The Investec Ashes 2013 August 7, 2013

I'm feeling as good as in 2011

Retaining the Ashes in 14 days was an outstanding effort by us, but we are fully focused on the remaining two Tests

If there was a subdued element to our celebrations after retaining the Ashes, it was because we know our job is not completed.

We set out to win the Ashes. Retaining them is great and retaining them in 14 days - the quickest time for nearly 100 years - is even better. But we set out to win this series and win it well and we have two big games coming up. We will celebrate properly when the job is done.

We were in a slightly awkward situation at the end of the game. We didn't want to go over the top in our celebrations, but we did want to show our gratitude to all those supporters who had paid for tickets and waited in the rain for hours. So we signed some autographs and spent some time talking with them. I think we got the balance about right.

Australia played well at Old Trafford, but that really wasn't a surprise. We have always respected them and we always knew that this series was going to be a challenge. They won an important toss and Chris Rogers and Michael Clarke batted beautifully when the pitch was at its best, to take advantage. When we batted, the pitch was just starting to crack and it had deteriorated quite a lot by the last day. Ryan Harris is an outstanding bowler, for whom we have a lot of respect, and he performed very well.

It sets up the next two games nicely. Momentum is a big thing in sport, and with another Ashes series to follow in Australia, the next two Tests remain vital. We don't want to scrape to a win; we want to win decisively and go into the next series with the confidence and momentum.

The biggest positive to come out of that match from our perspective was the performance of Kevin Pietersen. I've known Kevin a long time. I first played against him when he was an offspinner for Cannock in the Birmingham League - he got me out when I tried to reverse-sweep him; something he never tires of reminding me of - and he had a trial with Warwickshire in 2000 after he was recommended by the TV presenter Nick Owen.

At the time, Kev was a very aggressive batsman. The only thing that stuck in the mind was that he loved to give the ball a whack. He was confident and he hit the ball hard, but I don't remember too much more than that.

It probably wasn't until 2005 that I realised he was a special player. He had played some great limited-overs innings, but he came into the Test side at pretty much the same time as me and produced against a great attack, under pressure, and kept on playing the same way. His innings at The Oval to ensure we won the Ashes series that summer remains among the best I've seen.

Actually, he's played a fair few of the greatest innings I've seen. He is, without doubt, one of the best I've played with and one of those very rare batsmen who can change a game in two or three hours.

We're lucky in that we have another great batsman in the side in Alastair Cook. It's hard to compare them as their strengths are so different: Kev blasts it and has a technique that works for him, but in India, Cook produced some of the best batting I've ever seen, with his patience and his shot selection. Those skills maybe aren't quite as eye-catching as Kev's but they're just as important. We're lucky to have two such good, so different players in our side.

Kev is fantastic to bat with and I think we present a tricky problem for bowlers. They can bowl us the same balls and he'll hit it for four on the leg side and I'll play it on the off side. He cuts, I pull. He flicks it, I drive it.

I think the records show I've put on more runs with him than any other player - 2755 at an average of 56.22 a time - with nine century- and seven half-century stands. He's very calm, he's very good at pinpointing the areas the bowlers are going to target and he's very good at working as a pair to build the partnership.

Whatever the issues were last year - and we don't need to revisit that - Kev has been fantastic on and off the pitch since. One of the nicest things about this summer has been the close-knit feel of the squad, and we are all spending time together and enjoying each others' successes and each others' company.

I felt as fluent with the bat at Old Trafford as I have done all series. I feel great at the moment, pretty much as I did in 2011. But I'm trying not to focus on that; I'm trying to remain in the moment and keep doing the basic things well. That is what has brought me my success.

It's not long ago that I was struggling a bit. I felt okay, but I was failing to go on and register decisive scores. When that happens you can become introspective and focus on your technique too closely. You end up chasing your tail.

So I know what it's like for my old friend Jonathan Trott at the moment. He has had one quiet Test, really, and is just in that dip where he is having no luck at all. It is a horrible situation to be in as an individual, but I can guarantee every single person in the team and among the support staff has the fullest confidence in him. He has been an incredibly valuable player over a long time and he will bounce back.

Sadly the series has been overshadowed a bit by the DRS issues. As players, we have a great deal of respect and sympathy for the on-field umpires. We understand what a tough job they have and we understand that they, just like us, will make mistakes. The problem comes when mistakes are made by the TV umpire. Once you have access to the replays and the slow motions and all the rest of the technology, the expectation we have is that the decision will be right. That hasn't happened and has left us confused. Hot Spot, in particular, just hasn't worked on a few occasions.

The meetings over what has gone wrong and what we can do about it have already started. As players we have to remain above that and not let it distract us. But it has created confusion and it is an issue that requires resolution.

A fixture in England's middle order for almost a decade, Ian Bell has played in three Ashes-winning sides

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • CapitalMarkets on August 8, 2013, 17:24 GMT

    Bell has the highest number of runs in the series on either side and is in the enviable position of not having to play for his place for at least the next seven test matches. I'm sure he could rock the boat if he wanted to but he is far too mature (and well coached) an individual to give us the sort of controversial output some are looking for, even if he hadn't signed the agreement to avoid "bringing the game into disrepute" which he undoubtedly has.

    What Bell implies of course is that it isn't necessary for team members to be bosom buddies but they must have enough unity of purpose and co-operation for the team effort as a whole to be more than the sum of its parts. You don't need to socialise as a cricketer; that's a bonus. However, cricket is littered with examples of very good and even great players who were unable to keep their abrasive personalities in check for the common good. It's implied that Katich isn't in the series for this reason but Pietersen and Watson have adjusted.

  • husseybukhari on August 8, 2013, 8:13 GMT

    just like ur batting, very elegantly written. Wish you all the very best for the remaining tests. I really want you to take the man of the series award. you are my favorite player for a long time and its great to see you doing justice to your talent and silenced those who questioned the value of your performances. Keep it up belly!

  • cloudmess on August 9, 2013, 0:38 GMT

    Ian Bell and KP are now 2 of the old guard of the England team, and yet I always try to watch when they're batting together. They're both so stylish - in quite different ways - and compliment one another so well.

  • on August 8, 2013, 18:09 GMT

    Ian Bell and Michael Clarke have been the standout batsmen in this exciting Ashes series. Otherwise, only Joe Root averages over 40, let alone nearly 50, in this series. Kevin Pietersen is the only other batsman to have notched up 200 runs on either side. Stuart Broad averages more than any Australian batsmen bar Clarke during this Ashes. It tells a story - that cricket doesn't necessarily have to be of the very highest quality to be very exciting.

  • on August 8, 2013, 17:42 GMT

    amazing...

  • Cpt.Meanster on August 8, 2013, 15:40 GMT

    One of the VERY FEW players I admire in the England team. Bell and KP are magnificent. They could slip into any team in the world. I have always referred to Bell as England's Tendulkar. His style is very similar to that of the Little Master, the elegance, the subtle touch, the majestic drives and the list goes on. A fine player in any format of the game. England must never doubt his credentials any more. And what more ? He is a class act with the pen as well. :)

  • on August 8, 2013, 8:56 GMT

    Husseybukhari spot on about Belly's elegance both as a batter and writer - and don't forget his brilliant fielding both at short leg and in the covers. His cover driving and cutting almost makes one swoon like being at the opera or ballet - not something that one would say about even KP brilliant and effective as he is! And not only just elegance of course - without Belly's magnificent contributions we might be 3-0 down!

  • Brownly on August 8, 2013, 8:24 GMT

    Come on, Ian, tell us something! Give us an opinion piece. Have some mongrel. You've got a good grasp of your writing technique, so give us a few clever and subtle digs at the Aussies. Sports journalism doesn't have to fence-sit - it's entertainment not contentious world issues. You can't dispel thoughts that any of your opinions are biased (because you play for one of the teams) so run with it and have some fun! We Aussies don't want to hear we've played well - the Ashes aren't about polite 'well-played, sirs'. Tell us we missed out this test and we're gonna regret it.

    And tell Cook to get Root to bowl when Warner is batting. Does he not realise he's denying the battle two countries are waiting for?? If he doesn't do it he's a wet blanket.

  • CapitalMarkets on August 8, 2013, 17:24 GMT

    Bell has the highest number of runs in the series on either side and is in the enviable position of not having to play for his place for at least the next seven test matches. I'm sure he could rock the boat if he wanted to but he is far too mature (and well coached) an individual to give us the sort of controversial output some are looking for, even if he hadn't signed the agreement to avoid "bringing the game into disrepute" which he undoubtedly has.

    What Bell implies of course is that it isn't necessary for team members to be bosom buddies but they must have enough unity of purpose and co-operation for the team effort as a whole to be more than the sum of its parts. You don't need to socialise as a cricketer; that's a bonus. However, cricket is littered with examples of very good and even great players who were unable to keep their abrasive personalities in check for the common good. It's implied that Katich isn't in the series for this reason but Pietersen and Watson have adjusted.

  • husseybukhari on August 8, 2013, 8:13 GMT

    just like ur batting, very elegantly written. Wish you all the very best for the remaining tests. I really want you to take the man of the series award. you are my favorite player for a long time and its great to see you doing justice to your talent and silenced those who questioned the value of your performances. Keep it up belly!

  • cloudmess on August 9, 2013, 0:38 GMT

    Ian Bell and KP are now 2 of the old guard of the England team, and yet I always try to watch when they're batting together. They're both so stylish - in quite different ways - and compliment one another so well.

  • on August 8, 2013, 18:09 GMT

    Ian Bell and Michael Clarke have been the standout batsmen in this exciting Ashes series. Otherwise, only Joe Root averages over 40, let alone nearly 50, in this series. Kevin Pietersen is the only other batsman to have notched up 200 runs on either side. Stuart Broad averages more than any Australian batsmen bar Clarke during this Ashes. It tells a story - that cricket doesn't necessarily have to be of the very highest quality to be very exciting.

  • on August 8, 2013, 17:42 GMT

    amazing...

  • Cpt.Meanster on August 8, 2013, 15:40 GMT

    One of the VERY FEW players I admire in the England team. Bell and KP are magnificent. They could slip into any team in the world. I have always referred to Bell as England's Tendulkar. His style is very similar to that of the Little Master, the elegance, the subtle touch, the majestic drives and the list goes on. A fine player in any format of the game. England must never doubt his credentials any more. And what more ? He is a class act with the pen as well. :)

  • on August 8, 2013, 8:56 GMT

    Husseybukhari spot on about Belly's elegance both as a batter and writer - and don't forget his brilliant fielding both at short leg and in the covers. His cover driving and cutting almost makes one swoon like being at the opera or ballet - not something that one would say about even KP brilliant and effective as he is! And not only just elegance of course - without Belly's magnificent contributions we might be 3-0 down!

  • Brownly on August 8, 2013, 8:24 GMT

    Come on, Ian, tell us something! Give us an opinion piece. Have some mongrel. You've got a good grasp of your writing technique, so give us a few clever and subtle digs at the Aussies. Sports journalism doesn't have to fence-sit - it's entertainment not contentious world issues. You can't dispel thoughts that any of your opinions are biased (because you play for one of the teams) so run with it and have some fun! We Aussies don't want to hear we've played well - the Ashes aren't about polite 'well-played, sirs'. Tell us we missed out this test and we're gonna regret it.

    And tell Cook to get Root to bowl when Warner is batting. Does he not realise he's denying the battle two countries are waiting for?? If he doesn't do it he's a wet blanket.

  • Brownly on August 8, 2013, 8:24 GMT

    Come on, Ian, tell us something! Give us an opinion piece. Have some mongrel. You've got a good grasp of your writing technique, so give us a few clever and subtle digs at the Aussies. Sports journalism doesn't have to fence-sit - it's entertainment not contentious world issues. You can't dispel thoughts that any of your opinions are biased (because you play for one of the teams) so run with it and have some fun! We Aussies don't want to hear we've played well - the Ashes aren't about polite 'well-played, sirs'. Tell us we missed out this test and we're gonna regret it.

    And tell Cook to get Root to bowl when Warner is batting. Does he not realise he's denying the battle two countries are waiting for?? If he doesn't do it he's a wet blanket.

  • on August 8, 2013, 8:56 GMT

    Husseybukhari spot on about Belly's elegance both as a batter and writer - and don't forget his brilliant fielding both at short leg and in the covers. His cover driving and cutting almost makes one swoon like being at the opera or ballet - not something that one would say about even KP brilliant and effective as he is! And not only just elegance of course - without Belly's magnificent contributions we might be 3-0 down!

  • Cpt.Meanster on August 8, 2013, 15:40 GMT

    One of the VERY FEW players I admire in the England team. Bell and KP are magnificent. They could slip into any team in the world. I have always referred to Bell as England's Tendulkar. His style is very similar to that of the Little Master, the elegance, the subtle touch, the majestic drives and the list goes on. A fine player in any format of the game. England must never doubt his credentials any more. And what more ? He is a class act with the pen as well. :)

  • on August 8, 2013, 17:42 GMT

    amazing...

  • on August 8, 2013, 18:09 GMT

    Ian Bell and Michael Clarke have been the standout batsmen in this exciting Ashes series. Otherwise, only Joe Root averages over 40, let alone nearly 50, in this series. Kevin Pietersen is the only other batsman to have notched up 200 runs on either side. Stuart Broad averages more than any Australian batsmen bar Clarke during this Ashes. It tells a story - that cricket doesn't necessarily have to be of the very highest quality to be very exciting.

  • cloudmess on August 9, 2013, 0:38 GMT

    Ian Bell and KP are now 2 of the old guard of the England team, and yet I always try to watch when they're batting together. They're both so stylish - in quite different ways - and compliment one another so well.

  • husseybukhari on August 8, 2013, 8:13 GMT

    just like ur batting, very elegantly written. Wish you all the very best for the remaining tests. I really want you to take the man of the series award. you are my favorite player for a long time and its great to see you doing justice to your talent and silenced those who questioned the value of your performances. Keep it up belly!

  • CapitalMarkets on August 8, 2013, 17:24 GMT

    Bell has the highest number of runs in the series on either side and is in the enviable position of not having to play for his place for at least the next seven test matches. I'm sure he could rock the boat if he wanted to but he is far too mature (and well coached) an individual to give us the sort of controversial output some are looking for, even if he hadn't signed the agreement to avoid "bringing the game into disrepute" which he undoubtedly has.

    What Bell implies of course is that it isn't necessary for team members to be bosom buddies but they must have enough unity of purpose and co-operation for the team effort as a whole to be more than the sum of its parts. You don't need to socialise as a cricketer; that's a bonus. However, cricket is littered with examples of very good and even great players who were unable to keep their abrasive personalities in check for the common good. It's implied that Katich isn't in the series for this reason but Pietersen and Watson have adjusted.