I Was There I Was ThereRSS FeedFeeds
Great games relived by those who featured in them

When Atherton's men broke the hoodoo

The Ashes were long gone and England were in disarray, but a young captain and a greenhorn bowling trio produced a victory to remember

Interviews by Nagraj Gollapudi

August 20, 2013

Comments: 16 | Text size: A | A

Angus Fraser takes the wicket of Allan Border, England v Australia, 6th Test, The Oval, August 20, 1993
Angus Fraser: "Allan Border tried to cut too close but could only edge to the wicketkeeper" © Getty Images
Enlarge

Twenty years ago England went into the sixth and final Test at The Oval with nothing but pride to restore. Allan Border's Australia had already won the Ashes 4-0. Graham Gooch, at 40, decided to step down from the captaincy after the defeat in the fourth Test, in Leeds. Ted Dexter, the chairman of selectors, had announced he was resigning too, but as his final decision he picked 25-year-old Lancastrian Mike Atherton to lead. Graham Thorpe broke a bone in the finger, an hour before the toss, facing a net bowler. Mark Ramprakash, playing for Middlesex at Lord's, was summoned immediately. England's fast bowling attack, Devon Malcolm, Angus Fraser and Steve Watkin, were playing together for the first time, and in their first match of the series. Yet these three, along with a bold captain, made it a victory to savour.

England won the toss on a fast pitch and batted first. They were given a swift start, with Atherton and Gooch raising 100 runs in 18 overs. The two of them, and Graeme Hick and Alec Stewart made half-centuries, and England finished on a strong 380

Michael Atherton Thorpe had come into the team that summer and done well, so his injury was a blow. As for the fast start: a quick pitch, and both of us [Gooch and Atherton] being in decent form, accounted for that, rather than a preordained plan. However, as a new captain, I wanted to try and play in a positive manner.

Watkin was preferred to Phil Tufnell, given the pitch. Martin Bicknell had pulled out the previous day due to an injury. Fraser had played just a couple of games before the Test, having returned to active cricket from a hip injury that had kept him out for two and a half years. He had been picked at the behest of Dexter, who had seen him take seven wickets in the county match between Middlesex and Leicestershire.

Angus Fraser Devon and I bowled quite well together. He was quick, hostile. Big strong man, got away swing. When he got it right, he was very dangerous. He wasn't the most consistent bowler and always bowled the odd bad ball. We complemented each other. If Devon was bowling, then for a batsman I might have been a more attractive proposition to look to score runs against, but my accuracy meant you were taking a risk. Steve Watkin was a fine bowler. Similar bowler to myself: accurate, nagging, bowled a good line, swung it if the conditions were right. It was a white pitch at The Oval, had some pace in it.

Steve Watkin I had been the leading wicket-taker in the country that year, with Glamorgan going well that season. I had been in the squad from the Edgbaston Test and was obviously disappointed not to play there. But I got my chance in the final Test and was excited, despite England being 4-0 down. We had never played together, but I knew what my role would be: Malcolm was the paceman, while Fraser and myself were control bowlers. One reason Fraser and I had never played in the same Test was because people felt we were similar, but I always thought we were different in a number of respects: he was taller, I was probably little bit more quicker and had bit more variations, perhaps. But both of us knew if you bowled accurately you had more chances.

The first-timers did not disappoint. Malcolm bowled quick and got rid of Michael Slater and David Boon, caught by Gooch, positioned as hip-pocket fielder. Fraser took his first wicket off his 17th delivery, over 31 months since his last Test victim, in Adelaide in December 1991. He would finish with a five-for. Australia just managed to avoid the follow-on, having been reduced to 196 for 8 late on the second afternoon.

Fraser It was a big Test for me because on the 1990-91 tour of Australia I had injured my hip. Many people had forecast that as the end of not only my international career but my cricket. In the winter of 1992-93 I saw a hip specialist in Cambridge who performed an operation that got rid of the pain. Then all of sudden, at the back end of the summer, as England were getting beaten by Australia, Middlesex were having a good year. I got eight wickets against Leicestershire at Lord's in a match that Middlesex won. Then I went to Scarborough, where I took an eight-wicket match haul again, against Yorkshire. That is where I got the call to play again for England.

I had some real low times, what felt like meaningless [training] sessions during the winter months when I was trying to get fitter and stronger. So to get back to the England side was very satisfying. And that first wicket, of Mark Waugh, probably meant as much to me as any wicket in my career, just because all the work was worthwhile. It was a good ball, bounced a bit, took the outside edge and Waugh was caught behind.

I remember Mark Ramprakash produced a brilliant bit of fielding at cover point the previous delivery. Waugh had gone for a drive but Ramprakash dived and stopped the ball one-handed.

I managed to get Steve Waugh with a good ball - a straight one bowled from close to the stumps. Allan Border tried to cut too close but could only edge to the wicketkeeper. Third morning I removed the final two Australian wickets to finish with a five-for, the fifth of my career. It was hugely satisfying.

Devon Malcolm I bowled pretty quickly throughout. I got one ball to curve back into Mark [Taylor] and although he had a chest guard it hit him in the solar plexus. He was forced over and he was finding it hard to breathe and he was very uncomfortable.

We bowled well as a unit. It was the first time for a while I bowled with Angus. When he bowled at the other end I could bowl a lot of outswingers, and even if I went for four an over he would go for two an over.

 
 
"We always had to get through Healy to win against Australia. He wasn't a pretty batsman but he would help the lower order get in the right frame of mind, and in no time he would put on a big partnership with the tail" Devon Malcolm
 

England's overnight lead of 141 shrank to 77 as Ian Healy had a three-hour partnership with Shane Warne and batted another hour with last man Tim May. Australia's final two wickets added 107. But it was the first time England had taken the lead in the series

Atherton Ian Healy was a good player at No. 7, counter-punching and marshalling the tail. The context of the game was that England had lost eight or so of the previous nine Tests (hence the change of captain), so any good position was happily taken. Confidence was obviously low because of that.

Malcolm We always had to get through Healy to win against Australia. He was such a dangerous player. He wasn't a pretty batsman but he would help the lower order get in the right frame of mind, and in no time he would put on a big partnership with the tail. I tried everything but he stood strong.

Watkin We always talk about winning the first innings. If you do that, you control the game. And we controlled that match from the first day, with Gooch and Hick getting runs.

England were once again given a bold start by their openers. Gooch changed gears once Atherton departed, stayed solid, and went past David Gower to become England's highest run-getter in Tests. England set Australia a tall target of 391 in 123 overs.

Atherton Australia's advantage in the previous Tests had been based around spin fundamentally, Warne and May. This Oval pitch offered the spinners nothing except bounce. Like a Perth pitch (where Warne has rarely done well), not like the modern Oval pitches which turn. Seven batsmen was a short-term measure, really, because of how things were going, and we got lucky that the pitch was responsive to the quicker bowlers.

Rain curtailed play on the fourth evening. The final morning started well for England.

Watkin I remember bowling a ball early in the morning which had come out of my hand wrong and landed sort of in the covers and it stopped dead. Normally a batsman would let it go and throw the ball back to bowl the next delivery. But Slater came down and hit the ball for a four. Ironically a couple of balls later he got something on a ball, which went through to the wicketkeeper and was given out. It seemed the ball had hit his arm guard. Funny how the cricketing gods work!

I got Boon lbw next ball and it put me on a hat-trick. But Mark Waugh defended a reasonably straight ball. I was quite pleased to get four wickets after I got Mark Taylor bowled. My final wicket was Ian Healy, who went after a good bouncer. He top-edged and Mathew Maynard, my Glamorgan colleague, at second slip ran back and caught him near third man. That was the second catch he had got in the game off me, and that was really another good moment.

Malcolm We were staying at the Hilton in Chelsea and I was driving to the ground, but there was an incident at Vauxhall Bridge and it took absolutely ages to move in the traffic. I had to abandon my car and run to the ground to try and get in on time so we could start the game. I arrived all sweaty in the dressing room.

Australia needed 300 in the final two sessions. They were 148 for 8 at tea, but Steve Waugh and Merv Hughes dug in. Malcolm removed them with another aggressive burst of fast bowling, but Paul Reiffel and Warne put up more staunch resistance with a 74-run partnership for the ninth wicket.

Malcolm I remember hitting Reiffel on the head with his second ball, and that shook him up, but he stayed put and frustrated us. But we three were a good bowling unit and even if Australia had a few partnerships, we were always confident.

Fraser I got three of the last four wickets. Hughes went for the slog off a length ball, top-edged and was caught at long leg. Reiffel pushed one back to me for a return catch. Then I trapped Warne lbw in front as the final wicket. I don't think we feared they were going to get there.


Michael Atherton scored 50 in the first innings, England v Australia, 6th Test, The Oval, 1st day, August 19, 1993
Atherton: "As a new captain, I wanted to try and play in a positive manner" © Getty Images
Enlarge

At 5.18 pm England won. It had been 2430 days, 11 hours, 49 minutes, as one newspaper noted, since England's last Test win against Australia in Melbourne, in December 1986.

Fraser I was absolutely chuffed. I won a bottle of champagne and a few quid, which ended in the players' pool. Having been through what I had gone through and then to stand there on the balcony with the Man-of-the-Match medal was amazing.

A week later Middlesex went to play Essex. We beat them to win the Championship. Having sort of struggled to take wickets, I finished with 32 wickets in four matches, including the Oval Test, with eight in each of those games.

Watkin It would have been nice to get a five-for, considering I had got four of the first six wickets. I had a couple of chances to get there when Warne hit one down to third man, dropped short, and then he hit one over the top of cover.

It was my third Test match. Of the other two we had won one and drawn the other, so I had won two out of three. Also, it was the first time two Glamorgan players had been in a Test match together. Glamorgan won the Sunday League that season and finished third in the Championship.

Atherton We were obviously delighted, given the context which had seen us lose a lot of Tests recently and given our inability to beat Australia for some time. Naturally, given that it was my second match as captain I was delighted. Relief, I suppose more than anything.

Nagraj Gollapudi is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo

RSS Feeds: Nagraj Gollapudi

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by jmcilhinney on (August 21, 2013, 6:38 GMT)

@777aditya on (August 20, 2013, 9:46 GMT), established by whom? How many Australian players have you actually asked about that?

Posted by AbsoluteRabbit on (August 20, 2013, 22:17 GMT)

@777aditya: Fair point mate - and one that we'll be sure to remind you of if Australia win at the Oval this week!

Posted by TenDonebyaShooter on (August 20, 2013, 18:13 GMT)

"Australia needed 300 in the final two sessions. They were 148 for 8 at tea, but Steve Waugh and Merv Hughes dug in. Malcolm removed them with another aggressive burst of fast bowling". Quite clearly the scorecard reveals that this is incorrect. When Australia stood 148 for 8, both Waugh and Hughes had already been dismissed. And the two were not both removed by Devon Malcolm; Malcolm dismissed Waugh, but not Hughes.

Posted by HumungousFungus on (August 20, 2013, 15:05 GMT)

This match was a frustrating glimpse of what might have been in what was a largely desperate decade for England. That is not to suggest that they could have competed with Australia, as that would just be fanciful nonsense, but with a little bit of backing of players, and some consistency of selection, England could have been more competitive against the other Test nations than they were. In the game itself, Malcolm bowled very, very fast, and did both Slater and Boon for pace on multiple occasions (which was a prelude to his demolition of SA on the same ground a year later). Steve Watkin, playing his third and - sadly - last Test match, bowled really well and took a couple of wickets on a very fast Oval wicket with his much quicker "effort" ball. Angus Fraser was Angus Fraser: Remorselessly accurate, quick enough, and extracting anything that could be extracted out of the wicket. If memory serves, these three never played a Test together again, which was, for the time, classic England!

Posted by hhillbumper on (August 20, 2013, 12:16 GMT)

Ah and then came Illingworth.The only bonus to his obsession with Yorkshire is that we got Gough. But seriously that man did more damage to English cricket than anyone else. He destroyed what could have been a decent workmanlike team. As for Gus what a bowler he was before his injury.The fact that he came back to play was amazing given the nature of his injury.Necrosis of a joint is very painful and to come back and bowl again for England is all credit to him.

Posted by 777aditya on (August 20, 2013, 9:46 GMT)

You can romanticize all you want, but it is an established fact that Aussies don't take dead rubbers seriously - period.

Posted by Greek_Card on (August 20, 2013, 9:00 GMT)

And to think that Fraser was excluded from the team for 18 months by Ray Illingworth. Truly the mind boggles.

England really didn't have such a bad group of players in the 90s. The problem was getting them on the pitch in one piece, rested and motivated.

Those players under the current regime would have one twice as many games as they did, although a series victory against Australia would likely have always been out of their reach.

Posted by Rowayton on (August 20, 2013, 8:50 GMT)

Actually it's a bit of a cautionary tale this one. When England won by an innings in 3 days in Melbourne ( which meant they had won the last 10 tests 5/1) who would have thought they would not win another one out of about the next 15 over 7 years? Things can change quickly.

Posted by   on (August 20, 2013, 8:42 GMT)

What was sad was that here was a decent bowling attack, with Tufnell poised to play long term as the spinner and yet the incoming Chairman of Selectors, Ray Illingworth didn't like all four of them. Cue another 7 years of chopping and changing line ups.

Comments have now been closed for this article

FeedbackTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Nagraj GollapudiClose

    What is Rohit Sharma's role?

Should India have practised slip catching in the nets? Who will play at the G?

    'I'd like to have faced the West Indies quicks'

Northamptonshire's David Willey picks his ideal partner for a jungle expedition, and talks about his famous dad

    Benn shows up in body and spirit

Tony Cozier: The spinner has brought in a sense of discipline into his bowling and behaviour on the field since his Test comeback

    The return of Bob Simpson

Rewind: When the 41-year-old former captain came out of retirement to lead Australia against India

Bowling to blame for India's poor overseas record

Kartikeya Date: The inability to build pressure by denying runs, even on helpful pitches, is India's biggest problem

News | Features Last 7 days

What ails Rohit and Watson?

Both batsmen seemingly have buckets of talent at their disposal and the backing of their captains, but soft dismissals relentlessly follow both around the Test arena

The perfect Test

After the tragedy of Phillip Hughes' death, this match showed that cricket and life will continue to go on. This time Test cricket dug in and got through to tea.

Hazlewood completes quartet of promise

Josh Hazlewood has been on Australian cricket's radar since he was a teenager. The player that made a Test debut at the Gabba was a much-improved version of the tearaway from 2010

Australia in good hands under proactive Smith

The new stand-in captain has the makings of a long-term leader, given his ability to stay ahead of the game

Karn struggles to stay afloat

The failed gamble of handing Karn Sharma a Test debut despite him having a moderate first-class record means India have to rethink who their spinner will be

News | Features Last 7 days