New Zealand v England, 3rd Test, Auckland, 5th day

Luck holds as Cook looks away

Andrew McGlashan in Auckland

March 26, 2013

Comments: 13 | Text size: A | A

For most of the final day at Eden Park, Alastair Cook was tense but calm. However, when two wickets fell in three balls during the dying moments of the match, threatening to undo England's attempts to salvage a draw, it become too much even for the England captain. He followed the last three overs courtesy of a running commentary by others in the dressing room although Monty Panesar's brief innings brought some light relief.

Cricketers are notoriously superstitious, especially in tight situations. As Ian Bell, Matt Prior and Stuart Broad pushed England closer to a draw Cook, whose role in the match ended when he was out on the fourth evening, stayed in the same seat until Broad edged to slip.

"I was pretty good for the majority of it," he said. "I watched 95 percent of it - the last 18 balls I didn't watch, but I was having a running commentary. I sat in one place the whole day. Then we lost Broady, and I thought that position had run out of luck - so I thought I'd move."

The updates were provided by Jonathan Trott and Huw Bevan, the fitness trainer, and included some language you would not hear on TV or radio, especially when Panesar was sprawling towards his crease scampering a single to give Prior the strike.

"There were a few ooh-arghs, and then a few expletives saying 'What's gone on there?' Then we obviously had to sit and watch the replay and started laughing - probably the only thing you could do in that situation."

Jonathan Trott, Alastair Cook and James Anderson contemplate the draw, New Zealand v England, 3rd Test, Auckland, 5th day, March 26, 2013
Jonathan Trott helped relay news of the last few overs to his captain, Alastair Cook © Getty Images

Watching England cling on for a draw was not a new feeling for Cook or, indeed, quite a few in the dressing room. The most famous also involved Panesar when he and James Anderson survived the final 69 deliveries against Australia at Cardiff in 2009. The following winter, Graham Onions twice batted out the final over against South Africa at Centurion and Cape Town.

"With all of them, the tension is pretty much unbearable at the end," Cook said. "Obviously, everyone remembers the Australia one - because of how important it was at the time. But there were the two in South Africa as well. This one, because it's just happened, seems to bring back all those memories. It's exactly the same feeling, exactly the same tension - people walking round, finding little spots to sit. It's amazing what cricketers do in those situations."

However, while Cook could reflect with satisfaction on how England regained their pride on the final day and retained their No. 2 spot in the Test rankings with a series draw he could not escape the fact that in two out of three Tests his team had been distinctly second best.

"Certainly, we came here to win," he said. "So we're disappointed we haven't done that. We haven't played as well as we needed to win a Test series. That's the bottom line. We fought hard, but haven't played as well as you need to beat anyone in international cricket. We've got to find out the reasons why that is and get back on that horse and get our standards higher.

"We've got to give a lot of credit to New Zealand. They put us under a lot of pressure as well. It's a combination of them playing well and us not playing as well as we know we can. We've just about managed to respond to the pressure, and hold on. But bowled out for 160 in the first innings in Dunedin and then here getting 200, on that wicket, is not good enough."

Andrew McGlashan is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo

RSS Feeds: Andrew McGlashan

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by JG2704 on (March 27, 2013, 14:30 GMT)

@Ashish_514 on (March 26, 2013, 18:05 GMT) You have made valid points but I fail to see how the SL series would have that much effect on the Indian series as there were 2 home series in between. Also the 1st test was a thrashing to India

Posted by   on (March 27, 2013, 4:36 GMT)

It was an very interesting Test match,especially during last few overs.Also it was hilarious to see Monty Panesar's batting.It was a good series, where both England & NZ were equal, whereas India vsAustralia matches were one sided.

Posted by tpjpower on (March 27, 2013, 0:57 GMT)

@Ashish: England did play a series at home against a weaker team before the South Africa tests. The poor old Windies wouldn't have been so easily forgotten twenty years ago.

Posted by 2.14istherunrate on (March 26, 2013, 22:49 GMT)

It is quite hard enough watching at home let alone being there in the team. However they are fun primarily whatever the tension because at times they are so improbable and as the amazing story unfolds you have to pinch yourself to make sure you didn't just nod off and are dreaming it all. Epic. It's good to know how they fight from 4 wickets down.

Posted by Bring_back_Wright on (March 26, 2013, 21:37 GMT)

I guess I'm a tad superstitious. As our first breakthrough came when McCullum was off the field, when we couldn't get Broad/Prior I just kept thinking maybe it was time for McCullum to seek more medical attention for a couple of overs. KW really was a good luck charm in that innings, whether being captain or bowling!

Posted by   on (March 26, 2013, 21:19 GMT)

Note the last pair heroes in England's draw were both Sussex players! Well done Matt and Monty! The two 'MPs' represent us well!

Posted by   on (March 26, 2013, 19:52 GMT)

The whole world Except England wanted NZ to win !!

Posted by Ashish_514 on (March 26, 2013, 18:05 GMT)

I feel this England team though strong, finds it hard to adapt to change in conditions. They did so well at home earlier and then lost to Pakistan 3-0. It took them another series draw with Sri Lanka to get the hang of subcontinent conditions which helped them in India. In between, they had to get back and play in home conditions and they lost. After doing so well in India they again struggled in swinging conditions in NZ. Seems they are slow to learn and unlearn. Had they played another series at home with a weaker team before playing SA, who knows they still might have been no.1

Posted by   on (March 26, 2013, 18:05 GMT)

Well,big relief must say that.There were plenty of up n downs for Eng ,but I think kiwis r pretty balanced outfit now .U have 2 reliable openers of contrasting characters ,a talented no.3 in Kane Williamson good middle order and McCullum at no.5 provides an attacking option. And lastly pace battery is simply solid

Comments have now been closed for this article

Email Feedback Print
Andrew McGlashanClose
Andrew McGlashan Assistant Editor Andrew arrived at ESPNcricinfo via Manchester and Cape Town, after finding the assistant editor at a weak moment as he watched England's batting collapse in the Newlands Test. Andrew began his cricket writing as a freelance covering Lancashire during 2004 when they were relegated in the County Championship. In fact, they were top of the table when he began reporting on them but things went dramatically downhill. He likes to let people know that he is a supporter of county cricket, a fact his colleagues will testify to and bemoan in equal quantities.
Tour Results
New Zealand v England at Auckland - Mar 22-26, 2013
Match drawn
New Zealand v England at Wellington - Mar 14-18, 2013
Match drawn
New Zealand v England at Dunedin - Mar 6-10, 2013
Match drawn
NZ XI v England XI at Queenstown - Feb 27-Mar 2, 2013
NZ XI won by 3 wickets
New Zealand v England at Auckland - Feb 23, 2013
England won by 5 wickets (with 75 balls remaining)
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days