New Zealand v England, 2nd ODI, Napier

Root creates selection dilemma

Joe Root has looked right at home in international the moment he made his Test debut. The latest example was a matchwinning innings in Napier, but how does he get into the Champions Trophy side?

Andrew McGlashan

February 20, 2013

Comments: 26 | Text size: A | A

This current one-day series against New Zealand is the last chance for England players to make a case for a place in the Champions Trophy squad. In terms of leaving a favourable impression on the selectors, Joe Root could hardly have done any better with two half-centuries in two matches, including his unruffled matchwinning innings in Napier.

But instead of finalising plans in the selectors' minds his success may yet require them to rip up their original ideas. Heading into England's New Year one-day commitments, firstly in India and now in New Zealand, it was largely accepted that England's top five was set in stone: Alastair Cook, Ian Bell, Jonathan Trott, Kevin Pietersen and Eoin Morgan.

But England's rotation of senior players - Trott was rested for India and Pietersen is missing this series - has given Root an opportunity which he has made the most of. In Napier he became the first batsman to start his ODI career with six consecutive scores of over 30 and, even taking into account a friendly batting surface and reasonably friendly attack, it was an innings that any of the best finishers around would have been proud of. Needing seven-an-over does not worry a modern batsmen, but Root made it look like a Sunday stroll.

As ever, Cook would only say that it was a position he was pleased to be in. "That is a good sign. You always want these new guys pushing the seniors for places. It's a good problem to have. Joe can only keep doing what he's doing, scoring crucial runs."

Root has already shown himself to be a very versatile batsman, which is why his case for Champions Trophy selection is becoming stronger by the day. Being an opener in the first-class game means he is not adverse to facing the new ball but he has the invention in his strokeplay to manipulate the field later on. What he lacks in brute strength he more than makes up for in dexterity as he showed in Napier with the scoop over fine leg.

"He's played shots I didn't know he could play," Cook said. "He came in today when we needed seven runs an over, and played very well. The way he has handled himself in international cricket so far has been very good. A lot of playing international cricket is about temperament, and he's certainly shown the right attitude and been able to handle pressure."

The current top five all have plenty going for them. The captain is not going anywhere, and is developing into a high-class one-day batsman; Bell is averaging 55 with a strike-rate of 80 since coming back into the team and Trott's value is appreciated hugely within the side if not quite so highly outside it.

Joe Root made an unbeaten 79, New Zealand v England, 2nd ODI, Napier, February 20, 2013
Joe Root has shown coolness and a wide array of strokes in his early innings © Getty Images

Trott certainly puts the onus on other batsmen to make the running, which Root did on Wednesday, and a perfectly balanced top order would not have three similar players in the top three but, to beat a slightly broken drum, his record does not lose anything when compared to the likes of Jacques Kallis, Mahela Jayawardene, Kumar Sangakkara or Younis Khan.

Perversely, Pietersen's u-turn over one-day retirement has caused some headaches. England had actually started to plan, successfully as last summer showed, for life without him. That is not the same as saying they were happy not to have him, but sport moves on and the squad had started afresh.

The rotation policy has meant the ultimate decision over how he slots back in has been delayed. Remember, before he briefly gave the game away in May he had been opening the batting alongside Cook. Now that is Bell's role and with the new fielding restrictions - and two new balls - there is the belief Pietersen can be most effective at No. 4. Still, Root is not making a bad job of that spot right now. And it was a lack of desire for 50-over cricket that sparked Pietersen's problems last year. Does he really have the drive for it, even in a Champions Trophy year and with a World Cup in 2015?

If it is accepted that Pietersen's place is certain then that leaves Morgan, a player who has shown some of the best "closing" skills in the world but who has begun 2013 with a bit of a stutter in ODIs. He scored 94 runs in five innings in India, although that came off a 2012 home season where he averaged 74.50. And there are still few better, and calmer, judges of a chase.

Ashley Giles has shown he is not afraid to make significant decisions early in his reign. In all likelihood he has ended Craig Kieswetter's international career and Jade Dernbach faces a long road back to the one-day side. To a lesser extent, Samit Patel - another victim of Root's success - is being pushed back to the fringes. But if Giles finds a space in the top five for Root come June, and the opening match of the Champions Trophy against Australia, he will have made his toughest decision yet.

Andrew McGlashan is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo

RSS Feeds: Andrew McGlashan

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by Oli_B on (February 22, 2013, 10:14 GMT)

I agree that Root has to play on current form and, given his age, for the good of his and England's future development in ODIs. Pietersen is the most devastating batsman we have and probably the only one guaranteed a place in any ODI side in the world; he must come back in. I personally think we go with the following line-up - with the order to be varied, as I believe all limited overs batting orders should be, depending on the match situation: 1. Cook (c) 2. Bell 3. Trott 4. Pietersen 5. Root 6. Morgan 7. Butler (wk) 8. Swann 9. Broad 10. Anderson 11. Finn

While there is no authentic all-rounder there, I think it's perfectly reasonable to expect 10 overs from Trott, KP and Root (I believe the latter's off-spin has decent potential). Morgan and Butler can be shifted up the order if some serious acceleration in the run rate is required.

Posted by jmcilhinney on (February 22, 2013, 0:09 GMT)

@kallis57 on (February 21, 2013, 15:39 GMT), I agree with you mostly there and would say that Trott's lack of ability to accelerate when it's appropriate/needed is the issue. I don't have a problem with his latest innings though. Usually he starts off very slowly and accelerates slowly, winding up with a decent strike rate only if he gets into the 70s or 80s. This time he got his strike rate up to 80 fairly early on and maintained it. He also played a lot more scoring shots so, at worst, he was rotating the strike. I don't expect Trott to be a big hitter as that's not where his strength lies but I do think that a more attacking frame of mind is in order so that he can get his strike rate up earlier in his innings and genuinely push it in situations where England need runs or have wickets in hand.

Posted by JG2704 on (February 21, 2013, 18:17 GMT)

@yorkshire-86 on (February 21, 2013, 10:13 GMT) Bell will almost certainly do well in NZ and it will keep him in the side for all Ashes/SA series and SC series for however long he wants to play the game.

Posted by R_U_4_REAL_NICK on (February 21, 2013, 17:13 GMT)

@Dark_Harlequin (post on February 21, 2013, 16:27 GMT): Yup, based on current form and if five bowlers is the way to go, then I agree with your team. The likes of Morgan, Bairstow, Hales and Wright have also been argued throughout these threads which is fair enough, and I've already listed the bowlers in contention below. There's of course others I've missed like Meaker as well...

Posted by Harlequin. on (February 21, 2013, 16:27 GMT)

@RU4RealNick - Dernbach never had form to get back! But I agree with Lmaostestung; you need 5 bowlers because and I don't think KP/Trott/Root are good enough with the ball. If Bopara could bat then you could possibly use him. I would have Root instead of Morgan at the moment, with 2 new balls and in England where those new balls with last longer, Trott will be invaluable at 3.

Belly, Cookie, Trotsky, KP, Rooty, Buttlery, Woakesy, Tredders/Onions, Swanny, Jimmy, Finny

Posted by kallis57 on (February 21, 2013, 15:39 GMT)

I know Trott averages 50 in ODI cricket but his batting is one paced and often leaves England short of the correct total when batting first and puts incredible pressure on his team mates. Root bailed him out the other night with a quite brilliant innings while Trott looked for another not out to boost his average. His batting is not based on what is best for the team but what is best for him. His grinding 60 odd the other night left us 30 short of the total required and he scored a 50 with one four in the game we won. Root should not be expected to bail out a senior batsman when he comes to the crease. Trott was happy to play for a not out and let Root do all the work. Players like Root KP and Buttler are prepared to attack the opposition bowling rather than sit at the non-strikers end calculating their average. Trott is also a horrible runner between the wickets and our worst fielder.

Posted by   on (February 21, 2013, 15:28 GMT)

England will be the strongest team and will be favorites to win the champions trophy the batting looks classy with pietersen coming in , and bowlers like finn and her son lol jimmy . swann a quality spinner i will back them to win the champions trophy

Posted by broadlm on (February 21, 2013, 13:14 GMT)

PPD123, I agree and feel England would be stronger if KP slotted in at 4 with the rest moving down 1. Thus 4 bowlers + Root, KP and Trott to fill the other 10 overs. Alternatively, in English conditions I would have thought they would have kept Luke Wright on. He would have been ideal to bat 6 or 7 and send down some overs. Looked good in the 20/20s. Could have played in these 1 dayers vs NZ to see how he got on and then into the champs Trophy. I just think no 7 in one too high for Woakes/Bresnan.. Plus neither are particularly big hitters, which is what you ideally want at no 7.

Posted by yorkshire-86 on (February 21, 2013, 10:13 GMT)

deb61 - Compton young? He is the wrong side of 30 and one of the oldest players in the squad! As for Root, he should replace the hapless Bell who is useless away from home.

Posted by phermon on (February 21, 2013, 1:18 GMT)

PPD123: this is particularly true if you consider Root to be verging on being an allrounder. He's as likely as any of the fifth bowlers to restrict the scoring and get a wicket or two

Posted by jackiethepen on (February 21, 2013, 0:56 GMT)

Bairstow is still in contention with Buttler for the wickie position. Buttler has to get runs to hold his place. Root bats in the middle order in the one day game for his County which explains his success at 4/5. KP will come back in. I can't see Morgan being dropped unless his current loss of form really persists. Rotation shouldn't mean you can lose your place. Root will have to accept that.

Posted by whocareswhowins on (February 21, 2013, 0:44 GMT)

Young Joe Root seems to be a very very good player. England have a few good young players coming through - Root, Butler, Compton, Bairstow and Woakes..may pose a few selection headaches, but only in a good way. Great news for England, wish them well.

Posted by Lmaotsetung on (February 20, 2013, 22:52 GMT)

Never been this excited about England's future in a long while. Root (opener), Bairstow (wk), Butler (finisher), Stokes (all-rounder), Kerrigan (spinner), Topeley (left arm seamer which Eng hasn't had in ages).

Posted by Lmaotsetung on (February 20, 2013, 22:42 GMT)

@PPD123 - English conditions you defintely need 5 bowlers. You can get away with 4 bowlers and 2 part timers in sub-continent but not on Eng/Aus/SA tracks. Eng has shown that 5 main bowlers is the way to go in these conditions last year by demolishing Aus and they've shown it again in this series. They bowled relatively well in the first ODI except at the death.

Posted by PPD123 on (February 20, 2013, 21:45 GMT)

The author talks about the top 5 batsman, why not have 6 batsman 1 wk and 4 bowlers... Champions trophy will be played in Eng and they would not need 5 bowlers in those condition. replace woakes with Root, problem solved....

Posted by hhillbumper on (February 20, 2013, 21:03 GMT)

joe root should play in tests. There is a lot of young talent coming through in England. Who do the Aussies have?????

Posted by Rahulbose on (February 20, 2013, 20:27 GMT)

There was some real bad commentary during the run chase yesterday. They kept questioning the ability of Joe Root, asking for Morgan to be promoted. All while Root was leading his team to a victory. Eng had done that in Mohali and Morgan and Patel promptly flopped before Root played a good knock. Someone should send a memo to the English commentators, this guy can bat and score runs quickly when needed.

Posted by Front-Foot-Lunge on (February 20, 2013, 20:03 GMT)

With every shot in his back pocket, Root is such an unbelievable talent, just highlighting how deep England's talent pool is. Teams like Australia, with nothing to fill their ranks and so desperate they can only find a dart-bowler to take to India as their lone spinner, must be looking on wondering where they can begin their rebuilding process.

Posted by   on (February 20, 2013, 19:47 GMT)

I wish they give the guy a chance to settle down. He's good, but omitting him from the side in the next game in the name of the rotation policy won't do him any good.

Posted by A_Vacant_Slip on (February 20, 2013, 19:42 GMT)

@Nish_us why do you bring India here? Sure Pujara is excellent prospect no doubt but this is not relevant to NZ v Eng ODI. Your test match with Australia start soon. Enjoy that.

Posted by R_U_4_REAL_NICK on (February 20, 2013, 19:20 GMT)

As I wrote on another thread: Trott is too great an asset to be dropped IMO. I would play: Cook; Bell; Trott; Root; KP; Morgan; Buttler; Woakes; Swann; Finn; Anderson. The order can be shuffled a little depending on whether England are batting first or chasing; the pitch and weather conditions; whether the openers get out early or dig in; etc.

You will notice the biggest change to my team is the absence of the infuriating Broad! I think the likes of Bell, Trott, Root and KP can occupy 10 overs between them much better than Broad. The likes of Hales and Bairstow are waiting in the wings as replacement batsmen; and then Onions, Harris, Briggs, Dernbach (if he gets his form back!), Bresnan (once fit), Tredwell etc. are all there to fight over bowling slots up for grabs. There's always Patel as well...

Posted by Nish_US on (February 20, 2013, 17:02 GMT)

Do not rotate for the sake of rotation.. and especially do not rotate emerging talent when on High...

Yes, do rotate those who had a heavy workflow for a few years..and who needs rest.. or out of form... but not young talent in the peak of their form... Do not take those golden years/tours away from them.

Posted by Nish_US on (February 20, 2013, 17:00 GMT)

Joe root is in prime form and has shown the calm head and temperament. He has shown that he got it in his first 50 against India. If he was in Indian team, would any one dare to think of not selecting him?

Oh well, India can indeed select such a talent, as we've seen in Pujara.. same match he made a ton, but did not get a chance in the ODIs.

Tests 1 2 1 93 73 93.00 285 32.63 0 1 5 1 0 0 ODIs 7 6 2 298 79* 74.50 321 92.83 0 3 30 3 4 0

Comments have now been closed for this article

Email Feedback Print
Andrew McGlashanClose
Andrew McGlashan Assistant Editor Andrew arrived at ESPNcricinfo via Manchester and Cape Town, after finding the assistant editor at a weak moment as he watched England's batting collapse in the Newlands Test. Andrew began his cricket writing as a freelance covering Lancashire during 2004 when they were relegated in the County Championship. In fact, they were top of the table when he began reporting on them but things went dramatically downhill. He likes to let people know that he is a supporter of county cricket, a fact his colleagues will testify to and bemoan in equal quantities.
Tour Results
New Zealand v England at Auckland - Mar 22-26, 2013
Match drawn
New Zealand v England at Wellington - Mar 14-18, 2013
Match drawn
New Zealand v England at Dunedin - Mar 6-10, 2013
Match drawn
NZ XI v England XI at Queenstown - Feb 27-Mar 2, 2013
NZ XI won by 3 wickets
New Zealand v England at Auckland - Feb 23, 2013
England won by 5 wickets (with 75 balls remaining)
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days