Dickie Bird April 30, 2014

'Umpiring is done by machines these days'

Back in Dickie Bird's day the officials got respect and gave it. One of cricket's iconic umpires looks back

Dickie Bird collects his OBE at Buckingham Palace in 2012 © Getty Images

My first job was working down a coal mine. That's what I was doing before I got into cricket. I worked as a fitter from the age of 15 to 19.

If I had to describe myself as an umpire, I'd like to say I was honest and fair. I treated everybody on the field as human beings and as professional cricketers. If I had the respect of the players, then marvellous.

My final Test, with the guard of honour from the England and India players, was marvellous. I didn't know what was happening but I had an idea that something was going off. I walked through the Long Room at Lord's and everyone was off their high seats, clapping. Both teams were lined in a channel for me to walk through. I had a lump in my throat and tears in my eyes. People who saw Don Bradman's last appearance in cricket at The Oval said he got a tremendous reception, but they tell me mine were better. It's a day I shall always remember.

If I could turn the clock back, I would have stayed at Yorkshire as a player. I couldn't see myself nailing a place in the Yorkshire team. I was in and out of the side. That's why I left but I wish I hadn't. It's my biggest regret.

We had to look down for the no-ball, we had to look at any edges, where it pitched - we had all those decisions to make. Now I think all the authority has been taken away from the umpire. It's like umpiring is now done by a machine. It's made by electronic aids. It's very, very sad that umpiring as we knew it is finished. If you asked me who are the best umpires in the world right now, I couldn't tell you because umpiring is done by a machine.

I don't mind the guys that don't walk. There's nothing in the laws saying that a batsman has to walk. He can stand his ground and wait for the umpire's decision but he must walk off when he's given out. And that's the key. He mustn't show any dissent. It's the umpire's decision, and whether it's right or wrong, he mustn't show dissent.

If Yorkshire could put their best team out on the field for every game, we would win the County Championship ever year. We are the envy of every county side in the country, with so many magnificent young players. It's just like a conveyor belt of young players who are so talented. They just keep producing these lads who go on to play for England. It excites me tremendously, seeing all that talent. There's a lad, Matthew Fisher, he will play for England, that boy. If he's sensible - and I think he is - and everything goes his way, he will be an excellent player. Jason Gillespie, Martyn Moxon and Ian Dews have done a tremendous job.

"The conductor said, 'Fares, please.' He had a white cap on and I thought it looked like one of mine. I said: 'Excuse me, sir, where did you get that?' He replied: 'Haven't you heard of Mr Dickie Bird? It's his hat'"

Whatever you say about the technology, it's here to stay. Everyone seems to want electronic aids, so we have to have them.

The World Cup final in 1975 between West Indies and Australia was the best game of cricket I've ever umpired - but I had to be wary of the West Indies fans. I had to have a box of white caps made for me every time I umpired them, because they used to run on and nick them. At the end of the World Cup final, someone whipped my white cap off and I saw him run through the thousands of spectators who used to go on the field.

My first love was football. Cricket was very much second. I played football and cricket when I was at school, both for Barnsley. When I left school, at 15, I signed for Barnsley at football. I was an inside-right. I was there until I was 16 or 17 before I decided to stick to cricket. I don't think you could play two games. It's hard work. Cricket gave me a longer career.

The best cricketer I ever saw was Garfield Sobers. He was a truly great player. He was three cricketers rolled into one. A great entertainer, and on top of that, he was a gentleman.

One day I caught a London bus because my car was off the road. The conductor came on and said, "Fares, please." I looked at him and he had a white cap on and I thought it looked like one of mine. I said: "Excuse me, sir, where did you get that?" He turned round and replied: "Haven't you heard of Mr Dickie Bird? It's his hat. I ran on the pitch and got it and I am so proud of it." I thought it was great. I never let on that it was me.

In the modern-day game, I loved watching Jacques Kallis. He was a fine player. Sachin Tendulkar and Brian Lara were incredible to watch. But those three are now finished. They would be three outstanding players in any era and now they are gone. It's sad.

Geoffrey Boycott is a good friend of mine but I don't think he was right when he said I suffered from nerves when I played. I think I worried a lot, and that's what he's probably thinking about, Geoff. I got low scores and I used to worry.

I had to have a word with Merv Hughes once. He was bowling to Graeme Hick and he kept playing and missing. Merv's language was getting worse and worse and I had had enough. I turned to him and told him: "I want you to be a good boy. Don't swear anymore." He looked at me and said: "Dickie Bird, you're a legend. I won't swear again." He came in next ball and Hick played and missed again. Never swear again? I've never heard language like it after that!

I'm about to become president of Yorkshire - and what a tremendous honour that is. Never in my wildest dreams did I ever think I'd be president when I walked through those gates as a 16-year-old for the first time. It's one of the greatest honours of my life.

I was walking off the field in a Test match at Old Trafford once. There was a Lancashire supporter right at the top of the members' enclosure. He'd had so much to drink he couldn't stand. He shouted at me, "Bird, it's the best day of the year, it's blue sky, red hot, the sun's shining, you can't take them off. What is your problem?" I said: "I have no problem - but it's lunch!"

I didn't have any superstitions. I had faith in the Lord. That was good enough for me.

One man I cannot wait to see develop is Will Rhodes. I watched him play for England Under-19 over the winter and he looked a real prospect.

Yorkshire County Cricket Club is the greatest club in the world.

The funniest thing I've seen on a cricket field was when the drains burst at Headingley. There was torrential rain before the Test match and they were all saying the match would be delayed. The ground staff worked through the night to get the pitch fit because it was like a lake. Somehow we started on time and England won the toss and batted. Curtly Ambrose went to bowl the fifth ball of the day and stopped and said: "We've got a big problem here, Mr Dickie. You better come and look, man." Halfway through his run-up there was spray, like a fountain, the water coming up above his boots and mine. We trooped off and the crowd were shouting: "Same again, Bird, what is your problem?" I told them: "We've got a big one, we need some plumbers!"

I did 25 years as a Test umpire. If you worked it out, with all the Test matches played today and ODIs, I think if I'd have done 25 years now I'd end up standing in 500 international matches.

There were so many great players in my day, it's hard to pick a favourite that I umpired. Barry Richards, Sunil Gavaskar, Viv Richards, Graeme Pollock, Garfield Sobers, Alan Knott, Shane Warne, Lance Gibbs and Abdul Qadir were all enjoyable to watch. Then there are the quicks: Michael Holding, Andy Roberts, Joel Garner, Malcolm Marshall, Richard Hadlee, Imran Khan, Kapil Dev, Waqar Younis and so on. The left-armer, Wasim Akram, was tremendous as was Sachin Tendulkar.

I like talking to people everywhere I go.

In my era as an umpire, players used to have a joke with you and I used to have a joke with them off it. The game was always played in tremendous spirit. Everyone accepted decisions. That was an era that I really do think was the best time in cricket.

When the legends from Pakistan, India, West Indies and Sri Lanka retired, they used to invite me to their homes if I was on holiday. Dennis Lillee, the greatest fast bowler I've ever seen, used to invite me to come round and have a meal with him and his family. How great a thing to do was that? I doubt it happens nowadays.

I go to all the county matches. I will go to every home match and as many away matches as I can as president of Yorkshire.

I'm an honorary life member of the MCC and I'm very proud of that too. I am also an honorary life member at Leicestershire. It's so nice to see so many people who I think might have forgotten me but they still remember and have a chat. It's just amazing.

I enjoy watching Kevin Pietersen. What a fine player. I don't know what's behind England's decision to get rid of him. It's got to be in the dressing room somewhere, but I just love watching him.

In my spare time I go down to watch Barnsley a lot. I'm a season-ticket holder at Oakwell for my sins. It is a bit frustrating, though. I would like to see more Barnsley youths playing, the local lads who have got Barnsley at heart. There's not one boy in the squad that is a Barnsley-born player. We have got one of best academies in the country so why can't we use some of them?

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • landl47 on May 2, 2014, 2:12 GMT

    Dickie was a character, but as an umpire that was his problem. He couldn't resist getting into the act when he should have been as invisible as possible. He was the worst umpire I've ever seen for interfering with play- taking the teams off and keeping them off when they should have been playing. He forgot the only reason we have professional cricket is because people pay to watch it; it's the spectators who should be the first concern for every umpire and every cricketer.

    Having said that, he seems to be a nice guy and I wish him all the best in retirement. I just don't want to see anyone like him umpiring again.

  • dummy4fb on May 1, 2014, 15:51 GMT

    No technology at ECB Premier League level and it's still just as much fun and I agree with geoffboyc. Television angles and Hawkeye produce far too many wrong decisions.

  • sighed on May 1, 2014, 15:36 GMT

    I am a person who believes that the right decision should be made most of the times, but also agree to Mr. Birds views here. I read a comment from John-Price which says the game is about player. I beg to differ. It also includes umpires and thier judgement. I still get goosebumps when a close umpiring decision looks incorrect to the naked eye, but replay confirms the decision. I feel cricket is a 'whole' experience and it also includes the energy from the spectators in the stadium.

  • whoster on May 1, 2014, 14:12 GMT

    Always lovely to hear Dickie's musings about the game. No umpire before or since has received such affection and respect from players and supporters alike, and that's an incredible achievement. He wasn't only a brilliant decision maker, but had exactly the personality and charisma to diffuse any volatile on-field situations.

    Even though it's coming up to 20 years since he retired, Dickie is still one of the game's great entertainers. Let's hope he keeps us entertained for many more years.

  • geoffboyc on May 1, 2014, 14:10 GMT

    If the technology that was originally developed to amuse the TV audiences is now so fundamental to the game of cricket, how come it's not considered necessary to use in all the 4-Day domestic championships in ICC member countries? If it doesn't matter whether umpires make a wrong decision, uncorrected by technology, in an LVCC game for example, why is it so overwhelmingly important in a Test Match, notwithstanding the extra interest in the International game. There's a real debate to be had about at what point the technology changes the whole conduct and tactics of a game to the detriment of the cricket and it's one that is long overdue.

  • John-Price on May 1, 2014, 13:49 GMT

    "It's very, very sad that umpiring as we knew it is finished."

    Why is that sad? The game is about players, umpires are there only because they are needed. No-one goes to a match to watch umpires, no-one plays for the pleasure of interacting with them. If there is a better way of adjudicating, that is not sad, that is excellent.

    In any case 99.999% of cricket matches do not have access to technology, so umpiring will continue for a while yet.

  • Charindra on May 1, 2014, 5:18 GMT

    Wow, so he retired in 1996. That was the year SL won the world cup, and before that nobody really cared about us. That's probably why he didn't mention any Sri Lankan players. But I honestly think Bird is respected more as a man manager and a character than an actual umpire. His decisions might not have held up against the modern day scrutiny. Maybe that's why he doesn't like technology. He'd rather have a team lose a match due to a bad decision than have an umpire assisted by technology to deliver correct decisions.

  • c-rashed on April 30, 2014, 23:11 GMT

    To err is human, we should not forget this. The mistakes of yester years are the stuff to while away the rains, waiting play to resume. The 1979 match (re Middle Stump) is a good example. Would India have won it? Maybe they might have lost it, maybe the result would not have changed. You can pick any similar match and go on for hours with friends and foes. The modern umpiring, like the modern game (T20) is nothing but farce, made for tv. Where is the human factor?

  • espncricinfomobile on April 30, 2014, 22:18 GMT

    The same stories every time...we've heard them all before...Merv Hughes, the bus conductor, Headingly water leak.., I read his latest book and repeats the mobile phone prank with Botham and Lamb....how true are all these stories...I'm sure with time they have been exaggerated 10 fold!

  • Former_SJCC on April 30, 2014, 22:04 GMT

    Dickie was a good umpire no doubt, but there is no justification in standing in the way of technology. the whole reason that neutral umpires were introduced in the early 90s was because of the bias of the umpires. if umpires were held to high standards many of them would not have had a job. players work jolly hard to make a living and no umpire has any rights to take away the fruits of their labor by howler decisions. umpires and officials have for all too long been hiding behind the "gentlemans game" approach. if they want to breed so many gentlemen then why not sponsor the church or any religious institution rather than trying to run a sport. spectators come to see the skills of the players and not the the poor decisions that was notorious in the 80's of the umpires. wish more technology is introduced into this sport that is lacking global appeal simply cause the administrators like to hold it to its 18th century roots.