Jarrod Kimber
Jarrod Kimber Jarrod KimberRSS FeedFeeds  | Archives
One half of The Two Chucks, and the mind responsible for cricketwithballs.com

England v India, 4th Investec Test, Old Trafford, 3rd day

Pankaj Singh, Test wicket-taker

After 26 spells, 69 overs, and 415 deliveries, Pankaj Singh took the wicket that was cheered by cricket fans regardless of their affiliation

Jarrod Kimber at Old Trafford

August 9, 2014

Comments: 26 | Text size: A | A
Pankaj Singh ends long wait for Test wicket

In Southampton, Pankaj Singh walked off the ground after England's second innings completely alone. Not one team-mate waited for him to walk off. He had to make a 100-metre walk alone. If you watched him on the entire walk, you could hear the "sad Hulk" theme.

****

There is a red thread around Pankaj's right wrist when he bowls. Despite Sunday being the Hindu festival Raksha Bandhan, this is not a Rakhi. It is not a sign of a bond between him and his sister. The Rakhi is a knot of protection. Whatever Pankaj's wrist thread signifies, it's not protection. And it's certainly not for luck either.

There was a smile for Pankaj on day two at Old Trafford. It came, unsurprisingly, when he had no luck. Instead of getting angry or disappointed, he smiled.

A newspaper recently wrote in its death notices that "Deaths are coming". The remnants of a tropical storm are about to flood England. Meanwhile, the Daily Express, is concerned about lunar activity: "The SUPERMOON will light up the sky in a beautiful spectacle on Sunday but may also act as a catalyst to Earth's terrifying and dramatic conclusion."

We could all be dead by the time Monday roles around. Pankaj Singh started Friday with the thought that he could end it as the single worst bowler in Test match history. And he smiled. He started Saturday with that in mind, and the potential for our global annihilation, and he smiled again. He smiled after another luckless over as he stood out on the ugly mush by the fine leg boundary. He stood on the semi-dried sludge, knowing that he might never ever take a Test wicket. And he smiled.

How can you not like Pankaj?

I know his gait, I know that it changes in different situations. I know the lean in when the ball is about to be bowled. I can see how he has a different step when walking around the field to when he's coming in to bowl. I know all this because I have become obsessed with Pankaj. In between overs I stare at him through my binoculars. I watch his spells live, and then every single ball again on replay. I then Hawk-Eye the overs later.

I noticed his new thumb guard, needed after one of his all-too-common fumbles. Noticed that when he fields, on the very odd occasion, in a catching position, he does it with all the grace of a plumber performing a plié. I see when he finds himself at mid-off with no cover fielder, he asks a more agile fielder to swap with him. And I am watching close enough to notice that while in general he sort of flicks his feet out for each step, when it's bowling time, he has more purpose, more strength in each step. Pankaj likes bowling time.

No matter how poor he bowled, how poor his luck was, how much the batsmen are taking him on, you can see it. He's a born bowler. Nothing says that more than his batting.

 
 
Pankaj turns instantly to the umpire. He has appealed to these two umpires, Marais Erasmus and Rod Tucker, many times. They have never given him anything but this time he appeals like he's finally got a chance
 

It's hard to not be romantic about him. Every single time he fronted up to the crease he seemed to be looking more and more likely to end up as the single worst bowler in the history of cricket, statistically speaking. Despite bowling well at times, really well even, he was somehow going further and further into Test-match bowling without taking a wicket. Ian Botham did some analysis on Sky that said he could have taken ten wickets so far. The press box was cheering him on. Twitter was tear-stained after every play and miss. His pain was seemingly everyone's. We all just wanted him to have one wicket. Save the embarrassment, give him something. Forget the luck, just one. Please.

It's not often a player gets picked for romantics or even on popular opinion. Behind the lovable-lug nature, the cold analysis is not as heart-warming for Pankaj. He's not a perfect bowler. The outswing, offcut and bounce are all good. But his biggest problem is his lack of consistency ball after ball, over after over, day after day. On Saturday morning, he bowled two overs with the old ball. Twice he went past Jos Buttler's edge with top class international deliveries. But then with the new ball, he was ordinary.

He struggled for a decent line, often just spraying wide and harmless. His length was poor as well. He didn't correct it. And, not for the first time, MS Dhoni had to drag him off and overbowl Bhuvneshwar Kumar. His front arm is not strong, which could be the reason he sometimes doesn't get it right. But the problem he really has is that at his pace, to succeed at this level, Test after Test, against big bats, flat pitches and an ever-encroaching boundary triangle, you need to be able to put 23 out of 24 balls in a place that is restricting the batsman. Pankaj doesn't, yet. He's a bowler who bowls you the odd ball that is too good, and occasionally gifts the batsman free runs. That's not unlucky, that's untidy.

Whatever the outcome of the ball, Pankaj reacts much the same. A look at where the ball has gone, the odd nostril flare or sideways glance at the batsman, and then head down and back to his mark. He doesn't seek out any chat, or respond much to it. Once, Rod Tucker tried to suggest his feet were finding the pitch's danger zone, but even then Pankaj didn't really stop or listen, he just went back to his mark, and waited for the ball. Pankaj is almost always ready before his team-mates, waiting for the ball, yanking up his left shirt sleeve and waiting for one more chance.

It's probably no different to what he has done more than 16,000 times in first-class cricket. It's probably no different to how he has played for any of the 2424 days since he first played a tour game for India. Same again. One more spell. He had bowled 26 spells in Test cricket. One more over. He had bowled 69 overs. One more ball. He had bowled 415 balls. One more. One more.

On the 16,162nd ball of his first-class career, Pankaj comes in again. His action is slightly more hurried, he is searching for pace. But the ball isn't quick, and it's down the legside. It's not a good ball. It's not the ball that has got Pankaj selected. It's not a swinger or a cutter. It's a ball that Joe Root should score four from. Instead it bounces a little and brushes some glove. Dhoni takes it in front of his eyes.

Pankaj turns instantly to the umpire. He has appealed to these two umpires, Marais Erasmus and Rod Tucker, many times. They've never given him anything. But this time he doesn't plead with both hands and the face of pure desperation, this time he appeals like he's finally got a chance. Like he doesn't have to prove himself, that his desperation is simply not needed. Erasmus sticks his finger up straight away. Pankaj looks to the sky. Deaths are not coming. There is no hurricane. The supermoon can't defeat him.

This time the luck is his. Pankaj Singh has a lucky wicket. Pankaj Singh has a Test wicket. He is Pankaj Singh, Test wicket-taker.

The commentators cheer, the press box cheers, the Indian fans scream and even the English fans cheer. It's rare that one wicket can give so much cheer to so many different cricket fans. I put my binoculars up to my eye. I tell myself it's to see him close up. But I know it's really to stop people seeing my tears. This is the happiest I've ever been for a crap leg-side dismissal. It's probably close to as happy as I can be for someone I don't actually know.

Those who do know him flock to him, his team-mates crowd around him. He tries to smile, but he's too embarrassed to do it properly. They all look happier than he does. He's taking big breaths and is clearly not comfortable with the attention for what was one of the worst wickets of his career. They love it. The team stay in a circle, smiling, laughing, joking, happy for their team-mate. Pankaj walks off back to his mark.

Pankaj is a bowler. He doesn't need the adulation of a lucky wicket. He needs to bowl his next ball.

****

At the end of the innings, Pankaj has to make the long walk across the field. It's every bit as far as his walk in Southampton. Yet again he walks all the way across the ground alone. This time his team-mates wait for him.

Jarrod Kimber was 50% of the Two Chucks, and is the mind responsible for cricketwithballs.com

RSS Feeds: Jarrod Kimber

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by VipinGangwar on (August 11, 2014, 11:04 GMT)

Jarrod, Don't you have any words for Chris Jordan? Take a look into his stats and you would found a lot of similarity.

Posted by   on (August 11, 2014, 1:07 GMT)

@Ameya: I agree. He is built like an ox, but yet bowls in the low 130kmph range, bowls at least 2 pressure releasing 4 balls in an over. There is a reason why the selectors did not give him a chance till now. But then, he has an axe to grind too.. if the selectors can give so many chances to Ishant, why not Pankaj?

Posted by ac_Indian on (August 10, 2014, 15:43 GMT)

Jarrod, your writings are very interesting and are actually borderline poetry. It is good to see that you too are among those few in the media who are able to see the virtue of not feeling the itch to "chat". And yes, this has to be called a virtue these days.

Posted by   on (August 10, 2014, 15:21 GMT)

Let's hope that he gets another chance. He has a fiver in his hands. Way to persevere Pankaj. DO IT FOR THE BOWLER IN ALL OF US. DO IT AND SMILE nEVER GIVE UP.

Posted by sharidas on (August 10, 2014, 9:36 GMT)

Thanks Jarrod. If there is one player in the Indian team, who never seems to give up, that's Pankaj Singh. I am glad he got the wickets.

Posted by   on (August 10, 2014, 7:25 GMT)

though paeans are sung about Pankaj and how likeable and gentle and the best guy i the world that he is, fact of the matter is he looks like geriatric 45 year old trying to do a young mans job. Walsh in 2000 in England after sending down over 4500 overs in international test cricket still could tease , and make batsmen look silly, with genial smile and sinister raised eyebrow. Heck that actual 40 year old with 17 years of cricket under him looked to be in an excellect place than than Pankaj. Apart from that, Pankaj doesnt have a natural length or line which is suprising for a vastly experienced guy.

Posted by   on (August 10, 2014, 6:50 GMT)

Indian pace bowlers are selected based on their domestic performance against domestic batsmen - and they never going to succeed against international batsmen outside India...they do not have the power to hit the deck... bhuvi's performance in England - surely will mislead the selectors and he will toil in other countries ..as regards the performance of the Indians in current tour the batsmen always struggle under English conditions. it is only the bowlers can win matches for India ...unfortunately MSD lacks quality bowlers and the fielders let them down further.. ...it would be 2-1 win for England...

Posted by karthik_ig on (August 10, 2014, 6:34 GMT)

If You have praised Bhuvi, I would have been more happier. Pankaj is a giant, he is bowling well in patches..he is good not excellent. Do we only have bowlers like this in India? We dont have fierce bowlers to chose from? Body posture Does not matter if he does not bowls aggresive.See bhuvi, he is lean and short..he dont have natural physical ability that fast bowler should have..But way he is using his cricketing brain is really good..we need fast medium bowlers with inteligent cricket brain or bowlers with raw pace and aggressive attitude. Iwe dont get either of this variety i will be difficult for us to win overseas test matches..Remeber we need to improve our batting as well in those conditions

Posted by   on (August 10, 2014, 5:56 GMT)

It seems like that we won the Lord's test just coz of destiny.....

I am wonder, just coz of Ishant we have lost the winning momentum. The day is not far when we have to rework - ☆reseach to get new generation of bowl

ers

Posted by SeanB on (August 10, 2014, 2:10 GMT)

We like Pankaj. He has tried his best and given everything. Would have had more wickets with a bit of luck going his way. Really wish he took many more wickets for India. All that said, how is he different from Stuart Binny? Both bowl at the same pace, but Binny has shown better control and the ability to swing the ball. Finally, Binny can bat. At this point, India should pick Binny as a third seamer / all rounder (if they think Pankaj is good enough as a specialist bowler) and drop Jadeja.

Comments have now been closed for this article

FeedbackTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Jarrod KimberClose

'Chanderpaul was always out to prove himself'

Modern Masters: Playing in a weak team, his single-minded focus is to be the best he can be

    The Bangladesh album

ESPNcricinfo XI: A look at the side's international highlights: from shocking Pakistan in 1999 to whitewashing New Zealand

South Africa's domestic spinners eye their chance

Firdose Moonda: Ahead of the first-class season, we look at the players the selectors will be watching closely

    Catch dodgy actions early

Ian Chappell: Kids mimic the cricket heroes of the day, so the problem of throwing must be tackled below the first-class level

Four Pakistan women to watch in the Asian Games

Ahmer Naqvi: A look at two bowlers and two batsmen who could be crucial to their campaign in Incheon

News | Features Last 7 days

Champions League T20 still battling for meaning

The thrills are rather low-octane, the skills are a bit lightweight, and the tournament overly India-centric

Automaton, man, inspiration

Twenty years on, Shivnarine Chanderpaul continues to be understated, underestimated. And that doesn't bother him. What's not to like?

Busy keepers, and Waqar's bowleds

Also, high scores and low averages, most ducks in international cricket, and the 12-year-old Test player

85 Tests, 70 defeats

Of the 85 Tests that Bangladesh have played so far, they've lost 70 and won just four. Those stats are easily the worst among all teams when they'd played as many Tests

'My kind of bowling style is gone now'

Former New Zealand seamer Gavin Larsen talks about wobbly seam-up bowling, the 1992 World Cup, and his role in the next tournament

News | Features Last 7 days