dismissing a batsman using unfair methods such as overstepping, chucking, changing the point of delivery (over vs. round the wkt). Having immunity from dismissal off a no-ball is punishment enough for the bowler. There's no need for a run penalty for a 1mm overstepping of the crease. That rule is already harsh as it is. Free hits just rub it in even more.
Posted by SridharKalyan on (January 15, 2013, 15:45 GMT)Not just the FREE-HIT, there are many such rules that are blatantly skewed to favor the batsmen. Just take a look at some of the 'greats' - and their batting records sorted by scoring patterns during 'power-plays' and outside them. It will be glaring how the artificial fielding restrictions have helped some of them amass the runs they did. Similarly, most batsmen go scot-free playing from outside the batting crease, while bowlers' infringement causes double-jeopardy (as discussed by Akash Chopra here)!! Finally, they even tried to bring in the ropes by more than 5 meters, so that silly hoicks can become huge sixers!!! It has ceased to be CRICKET long back; it is now only a stage-managed circus to cater to entertainment-starved yelling crowds.
Posted by kapsy on (January 15, 2013, 5:07 GMT)Being somewhat a cricket purist, I didn't like the "free hit" rule in the beginning. As long a sit remains in the shorter formats, I don't really have a problem with it. However, Aakash is right about cricket being a batter's game. Once it becomes equally in favour of bowlers, not only will games become quicker, there will be more frequent action and results.
Posted by MinusZero on (January 15, 2013, 1:49 GMT)There is no rule to say that the bowler must have his foot nearly over the crease on all deliveries. They can easily go a foot back and make no difference at all to their delivery. There is no excuse for a no ball
Posted byCould not agreed more here. It takes down hardly to run in , run good and land the ball on those prescribed areas, especially when the batsman stands with the best protective gear available. Yet, a small lapse of concentration or a foible in arriving at the crease takes the ball round the fence for a walk. I'm not against to the mini format, but, it changed the attitude of all. Respect bowlers, respect the rules. After all, cricket is not all of batting.
Posted byTo make the game even: 1. Batsman edging the bowl should give a catch to a fielder on the next ball. 2. Batsman coming out of crease to hit the ball, if misses, should leave the crease the next ball too. 3. Batsman missing the ball should leave stumps wide open to the bowler on the next ball. Hahaha