NZ v England, 2nd Test, Wellington, 2nd day March 15, 2013

Selfless Prior lays claim to top spot

Matt Prior's strength is his ability to play in any situation, and according to the needs of his team. His commitment to England's cause cannot be doubted
20

Matt Prior is one injury away from captaining England. Alastair Cook does not miss Tests - he has only been absent for one since his debut, on his first tour in 2006 - so the odds are against it, but a broken finger is only one rearing delivery or awkward catch away. If misfortune did happen to cross Cook, leading England would certainly not be a role above Prior's station.

He has been elevated to vice-captain for this tour, replacing Stuart Broad who had previously been Cook's deputy, and it is the official stamping of the leadership position he has had within this team since his second coming as a Test cricketer. Whether it be trying to salvage a disintegrating innings, throwing the bat to bring about a declaration, stealing back impetus as he did today, snaffling catches behind the stumps, geeing up fielders during a long day in the dirt, or running from his position to have a word with the bowler, Prior is rarely far away from the crux of a situation.

His leadership qualities shone through last year off the field, too, when he took it upon himself to pick up the phone and call Kevin Pietersen after his meltdown following the Headingley Test against South Africa. Prior had no selfish thoughts and just wanted to try and sort out a mess that was engulfing the England team. His chat with Pietersen did not bring immediate rewards, but it was another occasion when all the thought was about the bigger picture.

Selfishness is just not something that comes near Prior's game. You only had to witness his dismissal in Wellington, reverse sweeping to be caught at short third man shortly before tea, when he was within touching distance of a seventh Test hundred, which would have put him just one behind Les Ames among England wicketkeeper-batsmen.

"It's not the way I play, mate. I try to read the situation as best I can, and adapt my game," Prior said. That's all that's important to me - making sure the team's in the right position at the end of the day.

"I'd be lying if I didn't say you do walk off and [think] 'Oh, 18 runs away - it would have been lovely to get a Test century'. They don't come around that often. But if I get it over his head, it's another boundary, then get to tea and have another little dart after tea. That's more important."

Prior and the team's plan had worked out just about right, especially having been put in. Bat until tea on the second day with more than 450 on the board. Yet when Prior walked in at 325 for 5, following loose shots from Ian Bell and Joe Root, the innings was threatening to be neither one thing nor the other. In fact New Zealand were enjoying the better of the day. However, by lunch he was already into gear with 15 off 21 balls, signing off the session two powerful off drives.

Shortly after the interval, Pietersen fell trying to clear mid-off against Bruce Martin, and Broad, whose batting continues to slide to such an extent that Steven Finn will expect the No. 8 position soon, feathered a catch to keeper. At 374 for 7, England could have been kept under 400, not a failure by any means but neither the statement they wanted to make.

With Finn at the other end, fresh from his nightwatchman heroics in Dunedin, Prior knew he had someone who would not gift his wicket away so there was no need to go into farming mode, but intent was important. England wanted to dictate the nature of the game. While he plundered the off side there was also a delicate touch as he glided the ball through the slips to bring up the 400. Then he took apart Neil Wagner, the feisty left-arm quick, with two straight drives for six as he set his sights on the team's aim.

But when asked about his display, typically he focused on someone else. "It was nice to contribute. But more important for me today was the contribution from Steven Finn. There was a lot said about his innings in the last Test match. It was a slightly different situation today, and again he stepped up. It's so important, those guys putting in those contributions at the bottom. Even if he's just batting time, and someone else is able to score at the other end, it's so vital."

Of the current vintage of wicketkeeper-batsmen, Prior is one of a few in form. MS Dhoni's has a recent double-hundred against Australia, to follow his 99 against England in Nagpur, although his average does not match Prior, and AB de Villiers is settling into his new position with increasing effectiveness. Kumar Sangakkara was outstanding, and remains so as a batsman, but no longer keeps in Tests.

From those three contemporaries, de Villiers and Sangakkara are top-order batsman while Dhoni has recently moved from No. 7 to No. 6. A move one place up the order would allow Prior the chance for more substantial innings, but it is easy to see why England like the current set-up. The only way it will change is if a bowling allrounder, perhaps Chris Woakes, makes a sustained case for No. 7.

Regardless of where he bats, though, Prior can lay a claim to being England's best ever. His average has pushed ahead of Ames, although he remains behind him in terms of hundreds, and is considerably higher than that of Alan Knott, who Prior does not match as a gloveman, although errors in his work are few and far between now. Alec Stewart also needs to be included in any such debate, but Prior makes a strong case although not one he is yet willing to think about.

"As far as I'm concerned, those guys are legends of the game - and I've got a long way to go before I class myself alongside them," he said. "You look at these guys - Stewie has been a mentor of mine for many years - and their stats and the games they've played, of course. They're distant goals. I made the mistake of looking too far ahead once before, and I'm not going to do that again.

"Fingers crossed, one day I might be able to say 'Yes, I had a good influence on the team'." Of that, there is no doubt.

Andrew McGlashan is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • whoster on March 15, 2013, 11:14 GMT

    Having Matt Prior at no.7 is a real bonus for England. He's become a first-rate wicket keeper and extremely dangerous batsman. He has to be the best keeper batsman in the world - and he won't be bothered about missing out on a century. His game is all to do with doing what he can for the team in whatever the circumstances. A true team player, and he's as big a part of the England side as anyone - and that includes Cooky.

  • TheMehssiah on March 15, 2013, 8:14 GMT

    I think I'm right in saying that Matt Prior was opening the batting for his county when he first came into the test side. For me, he'd clearly be a contender for an England batting spot even if he wasn't keeping wicket. The fact that he has managed to turn himself from an average keeper into the player we see today, through sheer hard work, speaks volumes about the character of the man.

    I'm slightly torn - I prioritise test cricket over every other form of the game. I'm at a loss to understand why he isn't picked in the one-day side (I take the point about his ODI average, but that was a long time ago). Then again, I'd hate to see his career shortened through playing too much cricket. That said - he makes every other keeper around the England set-up look like a rank amateur, and in Kieswetter's case, that's true with both bat and gloves.

  • cric_J on March 16, 2013, 8:17 GMT

    Matt Prior is definitely the most dependable wicketkeeper batsman in the current lot eventhough I find AB probably more talented and athletic.He scores whenever Eng is in bother and misses very few with the gloves on.He is not talked about as much as Cooky or Jimmy when England's ascent to the top is considered but silently and "selflessly" he has done his deed to perfection.Great asset to the team.

  • Greatest_Game on March 16, 2013, 2:12 GMT

    @ bennybow Well said. I could not agree with you more, except for one small point. I think the glasses may be more beer tinted than rose tinted.

    I watched the last tests SA played before they were, rightfully, kicked out of international cricket. I see many Saffas today waxing lyrical about Amla, de Villiers, or even one of my all time favorites, Kallis. They are all fine players, but next to Graeme Pollock and Barry Richards there is still no comparison.

  • on March 15, 2013, 22:46 GMT

    Best English keeper alright, third best in these Islands he'd struggle to make the Irish team behind Niall O'Brien and Gary Wilson.

  • OhhhhhMattyMatty on March 15, 2013, 19:28 GMT

    31 scores of 50+ for Matt Prior in 95 Test innings (1 in 3.06). Even Pietersen (1 in 3.09) and Dhoni (1 in 3.44) don't make 50+ scores as regularly as Prior!!! World class! Best ever English keeper-batsman!

  • Tlotoxl on March 15, 2013, 19:19 GMT

    @ajetti: Prior is described as selfless for exactly reasons described in the article, that he will completely play to the situation and ignore personal landmarks.

  • Arun14 on March 15, 2013, 18:20 GMT

    Prior's second coming has been remarkable. I mean what player wouldn't be traumatized by facing the ire of the Indian fans for allegedly sledging their hero about a Ferrari and then later seeing your wife seated on the lap of another man. Prior has indeed been all about mental strength.

  • cricketeria on March 15, 2013, 16:55 GMT

    He's the best keeper-batsman after Gilchrist and De Villiers. All hail Prior!

  • bumsonseats on March 15, 2013, 15:26 GMT

    as all good wicket keeping batsmen should do, if in a hole or to add the icing to the cake, which is score important runs and thats why prior best in the world.

  • whoster on March 15, 2013, 11:14 GMT

    Having Matt Prior at no.7 is a real bonus for England. He's become a first-rate wicket keeper and extremely dangerous batsman. He has to be the best keeper batsman in the world - and he won't be bothered about missing out on a century. His game is all to do with doing what he can for the team in whatever the circumstances. A true team player, and he's as big a part of the England side as anyone - and that includes Cooky.

  • TheMehssiah on March 15, 2013, 8:14 GMT

    I think I'm right in saying that Matt Prior was opening the batting for his county when he first came into the test side. For me, he'd clearly be a contender for an England batting spot even if he wasn't keeping wicket. The fact that he has managed to turn himself from an average keeper into the player we see today, through sheer hard work, speaks volumes about the character of the man.

    I'm slightly torn - I prioritise test cricket over every other form of the game. I'm at a loss to understand why he isn't picked in the one-day side (I take the point about his ODI average, but that was a long time ago). Then again, I'd hate to see his career shortened through playing too much cricket. That said - he makes every other keeper around the England set-up look like a rank amateur, and in Kieswetter's case, that's true with both bat and gloves.

  • cric_J on March 16, 2013, 8:17 GMT

    Matt Prior is definitely the most dependable wicketkeeper batsman in the current lot eventhough I find AB probably more talented and athletic.He scores whenever Eng is in bother and misses very few with the gloves on.He is not talked about as much as Cooky or Jimmy when England's ascent to the top is considered but silently and "selflessly" he has done his deed to perfection.Great asset to the team.

  • Greatest_Game on March 16, 2013, 2:12 GMT

    @ bennybow Well said. I could not agree with you more, except for one small point. I think the glasses may be more beer tinted than rose tinted.

    I watched the last tests SA played before they were, rightfully, kicked out of international cricket. I see many Saffas today waxing lyrical about Amla, de Villiers, or even one of my all time favorites, Kallis. They are all fine players, but next to Graeme Pollock and Barry Richards there is still no comparison.

  • on March 15, 2013, 22:46 GMT

    Best English keeper alright, third best in these Islands he'd struggle to make the Irish team behind Niall O'Brien and Gary Wilson.

  • OhhhhhMattyMatty on March 15, 2013, 19:28 GMT

    31 scores of 50+ for Matt Prior in 95 Test innings (1 in 3.06). Even Pietersen (1 in 3.09) and Dhoni (1 in 3.44) don't make 50+ scores as regularly as Prior!!! World class! Best ever English keeper-batsman!

  • Tlotoxl on March 15, 2013, 19:19 GMT

    @ajetti: Prior is described as selfless for exactly reasons described in the article, that he will completely play to the situation and ignore personal landmarks.

  • Arun14 on March 15, 2013, 18:20 GMT

    Prior's second coming has been remarkable. I mean what player wouldn't be traumatized by facing the ire of the Indian fans for allegedly sledging their hero about a Ferrari and then later seeing your wife seated on the lap of another man. Prior has indeed been all about mental strength.

  • cricketeria on March 15, 2013, 16:55 GMT

    He's the best keeper-batsman after Gilchrist and De Villiers. All hail Prior!

  • bumsonseats on March 15, 2013, 15:26 GMT

    as all good wicket keeping batsmen should do, if in a hole or to add the icing to the cake, which is score important runs and thats why prior best in the world.

  • ajetti on March 15, 2013, 15:23 GMT

    I am not sure why they use the term "selfless" when describing Matt Prior over and over again? Is it because he gifts his wicket and does not make a hundred when one's for the taking?

  • jb633 on March 15, 2013, 13:54 GMT

    I don't think it's really right to judge the DeVilliers and Prior as they are different cricketers. DeVilliers is a batsmen first and a wicket keeper second. Prior is probably a keeper first and a batsmen second. Both are brilliant in their own way but very different. ABV is certainly the better bastmen and his averages at the top of the order speak for themself. Prior is a better glovemant though and looks much more assured stood up which is the real testament of a wicket keeper. I think both are still learning and both will get better. If I had to choose one I would go for ABV in conditons that favour seam and Prior in Asia. I think ABV has not really had his keeping tested to the limit yet, but we will see when SA tour the UAE later this year. IMO Matt Prior is the best all rounder England have had since Botham. He is certainly better than Freddie.

  • DeckChairand6pack on March 15, 2013, 12:52 GMT

    Very well played Matt Prior and unquestionably the 2nd best keeper batsmen in the world today behind AB. He needs a good few heavy scores to be mentioned in the same breath as de Villers

  • Harlequin. on March 15, 2013, 12:10 GMT

    Best keeper/batsman in test cricket, definitely. best keeper/batsman England has ever had, hmm, Stewie still has that in my mind. Prior is an fantastic player and seems like a solid gent (the KP phonecall was a great move), but most of his success has come batting down the order following the likes of Cook, Trott & KP. Stewie batted in the top order, with very few players of genuine class for company, against much stronger bowling attacks than there are nowadays, whilst also captaining.

    Having said that, neither Prior nor Stewart are my favorite Eng w/k. Jack Russell hands down!

  • bennybow on March 15, 2013, 11:56 GMT

    Yes Prior is clearly worth his place as a batsman. However, to put things in perspective, the earliest England keeper I can remember back to was the great Godfrey Evans and Prior is the least capable keeper England have had since then. He's not even the best keeper in England.

    Much rose-tinted spectacle thinking with people commenting about today's cricketers. For example, Anderson may well become England's highest wicket taker - because they play more tests now. His stats don't stack up against Fred Trueman's at all and he's not half the bowler.

  • SamRoy on March 15, 2013, 11:13 GMT

    I have always liked cricketers who don't care for personal landmarks. I like Prior and Dhoni (though I hate his captaincy) as neither cares much for personal glory. It's the way the game should be played. And Prior is both a better wicketkeeper and better test batsman than Dhoni. But that's not the issue I wanted to talk. Non-selfish players like Prior, Dhoni, Pietersen , Sehwag, AB DeVilliers win you games. Selfish players like Tendulkar and Kallis (in ODIs) lose you games.

  • spinnermatt on March 15, 2013, 9:03 GMT

    Dhoni did not score a ton against England in Nagpur - run out for 99.

  • JG2704 on March 15, 2013, 8:43 GMT

    @Tom_Bowler - How do you know Woakes could not succeed for England at 7? You say he's not Botham or Flintoff and while I'd not compare any Eng AR with Botham til he at least played 15 tests Flintoff's stats aren't hugely impressive.Big personality and made big contributions in big matches but hasn't been a role model of consistency and early England form was not good either. Pretty sure Woakes 1st class stats rack up against anyone's and would certainly be better than Flintoff's at this stage in his career I make it that Woakes has played one (non shorter format) game for England and in that game very few players (batsmen or bowlers) did anything of note. So what youre doing is either judging him on one game - which you wouldn't have watched anyway - or his shorter formats contribution. I agree not to get carried away with potential but to write a player off before he's even played a test with his 1st class stats being so impressive.Most of CW's runs last season came at 6or7

  • peterfromspain on March 15, 2013, 8:35 GMT

    Why even bother mentioning Sanga if he doesn't keep wicket anymore? And what about a certain diminutive Bangladeshi, who on current form is up there with Prior, who I agree is probably the best at the moment. As you say yourself, most of the othes are batsmen who keep, not W/B.

  • Tom_Bowler on March 15, 2013, 7:39 GMT

    Chris Woakes at seven? Please. He looks like the latest incarnation of England's all rounder fixation to me. His first class figures are impressive but he has frequently batted as far down as eight for Warwicks and bowls at a traditionally seamer friendly ground. In international cricket he's had a lot more troughs than peaks and, most importantly, his bowling doesn't obviously possess either the pace or craft to consistently trouble good players. He may not be Gavin Hamilton or David Capel but let's not pretend he's Botham or Flintoff.

    Matt Prior on the other hand is very much the real deal as he proved today.

  • Tom_Bowler on March 15, 2013, 7:39 GMT

    Chris Woakes at seven? Please. He looks like the latest incarnation of England's all rounder fixation to me. His first class figures are impressive but he has frequently batted as far down as eight for Warwicks and bowls at a traditionally seamer friendly ground. In international cricket he's had a lot more troughs than peaks and, most importantly, his bowling doesn't obviously possess either the pace or craft to consistently trouble good players. He may not be Gavin Hamilton or David Capel but let's not pretend he's Botham or Flintoff.

    Matt Prior on the other hand is very much the real deal as he proved today.

  • peterfromspain on March 15, 2013, 8:35 GMT

    Why even bother mentioning Sanga if he doesn't keep wicket anymore? And what about a certain diminutive Bangladeshi, who on current form is up there with Prior, who I agree is probably the best at the moment. As you say yourself, most of the othes are batsmen who keep, not W/B.

  • JG2704 on March 15, 2013, 8:43 GMT

    @Tom_Bowler - How do you know Woakes could not succeed for England at 7? You say he's not Botham or Flintoff and while I'd not compare any Eng AR with Botham til he at least played 15 tests Flintoff's stats aren't hugely impressive.Big personality and made big contributions in big matches but hasn't been a role model of consistency and early England form was not good either. Pretty sure Woakes 1st class stats rack up against anyone's and would certainly be better than Flintoff's at this stage in his career I make it that Woakes has played one (non shorter format) game for England and in that game very few players (batsmen or bowlers) did anything of note. So what youre doing is either judging him on one game - which you wouldn't have watched anyway - or his shorter formats contribution. I agree not to get carried away with potential but to write a player off before he's even played a test with his 1st class stats being so impressive.Most of CW's runs last season came at 6or7

  • spinnermatt on March 15, 2013, 9:03 GMT

    Dhoni did not score a ton against England in Nagpur - run out for 99.

  • SamRoy on March 15, 2013, 11:13 GMT

    I have always liked cricketers who don't care for personal landmarks. I like Prior and Dhoni (though I hate his captaincy) as neither cares much for personal glory. It's the way the game should be played. And Prior is both a better wicketkeeper and better test batsman than Dhoni. But that's not the issue I wanted to talk. Non-selfish players like Prior, Dhoni, Pietersen , Sehwag, AB DeVilliers win you games. Selfish players like Tendulkar and Kallis (in ODIs) lose you games.

  • bennybow on March 15, 2013, 11:56 GMT

    Yes Prior is clearly worth his place as a batsman. However, to put things in perspective, the earliest England keeper I can remember back to was the great Godfrey Evans and Prior is the least capable keeper England have had since then. He's not even the best keeper in England.

    Much rose-tinted spectacle thinking with people commenting about today's cricketers. For example, Anderson may well become England's highest wicket taker - because they play more tests now. His stats don't stack up against Fred Trueman's at all and he's not half the bowler.

  • Harlequin. on March 15, 2013, 12:10 GMT

    Best keeper/batsman in test cricket, definitely. best keeper/batsman England has ever had, hmm, Stewie still has that in my mind. Prior is an fantastic player and seems like a solid gent (the KP phonecall was a great move), but most of his success has come batting down the order following the likes of Cook, Trott & KP. Stewie batted in the top order, with very few players of genuine class for company, against much stronger bowling attacks than there are nowadays, whilst also captaining.

    Having said that, neither Prior nor Stewart are my favorite Eng w/k. Jack Russell hands down!

  • DeckChairand6pack on March 15, 2013, 12:52 GMT

    Very well played Matt Prior and unquestionably the 2nd best keeper batsmen in the world today behind AB. He needs a good few heavy scores to be mentioned in the same breath as de Villers

  • jb633 on March 15, 2013, 13:54 GMT

    I don't think it's really right to judge the DeVilliers and Prior as they are different cricketers. DeVilliers is a batsmen first and a wicket keeper second. Prior is probably a keeper first and a batsmen second. Both are brilliant in their own way but very different. ABV is certainly the better bastmen and his averages at the top of the order speak for themself. Prior is a better glovemant though and looks much more assured stood up which is the real testament of a wicket keeper. I think both are still learning and both will get better. If I had to choose one I would go for ABV in conditons that favour seam and Prior in Asia. I think ABV has not really had his keeping tested to the limit yet, but we will see when SA tour the UAE later this year. IMO Matt Prior is the best all rounder England have had since Botham. He is certainly better than Freddie.

  • ajetti on March 15, 2013, 15:23 GMT

    I am not sure why they use the term "selfless" when describing Matt Prior over and over again? Is it because he gifts his wicket and does not make a hundred when one's for the taking?