July 14, 2014

Mesmeric Sachin, soporific Boycs

Memorable innings in England-India Tests down the years
31

Mohammad Azharuddin
At Lord's in 1990, India's captain, Azharuddin, achieved the almost impossible: he upstaged a triple-century (Graham Gooch's, see below), with a sublime hundred of his own, full of frolicky flicks, the bat wafting wand-like in the way Ranji must have patented around 100 years previously. Azhar's 121 couldn't prevent an Indian defeat, but it remains top of the Lord's honours board for elegance.

Graham Gooch
Gooch's 333 at Lord's in 1990 was the monolith to Azharuddin's minaret, but it was mighty effective: backed up by his second-innings 123, it helped England pull off a comfortable victory, sealed by Gooch's direct-hit run-out. It was the first triple-century I ever saw in the flesh: nonetheless, the innings radiated effectiveness rather than elegance. And although Gooch hit 43 fours and pile-drove three sixes, the first memories are of the straightforward chance behind he survived on 36, and of tea being taken with him stuck on 299.

Vinoo Mankad
At Lord's in 1952, India batted again 302 behind after England passed 500: Mankad, their left-arm spinner, really deserved a rest after bowling 73 overs and taking 5 for 196. Instead, he opened the innings and cracked 184 at a fair rate (he batted only four and a half hours in all). According to Wisden, "The fourth day was memorable for the visit of the Queen and more wonderful batting by Mankad." He couldn't save India, but Mankad - who also top-scored with 72 in the first innings - had chalked up one of the greatest all-round performances in any Test.

Kevin Pietersen
England's eventual clean sweep in 2011 started at Lord's, where their big total revolved around 202 not out from the elephant in the current team's dressing room, Pietersen. Shrugging off a poor run and a disputed catch when he had 49, KP really got going once he'd reached 130, and powered to a memorable double-century to light up the 2000th Test match - and the 100th between England and India.

Sachin Tendulkar
He went on to make 100 international hundreds, but Tendulkar's first - at Old Trafford in 1990, not long past his 17th birthday - was one of the best. It certainly confirmed what many had suspected: here was a very special talent indeed. This ton, studded with 17 fours, ensured that India would not lose after being set a stiff target of 408. "After several of his colleagues had fallen to reckless strokes," tutted Wisden, "Tendulkar held the England attack at bay with a disciplined display of immense maturity."

David Gower
England's imposing total of 633 for 5 at Edgbaston in 1979 owed much to a big partnership between the old (Geoff Boycott, nearly 39) and the new (David Gower, just 22). They put on 191, and after Boycott was out for 155, Gower sailed on to his maiden double-century, many of his 24 fours coming from those effortless-looking cover drives.

Sunil Gavaskar
Rather surprisingly, only four of Gavaskar's 34 Test hundreds came against England - but they tended to be important ones. At The Oval in 1979 few fancied India's chances of chasing 438 for victory - but perceptions changed as Gavaskar batted on and on... and on. They might have got there had time not become a factor: from 366 for 1 India declined to 423 for 8, but held on in the end for the draw. Gavaskar's contribution? A tremendous 221, in 490 minutes. "It was a perfect innings, a masterpiece," said his team-mate Yajurvindra Singh. "Every ball was played on merit, and the head and feet movement and strokeplay were extraordinary."

Michael Vaughan
England's Vaughan was at the peak of his powers in 2002, a year in which he hit 1481 Test runs, with six centuries. Three of them came in the four home Tests against India, including 197 at Trent Bridge and 195 at The Oval. "If only the game could seem this simple all the time," recalled Vaughan, who never did reach 200 in a Test.

Vinod Kambli
Sachin Tendulkar's partner in a massive schoolboy stand, Kambli seemed to have arrived as a Test player with a superb 224 against England in Mumbai early in 1993. Kambli's innings, in only his third Test, was "full of daring strokeplay executed with a joyfulness that rippled round the ground", according to Wisden, and when he followed it with 227 against Zimbabwe in his next Test it seemed the sky was the limit. But then that sky fell in: within two years Kambli's Test career was over, not helped by a liking for the fast and flashy life, something his old school pal could never be accused of.

Geoff Boycott
The idea of a player scoring 246 and immediately being dropped seems preposterous these days: but that's what happened to Boycott after his highest Test score, at Headingley in 1967. The selectors felt he hadn't stepped on the accelerator enough against an admittedly modest Indian attack, and left him out of the next match (something similar had happened to Ken Barrington two years previously). The incident remains a sore point with the man himself - and when he returned, he admitted to being "terrified in case I played a maiden over". For more details, see this Rewind article.

Sourav Ganguly
After a long international apprenticeship - he had played a one-day international in Australia in January 1992 - Ganguly finally got a Test chance at Lord's in 1996. And he made it count, with a resolute 131 (and 136 in the next match, at Trent Bridge). "I think the hundred at Lord's changed me totally," he said later. "I realised that I had it in me to excel at this level." Another promising youngster made a handy debut in that match at Lord's too: Rahul Dravid started with 95.

Steven Lynch is the editor of the Wisden Guide to International Cricket 2014. Ask Steven is now on Facebook

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • akpy on July 14, 2014, 22:41 GMT

    For all dravid fans, can you please tell me his average/aggregate in England before the last tour? Of course, we need to include it in the analysis but that just proves that merely based on one series, one should not decide who is better, etc. Then, Dravid is the worst because of 2007 series when he was in a terrible patch but india won under his captaincy because of critical knocks played by Dinesh Karthik, Jaffer, Sachin and Saurav, apart from Zaheer's bowling and dont forget Dhoni's batting to save Lord's test. Sachin did not convert his starts in 2011 both in England and Australia. Dravid did very well in England and was a total flop in Australia except for one good innings in Melbourne where sachin was bashing the bowlers at the other end. Watch You tube if you are not convinced

  • on July 14, 2014, 21:42 GMT

    Dravid's 148 should have been top of the list. Kambli's knock came in India, and wasn't the only knock worth mentioning had the canvas been both games played in Indi and England. It should have been Dravid's match winning 148 in real tough conditions and not Kambli's double ton in India.

  • on July 14, 2014, 20:00 GMT

    @India_Boy -> Very Nicely Put!! Great to see a Game fan, rather than a Player fan!!

  • on July 14, 2014, 18:44 GMT

    While some very fine knocks have been mentioned, Rahul Dravid's hundreds in England were completely ignored. I remember him playing some outstanding knocks there. He is most probably the most successful Indian batsman in English conditions.

  • on July 14, 2014, 18:33 GMT

    I can't believe Rahul Dravid's 148 didn't make the list.

  • India_boy on July 14, 2014, 18:26 GMT

    The sad thing is that people fail to differentiate between an amazing batsman and a matchwinner. Sachin was an amazing amazing batsman. But RD was a matchwinner,and specially when it comes to oversees victories - something that we Indians crave for, RD is the indisputable leader. Cook is an amazing batsman, KP is a matchwinner. Amla is an amazing batsman but Smith was the matchwinner. The sooner people realize this, the better it is for the game

  • harshthakor on July 14, 2014, 17:45 GMT

    Technically I rate Graham Gooch's 127 at Madras in 1981-82 as a better effort than his 333 at the Lords in 1990.It was majestic exhibition of batting.From the technical point of view Gavaskar's 221 at the Oval,Greame Hick's 175 at Mumbai and Rahul Dravid's 148 at Leeds were arguably the best.In terms of pure artistry nothing surpased Azharrudin's 121 in 1990 at Lords where he bissected the field like a cake being cut with the artistry of a weaver.For pure domination Ian Botham's 208 at the Oval ,Gooch's 127 at Madras,Kapil Dev's 89 at Lords and Sandeep Patil's 129 at Manchester were gems..

  • harshthakor on July 14, 2014, 17:35 GMT

    My list 1.Sunil Gavaskar's 221 in 1979 at Oval 2.Dilip Vengsakar's 102 n.o at Leeds in 1986 3.Rahul Dravid's 148 at Leeds in 2002 4.Ian Botham's 208 at Oval in 1982. 5.Sandeep Patil's 129 at Old Trafford in 1982 6.Sachin Tendulkar's 177 in 1996 at Trent Bridge 7.Mohammad Azharuddin's 121 at Lords in 1990 7.Graham Gooch's 333 at Lords in 1990 9.Kapil Dev's 89 at Lords in 1982. 10.Graeme Hick's 179 at Mumbai in 1993. 11..Sunil Gavasakar's 101 at Old Trafford in 1974. 12.Gundappa Vishwanath's 107 at Delhi in 1981-82

    I preferred Greame Hick's 175 to Vinod Kambli's 224 at Mumbai in 1993 and preferred Tendulkar's innings of 177 in 1996 to his century in 1990.I also think Kapil Dev's swashbuckling 89 off 55 delliveries was a mini-classic with strokeplay of herculean proportions.Vishy's 107 at Delhi in 1981-82 displayed artistry at it's best while Gavaskar's 101 in difficult conditions in 1974 displayed phenomenal technical mastery.

  • on July 14, 2014, 17:26 GMT

    @Latey Kabir. Thats not India Boy's fault. We all remember Rahul Dravid as a matchwinner. It has got ingrained in our systems. Plus he was a match winner. That is where he is better than Sachin.

  • skilebow on July 14, 2014, 17:20 GMT

    @BUCG - simmer down. the only century Sehwag made in England was 106 in 2002.

  • akpy on July 14, 2014, 22:41 GMT

    For all dravid fans, can you please tell me his average/aggregate in England before the last tour? Of course, we need to include it in the analysis but that just proves that merely based on one series, one should not decide who is better, etc. Then, Dravid is the worst because of 2007 series when he was in a terrible patch but india won under his captaincy because of critical knocks played by Dinesh Karthik, Jaffer, Sachin and Saurav, apart from Zaheer's bowling and dont forget Dhoni's batting to save Lord's test. Sachin did not convert his starts in 2011 both in England and Australia. Dravid did very well in England and was a total flop in Australia except for one good innings in Melbourne where sachin was bashing the bowlers at the other end. Watch You tube if you are not convinced

  • on July 14, 2014, 21:42 GMT

    Dravid's 148 should have been top of the list. Kambli's knock came in India, and wasn't the only knock worth mentioning had the canvas been both games played in Indi and England. It should have been Dravid's match winning 148 in real tough conditions and not Kambli's double ton in India.

  • on July 14, 2014, 20:00 GMT

    @India_Boy -> Very Nicely Put!! Great to see a Game fan, rather than a Player fan!!

  • on July 14, 2014, 18:44 GMT

    While some very fine knocks have been mentioned, Rahul Dravid's hundreds in England were completely ignored. I remember him playing some outstanding knocks there. He is most probably the most successful Indian batsman in English conditions.

  • on July 14, 2014, 18:33 GMT

    I can't believe Rahul Dravid's 148 didn't make the list.

  • India_boy on July 14, 2014, 18:26 GMT

    The sad thing is that people fail to differentiate between an amazing batsman and a matchwinner. Sachin was an amazing amazing batsman. But RD was a matchwinner,and specially when it comes to oversees victories - something that we Indians crave for, RD is the indisputable leader. Cook is an amazing batsman, KP is a matchwinner. Amla is an amazing batsman but Smith was the matchwinner. The sooner people realize this, the better it is for the game

  • harshthakor on July 14, 2014, 17:45 GMT

    Technically I rate Graham Gooch's 127 at Madras in 1981-82 as a better effort than his 333 at the Lords in 1990.It was majestic exhibition of batting.From the technical point of view Gavaskar's 221 at the Oval,Greame Hick's 175 at Mumbai and Rahul Dravid's 148 at Leeds were arguably the best.In terms of pure artistry nothing surpased Azharrudin's 121 in 1990 at Lords where he bissected the field like a cake being cut with the artistry of a weaver.For pure domination Ian Botham's 208 at the Oval ,Gooch's 127 at Madras,Kapil Dev's 89 at Lords and Sandeep Patil's 129 at Manchester were gems..

  • harshthakor on July 14, 2014, 17:35 GMT

    My list 1.Sunil Gavaskar's 221 in 1979 at Oval 2.Dilip Vengsakar's 102 n.o at Leeds in 1986 3.Rahul Dravid's 148 at Leeds in 2002 4.Ian Botham's 208 at Oval in 1982. 5.Sandeep Patil's 129 at Old Trafford in 1982 6.Sachin Tendulkar's 177 in 1996 at Trent Bridge 7.Mohammad Azharuddin's 121 at Lords in 1990 7.Graham Gooch's 333 at Lords in 1990 9.Kapil Dev's 89 at Lords in 1982. 10.Graeme Hick's 179 at Mumbai in 1993. 11..Sunil Gavasakar's 101 at Old Trafford in 1974. 12.Gundappa Vishwanath's 107 at Delhi in 1981-82

    I preferred Greame Hick's 175 to Vinod Kambli's 224 at Mumbai in 1993 and preferred Tendulkar's innings of 177 in 1996 to his century in 1990.I also think Kapil Dev's swashbuckling 89 off 55 delliveries was a mini-classic with strokeplay of herculean proportions.Vishy's 107 at Delhi in 1981-82 displayed artistry at it's best while Gavaskar's 101 in difficult conditions in 1974 displayed phenomenal technical mastery.

  • on July 14, 2014, 17:26 GMT

    @Latey Kabir. Thats not India Boy's fault. We all remember Rahul Dravid as a matchwinner. It has got ingrained in our systems. Plus he was a match winner. That is where he is better than Sachin.

  • skilebow on July 14, 2014, 17:20 GMT

    @BUCG - simmer down. the only century Sehwag made in England was 106 in 2002.

  • harshthakor on July 14, 2014, 17:14 GMT

    At the top I will always place Sunil Gavaskar's 221 as he scored it in the most difficult of situations.It was one of cricket's classic batting displays where Gavaskar did not commit a single mistake displaying technical perfection of an architect and the skill and patience of a surgeon.He all but pulled of one of test cricket's most improbable of victories .

    I will also add atleast one of Dilip Vengsarkar's centuries.His unbeaten century at Leeds in 1986 in the 2nd innings in seaming conditions, on a wet pitch was an innings of the very highest class where his domination of bowling was complete.Rahul Dravid's 148 at Leeds in 2002 was technically an epic if you assess the conditions.Above all both the centuries discussed won the game for India,perfectly blending defence with agression.

    Sandeep Patil's unbeaten 129 in 1982 at Manchester was a gem saving the match.His demoralizing of Bob Willis was classical.,hitting him for 6 boundaries in a single over.

  • Naikan on July 14, 2014, 16:18 GMT

    No doubt like all of us who comment in here, you -Steven, have your personal preferences but then you cannot be counted amongst all of us!! Being a prominent cricketing journalist, I hope you will avoid sachinisation of your articles. For all his great deeds, I feel Sachin needs to give way to other Indian batsmen when it comes to England. How can you miss out on headingly - the one match where Dravid anchored the match (Dravid, Sachin and Sourav all scored centuries)? or any of the 2011 matches where he remained the only wall of Indian resistance? Dravid averages 60+ against England. Surely he deserves more than just 5 words at the end of the article?

  • SalarianScientist on July 14, 2014, 16:01 GMT

    No Dravid hundreds? Seriously? What about his 148 at Headingley 2002 in wildly swinging conditions which led to a rare overseas victory? Or any one of his brilliant 3 hundreds in our last tour to England in 2011?

  • shillingsworth on July 14, 2014, 13:26 GMT

    The Wisden quote from 1952 is hilarious. Even 60 years ago, my guess is that most people went to Lord's to watch cricket, not to get a glimpse of the Queen. Yet in the mind of the writer her annual visit was as memorable as a unique cricketing feat by Mankad.

  • drinks.break on July 14, 2014, 12:58 GMT

    @Shyam Jansale, the author selected 6 Indian innings and 5 English innings (because his articles always involve a list of 11). He already selected more Indians than English; why should he select even more Indians?

    And his task was to select 11 "memorable" innings. If there are 11 innings in India-England tests that you remember better, then you are welcome to list them for us in your next comment. But don't criticise the author for sharing his memories with us.

  • on July 14, 2014, 11:20 GMT

    I too was at Lords in 1990 and Gooch's innings marked something more than just a single minded accumulation of 333 runs. It was the beginning of Imperial Era Gooch, where he climbed to #1 in the batting ratings, had a late flourish of big and often superb innings and the look of a solid England under his leadership. Before Lord's there were dark mutterings in the press about his and England's abilities but that summer saw England undefeated at home with a solid and stable line up. That never did pan out but it led to a World Cup final and being competitive against Pakistan and the West Indies.

  • India_boy on July 14, 2014, 8:56 GMT

    @itjob & latey-I don't even know what to say if you think SRT or any other player has contributed more to Indian wins than Dravid. SRT could not even change his batting position when every other batsman did at some point of time. India won series in Eng - major contributor RD.India won series in WI - RD. India won their first match in Aus in 2003-04 - RD. India won series in Pak - RD (270 in one inns.). Not to mention he kept wkts and opened batting.What did Sachin do in any of those series? Zilch , Nada! Oh wait he did score 248* in one of the test matches apparently to get his form back, thereby consuming 2 days and we ended up getting less time in the Waugh's farewell test, and thereby squandered the chance to win the series. Rating on SC pitches in winning cause - Sehwag - 9/10, SRT 7/10, RD - 6/10 and VVS - 5.5/10. Abroad in winning cause - RD 8/10, VVS - 6/10, Sehwag - 5/10, SRT - 2/10.Hope this explains the scenario to you. And oh yes, start watching cricket before it's too late

  • on July 14, 2014, 8:49 GMT

    How come none of Rahul Dravids centuries in England don't merit any mention here. Not to mention innings by other Indian Player

  • muzika_tchaikovskogo on July 14, 2014, 8:09 GMT

    @Bucg: This is dedicated to innings in test matches between India and England. I don't remember any defining innings by Sehwag against England.

  • on July 14, 2014, 8:03 GMT

    @India_boy- Please try to make sense - "Dravids stoic and stubborn hundreds that won matches. like the bat carrying ones in 2011" Where we LOST 4-0.

  • BUCG on July 14, 2014, 7:20 GMT

    Where the hell is Sehwag's tons??? He has made probably some of the most destructive and awesome hundreds, double hundreds and triple hundreds of this era!!

  • D.Sharma on July 14, 2014, 7:17 GMT

    The Tendulkar that always hides at number 4 only scores because he doesn't have to face the new ball as the openers and Dravid (especially) do the hard work for him. Dravid's 100 at Headingley alone was ahead of any of Tendulkar's 100s. He only averaged 27 after Dravid retired hahaha

  • on July 14, 2014, 7:12 GMT

    Two more very significant innings that come to mind are Rahul Dravid's twin centuries in his 99th Test at Kolkata in 2006, and Azharuddin's magnificent 182 in the 1993 Calcutta Test, the beginning of a clean sweep 3-0 win by India.

  • on July 14, 2014, 6:52 GMT

    Steven, you have missed out on Rahul Dravid's umpteen centuries against England (especially the 148 at Headingley in 2002) and also Dilip Vengsarkar's three centuries at Lord's. As also G.R. Viswanath's match-saving century at Lord's in 1979.

  • on July 14, 2014, 6:18 GMT

    My memories of that Lord's game in 1990, those hundreds aside, are Tendulkar's stunning catch and Kapil's sixes :-)

  • Unbiased-views on July 14, 2014, 6:09 GMT

    Steven has done a great job in selecting the 11 Best innings as you can't please everyone!!! Few has mentioned that he has missed dravid's ton....going by that logic Steve has also missed SRT's 192 which helped Ind to win the Test in Eng in 2002, 103 in 4th innings on an absolute turner in chennai which Ind won te match, 91 which helped Ind to win the series in 2007 after 21 yrs & et al!!!

  • Unbiased-views on July 14, 2014, 5:48 GMT

    @India_boy I didn't see the dravid's reliability against Aus in Aus (away avg of 41 with overall avg of 38) & SA(away avg of less than 30 with overall avg 33)...It's fair to say that dravid failed miserably against the 2 Best Test teams for the last 15-20yrs... ..BTW, he did show his reliability against lowly ranked teams like WI, NZ,Zim, Eng, Pak!!! When India won the series in Eng in 2007 after 21yrs, it was SRT(91 before getting a shocker from the best umpire Taufel & publicly said sorry to Sachin) & Dada(77) made runs on a difficult Nottingham pitch & if my memory serves me right, dravid couldn't score even 100 runs in 3 test series!!!! Dravid has failed 3 out of 4 series in Aus & scored lots of in 2003-04 when Mcgrath & Warne were missing which says a lot about his ability!!!

  • India_boy on July 14, 2014, 5:08 GMT

    Mr. Steven would be delighted to know that Indian fans have matured and moved on from the batsman Sachin Tendulkar to the reliable and dependable team player Rahul Dravid. They are realising that Dravid's stoic and stubborn 100 that won matches are twice as better as SRT's fun-filled losing centuries. So, if you include innings of substance, specially the ones from Oval and his bat carrying one from 2011 tour, this article would be better.

  • on July 14, 2014, 4:43 GMT

    Agreeing with you man..Prasahanth. It was one of the best performance by an indian in an away test along with his own double in adelaide later,,,

  • on July 14, 2014, 4:43 GMT

    The most memorable hundreds in England by Indian batsmen were played by Rahul Dravid. The most unique hundreds in England by Indians include Anil Kumble and Ajit Agarkar's hundreds.

  • prashanthbm on July 14, 2014, 3:05 GMT

    How can the article miss RAHUL DRAVID's Headingly 100 or the Oval double 100 ????? how can they miss such amazing innings ???? especially the headingly 100 which was the foundation on which indian won the test ?????

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • prashanthbm on July 14, 2014, 3:05 GMT

    How can the article miss RAHUL DRAVID's Headingly 100 or the Oval double 100 ????? how can they miss such amazing innings ???? especially the headingly 100 which was the foundation on which indian won the test ?????

  • on July 14, 2014, 4:43 GMT

    The most memorable hundreds in England by Indian batsmen were played by Rahul Dravid. The most unique hundreds in England by Indians include Anil Kumble and Ajit Agarkar's hundreds.

  • on July 14, 2014, 4:43 GMT

    Agreeing with you man..Prasahanth. It was one of the best performance by an indian in an away test along with his own double in adelaide later,,,

  • India_boy on July 14, 2014, 5:08 GMT

    Mr. Steven would be delighted to know that Indian fans have matured and moved on from the batsman Sachin Tendulkar to the reliable and dependable team player Rahul Dravid. They are realising that Dravid's stoic and stubborn 100 that won matches are twice as better as SRT's fun-filled losing centuries. So, if you include innings of substance, specially the ones from Oval and his bat carrying one from 2011 tour, this article would be better.

  • Unbiased-views on July 14, 2014, 5:48 GMT

    @India_boy I didn't see the dravid's reliability against Aus in Aus (away avg of 41 with overall avg of 38) & SA(away avg of less than 30 with overall avg 33)...It's fair to say that dravid failed miserably against the 2 Best Test teams for the last 15-20yrs... ..BTW, he did show his reliability against lowly ranked teams like WI, NZ,Zim, Eng, Pak!!! When India won the series in Eng in 2007 after 21yrs, it was SRT(91 before getting a shocker from the best umpire Taufel & publicly said sorry to Sachin) & Dada(77) made runs on a difficult Nottingham pitch & if my memory serves me right, dravid couldn't score even 100 runs in 3 test series!!!! Dravid has failed 3 out of 4 series in Aus & scored lots of in 2003-04 when Mcgrath & Warne were missing which says a lot about his ability!!!

  • Unbiased-views on July 14, 2014, 6:09 GMT

    Steven has done a great job in selecting the 11 Best innings as you can't please everyone!!! Few has mentioned that he has missed dravid's ton....going by that logic Steve has also missed SRT's 192 which helped Ind to win the Test in Eng in 2002, 103 in 4th innings on an absolute turner in chennai which Ind won te match, 91 which helped Ind to win the series in 2007 after 21 yrs & et al!!!

  • on July 14, 2014, 6:18 GMT

    My memories of that Lord's game in 1990, those hundreds aside, are Tendulkar's stunning catch and Kapil's sixes :-)

  • on July 14, 2014, 6:52 GMT

    Steven, you have missed out on Rahul Dravid's umpteen centuries against England (especially the 148 at Headingley in 2002) and also Dilip Vengsarkar's three centuries at Lord's. As also G.R. Viswanath's match-saving century at Lord's in 1979.

  • on July 14, 2014, 7:12 GMT

    Two more very significant innings that come to mind are Rahul Dravid's twin centuries in his 99th Test at Kolkata in 2006, and Azharuddin's magnificent 182 in the 1993 Calcutta Test, the beginning of a clean sweep 3-0 win by India.

  • D.Sharma on July 14, 2014, 7:17 GMT

    The Tendulkar that always hides at number 4 only scores because he doesn't have to face the new ball as the openers and Dravid (especially) do the hard work for him. Dravid's 100 at Headingley alone was ahead of any of Tendulkar's 100s. He only averaged 27 after Dravid retired hahaha