March 6, 2014

Working with Smithy

A one-time South Africa coach talks about his partnership with one of the toughest, most driven captains the country has had
21

The first time I met Smithy, he was 18 years old and just out of school. I was leading Griqualand West in Kimberley against a development squad of up-and-coming young players.

We both got centuries in that match. At the end we had a barbecue and I tried to sign Smithy for our small province for the following season, but he obviously had bigger and better things on his mind. He started his first-class career at Western Province.

When I joined him at the national team, we shared an instant trust.

I started my job with an ODI series in India that South Africa drew 2-2. Then we went to Australia, which was tough. We lost the Test series and then lost in the tri-series involving Australia and Sri Lanka. That was one of the low points of my career.

I sat in my hotel room in Hobart thinking about how we were going to turn the team around. On the flight back home Smithy and I spent the entire 13 hours swapping ideas, deciding this is the brand of cricket we wanted to play, these are the personnel we want on board, and this is how we are going to take the next couple of years of our relationship together.

Both of us believed in playing attacking cricket. We wanted to pick velocity bowlers, we wanted to create an environment that was structured, organised, disciplined but also allowed players to have fun. We identified players who were genuine game-breakers: players who not only set games up but also won them.

That brainstorming was beneficial. Hashim Amla, AB de Villiers, Dale Steyn and Morne Morkel came into the team. It was a youngish unit we were building, a team we thought could take South Africa forward and make it the best team in the world.

That was kind of where we solidified our plans and clarified our roles. I was going to take the pressure off the field, allowing him to concentrate on his preparations, and then I was going to back him up on the decisions he made on the field.

Contrary to popular opinion, our personalities complemented each other. I have always maintained that a captain-coach relationship is like a marriage - you have to completely trust each other. Of course we had our disagreements, but they were always behind closed doors.

If he was not happy with the way we had prepared during training, he would come and let me know. For example, there were times when he noticed we had not done enough slip catching. I would respond by saying that the next time we would stretch the fielding drills.

Then there were times when I heard him say things to people which I would not agree with, and I would make him aware of it privately and he would accept it without holding any grudges. We had give-and-take personalities and that helped us in addressing the team members.

Tough and uncompromising - these were the characteristics that defined Smithy the captain. That was what the media and public saw. But away from the field he is a wonderful gentleman. He is at his happiest sitting around a braai. Off the field he is not the hard, gum-chewing player the public see. Determination was the mask Smithy wore.

When Smithy played with freedom, he would hit the ball in unusual areas and the bowlers would be shattered. James Anderson completely lost the plot when Smithy hit good balls past midwicket

A batsman whose career has spanned more than 100 Tests is bound to have many peaks. There are three major innings I will always remember.

Edgbaston, 2008 was a phenomenal innings under pressure. Monty Panesar was spinning it out of the rough but Smithy's determination never waned. At tea on the final day, South Africa were on a knife edge at 111 for 4, chasing 281 for victory. We were under pressure. Andrew Flintoff had taken a couple of wickets. We needed a partnership. It might have been advantage England otherwise.

I remember when Smithy came into the change room at the break. He put a towel over his head and sat there. I checked with him if everything was all right, if there was anything he needed. He just said: "Coach, get somebody to stay with me and I will make the runs." Of course, Mark Boucher stayed with him, as we know - they had a great partnership and Smithy played exceptionally well to get us the victory. Our first series win in England after 1965.

I will never forget his second-innings century in Perth the same year. He set up the run chase, led from the front and won us the match. The target of 414 had never been conquered. But we thought the WACA pitch was very good and we believed that if we got a good start we could certainly challenge the score. Smithy was instrumental in getting us to a solid start with a century, and that gave the rest of the batsmen confidence.

The third one was the world record 438 in the ODI against Australia in Johannesburg. When people think of that match they immediately think of Herschelle Gibbs. But it was Smithy at the other end who was instrumental in giving South Africa the start they needed in order to win. The range of emotions we went through that day were amazing. It went from total embarrassment to total inspiration within three hours. I remember him not saying too much during the dinner break because he was padding up. During the team meeting I set the various targets we needed to get to at different times in our innings to achieve the chase. Those targets were unreal but it was so uncanny that we hit them all. It was amazing.

I remember another match against England, in the 2007 World Cup in the Caribbean, which we won handsomely. In that game Smithy played with so much freedom, and when he did that he would hit the ball in unusual areas and the bowlers would be shattered. James Anderson completely lost the plot when Smithy hit good balls past midwicket. When he dominated he would score at such a good rate that the opposition's spirits would be punctured.

But our march towards the title was ended in the next match. The disappointment was tangible. We had gone into the tournament as the No. 1-ranked ODI side. We genuinely believed that we were the best and that we had an opportunity to win, so to lose to Australia in the semi-final was a bitter pill to swallow.

The pressures of being a captain of a country are unique - especially in South Africa, where you have the need to have a team that represents the entire country. It was challenging at times, but Smithy bought into and believed in the concept and handled it exceptionally well.

As a leader he was open-minded and wanted to lead from the front. Take the SCG Test in 2009, when he swallowed pain and went in to bat late with a broken hand. When we were driving to the ground there was no way Smithy was even contemplating batting. He did not have his whites on him when we entered the ground. But as the day went along and we batted better and better, he looked at me as if to ask "Coach, should I bat?" It was still too far away but then it started to come closer and closer. At tea we were 198 for 7, chasing 376. Having won the first two Tests, our solitary aim was to draw the final match. Smithy came and told me: "I am going to bat." I told him if he wanted to bat, I was behind him.

It was such a funny moment as we went around trying to find whites for him. Eventually we got Paul Harris' shirt and jumper. Paul had spilled sweet-and-sour sauce all over his shirt at lunch! Then there were guys who were trying to make a cast for Smithy on his glove. All this was happening behind closed doors because we did not want the TV cameras to catch it and indicate to Australia that Smithy was going to bat.

Then Dale Steyn got out and we still had to survive about ten overs. I will never forget Smithy walking out, pushing the SCG dressing-room doors open - like a cowboy walking into a saloon. It was a fantastic moment. It showed to the team what a tough competitor he was and what he expected from them. He expected no quarter asked, none given.

I read that whenever Smithy got a Test hundred South Africa never lost. That is an amazing stat. And when he got a century he got them at a good pace, which demoralised the opposition. He had the capability of converting a century into a big score, a hallmark of a true champion player.

The biggest token of appreciation I received during my tenure as South Africa's coach came from Smithy. After winning the Man-of-the-Series award on the 2008 England tour, he came to the changing room and gave me his medal. He said it was a token for the hard work we both had put in to win the series. That medal is framed and sits in my study along with the cricket shirt he wore on the day, with a message on it.

He was an unbelievable captain of South Africa. His belief in his own ability and in his team were virtues future leaders can learn from. He was incredibly decisive in the way he went about things. When Smithy wanted to make a decision, he made it. True leaders are decisive. People want a decision and Smithy was prepared to make them.

Graeme Smith leaves a massive legacy. He can be credited for getting South African cricket to where it is now - at the top. After the Hanse Cronje saga and the disastrous World Cups Smithy created a culture, a brand, an air of success around South African cricket.

As told to Nagraj Gollapudi, assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • jimmythefish on March 9, 2014, 12:18 GMT

    whatever you say hussainy

  • AllanGavaskar on March 9, 2014, 9:00 GMT

    Reading this article and having heard how Arthur "coached" Australia in prior to Lehmann's tenure, it is hard to take any of it seriously. Perhaps he was more enlightened in his approach with Graeme Smith, perhaps it was a case of a poor cultural fit. I have similar disregard for Andy Flower and his hard-man tactics. Authoritarian coaches might suit certain situations, but if you want to develop captains and teams beyond the dour conservatism of RSA cricket and English cricket, then some more finesse and inspiration is required.

    Having said this, Graeme Smith is to be lauded for lifting South African cricket out of the quagmire that was the Cronje era and giving it credibility and class during his time as captain. Thank you Graeme Smith for developing and captaining such a cricket colossus as RSA.

  • Ragav999 on March 8, 2014, 5:59 GMT

    Was Graeme Smith the captain of SA ODI team in 2007 world cup when they lost 5 for 30 in the semi final against Australia and the match finished before lunch?

  • Ragav999 on March 8, 2014, 5:56 GMT

    @Ahmad Uetian: Very analytical observations. Nobody can deny the conclusions that are drawn from the cold hard stats that you presented.

    The difference in success rate between Ponting and Smith is quite astounding considering that Ponting had to manage without McGrath and Warne for last 4 years out of the 8 years that he captained the test team. It could be because the Australian team generally went for victories even in dead rubbers by playing aggressive cricket and declaring slightly earlier than other teams. This shows how good the Australian performances have been inspite of them being only as good as other teams (esp. SA) on paper.

  • on March 8, 2014, 4:43 GMT

    please he was Smith period not smithy. Let us cut this english crap like cookie, broadie etc. He was Smith the captain and the leader. He was a man's man.

  • on March 7, 2014, 21:19 GMT

    imagine if they had a decent coach what they could have done. maybe not choke in every major tournament

  • on March 7, 2014, 19:41 GMT

    @Ahmad Uetian such a ridiculous way to judge captains, Smith, Ponting, Waugh were all strong leaders with great individual players at their disposal, u cant judge captains by win/loss ratio, the best captain during 90's and early 2000's was stephen fleming, a captain should be judged by how he gets his team to pull above their weight, like Imran Khan did during his memorable series against west indies, the only team at that time to challenge the mighty west indies.

  • on March 7, 2014, 13:08 GMT

    Great leaders lead from front in big games but he had poor avg in WC & tournament finals

    Captaincy wise he was very poor compared to Ponting who won 2 WCs out of 3 with no losses in 2 of them. Smith's team never made it to even semis of any ICC event, despite SA always being at par with AUS in terms of batting, bowling & fielding capacity. Even Dhoni won 3 ICC titles despite weak bowling. Similarly in tests his win rate was meager 45% @ 1.8 W/L compared to Ponting's 62% @ 3 W/L.

    For a captain main deliverable is win % & W/L ratio (given team with same credentials as the ones compared against). That's why I chose Ponting that had team with same credentials as SA, captained in the same era as Smith (hence opposition's faced had similar capacity) & captained weak team during late phase of captaincy yet Ponting's captaincy record far superior to Smith in both formats.

    He wasn't even SA's best Captain. Cronje had equivalent win rate in test & far better: 2.8 in ODI's against Smith's 1.8

  • TheCricketeer on March 7, 2014, 6:17 GMT

    Please Micky - stick to rugby now. How many times do you want to try take credit for Smith's achievements in one article?

  • xtrafalgarx on March 7, 2014, 5:22 GMT

    @Sandt: AUS captains are the best tactitions and the most ruthless of them all. The best.

  • jimmythefish on March 9, 2014, 12:18 GMT

    whatever you say hussainy

  • AllanGavaskar on March 9, 2014, 9:00 GMT

    Reading this article and having heard how Arthur "coached" Australia in prior to Lehmann's tenure, it is hard to take any of it seriously. Perhaps he was more enlightened in his approach with Graeme Smith, perhaps it was a case of a poor cultural fit. I have similar disregard for Andy Flower and his hard-man tactics. Authoritarian coaches might suit certain situations, but if you want to develop captains and teams beyond the dour conservatism of RSA cricket and English cricket, then some more finesse and inspiration is required.

    Having said this, Graeme Smith is to be lauded for lifting South African cricket out of the quagmire that was the Cronje era and giving it credibility and class during his time as captain. Thank you Graeme Smith for developing and captaining such a cricket colossus as RSA.

  • Ragav999 on March 8, 2014, 5:59 GMT

    Was Graeme Smith the captain of SA ODI team in 2007 world cup when they lost 5 for 30 in the semi final against Australia and the match finished before lunch?

  • Ragav999 on March 8, 2014, 5:56 GMT

    @Ahmad Uetian: Very analytical observations. Nobody can deny the conclusions that are drawn from the cold hard stats that you presented.

    The difference in success rate between Ponting and Smith is quite astounding considering that Ponting had to manage without McGrath and Warne for last 4 years out of the 8 years that he captained the test team. It could be because the Australian team generally went for victories even in dead rubbers by playing aggressive cricket and declaring slightly earlier than other teams. This shows how good the Australian performances have been inspite of them being only as good as other teams (esp. SA) on paper.

  • on March 8, 2014, 4:43 GMT

    please he was Smith period not smithy. Let us cut this english crap like cookie, broadie etc. He was Smith the captain and the leader. He was a man's man.

  • on March 7, 2014, 21:19 GMT

    imagine if they had a decent coach what they could have done. maybe not choke in every major tournament

  • on March 7, 2014, 19:41 GMT

    @Ahmad Uetian such a ridiculous way to judge captains, Smith, Ponting, Waugh were all strong leaders with great individual players at their disposal, u cant judge captains by win/loss ratio, the best captain during 90's and early 2000's was stephen fleming, a captain should be judged by how he gets his team to pull above their weight, like Imran Khan did during his memorable series against west indies, the only team at that time to challenge the mighty west indies.

  • on March 7, 2014, 13:08 GMT

    Great leaders lead from front in big games but he had poor avg in WC & tournament finals

    Captaincy wise he was very poor compared to Ponting who won 2 WCs out of 3 with no losses in 2 of them. Smith's team never made it to even semis of any ICC event, despite SA always being at par with AUS in terms of batting, bowling & fielding capacity. Even Dhoni won 3 ICC titles despite weak bowling. Similarly in tests his win rate was meager 45% @ 1.8 W/L compared to Ponting's 62% @ 3 W/L.

    For a captain main deliverable is win % & W/L ratio (given team with same credentials as the ones compared against). That's why I chose Ponting that had team with same credentials as SA, captained in the same era as Smith (hence opposition's faced had similar capacity) & captained weak team during late phase of captaincy yet Ponting's captaincy record far superior to Smith in both formats.

    He wasn't even SA's best Captain. Cronje had equivalent win rate in test & far better: 2.8 in ODI's against Smith's 1.8

  • TheCricketeer on March 7, 2014, 6:17 GMT

    Please Micky - stick to rugby now. How many times do you want to try take credit for Smith's achievements in one article?

  • xtrafalgarx on March 7, 2014, 5:22 GMT

    @Sandt: AUS captains are the best tactitions and the most ruthless of them all. The best.

  • on March 6, 2014, 19:50 GMT

    Smithy aka Biff was a imposing guy.He played cricket he was not a showman.He inspired he toppled the best he worked hard.He fought hard all the time.He was true grit.Hope the book reveals his soul and his mates. SA owes him a lot.SA needs him. Respond to the challenge Biff your contribution is immeasurable.

  • PPD123 on March 6, 2014, 17:26 GMT

    He was one of the best captains SAF ever had. he took them to the top in both ODIs and Tests and was a wonderful batsmen at his peak during 2005-2010. Got the captaincy at a very young age and matured nicely into it. SAF will truly miss him ad given that this come so close to Kallis's retirement, will have a short term impact on the overall performance of the team. Smith can be proud of what he has achieved during this career and he can walk into the sunset with his head held high! A great servant for SAF and world cricket. He will be missed - Have a great life ahead.

  • web_guru2003 on March 6, 2014, 15:51 GMT

    @Ahmed, I hope you are not trying to say Ganguly was better captain than Smith.

    Beside the fact that Smith numbers are better than Ganguly on any given day, main factor is that Ganguly inherited team with Tendulkar, Dravid, Laxman, Zaheer and Kumble while Smith rebuild his team and only inherited Kalis and Boucher

  • on March 6, 2014, 13:33 GMT

    He was almost as good a captain as Stephen Fleming, except when he played against Stephen Fleming.

  • Testcricketistop on March 6, 2014, 12:34 GMT

    Ahmad, you protest to much mate, every article praising Smith has a negative comment by you.

    Lighten up mate, your bias is showing.

  • on March 6, 2014, 11:36 GMT

    @David Schier Gangully never got the home thrashing 3 times out of 4 tours from Aussies........................Gangully never got beaten at home by................ Ravindran Subramanian Gangully & Dhoni didn't have luxury of fierce bowling attack that Smith has & still managed to play WC final & WON 3 ICC titles...........Smith's team couldn't qualify for semis ever despite balanced side

  • on March 6, 2014, 11:04 GMT

    Yes very good Captain , brilliant series ....bring on India out in Aus next can't wait for the Johnson/Kohli confrontation .....Ganguly never had the record Smith had and never won in Australia ...Nor did he ever break his hand and go out to bat !

  • on March 6, 2014, 10:38 GMT

    He was a captain in the Sourav Ganguly mould. Both took over at a time when the climate in their countries was not well disposed towards cricket. They restored the reputation of the game through personal integrity and inspired their teams to believe in themselves. Their teams therefore went where they had not gone before. Unlike Gnaguly, Smith had a great attack at his disposal outside home conditions. This helped his team become world beaters while Ganguly's team began winning abroad without becoming world beaters.

  • Sandt on March 6, 2014, 9:52 GMT

    One of the best captains of modern era. Better than the AUS captains. He is real fighter and believer of his team.The reason why SA bas become the best side in the world is because of his captaincy.No doubt about that.

  • muzika_tchaikovskogo on March 6, 2014, 8:20 GMT

    Graeme Smith is the man who got his team to believe they could go where no South African side before had ever done. For that alone he deserves to be remembered as one of the legends of the game.

  • on March 6, 2014, 6:00 GMT

    One of the best Captains to lead South Africa.

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • on March 6, 2014, 6:00 GMT

    One of the best Captains to lead South Africa.

  • muzika_tchaikovskogo on March 6, 2014, 8:20 GMT

    Graeme Smith is the man who got his team to believe they could go where no South African side before had ever done. For that alone he deserves to be remembered as one of the legends of the game.

  • Sandt on March 6, 2014, 9:52 GMT

    One of the best captains of modern era. Better than the AUS captains. He is real fighter and believer of his team.The reason why SA bas become the best side in the world is because of his captaincy.No doubt about that.

  • on March 6, 2014, 10:38 GMT

    He was a captain in the Sourav Ganguly mould. Both took over at a time when the climate in their countries was not well disposed towards cricket. They restored the reputation of the game through personal integrity and inspired their teams to believe in themselves. Their teams therefore went where they had not gone before. Unlike Gnaguly, Smith had a great attack at his disposal outside home conditions. This helped his team become world beaters while Ganguly's team began winning abroad without becoming world beaters.

  • on March 6, 2014, 11:04 GMT

    Yes very good Captain , brilliant series ....bring on India out in Aus next can't wait for the Johnson/Kohli confrontation .....Ganguly never had the record Smith had and never won in Australia ...Nor did he ever break his hand and go out to bat !

  • on March 6, 2014, 11:36 GMT

    @David Schier Gangully never got the home thrashing 3 times out of 4 tours from Aussies........................Gangully never got beaten at home by................ Ravindran Subramanian Gangully & Dhoni didn't have luxury of fierce bowling attack that Smith has & still managed to play WC final & WON 3 ICC titles...........Smith's team couldn't qualify for semis ever despite balanced side

  • Testcricketistop on March 6, 2014, 12:34 GMT

    Ahmad, you protest to much mate, every article praising Smith has a negative comment by you.

    Lighten up mate, your bias is showing.

  • on March 6, 2014, 13:33 GMT

    He was almost as good a captain as Stephen Fleming, except when he played against Stephen Fleming.

  • web_guru2003 on March 6, 2014, 15:51 GMT

    @Ahmed, I hope you are not trying to say Ganguly was better captain than Smith.

    Beside the fact that Smith numbers are better than Ganguly on any given day, main factor is that Ganguly inherited team with Tendulkar, Dravid, Laxman, Zaheer and Kumble while Smith rebuild his team and only inherited Kalis and Boucher

  • PPD123 on March 6, 2014, 17:26 GMT

    He was one of the best captains SAF ever had. he took them to the top in both ODIs and Tests and was a wonderful batsmen at his peak during 2005-2010. Got the captaincy at a very young age and matured nicely into it. SAF will truly miss him ad given that this come so close to Kallis's retirement, will have a short term impact on the overall performance of the team. Smith can be proud of what he has achieved during this career and he can walk into the sunset with his head held high! A great servant for SAF and world cricket. He will be missed - Have a great life ahead.