New Zealand v England, 1st Test, Dunedin, 2nd day March 7, 2013

In a position every team can dream of - Wagner

16

Was this really the team bowled out for 45 two Tests ago? Was it really the team who sacked their captain in such a way that he took time away from the game? Was it really the team whose off-field exploits make as many headlines as those on it? Was this really the team whose management and executive structure do not appear to see eye-to-eye?

What this was, without doubt, was one of New Zealand's greatest days of Test cricket in recent times. This was not dominating against a lowly Zimbabwe or Bangladesh side. They outplayed one of the strongest Test teams in the world from start to finish. There was an air of disbelief from those who have followed New Zealand cricket's recent woes.

"We're in the position that every team can dream of at the moment," Neil Wagner said, and even that sounded like an understatement.

It was Wagner who sparked New Zealand's incredible day. In his first over, with his second and third deliveries, he removed England captain Alastair Cook and trapped Kevin Pietersen lbw first ball. England's top order looked a little vulnerable coming into the match due to the lack of match practice and the home side made it count.

Wagner had been bullish in Queenstown after roughing up England's batsmen, including removing Pietersen, and highlighted keeping him short of runs. He said New Zealand would try to "hammer" on his confidence. He was as good as his word today and, when asked about England's performance, did not produce a dead-bat answer.

"They were under a bit of pressure and thought they might take lower-risk shots but at the end of the day, that's the way they play," he said. "There's days when it doesn't come off and days when it comes off and on those days you don't want to be the opposition and they can hurt you badly. Other days it doesn't come off and it was just one of those days when it didn't work for them."

The standout feature of New Zealand's day, of which there were many, was that the key individuals - Wagner, Bruce Martin and Hamish Rutherford - could, in slightly different circumstances, have been playing in the Ford Trophy one-day tournament rather than a Test match.


Wagner was only included in the squad after impressing for the New Zealand XI in Queenstown. Initially, Mark Gillespie was tipped to be the likely option to bolster the pace resources, but Wagner's six wickets last week tipped the balance back his way. He may still have missed the final cut, though, if Doug Bracewell had not decided to clean up his house, in the process stepping on a piece of glass. In this case, Wagner's glass was certainly half full.

However, his first three Tests had brought five wickets at 68.80 and it was already being suggested that he was another player unable to transfer dominant domestic form to the top level. One good day does not mean he has cracked it, but the relief from him was palpable. "I needed it and I was just glad to get it under the belt I guess," he said.

Wagner shared eight wickets with Martin, but the 32-year-old left-arm spinner was not a certain starter in this match just the day before. Four quicks were being seriously considered by Brendon McCullum and Mike Hesson. It's difficult to say Martin bowled for his wickets (caught point, deep square-leg and short fine-leg) but his presence ensured England's batsmen could not settle in against four medium-fast bowlers.  

Martin also made it clear before the series that he was not too interested in being a defensive bowler and "would look to take a few poles and bowl to some attacking fields" if he got his chance. McCullum, a captain out of the same aggressive mindset, supported him with men around the bat and also gave him the ball straight after lunch when logic might have suggested resuming with two seamers. When Matt Prior began to open his shoulders, McCullum did not withdraw Martin to the safety of the outfield and the following over he claimed the wicket.

Then there is Rutherford, like Wagner, an Otago cricketer playing on his home ground. Of all the problem areas in the New Zealand team over recent times, the opening partnership has been one of most vexing.  

Rutherford did not look remotely out of place, resisting England's attempts to disturb him with the short ball and driving more confidently than during the one-day series. His opening stand with Peter Fulton, currently worth 131, is New Zealand's best since Mark Richardson and Stephen Fleming added 163 against England, at Trent Bridge, in 2004.

A compact left-hander from the same school as McCullum, Rutherford was picked on the basis of strong domestic form but was not the most prolific option available.  There is also the likelihood that if Martin Guptill had not been injured during the one-day series, he would have been given another chance alongside Peter Fulton.  It was a day for a host of accidental heroes.

Andrew McGlashan is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • on March 7, 2013, 10:27 GMT

    Trust me, the first time when I read the news I thought it was NZ all out on 131. It took sometime to realize that they haven't lost a wicket yet and with both the openers having played more than 100 balls each marks a situation for tremendous respect. I am not in favour of an English bash because lately they earned some respect in India by tackling spin and scoring great runs, of course winning eventually, but am completely zapped by this Kiwi performance. Definitely an all accidental selection, but here it is...they are picking up. This shouldn't stop here and they should pile up a mammoth score to bring upon severe challenges for the English side. Guys keep your heads clean and go for the kill. This is perhaps going to be the best contest in a while. Australia vs India...ohhh..that's monotonously boring.

  • BigGeorgeMehemood on March 8, 2013, 3:47 GMT

    When I saw d news, i d not know it was right news, I d saw I d think England was New Zealand, but d not know it was d other way round..it was England for 167, not NZ, it was right score for d mind, after looking several many times, it was d right score. Thank you bery bery mooch.

  • GrindAR on March 7, 2013, 21:21 GMT

    Go on and win this... with authority Kiwis... Job well done so far...

  • Cpt.Meanster on March 7, 2013, 19:41 GMT

    God bless New Zealand and you have my ENTIRE support to beat the Poms. Come on boys !!!

  • on March 7, 2013, 15:11 GMT

    its amazing when the kiwis were bowling the ball was moving after that wicket got flat and nothing for the english bowlers....go kiwis...

  • armchairjohnny on March 7, 2013, 15:06 GMT

    In the build up to this series, the cockiness and sheer arrogance displayed by England players, fans and 'pundits' has been nothing short of disrespectful. I enjoyed every delivery of the first days play, and savored it with grace. Such a complacent attitude and incessant trash-talking by England has been met by a stiff rebuttal. What a wonderful day for New Zealand cricket, and a hard lesson still to be learned by England: No test team with such an appalling attitude, regardless of how talented they may be, deserves to be number one.

  • Batmanindallas on March 7, 2013, 14:52 GMT

    Big fan of Kiwis and their brand of cricket. The sportsmen from NZ seem like true sportsmen without swagger and cockiness one associates with their neighbors. I hope they come back strong and win the series. It is good for them and the game...wish you all the best

  • on March 7, 2013, 14:23 GMT

    Good to see someone giving the Black Caps some well deserved credit. Apparently England don't play well in the first test of an away series- give it a rest! You're playing in English conditions. And only one once decent chance was given by our openers...

  • CrICkeeet on March 7, 2013, 12:24 GMT

    When i saw d news, i thought it was a mistake nd newzealand allout by 167 nd england scored 131/0! then i entered d scorecard... read d players name in d score nd i got d r8 thing... WELL DONE NZL!

  • on March 7, 2013, 11:55 GMT

    Oh yay, we have one article writing about how good NZ were, instead of how England were out of match practice or complacent.

  • on March 7, 2013, 10:27 GMT

    Trust me, the first time when I read the news I thought it was NZ all out on 131. It took sometime to realize that they haven't lost a wicket yet and with both the openers having played more than 100 balls each marks a situation for tremendous respect. I am not in favour of an English bash because lately they earned some respect in India by tackling spin and scoring great runs, of course winning eventually, but am completely zapped by this Kiwi performance. Definitely an all accidental selection, but here it is...they are picking up. This shouldn't stop here and they should pile up a mammoth score to bring upon severe challenges for the English side. Guys keep your heads clean and go for the kill. This is perhaps going to be the best contest in a while. Australia vs India...ohhh..that's monotonously boring.

  • BigGeorgeMehemood on March 8, 2013, 3:47 GMT

    When I saw d news, i d not know it was right news, I d saw I d think England was New Zealand, but d not know it was d other way round..it was England for 167, not NZ, it was right score for d mind, after looking several many times, it was d right score. Thank you bery bery mooch.

  • GrindAR on March 7, 2013, 21:21 GMT

    Go on and win this... with authority Kiwis... Job well done so far...

  • Cpt.Meanster on March 7, 2013, 19:41 GMT

    God bless New Zealand and you have my ENTIRE support to beat the Poms. Come on boys !!!

  • on March 7, 2013, 15:11 GMT

    its amazing when the kiwis were bowling the ball was moving after that wicket got flat and nothing for the english bowlers....go kiwis...

  • armchairjohnny on March 7, 2013, 15:06 GMT

    In the build up to this series, the cockiness and sheer arrogance displayed by England players, fans and 'pundits' has been nothing short of disrespectful. I enjoyed every delivery of the first days play, and savored it with grace. Such a complacent attitude and incessant trash-talking by England has been met by a stiff rebuttal. What a wonderful day for New Zealand cricket, and a hard lesson still to be learned by England: No test team with such an appalling attitude, regardless of how talented they may be, deserves to be number one.

  • Batmanindallas on March 7, 2013, 14:52 GMT

    Big fan of Kiwis and their brand of cricket. The sportsmen from NZ seem like true sportsmen without swagger and cockiness one associates with their neighbors. I hope they come back strong and win the series. It is good for them and the game...wish you all the best

  • on March 7, 2013, 14:23 GMT

    Good to see someone giving the Black Caps some well deserved credit. Apparently England don't play well in the first test of an away series- give it a rest! You're playing in English conditions. And only one once decent chance was given by our openers...

  • CrICkeeet on March 7, 2013, 12:24 GMT

    When i saw d news, i thought it was a mistake nd newzealand allout by 167 nd england scored 131/0! then i entered d scorecard... read d players name in d score nd i got d r8 thing... WELL DONE NZL!

  • on March 7, 2013, 11:55 GMT

    Oh yay, we have one article writing about how good NZ were, instead of how England were out of match practice or complacent.

  • wanatawu on March 7, 2013, 11:26 GMT

    Hamish Rutherford looks like good batsman, wonder if his dad is still living in South Africa I believe he work for a sports betting co. there. What did Engeland expect the Kiwis to just handover their wickets to them? Actually SA team work hard last year over there for theirs. Still remember that on test NZ was cruising 133/2 and suddenly Saffas took 6 wickets for no run and remember the 45 in Cape Town. So come on England step up another level tomorow.

  • on March 7, 2013, 10:54 GMT

    Hamish Rutherford looks like an international test cricketer, reminds me a little of Matthew Hayden. Full credit to him and Fulton. I think 167 all out was as much England getting themselves out as it was our brilliance in the field. This test series has a long way to go, though...

  • nzcricket174 on March 7, 2013, 10:13 GMT

    ESPN Cricinfo, please correct your article. "A compact left-hander from the same school as McCullum" (last paragraph) - Hamish Rutherford went to Otago Boys', McCullum went to King's.

  • highveldhillbilly on March 7, 2013, 9:12 GMT

    Anyone else think it's pretty funny that the exSaffa (Wagner) gets another exSaffa (KP) first ball. I know which exSaffa I was routing for as Saffa myself - go Wagner!

  • on March 7, 2013, 9:03 GMT

    One of those near perfect days that come along every now and then.

  • ozwriter on March 7, 2013, 9:02 GMT

    well written article. one of the best writers on cricinfo.

  • ozwriter on March 7, 2013, 9:02 GMT

    well written article. one of the best writers on cricinfo.

  • on March 7, 2013, 9:03 GMT

    One of those near perfect days that come along every now and then.

  • highveldhillbilly on March 7, 2013, 9:12 GMT

    Anyone else think it's pretty funny that the exSaffa (Wagner) gets another exSaffa (KP) first ball. I know which exSaffa I was routing for as Saffa myself - go Wagner!

  • nzcricket174 on March 7, 2013, 10:13 GMT

    ESPN Cricinfo, please correct your article. "A compact left-hander from the same school as McCullum" (last paragraph) - Hamish Rutherford went to Otago Boys', McCullum went to King's.

  • on March 7, 2013, 10:54 GMT

    Hamish Rutherford looks like an international test cricketer, reminds me a little of Matthew Hayden. Full credit to him and Fulton. I think 167 all out was as much England getting themselves out as it was our brilliance in the field. This test series has a long way to go, though...

  • wanatawu on March 7, 2013, 11:26 GMT

    Hamish Rutherford looks like good batsman, wonder if his dad is still living in South Africa I believe he work for a sports betting co. there. What did Engeland expect the Kiwis to just handover their wickets to them? Actually SA team work hard last year over there for theirs. Still remember that on test NZ was cruising 133/2 and suddenly Saffas took 6 wickets for no run and remember the 45 in Cape Town. So come on England step up another level tomorow.

  • on March 7, 2013, 11:55 GMT

    Oh yay, we have one article writing about how good NZ were, instead of how England were out of match practice or complacent.

  • CrICkeeet on March 7, 2013, 12:24 GMT

    When i saw d news, i thought it was a mistake nd newzealand allout by 167 nd england scored 131/0! then i entered d scorecard... read d players name in d score nd i got d r8 thing... WELL DONE NZL!

  • on March 7, 2013, 14:23 GMT

    Good to see someone giving the Black Caps some well deserved credit. Apparently England don't play well in the first test of an away series- give it a rest! You're playing in English conditions. And only one once decent chance was given by our openers...

  • Batmanindallas on March 7, 2013, 14:52 GMT

    Big fan of Kiwis and their brand of cricket. The sportsmen from NZ seem like true sportsmen without swagger and cockiness one associates with their neighbors. I hope they come back strong and win the series. It is good for them and the game...wish you all the best