New Zealand v England, 3rd Test, Auckland, 3rd day

England have been out-swung

The Auckland Test has highlighted the difference between the England and New Zealand bowling attacks when it comes to their ability to swing the ball

Andrew McGlashan in Auckland

March 24, 2013

Comments: 7 | Text size: A | A

Tim Southee made early inroads on the third morning, New Zealand v England, 3rd Test, Auckland, 3rd day, March 24, 2013
Tim Southee troubled England's batsmen with swing on the third day © Getty Images
Enlarge
Related Links

The subject of swing is one of cricket's most often-debated topics, but one that rarely finishes with any definitive conclusions. That is especially true when there are such clear differences between the ability of one team to move the ball better than the other.

England's bowlers barely got the ball off straight in Auckland through 152 overs of New Zealand's first innings. Even for James Anderson, one of the finest exponents of swing in the world, it was mostly gun-barrel straight. When the home side took the ball on the second evening, however, there was distinct shape for Tim Southee and Trent Boult. It was not always straight, but the threat from one on target, such as Boult trapping Jonathan Trott lbw, was much greater.

Southee continued the trend on the third morning with a high-quality spell of swing bowling that accounted for Nick Compton and Ian Bell to ensure England's top order was knocked over with precious few runs on the board.

The ball to Compton did not actually swing, but that becomes just as dangerous when there has been movement to leave the batsman wary of what is to come. Bell was set up by a series of deliveries shaping way outside off before Southee brought one back into the pads to win another lbw decision. He should have had a third during the afternoon session when he drew Matt Prior into a drive and the edge went low to Dean Brownlie, who could not cling on low at second slip.

Importantly, too, the bowlers were backed up by attacking fields from Brendon McCullum, who often had four slips and rarely fewer than three. Of course, it easy to attack when on top but it is a lesson to Alastair Cook. In Wellington, BJ Watling edged through the vacant third slip when he had 2 runs and the score was 95 for 5. That moment cost England vital time in their race against weather.

Numerous theories were put forward as to why there was such a difference between the two attacks across the first innings. It could be as basic as form and consistency, but Simon Doull, the former New Zealand bowler who could move the ball mile, suggested on local TV that it was to do with the position of the seam. He picked up that Anderson had the seam pointing as far as third slip, while Southee's was towards first. Then there is the argument of bowling fuller, which New Zealand's seamers undoubtedly did here. Stuart Broad's six wickets in Wellington largely came from a fuller length - as did his wicket today of Ross Taylor - but Steven Finn is not a swing bowler and his full deliveries can become floaty.

More prosaically, it could just come down to the ball that was picked out of the box, as sometimes one just does not swing, or whether it gets wet as it did for New Zealand in Wellington. It is often said that the darker the leather, the more likely the ball is to swing. Choosing the ball is the job of the senior seamer, so you would think that Southee is the man with that role in the New Zealand team. He may have got lucky with his choice, or he could have pulled out a blinder for his side.

The mystery of swing

  • Trent Boult "You can present the seam as well as you want but if the conditions aren't there to suit then I believe it won't swing. Dunedin was a pretty hard place to swing the ball, Wellington traditionally swings but didn't, and coming here we knew it was going to swing. There's no doubt you've got to give it every opportunity to swing and by pitching it up you are encouraging it."
  • Matt Prior "They've probably got a better box of balls. It can be as simple as that. If it's flummoxed scientists for years, I don't think I'm going to have the answer."

Southee's stock and trade is swing. He marked his debut by taking five wickets against England in Napier during the 2008 series. His career did not flourish immediately in the way that first outing suggested and Auckland is only his 23rd Test. This has also been a fairly barren series for him; his wicket of Compton was his first since his second over of the series when he bowled the same batsman in Dunedin. He deserved some reward in Wellington, especially on the second day, but started this Test with a return of 1 for 216.

However, in the last couple of years he has shown, on a number of occasions, his ability to trouble top-class batting line-ups. And it has not always been on conditions you would expect. In the space of three Tests on the subcontinent - one against India in Bangalore and two against Sri Lanka - he collected 20 wickets. That included a career-best 7 for 64 in Bangalore and a match-winning haul to help New Zealand level the series in Colombo. Returns like that do not come by accident. He would not have prevented the one-sided series in South Africa, but his bowling was missed when a thumb injury ruled him out of tour.

His efforts warranted more than the final figures of 3 for 44. Instead it was Boult who ended with the headline return of 6 for 68 - his maiden five-wicket haul in Tests. He had set the tone on the second evening with a spell that quickly put England's effort into context.

The combination of Boult and Southee were central to New Zealand's most recent Test win, the victory in Colombo, when they shared 15 wickets in the match. Despite the wobble at the start of the second innings, they have a fantastic opportunity for a repeat performance.

Andrew McGlashan is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo

RSS Feeds: Andrew McGlashan

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by Cpt.Meanster on (March 25, 2013, 1:27 GMT)

If I were an English supporter, I would not get too far ahead of myself in terms of Ashes supremacy. This England team is good but it's far from being consistent. The bowling especially has looked toothless in NZ. Conditions aside and of course Steve Finn, England have bowled poorly to NZ's batsmen. The batting also has looked less convincing. This sets up the Ashes interestingly because I still feel Australia have a chance to upset England from nowhere.

Posted by YogifromNY on (March 25, 2013, 1:06 GMT)

I doubt my comment will get published as you guys seem to have a bias for the England team. This English team is middling at best, even when they climbed to Test #1 briefly. Decent bowling with one major weak link who seems to survive in the team only because he is well-connected and flourishes once every few Tests to avoid the sack: Broad. Superb wicketkeeper. One good batsman in Cook (KP is another, when present). The rest of the team is mediocre. When they come up against a side that fights to the death (a la NZ), this English team is shown up. It is only the English media who are surprised this is happening right now. The majority of cricket fans (of whichever nationality) would agree with me that this (English) emperor does indeed have clothes that are tattered in parts...

Posted by pommy80 on (March 25, 2013, 0:50 GMT)

England have been outperformed in 2 out of the 3 test matches, and credit goes to NZ. NZ are looking like a very talented team with a bright future, and their bowling attack is looking very dangerous, more dangerous than the Aus bowling lineup. Test cricket needs NZ. @RandyOz... Surprised your brave enough to comment on England pages than Aus.. Hows India going?If averages are what should be viewed, hows your hopeless top order going?

Posted by R_U_4_REAL_NICK on (March 24, 2013, 12:35 GMT)

Home-team bowlers will generally be better at exploiting home conditions than visitors. A lot of fast bowlers (including Steyn, Morkel etc.) were criticised in previous series for "bowling slower", e.g. when SA toured England. But sometimes you have to drop the pace to exploit swing and seam, which is a more dangerous weapon than raw pace IMO. I wonder if Finn was experimenting with this yesterday, but (as you write) he aint a swing bowler!

Posted by RandyOZ on (March 24, 2013, 12:31 GMT)

I think what England don't understand is that they just aren't a great bowling team. Averages are what should be viewed, and they all average over 30!!!

Posted by GeoffreysMother on (March 24, 2013, 8:13 GMT)

This is actually more worrying than Australia's dire performance in alien conditions inIndia. England have been out bowled in terms of swing bowling and their batsmen have shown poor technique against the swinging ball - which should be their stock in trade. Credit must go to all those involved in NZ cricket. The way Taylor was sacked was a cock up, but the new coach and captain have given the Kiwi's some real purpose and they have outthought England on and off the field. Whilst the talk was of Root and Bairstow fighting it out for one place, surely some scrutiny must be given to Bell's place. He should now be a player who you rely on in a crisis, not one of the ones you expect to fold; which he does with regularity when it really matters.

Posted by kausani on (March 24, 2013, 6:52 GMT)

130 more runs should do it for the kiwis.

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Andrew McGlashanClose
Andrew McGlashan Assistant Editor Andrew arrived at ESPNcricinfo via Manchester and Cape Town, after finding the assistant editor at a weak moment as he watched England's batting collapse in the Newlands Test. Andrew began his cricket writing as a freelance covering Lancashire during 2004 when they were relegated in the County Championship. In fact, they were top of the table when he began reporting on them but things went dramatically downhill. He likes to let people know that he is a supporter of county cricket, a fact his colleagues will testify to and bemoan in equal quantities.
Tour Results
New Zealand v England at Auckland - Mar 22-26, 2013
Match drawn
New Zealand v England at Wellington - Mar 14-18, 2013
Match drawn
New Zealand v England at Dunedin - Mar 6-10, 2013
Match drawn
NZ XI v England XI at Queenstown - Feb 27-Mar 2, 2013
NZ XI won by 3 wickets
New Zealand v England at Auckland - Feb 23, 2013
England won by 5 wickets (with 75 balls remaining)
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days