| Series | Countries | Live Scores | Fixtures | Results | News |
Features
|
Photos | Video & Audio | Blogs | Statistics | Archive | Games | Mobile | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
March 8, 2013
New Zealand 402 for 7 (Rutherford 171, Fulton 55, Anderson 4-108) lead England 167 (Trott 45, Wagner 4-42, Martin 4-43) by 235 runs
Live scorecard and ball-by-ball details
![]()
|
|||
|
Related Links
Matches:
New Zealand v England at Dunedin
Series/Tournaments:
England tour of New Zealand
Teams:
England
| New Zealand
|
|||
Hamish Rutherford completed one of the most audacious batting debuts in Test history as New Zealand took a firm grip of the first Test in Dunedin. Rutherford's 171, the seventh highest maiden Test innings, left England trailing by 235 at the end of a third day of an opening Test that has shaken their sense of well-being to the core.
Rutherford achieved a century on Test debut on his home ground and showed an uncomplicated appetite for mayhem as he made England pay for their hapless batting performance on the previous day. His freewheeling innings - 217 balls, 22 fours and three sixes - came to an end against the first delivery with the second new ball when he played too early at James Anderson and spooned him tamely to square leg.
Against the first new ball, though, he ruled supreme. Rutherford, like his father before him, does not look the type to fret unduly about his cricket. He thrashed 90 in an extended, 35-over morning session, at one point despatching Monty Panesar's left-arm spin for two sixes in an over to sail past 150. As England watched the ball disappear into gloomy skies, they must have wished they would darken some more over the wooded hills beyond and spare them further misery. They gradually did, a dank afternoon clipping the final session to only five overs.
Only Mathew Sinclair's double hundred on debut - 214 against West Indies in Wellington to wave goodbye to the old century - has exceeded Rutherford among New Zealand debutants. He chased anything wide with abandon and it was the way he severed the cover region against England's quick bowlers which stuck most in the memory.
He was 77 not out overnight and he soon thrashed five more boundaries to reach his hundred, the ninth New Zealand batsman to do so on debut. He was congratulated at the non-striker's end by Kane Williamson, who was the last New Zealand batsman to achieve the feat. Rutherford felt at home and emboldened in a genial country atmosphere; Williamson did it in Ahmedabad, which especially for a young batsman on Test debut must have felt a harsher environment.
England came out for the third morning with a new plan, bowling shorter and straighter, targeting the body with aggression. They have bowled strikingly shorter than New Zealand. They also cranked up the verbals. Taking Steven Finn's verbals seriously is difficult for anybody who has sat through his anodyne media conferences. He sneers at the batsman like a city gent offered an unacceptable wine list at a black-tie function. Anderson is more waspish and, befitting his long experience, these days offers his most Anglo-Saxon assessments behind his hand so he cannot be lip synched.
Smart stats |
Anderson imagined that he might have held a return catch when Rutherford was on 109, but it would have been miraculous if he had intercepted a ball which whistled past him to the boundary. He booted the next ball back to the wicketkeeper in frustration.
Neither New Zealand opener was perturbed by the rise in noise levels. Fulton was earthy - as stubborn and unresponsive as the treacly brown pitch on which England's quick bowlers flogged themselves to distraction; Rutherford looked more easy going, forever eager to flay the ball through the covers or, markedly in this innings, as both Finn and Anderson could testify, drive resoundingly through mid-on.
Fulton's half-century on his Test comeback was a gritty affair, but his part in an opening stand of 158 was not about to steal attention away from Rutherford, who had all the best lines and who delivered them with gusto. Fulton responded to the applause for his fifty only briefly, like a man who did not want to be bothered. He got out on 55, from 169 balls, driven onto the back foot off Anderson and edging to the wicketkeeper.
Panesar's left-arm spin was unable to provide the control that England needed, Rutherford sailed past 150 as he despatched him twice over long-off. Panesar struck back, bowling Williamson as the batsman tried to fashion a cut against a quicker delivery that was too straight for the shot, but he conceded nearly four an over, as did Finn, who learned to rue Dunedin pitches in a spell with Otago last year and found them just as unsympathetic on his return.
Anderson rallied England with the second new ball, having Ross Taylor caught at second slip as he tried to cut and then, in his next over, bowling Dean Brownlie, whose preference for the back foot cost him dearly as he played a fullish delivery onto his stumps. Anderson should have picked up Brownlie third ball only for Joe Root to drop an inviting opportunity to his left at third slip. England's slip cordon, with Andrew Strauss retired and, in this match, Graeme Swann injured, is not what it was. When Anderson bowls, neither does he have the advantage of his own athleticism as a close fielder.
BJ Watling's misjudgement, bowled first ball as he left a delivery from Stuart Broad, gave England a third wicket in four overs, but a counterattack by Brendon McCullum and Tim Southee - who put Broad over the ropes twice before he swung and missed one - reasserted New Zealand's authority in an afternoon session in which they gambolled along at five an over. They are in an enormously powerful position but they will look at the skies in the morning in trepidation.
| ||||||
| Comments have now been closed for this article |
||||||
David Hopps joined ESPNcricinfo as UK editor early in 2012. For the previous 20 years he was a senior cricket writer for the Guardian and covered England extensively during that time in all Test-playing nations. He also covered four Olympic Games and has written several cricket books, including collections of cricket quotations. He has been an avid amateur cricketer since he was 12, and so knows the pain of repeated failure only too well. The pile of untouched novels he plans to read, but rarely gets around to, is now almost touching the ceiling. He divides his time between the ESPNcricinfo office in Hammersmith and his beloved Yorkshire.
ICICI Bank M2I. Register Now and Get A Gift Offer.
Safe & simple online money transfer. Apply Now!
Buy Wisden 2013 & get a FREE Playfair
Available now at Cricshop
A slightly better day for England today (it couldn't possibly have been as bad as yesterday), but a great innings from Rutherofrd has NZ 235 ahead with two long days to go. Will McCullum declare immediately to give his bowlers the maximum possible time, knowing that NZ could knock off the runs if England takes a small lead, or will he opt for a T20 type bash for an hour to make it easier to bat only once? If he goes for the latter, he has the perfect batsman to bring it off- himself.
Either way, it sets up an enthralling battle as England tries to save the game. Unless, of course, they bat as they did in the first innings, in which case the end will be quick and far from sweet.
very impressed by Hamish Rutherford, what a knock on debut!....he looks so assured at the crease and not afraid to boss the bowling...One straight/on drive off Anderson early in the morning session was 'Haydenesque' in style and brutality!....Naturally, being English I was praying that every ball would be 'the ball' to knock his stumps flying, but sometimes, patriotism has to stand aside so one can applaud class at the crease :)
Ken Rutherford was probably my ultimate sporting hero of the early 1990s. He was the larrikin who could bat like Kim Hughes, but who wasn't going to win any prizes for his diplomacy or concentration or abstinence from a flutter or a drink.
His 1995 autobiography "A Hell of a Way to Make a Living" is a treasured possession for me, and makes endless references to young Hamish.
Rutherford Senior was driven out of New Zealand cricket before he even hit 30, and early victim of the Fun Police who now deprive us of Jesse Ryder and Dan Vettori.
So it brought tears to my eyes to see Hamish making his Dad proud these last couple of days. I'm still proud of Ken Rutherford, from his bravery as an out-of-his-depth teenager in the den of the unbeatable Windies in '85 to his '92 World Cup and his victory at Johannesburg in '94. Hamish is a welcome addition to NZ cricket.
Great to see Rutherford score a big hundred on debut, but once again it looks as if New Zealand are going to fail to put up a really big first innings score and take the opportunity to bat England out of the game. Frustrating to see a number of batsmen make starts and then gift their wicket. Few will complain about NZ taking over a 200 run lead on the first innings but it promised much more at lunch. When was the last time NZ posted a score in excess of 500?
First of all congratulations to Hamish Rutherford! You are brilliant. I hope you build on this and can be a great batsman for NZ. I recall Mathew Sinclair back in 1999 when he scored a double ton on test debut but just could not impress much after that. So hope you wont be like Sinclair.
For England, well Anderson is so reliable that no matter how expensive he is, he keeps getting the breaks.
It is hard to imagine England batting failing in the 2nd innings looking at their overall batting performance in tests. But a lead of 200 for NZ could mean scoreboard pressure that will play the part behind NZ winning if at all.
What a player Hamish Rutherford looks: solid in defence on both the front & back foot, & as capable of velveteen cover drives as he is of deft flicks off his legs or brutal aerial power shots over long-on. To cap it all, it seems he's also blessed with an unflappable temperament. As I write, he's just been dismissed for 171. If that wasn't the best debut Test innings I've ever seen, then it has to rank among the top three or four. Once Vettori & Jesse Ryder are back, New Zealand will have a formidable top seven & a world-class spinner to add to a hugely impressive seam attack. I'd love to see Ryder open with Rutherford, but I suspect that'll be deemed too high-risk a move for the Kiwi management to contemplate.
Amazing!! Just got home & took a look at the score. At lunch, Rutherford is on 167, exactly the same number that England put on the board! What a coincidence. Imagine the odds on that. The only major difference is it took England 330 balls, & Rutherford got there in 121 balls. What a dream debut he is having.
Eng's nightmare however seems to be continuing. If Rutherford keeps going, and Taylor gets his eye in, this could end up looking like the SA vs Eng test at the Oval, where, after Smith had put up 131, SA with Amla on 311 and Kallis on 182. 637 for 2 is not a score Eng want to see again. Mind you Eng had put up a healthy 385 in their innings, & SA declared only 252 ahead. To match that lead NZ need to add another 95 runs. However, with the new ball about to be taken, Eng might be able to claw their way back into the game. If that does not work for them, & Taylor gets going at somewhere near Rutherford's strike rate, the pair would take NZ beyond 500 today. Exciting stuff.
Soso_killer: you are embarrassing the rest of the saffer's on this forum with your arrogant comments. Things change in cricket very fast. It won't always be like this
Posted by WonkyBail on (March 8, 2013, 22:34 GMT)Now all the Bangladesh fans crying out for New Zealand to lose their test status following their routing v the No.1 team away, look as silly and pathetic as they are (when did they put in a performance like this, in a TEST, against a side ranked in the top 3? Not a ODI following a hammering in the test series). I like New Zealand as most England fans seem to and as long as they don't have the audacity to beat England, I am delighted with their showing. Good fans too, no crowing and talking big and being generally odious. England did beat the All Blacks last time out mind you :)
Posted by WonkyBail on (March 8, 2013, 22:26 GMT)Knock the deficit off today then hit a swift 250 and declare by lunch tommorow, no problem now they have got their eye in!