April 17, 2014

New Zealand must look in the mirror

If they are to live up to their potential in next year's World Cup at home, they need to look within and search for inspiration pronto
30

Signs have been encouraging for New Zealand as they build towards co-hosting the next World Cup in 2015. While, signs are good, billboards are better.

The event itself will be hugely supported. Kiwi folk know the meaning of supporting an event like this, for they have examples, etched in their hearts. In 1987, the All Blacks won the inaugural rugby World Cup on home turf. In 1992, the Young Guns went close, as close as any New Zealand cricket team to date has, and then after 24 long-suffering years, it was the fans' rousing support that spurred on the ABs again to lift the Webb Ellis trophy once more, by one point, against a fervent France. Add to that the 1974 and 1990 Commonwealth Games and the effect it had on our athletes, and it rounds off the notion that playing in one's backyard with a world title at stake can't be beaten in the life of a sportsman.

My own story of World Cup adventure has been eventful. In 1987, in Indore, in our third match of the tournament, following my excellent form in the first, I led with a blistering assault against Australia in a rain-reduced 30-over chase. The Australian bowlers were at my mercy and by the time we all arrived at the final over, we only needed 7 runs to win, with plenty of wickets in hand. I was 58 not out, the field spread, and Steve Waugh to bowl.

Instead of playing the ball instinctively, as I had done till then, I got sidetracked and hooked into seeing a big gap over mid-off, right in front of me. I didn't move the premeditated thought out of the way; I swung early and the off-side sweeper rounded out a good running catch at deep extra-cover. We lost two more wickets in that over, scoring just 1. It was my wicket that was the death blow. I choked.

I lived with that for weeks, as Australia, and not us under my brother Jeff, went on to lift the Cup at Eden Gardens. Weeks turned into months, and then years. Without confronting it, a few more chokes emerged; the final wake-up call happened a month prior to the 1992 World Cup, when I lost the first Test against England in Christchurch with a last-minute brain explosion.

However, when the honour was given to me to lead my nation out onto Eden Park on February 22, 1992, I was ready. In the weeks prior, I had sought the help I needed, faced the truth, removed the mistakes if not the memories, intent on carrying New Zealand all the way this time, by holding my nerve. If it wasn't for a hamstring tear, and my hasty, misguided decision to rest the leg in order to play the Melbourne final, we would have achieved our goal.

The point is admission. I choked in Indore, Wellington (where I was dismissed for 299 against Sri Lanka), and Christchurch. Slowly, I realised there was no shame in admitting it, and as soon as I did, my mind came alive in my quest to seek the right information on how to deal with mental interference and random thoughts when they arose. More so, to play fearlessly, with courage and skill, when the moment called for it.

This is what any side, any individual player, must attempt to do. Choking, in my understanding, is when you fail to admit there is a need to change, and remain stuck stubbornly in the old belief, unable to breathe in new air, unable to think clearly in the pressure moment.

Often in sport there are two mindsets that confront you: playing in familiar conditions that breed clarity, and the opposite - playing in conditions that are very unfamiliar (like Pete Sampras playing on clay, or Bjorn Borg on cement) that lead to confusion and uncertainty. Playing cricket in Asia is as hard as it gets for the likes of Australia, South Africa, England and New Zealand, and there is no shame in admitting that. Asian sides face the same challenges when it is reversed. The requirement is to face it front-on and improve your odds of success. All eight major nations have time to assess how they will approach this major event Down Under, and how they can improve their chances in familiar or unfamiliar conditions over a longer period.

Following their soft, weak departure in the World T20 recently, can New Zealand face the truth of courage under fire? What can they learn from succumbing to the pressure of elimination, albeit in unfamiliar conditions?

Only one player in that match against Sri Lanka, Kane Williamson, showed his growing and improving internal fortitude and appetite for riding stormy weather in foreign seas. He is a thorough workhorse in the net environment, and his obsession with the game showed, while the others toppled like a row of bicycles on a busy Mumbai roadside. It won't be like that in Wellington or Auckland, but some serious self-appraisal needs to be done if New Zealand are to break the hoodoo of six semi-final exits in days gone by. It could be said that reaching that many was an over-achievement, but in familiar conditions their potential rises again.

Many will read that and say you have to make a semi-final first to break anything. And that won't be easy. So here is the guts of what needs to be done, in my humble opinion.

That New Zealand have just recently failed a pressure test is why they must begin the admission that work is in order. Otherwise the slow choke will begin to surface at the toughest moments, as it did for the All Blacks in rugby World Cups over two decades

Mike Hesson, the head coach, and Brendon McCullum, the captain, should have a good grasp on their men at this point. Yet Hesson must encourage McCullum himself, and Ross Taylor, who have experienced enough by now, to share their truth as to what went down in Chittagong, and what has gone down at other moments, which will help their younger charges face any fears they may have. In what was effectively a quarter-final match, McCullum's reckless charge at Rangana Herath, when on nought, had a feeling of déjà vu about it; McCullum is building a track record in ICC tournament elimination matches that isn't good reading, and needs to be addressed: four ODI innings for 14 runs.

Darren Lehmann, for Australia, will ensure this mentoring happens for them in their build-up. There will be no doubt that his charges will be exposed to Allan Border, Steve Waugh, Ricky Ponting, Glenn McGrath and Shane Warne. Australia's library of World Cup success is vast and it will be a misguided soul who doesn't listen intently to any who lifted the Cup for them previously. They will be hard to beat next March.

The key for any team is, the work has to start now, but the difficulty is that in the meantime, individual players are spread far and wide, competing for IPL and other T20 riches. But there must in the next six months be some serious work, talk and enactment of how this next World Cup can be won.

The first task is to face the mirror. When you look deep into the eyes of the man staring back at you, you find much to see and consider. Whether you want to see the truth, and face changing the truth, is the crux. If the positive, enlightening decision is taken, then the process begins. From there you begin the search for the best information and inspiration you can find. Only the best will do, the ones who have smelt and touched it before. It gives you a sense of what is to come, of real hope and belief, coupled with an acceptance of what you can offer and achieve with new, raw honesty. Once all this is found, time is needed to throw out the old thinking and bring in the new, gently and slowly. It never happens overnight. That is the essence of truth.

That New Zealand have just recently failed a pressure test is the very reason why they must begin the admission that work is in order and the truth must be pursued and faced. Otherwise, the slow choke will begin to surface at the toughest moments, as it did for the All Blacks in rugby World Cups over two decades and has for South Africa in cricket world events since 1998.

While, incredibly, South Africa are still in denial, New Zealand must not fall into the same trap as they attempt to realise the potential for a glory never achieved before. Hesson has a job steering them towards the truth, and there is no time to lose, or the unique opportunity for Cup glory at home will be lost.

Martin Crowe, one of the leading batsmen of the late '80s and early '90s, played 77 Tests for New Zealand

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Guruprasad.S on April 17, 2014, 3:41 GMT

    I remember Martin Crowe nearly chasing down 197 (or so) against Australia in the 1987 world cup. Martin Crowe was a great player, and his admission of failure here makes us appreciate his greatness. His leadership abilities were on display in 1992 world cup, and McCullum would do well to take some lessons from Martin Crowe himself. Martin Crowe is also a fine thinker of the game and brings out the issues confronting top cricketers. NZ is expected to do well in home conditions. As the India vs NZ series showed, subcontinent teams are likely to struggle in Aus and NZ if they dont prepare well, and if they dont make quick adjustments.

  • on April 25, 2014, 7:47 GMT

    Everyone is commenting that NZ lack superstars. You don't NEED superstars necessarily to lift a World Cup - you need half a dozen guys who can turn on a big performance a couple of times in the tournament. You just need to reach the semis, then have a good couple of days. We will be well underdogs in this one, but the squad is a bit like the oz test team in South Africa - nobody who would be in that superstar category, but there's some good talent there who can light up on a given day. A good article, I thought - can't wait!!

  • Captainman on April 21, 2014, 10:01 GMT

    New Zealand just don't have a big pool of players and talent to win a world trophy. Maybe get to a final but they are clearly lacking hence an ordinary team I feel. They are an average team at best with no quality spinners, bar Taylor no world class batsman statistically and no Steyn like pacer.

  • ksquared on April 18, 2014, 15:22 GMT

    NZ are a good side no doubt but I don't see them as WC winners. Though they have a great team ethic I feel that they lack that IT factor in big games that teams like AUS, PAK, IND and SL have even in familiar conditions I feel if they face any of the aforementioned teams in Semi/Quarter final stages the weight of the occasion as well as expectations if not for quality performance from the opposition will bring them down. In both the previous WC they weren't expected to beat SL in the Semis and were well beaten but this time expectations would be high thus, they will either crumble or rise to the occasion. I feel it's going to be the former but only time will tell.

  • HennopsRiverEnd on April 18, 2014, 13:05 GMT

    Although NZ have good players, they don't have a lot of 'very' good players for them to start tournaments as favourites to win it. That's where the choke tag comes in for SA. They are deemed chokers because of the quality they've always possessed but have never turned into ICC silverware (apart from that Champions Trophy). NZ aren't underachievers, SA are, because of the quality they always produce they should be winning tournaments.

  • on April 18, 2014, 8:10 GMT

    New Zealand have a set of decent cricketers but no one whom you could consider as a great. Maybe this is the reason why they haven't gone past the semis. Their best chance was in 1992 when they were the best team in the 1st round. This time, they have good players in Guptill, Taylor, Williamson, Southee, etc. but I'm not too sure if they can take them all the way. They will be playing at home, so that's an advantage they'll be having.

  • fairfan70 on April 18, 2014, 7:15 GMT

    NZ has a decent team to do well in next year's WC. They just need every member of the team to contribute rather than expecting one or two stars like Ross Taylor/Kane Williamson to pull them through in every match. And it starts with McCullum.

  • Lion83 on April 18, 2014, 6:12 GMT

    New Zealand is a decent team but they lack the killing instincts to win a world cup or to win a crunch game. Saw that happen very recently in the World t20 game against SL they failed to chase 120. To me SL, Ind, Aus and SA will reach the semi finals of next world cup.

  • on April 18, 2014, 6:08 GMT

    asian teams always pack a super punch in multilateral competitions,since1992 worldcup,asian teams have alway reached the finals of icc 50-50 world cups,whatever be the conditions seaming or spinning

  • dunger.bob on April 18, 2014, 0:48 GMT

    I'm not so sure about any of this. It's way too complicated for it's own good. Too much mirror/navel gazing is bound to cloud the mind and ends up being counter productive. .. It's essentially a pretty simple game. When you're bowling, hit the top of off stump. When you're batting, see the ball - hit the ball and when you're fielding take your catches. Anything else is just a distraction.

  • Guruprasad.S on April 17, 2014, 3:41 GMT

    I remember Martin Crowe nearly chasing down 197 (or so) against Australia in the 1987 world cup. Martin Crowe was a great player, and his admission of failure here makes us appreciate his greatness. His leadership abilities were on display in 1992 world cup, and McCullum would do well to take some lessons from Martin Crowe himself. Martin Crowe is also a fine thinker of the game and brings out the issues confronting top cricketers. NZ is expected to do well in home conditions. As the India vs NZ series showed, subcontinent teams are likely to struggle in Aus and NZ if they dont prepare well, and if they dont make quick adjustments.

  • on April 25, 2014, 7:47 GMT

    Everyone is commenting that NZ lack superstars. You don't NEED superstars necessarily to lift a World Cup - you need half a dozen guys who can turn on a big performance a couple of times in the tournament. You just need to reach the semis, then have a good couple of days. We will be well underdogs in this one, but the squad is a bit like the oz test team in South Africa - nobody who would be in that superstar category, but there's some good talent there who can light up on a given day. A good article, I thought - can't wait!!

  • Captainman on April 21, 2014, 10:01 GMT

    New Zealand just don't have a big pool of players and talent to win a world trophy. Maybe get to a final but they are clearly lacking hence an ordinary team I feel. They are an average team at best with no quality spinners, bar Taylor no world class batsman statistically and no Steyn like pacer.

  • ksquared on April 18, 2014, 15:22 GMT

    NZ are a good side no doubt but I don't see them as WC winners. Though they have a great team ethic I feel that they lack that IT factor in big games that teams like AUS, PAK, IND and SL have even in familiar conditions I feel if they face any of the aforementioned teams in Semi/Quarter final stages the weight of the occasion as well as expectations if not for quality performance from the opposition will bring them down. In both the previous WC they weren't expected to beat SL in the Semis and were well beaten but this time expectations would be high thus, they will either crumble or rise to the occasion. I feel it's going to be the former but only time will tell.

  • HennopsRiverEnd on April 18, 2014, 13:05 GMT

    Although NZ have good players, they don't have a lot of 'very' good players for them to start tournaments as favourites to win it. That's where the choke tag comes in for SA. They are deemed chokers because of the quality they've always possessed but have never turned into ICC silverware (apart from that Champions Trophy). NZ aren't underachievers, SA are, because of the quality they always produce they should be winning tournaments.

  • on April 18, 2014, 8:10 GMT

    New Zealand have a set of decent cricketers but no one whom you could consider as a great. Maybe this is the reason why they haven't gone past the semis. Their best chance was in 1992 when they were the best team in the 1st round. This time, they have good players in Guptill, Taylor, Williamson, Southee, etc. but I'm not too sure if they can take them all the way. They will be playing at home, so that's an advantage they'll be having.

  • fairfan70 on April 18, 2014, 7:15 GMT

    NZ has a decent team to do well in next year's WC. They just need every member of the team to contribute rather than expecting one or two stars like Ross Taylor/Kane Williamson to pull them through in every match. And it starts with McCullum.

  • Lion83 on April 18, 2014, 6:12 GMT

    New Zealand is a decent team but they lack the killing instincts to win a world cup or to win a crunch game. Saw that happen very recently in the World t20 game against SL they failed to chase 120. To me SL, Ind, Aus and SA will reach the semi finals of next world cup.

  • on April 18, 2014, 6:08 GMT

    asian teams always pack a super punch in multilateral competitions,since1992 worldcup,asian teams have alway reached the finals of icc 50-50 world cups,whatever be the conditions seaming or spinning

  • dunger.bob on April 18, 2014, 0:48 GMT

    I'm not so sure about any of this. It's way too complicated for it's own good. Too much mirror/navel gazing is bound to cloud the mind and ends up being counter productive. .. It's essentially a pretty simple game. When you're bowling, hit the top of off stump. When you're batting, see the ball - hit the ball and when you're fielding take your catches. Anything else is just a distraction.

  • DJRNZ on April 18, 2014, 0:01 GMT

    And could not agree more with kiwicricketnut. Crowe not only has brilliant technical knowledge but has so much to offer the Black Caps mentally. He has been there and done that and among his great personal successes with the bat made many mistakes himself when it was his time on the field. In my view he is a cricketing genius of the mind - his articles prove that.

    I recall McCullum saying a couple of years back that they stopped listening to Crowe years ago - Well just look at Taylor's recent success after going through the issues he faced. Takes a certain type of man to do that and I have no doubts Crowe played a big part!

    Crowe can help guys like Guptil who look like they are about to break down in tears each time they get out, he can help the wayward Ryder and can push the likes of young Williamson to be a true NZ great in the years to come.

    I believe he will be involved down the track, just not with Hesson and McCullum at the helm.

  • DJRNZ on April 17, 2014, 23:01 GMT

    @Tughral Baig - Mcclenaghan was nearly the fastest bowler to 50 wickets in ODIs - you don't consider this near feat worthy of a 'good wicket taking bowler'? he has 5 four wickets bags and a five for in 22 matches!

    Southee has 105 wickets from 78 games and Mills 235 wickets from 165. Last time I checked this were very respectable in this format.

    Plus we have Bennett, Milne, Henry, Boult all in the wings - All genuine wicket takers. Appreciate you may not watch a lot of NZ cricket but in this regard you are wrong.

    You mention Taylor and Guptill being the only 2 batsmen being able to bat for 50 overs.... I agree in part but you forget about Williamson who in my opinion will do this many times in the years to come.

  • on April 17, 2014, 21:29 GMT

    I greatly admire Crowe but it seems like the 1992 loss is still well remembered by the Kiwis. I even heard that during the 1999 semis when one of the journalists was interviewing a Kiwi fan, she remarked, we still remember 1992. They have to get 1992 out of their system. They were the favorites, they were very very close, but so were many other teams who have lost the semis. NZ are a very good team and in their peek right now. I am not an expert, but to me it seems like even in 2014 T20, NZ team seemed to be under a lot of pressure of expectations.

  • t20cric on April 17, 2014, 19:22 GMT

    I think NZ have a realistic chance of winning the world cup. The have plenty of talent in Williamson, Amderson, Boult, Taylor etc... but they lack mental strength & collapse in the wrong moments (just like my team Pakistan). If they can fix that problem then they have potential to win the world cup. But that's easier said then done.

    @Ahmad Uetian: SA is definitely not overrated, in fact when it comes to some players like Kallis they are underrated. SA have Amla, AB, Kallis & de Kock (he's getting pretty reliable) in batting & in bowling they have Steyn, Morkel & Tsotobe. With all these world class players they aren't an overrated team & they have a really good chance of winning the world cup if they don't choke. In terms of not reaching SF in ICC events then just go back to CT 2013 & T20 WC 2014 where they did make it to the semis (maybe they made it to SF in other ICC events as well but I only remember these 2). It's possible to compliment your team without putting down other teams.

  • on April 17, 2014, 17:52 GMT

    Martin Crowe, sometimes you have to give credit to the opposing team. It is not that you loose, it is sometimes that the other team win. Your team scored a pathetic 166 in the last league game of the 1992 WC totally outclassed by Pakistan. This must have had a huge psychological blow on NZ team which was reflected when they came out to bowl against Inzi in the semi. Your batsmen did well to reach 262 but bowlers? They had no answer to Inzi. You have to give credit to the opposing players.

  • on April 17, 2014, 16:50 GMT

    martin crowe is fast becoming a philosopher.....

  • on April 17, 2014, 16:34 GMT

    NZ always punch above their weight that itself is a g8 achievement.............Hatts off to them for being such a small population with no super stars yet competing against big teams.

    It is the SA that r really OVER-RATED with overrated big players in bowling, batting & fielding yet not reaching even semis of any ICC tournament.

  • on April 17, 2014, 16:06 GMT

    New Zealand are not chokers.No one expect them to win World cup just that they get beaten by far superior teams semi final , quarter final stages of World Cups..No one expected them to beat SL in 2007 or 2011 in semifinal..same in this T20 WC..same when they face Australia , SA etc in knock out stages..They are a good team but not good enough to be a World Champion in cricket

  • cricket0580 on April 17, 2014, 13:11 GMT

    Very well written article. Again Martin Crowe is spot on on whats need to get done. It wont be easy for NZ team to go against the history of being the semi-final team, but it can be accomplished. NZ needs to form a think tank of former NZ greats such as Sir Hadlee, Martin Crowe, Shane Bond, John Wright, etc and carve out a plan of where they're at and what they need to do in terms of winning the Cup. It would be good idea to even include the Rugby world cup champions players who can share their experience of WC victory. They would be the sports psychologist for NZ team. But in the end of the day there should be fire in the current NZ's player belly to really win the cup. B. Mccullum did break the record for highest runs in test. Can he do it to win the Cup? It would have been great to see shane bond in action. I wish he would come out of retirement and play for NZ one last time. Stuff like that happens in movies (ref to "The Replacements" starring Keanu Reeves)

  • stormy16 on April 17, 2014, 12:55 GMT

    I dont agree with Crows idea of Chokers tag applying to NZ. To wear the chockers tag you have to first be the firm favorite and then lose and doubt if NZ have been the firm favorite in any of the WC games they have lost. I think in most of these games NZ were bascially an 'even chance' and if you lose that you just lost - not chocked. For example in the 2011 WC NZ lost to SL in the semi final in Colombo against a strong spin based attack inlcuding Murali - dont think that is a choke but a simple loss! In Chittagong t20 QF, same deal.

    WC 2015 in my books NZ would have chocked if they dont make the semi-finals given the mix of talent they have for the conditions.

  • codegreen on April 17, 2014, 11:57 GMT

    kiwis are not that proteas type of chokers ,they play good cricket every time ,and now they have very good players in their team. With that type of bowling and all rounders they are one of favourites to win this time.....,,,,...

  • electric_loco_WAP4 on April 17, 2014, 11:53 GMT

    NZ's 1 of genuine contndrs. in 2nd rung of tourney favs.No.1 side in shorter forms Aus is clearly o/whelming favs.,with quality-they wont look terrible comp. to some past champ. Aus sides-in ranks should win WC w/o L a game.NZ,SL,SA make 2nd list-favs.

  • on April 17, 2014, 11:45 GMT

    @Taghrul Beg Just have a look at Mitchell Mcclenaghan, Tim Southee, Corey Anderson and (if fit) Daniel Vettori. What strike power you want? Sir RJ Hadlee?

  • on April 17, 2014, 10:58 GMT

    As always, fantastic reading provided by Mr. Crowe. I agree with the definition of choking in this article. Choking is not just about folding under pressure, or "losing your head", but rather a loss of clarity, and skewing of perspective. Sometimes, that is changing your game unnecessarily, and sometimes it is being too dogmatic and inflexible in your game. Watching teams play SA in the recent T20WC, it was clear that many of the teams choked against SA (quite unusual). The strength / weakness of the team, the players, or technique have nothing to do with choking, rather it is loss of composure and concentration. The best and worst of us are susceptible to it. And that, is where the opportunity lies - successfully not choking provides the experience and confidence to do so in the future - it is the "winning mentality" that the Ozzies had for 2 decades - and is what separates the great from the good. All the best to the Kiwi's and the Saffers - lets hope they can drop the choke chain

  • on April 17, 2014, 9:13 GMT

    There is no way you can call Kiwis chokers..you need to have a great team which can be called a favorite and then loose it in order to be given that title. Nz just did good in ICC world events however they predictably lost against better oppositions at the semi final stage.1992 and 1999 against Pak in the semis NZ obviously had the weaker team so there was no surprises that they lost.About the 87' Cup,the favorites among the semi finalists was Pak however they threw it away against Aus who were a weak side in that tournament.My bet is NZ wont have gone far even if Crowe chased down that total.I think NZ always had a good competitive side but one which could be beaten without much fuss most of the time.Their present team is not one of their best.They have filled the team with big hitters with only Guptill and Taylor having the class and temperament of playing 50 overs and literally no good bowlers to talk about.My advice to NZ cricket find good wicket taking bowlers.

  • kiwicricketnut on April 17, 2014, 8:29 GMT

    its unfortunate that only a few players actually bother to listen to crowe, clearly he was a tortured player who fought alot of demons in his playing days but he did learn how to beat those demons and would have a wealth of knowledge of how to mentally steel yourself for the big games. most of our top players have the talent and the team we have now definately has the talent to lift the cup, its always the top two inches thats always been our players problem. crowe would have to be the biggest untapped resource in nz cricket not only would he be a brilliant batting coach he could also teach our players how to mentally prepare for matches which is a highly under rated skill, he's done wonders for taylor, why nobody else gets crowe involved is beyond me.

  • FAB_ALI on April 17, 2014, 7:32 GMT

    Two instances for WT20 2014: 1. Against SA when 7 needed of final over, why didi they look to hit a six every ball? should be looking for a single every ball ronchi & nathan and taylor could have find a boundary somewhere. 2. Against SL, needless run out of guptill and then Brendon loses his patience when the target is only 120. The other batsmen to follow were thoroughly confused as what was needed. They just needed singles!!!

    Both instances show that there is a real lack of mental toughness when under pressure and the pressure is being built by themselves trying to do which is not required at all.

  • Blade-Runner on April 17, 2014, 7:01 GMT

    If NZ ever wanna feature in a WC final, they need to stop constantly running into Sri Lanka in quarter/semi finals.

  • AshwinizXI on April 17, 2014, 6:13 GMT

    In my opinion NZ need to do following things to lift a major trophy:

    1. Find a responsible captain a la Fleming. I find Brendon casual in his approach to the game. Williamson should be appointed captain without much delay to give him time & opportunity to settle in the role.

    2. specific roles for each of the batsmen. I think NZ's batting disappoints far too often and leaves the bowlers to do much damage-control. Guptill, Taylor, Brendon, and Corey Anderson should play attacking game with Kane W as the sheet anchor. If Ryder can be fit again, it will be a plus and he should replace Guptill. Plus NZ need to be flexible in their batting order. Who'll be the floater?

    3. The bowling has improved, but it is somewhat uni-dimensional. With Vettori effectively retired, they need to find a spinner with subtle variations. Pacers all bowl in the same pace range.

  • Kulaputra on April 17, 2014, 3:23 GMT

    Good analysis. Even failures during successes have to be analyzed thoroughly to have a great. Team

  • Kulaputra on April 17, 2014, 3:23 GMT

    Good analysis. Even failures during successes have to be analyzed thoroughly to have a great. Team

  • AshwinizXI on April 17, 2014, 6:13 GMT

    In my opinion NZ need to do following things to lift a major trophy:

    1. Find a responsible captain a la Fleming. I find Brendon casual in his approach to the game. Williamson should be appointed captain without much delay to give him time & opportunity to settle in the role.

    2. specific roles for each of the batsmen. I think NZ's batting disappoints far too often and leaves the bowlers to do much damage-control. Guptill, Taylor, Brendon, and Corey Anderson should play attacking game with Kane W as the sheet anchor. If Ryder can be fit again, it will be a plus and he should replace Guptill. Plus NZ need to be flexible in their batting order. Who'll be the floater?

    3. The bowling has improved, but it is somewhat uni-dimensional. With Vettori effectively retired, they need to find a spinner with subtle variations. Pacers all bowl in the same pace range.

  • Blade-Runner on April 17, 2014, 7:01 GMT

    If NZ ever wanna feature in a WC final, they need to stop constantly running into Sri Lanka in quarter/semi finals.

  • FAB_ALI on April 17, 2014, 7:32 GMT

    Two instances for WT20 2014: 1. Against SA when 7 needed of final over, why didi they look to hit a six every ball? should be looking for a single every ball ronchi & nathan and taylor could have find a boundary somewhere. 2. Against SL, needless run out of guptill and then Brendon loses his patience when the target is only 120. The other batsmen to follow were thoroughly confused as what was needed. They just needed singles!!!

    Both instances show that there is a real lack of mental toughness when under pressure and the pressure is being built by themselves trying to do which is not required at all.

  • kiwicricketnut on April 17, 2014, 8:29 GMT

    its unfortunate that only a few players actually bother to listen to crowe, clearly he was a tortured player who fought alot of demons in his playing days but he did learn how to beat those demons and would have a wealth of knowledge of how to mentally steel yourself for the big games. most of our top players have the talent and the team we have now definately has the talent to lift the cup, its always the top two inches thats always been our players problem. crowe would have to be the biggest untapped resource in nz cricket not only would he be a brilliant batting coach he could also teach our players how to mentally prepare for matches which is a highly under rated skill, he's done wonders for taylor, why nobody else gets crowe involved is beyond me.

  • on April 17, 2014, 9:13 GMT

    There is no way you can call Kiwis chokers..you need to have a great team which can be called a favorite and then loose it in order to be given that title. Nz just did good in ICC world events however they predictably lost against better oppositions at the semi final stage.1992 and 1999 against Pak in the semis NZ obviously had the weaker team so there was no surprises that they lost.About the 87' Cup,the favorites among the semi finalists was Pak however they threw it away against Aus who were a weak side in that tournament.My bet is NZ wont have gone far even if Crowe chased down that total.I think NZ always had a good competitive side but one which could be beaten without much fuss most of the time.Their present team is not one of their best.They have filled the team with big hitters with only Guptill and Taylor having the class and temperament of playing 50 overs and literally no good bowlers to talk about.My advice to NZ cricket find good wicket taking bowlers.

  • on April 17, 2014, 10:58 GMT

    As always, fantastic reading provided by Mr. Crowe. I agree with the definition of choking in this article. Choking is not just about folding under pressure, or "losing your head", but rather a loss of clarity, and skewing of perspective. Sometimes, that is changing your game unnecessarily, and sometimes it is being too dogmatic and inflexible in your game. Watching teams play SA in the recent T20WC, it was clear that many of the teams choked against SA (quite unusual). The strength / weakness of the team, the players, or technique have nothing to do with choking, rather it is loss of composure and concentration. The best and worst of us are susceptible to it. And that, is where the opportunity lies - successfully not choking provides the experience and confidence to do so in the future - it is the "winning mentality" that the Ozzies had for 2 decades - and is what separates the great from the good. All the best to the Kiwi's and the Saffers - lets hope they can drop the choke chain

  • on April 17, 2014, 11:45 GMT

    @Taghrul Beg Just have a look at Mitchell Mcclenaghan, Tim Southee, Corey Anderson and (if fit) Daniel Vettori. What strike power you want? Sir RJ Hadlee?

  • electric_loco_WAP4 on April 17, 2014, 11:53 GMT

    NZ's 1 of genuine contndrs. in 2nd rung of tourney favs.No.1 side in shorter forms Aus is clearly o/whelming favs.,with quality-they wont look terrible comp. to some past champ. Aus sides-in ranks should win WC w/o L a game.NZ,SL,SA make 2nd list-favs.

  • codegreen on April 17, 2014, 11:57 GMT

    kiwis are not that proteas type of chokers ,they play good cricket every time ,and now they have very good players in their team. With that type of bowling and all rounders they are one of favourites to win this time.....,,,,...