February 5, 2014

Questions over Fulton, Hamish and Ish

New Zealand are keeping the faith in their opening pair and legspinner, but they are yet to prove their consistency at the top level
21

New Zealand enter the two-Test series against India with a level of confidence seldom seen. The pace bowling stocks of Tim Southee, Trent Boult and Neil Wagner have coordinated well against West Indies; Ross Taylor and Kane Williamson have gorged themselves on runs most of the summer; Brendon McCullum looks astute leading the team and may be in his most natural batting position at No. 5; Corey Anderson appears a genuine allrounder in progress; and BJ Watling's keeping and batting at No. 7 radiate reliability.

Two areas of selection intrigue remain: How will legspinner Ish Sodhi bowl against batsmen seemingly born with a genetic code of dancing feet and supple wrists to decipher spin? And how strong is the foundation behind the fine statistical record Peter Fulton and Hamish Rutherford have fashioned as an opening partnership?

Sodhi faces his biggest challenge against India after taking 11 Test wickets at 51.45 in his five-Test career. He has a useful googly and topspinner and his contribution of 5 for 29 to help Northern Districts defeat Canterbury on Sunday will boost his confidence. The 21-year-old also soaked up a nearly two-hour tutorial with Shane Warne at the Melbourne Cricket Ground nets during the Boxing Day Test. Sodhi returned realising raw talent alone won't guarantee greatness in the sport's longest form.

"Talking to him about tactics, he came up with so many little things beyond what I'd ever thought about," Sodhi said. "He was all about working batsmen out mentally and stressed it was about more than just how you bowled the ball. He suggested taking into account conditions, the strengths and weaknesses of your own fielders and creating a facade to keep batsmen out of rhythm. It was, without doubt, the best legspin session of my life."

Sodhi claims to have found other ways to intimidate, given a spinner can't bowl a bouncer. "He [Warne] was the absolute master, using his entire body rather than his hand to put 'work' on the ball. We also spoke about subtle variations like using the angle of the crease. He agreed it can be a good idea to land the ball on the same spot most of the time but said it's not the spot you bowl on but how the ball gets there through a different trajectory which is important. We bowled to a young up-and-coming Australian batsman and after ten minutes he [Warne] pulled us aside and said, 'How are you going to try to get him out?' He then described the batsman's strengths and weaknesses. That awareness is the reason he is world-class."

Sodhi says he has also benefited from working with McCullum as captain: "Baz has an attacking mindset, which I love." The faith is reciprocated. Speaking after the West Indies triumph, McCullum said: "I'm rapt with Ish. I know he hasn't bowled a great deal but this [series] has been great for his development. The luxury of our pace attack allows us to have the type of [attacking] bowler he is. I've got a tremendous amount of confidence in his ability."

The only problem now lies with the spin-proof techniques of the Indian batsmen.

Fulton and Rutherford are also under observation, but an average opening partnership of 38.41 in 17 innings compares well to the revered combination of John Wright and Bruce Edgar, who averaged 31.82 runs in 56 innings from 1978 to 1986. The incumbents deserve their spots on that evidence.

Still, after a partnership of 95 to start the West Indies series, there have been question marks. They have not endured beyond the 13th over in their last four outings, with stands of 3, 14, 18, and 33. Fulton looks comfortable on relatively flat tracks (for instance, Eden Park, where he scored two centuries last summer against England, and Chittagong) but struggled against the seaming ball in England (36 runs from four innings). He returned to form with 78 not out against Northern Districts in the Plunket Shield last week.

By comparison, Rutherford has passed 50 once in the 16 innings since his century on debut. He exudes left-handed elegance early but temptation seems to be triumphing after he gets a start. However, he impressed coach Mike Hesson with 48 not out to get New Zealand home in the final West Indies Test. He has backed up with 108 against Auckland and 96 against Canterbury in his most recent first-class fixtures.

"Hamish doesn't have a problem with conversion [into bigger scores] at first-class level," Hesson says. "But in Tests he's often got himself out after doing the hard work, particularly against spin. His innings in Hamilton was important against a high-quality spin bowler like [Sunil] Narine."

Martin Guptill and Tom Latham are the pair's immediate competitors. Guptill has an average of 26.53 opening in 45 Test innings, despite dominating the position at provincial and limited-overs level. He recently made first-class centuries for Auckland against Northern and Central Districts before scoring a white-ball ton against India in the tied third ODI.

Latham is yet to debut in Tests but is seen as a contender if there are problems. His first-class record (average 42.22 in 35 matches) has risen rapidly in a season that has included his highest score of 241 not out against Wellington. As captain of the New Zealand A side, the left-hander made two half-centuries and averaged 35.40 in three unofficial Test matches against equivalent opposition from Sri Lanka and India on the subcontinent in August and September.

"Martin and Tom have been discussed as options and they are pressing their claims, but we're showing faith in Hamish and Peter," Hesson says. "Hamish demonstrated good qualities in Hamilton to get us through, and we all know what Peter did last time at Eden Park [as the fourth New Zealander to score two centuries in the same Test]. It's a hard side to make at the moment."

Andrew Alderson is cricket writer at New Zealand's Herald on Sunday

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • on February 10, 2014, 11:57 GMT

    @Richdegroen - You state there will be no changes bar Taylor, but you will be mistaken if they switch, say, Neesham in for Ish Sodhi (and weirdly you mention replacing Ish) if the Basin Reserve is not going to assist spin. This is to win the series and will probably improve our bowling and batting judging by the last game. Neesham just got 147 and a four wicket bag for Otago.... I'd like to see him replace Bracewell tomorrow and play if pitch is green and fastish... Williamson will go for less and Ish was wicket-less last match and averages 80-odd a wicket.. And whilst Guptill should be in there, they will likely promote Latham and he will play... too risky to start with Taylor and he would be distracted. Family first. And you heard it here first too XD

  • RichDeGroen on February 10, 2014, 11:23 GMT

    There won't be changes for the 2nd test, unless Taylor is unavailable. Bad baby timing because I think we'll need him big time in Welly. Fulton will probably play his last test unless he gets a serious score. Rutherford they will plug away with for a while yet. Ish is the real problem because he leaves our pace attack quite exposed if he's attacked the way he was in the 1st test. We got away with it but only just, and I think we need a stock bowler to take a decent workload at the Basin, probs into the wind much of the day. Bracewell can forget it though, he is finished. If for no other reason that to scapegoat him to the media whilst mollycoddling Jesse back quicksmart for the T20WC. hehehe.

  • on February 9, 2014, 10:10 GMT

    LOLZ!! Well, had to happen I suppose.. I was finally wrong (slightly) after about 50 accurate 'predictions'!! Because Wagner was very good today and throughout the test.... and Ish looked a tad ordinary albeit against very good players of spin. So I would like to stick with my three replacements (and given the returns from Fulton and Rutherford I was bang on there)...Neesham, Ryder, Guptill should have come in for the three mentioned above in the article. But given the Ryder 'incident' (if it warrants such a description), this will be an interesting one... meaning they will likely wussy out and go with the status quo, stating that it is a winning team. So what? Why not have a superior team? NZ have been carrying the openers in a few games now if I am honest.

    The other looming issue is Taylor's child being due during the 2nd test given Ryder may not be allowed to replace him (??).... Interesting choices to be made... Neesham for Ish? Guptill for Fulton? Smart moves for 2nd test IMO.

  • on February 6, 2014, 23:04 GMT

    Fulton out, Latham in at the top. Guptill doesn't deserve his place back in tests yet Rutherford does need to improve though as he appears very one dimensional. I feel Ryder has to come into the team and with McCullum and Latham in the team who I believe are both capable keepers perhaps Watling should make way with Ryder slotting in at 6 and Anderson dropping to 7, however this is a tough call on BJ. Sodhi should be given a good run in the team as he has potential and should only improve. Wagner will come under pressure from Henry and Bracewell but should retain his place as he can hold an end very effectively which allows the other bowlers to bowl aggressively with McCullum setting his standard attacking fields.

  • alesana85 on February 6, 2014, 10:20 GMT

    @Dark_Harlequin, fair enough I'd never have a specialist captain in my test XI I'd be too ashamed to lead a test side in cricket if my stats weren't up to standard, but that's me & everyone has got an opinion on the matter I don't agree but I respect your point of view. Thank god he scored some runs, he was due hopefully he'll score a triple century I'm calling it....it worked yesterday.

  • Harlequin. on February 6, 2014, 8:37 GMT

    @alesana85 - yes, Clarke's batting stats blow Baz's out of the water, but I was speaking purely in captaincy terms. Clarke's captaincy (particularly with his handling of Lyon) compared to Cook's was worth 50 runs a game. A decent captain makes a huge difference, and unless you have 6 world class batsmen churning out runs, there is often space for a specialist captain who only averages 30's, IMO.

    But these points are now moot after BMac's ton!

  • SixFourOut on February 6, 2014, 1:09 GMT

    I like to play around with team lines ups to see which one looks the absolute strongest and for the Kiwis I thinks it:

    Guptill Latham Williamson Taylor McCullum Ryder Anderson Watling Neesham Southee Boult

    Frontline bowlers of Boult & Southee, two golden arm bowlers in Anderson and Neesham, plus the part time spin of Williamson and Guptill.

    Pointless is the definition of playing an ineffective spinner like Sohdi who is not making an impact at all even in first class cricket, let alone test level.

    A four pronged pace line up with some part time back up and a long batting line up is going to be a very hard team to beat.

    If you don't have aces play jokers. You don't have an ace spinner nor a wild card spinner, you only have a club level spinner who needs a lot of first class experience to justify selection.

    Latham has the first class record to justify selection and Guptill is in good domestic form and is a genuine class player who will only get better.

    Ryder's test average is 40+

  • alesana85 on February 5, 2014, 22:17 GMT

    @Dark_Harlequin michael Clarke off the top of my head has scored 30 odd test centuries @ 50 runs per innings he can afford to have a bad series now & again with the bat, his place in the Australian test team is justified..McCullums record as a batsman & captain doesn't compare, so again I hope he scores runs in this series.

  • on February 5, 2014, 18:06 GMT

    Ish should stay, but there should be three changes... Ryder and Guptill for the two batters you mention in the article, but also Wagner should make way for Neesham (faster, gets wickets and bats well)

  • on February 5, 2014, 16:29 GMT

    nz could have included ronchi, bennet and henry in there side

  • on February 10, 2014, 11:57 GMT

    @Richdegroen - You state there will be no changes bar Taylor, but you will be mistaken if they switch, say, Neesham in for Ish Sodhi (and weirdly you mention replacing Ish) if the Basin Reserve is not going to assist spin. This is to win the series and will probably improve our bowling and batting judging by the last game. Neesham just got 147 and a four wicket bag for Otago.... I'd like to see him replace Bracewell tomorrow and play if pitch is green and fastish... Williamson will go for less and Ish was wicket-less last match and averages 80-odd a wicket.. And whilst Guptill should be in there, they will likely promote Latham and he will play... too risky to start with Taylor and he would be distracted. Family first. And you heard it here first too XD

  • RichDeGroen on February 10, 2014, 11:23 GMT

    There won't be changes for the 2nd test, unless Taylor is unavailable. Bad baby timing because I think we'll need him big time in Welly. Fulton will probably play his last test unless he gets a serious score. Rutherford they will plug away with for a while yet. Ish is the real problem because he leaves our pace attack quite exposed if he's attacked the way he was in the 1st test. We got away with it but only just, and I think we need a stock bowler to take a decent workload at the Basin, probs into the wind much of the day. Bracewell can forget it though, he is finished. If for no other reason that to scapegoat him to the media whilst mollycoddling Jesse back quicksmart for the T20WC. hehehe.

  • on February 9, 2014, 10:10 GMT

    LOLZ!! Well, had to happen I suppose.. I was finally wrong (slightly) after about 50 accurate 'predictions'!! Because Wagner was very good today and throughout the test.... and Ish looked a tad ordinary albeit against very good players of spin. So I would like to stick with my three replacements (and given the returns from Fulton and Rutherford I was bang on there)...Neesham, Ryder, Guptill should have come in for the three mentioned above in the article. But given the Ryder 'incident' (if it warrants such a description), this will be an interesting one... meaning they will likely wussy out and go with the status quo, stating that it is a winning team. So what? Why not have a superior team? NZ have been carrying the openers in a few games now if I am honest.

    The other looming issue is Taylor's child being due during the 2nd test given Ryder may not be allowed to replace him (??).... Interesting choices to be made... Neesham for Ish? Guptill for Fulton? Smart moves for 2nd test IMO.

  • on February 6, 2014, 23:04 GMT

    Fulton out, Latham in at the top. Guptill doesn't deserve his place back in tests yet Rutherford does need to improve though as he appears very one dimensional. I feel Ryder has to come into the team and with McCullum and Latham in the team who I believe are both capable keepers perhaps Watling should make way with Ryder slotting in at 6 and Anderson dropping to 7, however this is a tough call on BJ. Sodhi should be given a good run in the team as he has potential and should only improve. Wagner will come under pressure from Henry and Bracewell but should retain his place as he can hold an end very effectively which allows the other bowlers to bowl aggressively with McCullum setting his standard attacking fields.

  • alesana85 on February 6, 2014, 10:20 GMT

    @Dark_Harlequin, fair enough I'd never have a specialist captain in my test XI I'd be too ashamed to lead a test side in cricket if my stats weren't up to standard, but that's me & everyone has got an opinion on the matter I don't agree but I respect your point of view. Thank god he scored some runs, he was due hopefully he'll score a triple century I'm calling it....it worked yesterday.

  • Harlequin. on February 6, 2014, 8:37 GMT

    @alesana85 - yes, Clarke's batting stats blow Baz's out of the water, but I was speaking purely in captaincy terms. Clarke's captaincy (particularly with his handling of Lyon) compared to Cook's was worth 50 runs a game. A decent captain makes a huge difference, and unless you have 6 world class batsmen churning out runs, there is often space for a specialist captain who only averages 30's, IMO.

    But these points are now moot after BMac's ton!

  • SixFourOut on February 6, 2014, 1:09 GMT

    I like to play around with team lines ups to see which one looks the absolute strongest and for the Kiwis I thinks it:

    Guptill Latham Williamson Taylor McCullum Ryder Anderson Watling Neesham Southee Boult

    Frontline bowlers of Boult & Southee, two golden arm bowlers in Anderson and Neesham, plus the part time spin of Williamson and Guptill.

    Pointless is the definition of playing an ineffective spinner like Sohdi who is not making an impact at all even in first class cricket, let alone test level.

    A four pronged pace line up with some part time back up and a long batting line up is going to be a very hard team to beat.

    If you don't have aces play jokers. You don't have an ace spinner nor a wild card spinner, you only have a club level spinner who needs a lot of first class experience to justify selection.

    Latham has the first class record to justify selection and Guptill is in good domestic form and is a genuine class player who will only get better.

    Ryder's test average is 40+

  • alesana85 on February 5, 2014, 22:17 GMT

    @Dark_Harlequin michael Clarke off the top of my head has scored 30 odd test centuries @ 50 runs per innings he can afford to have a bad series now & again with the bat, his place in the Australian test team is justified..McCullums record as a batsman & captain doesn't compare, so again I hope he scores runs in this series.

  • on February 5, 2014, 18:06 GMT

    Ish should stay, but there should be three changes... Ryder and Guptill for the two batters you mention in the article, but also Wagner should make way for Neesham (faster, gets wickets and bats well)

  • on February 5, 2014, 16:29 GMT

    nz could have included ronchi, bennet and henry in there side

  • unbeleaveable on February 5, 2014, 14:49 GMT

    I think people are missing the point, the openers have been averaging better opening stands than NZ perceived best openers. The role of openers, particularly NZ openers is to see of the new ball, which their record shows. This will make it easy for the next batters coming in. Rutherford is averaging 35 (helped by the big score against England) and is only 24, in fact his test average is not much different to Williamson. He will only get better with the right advice. The problem with replacing Fulton with another dasher like Guptill or Ryder is they might score a few runs but they are more likely to get out earlier exposing our other batters to the new ball. I agree with playing Sodhi for the first test and seeing how he goes. But depending on what happens, you could put Ryder in at 5 at the Basin, move Baz and the rest of the lineup down 1. Ryder and Williamson could make up your 5th bowler, also Bracewell I feel will want to play to prove a point and could play at the Basin.

  • on February 5, 2014, 12:28 GMT

    McCullum cannot claim a specialist captaincy role in tests for much longer, he needs runs or otherwise he must relinquish his spot for the good of the team and focus on the shorter game. His track record as a non wicket keeper batsmen is as follows:

    Below par in tests OK in ODI's Great in T20

  • mjs28 on February 5, 2014, 9:04 GMT

    Good on selectors for showing faith in FUlton and Rutherford. Teams need stability so players aren't thinking they will be dropped for a bad series. Fulton deserves another chance but Latham or Guptil are longer term options.

  • Harlequin. on February 5, 2014, 8:57 GMT

    Well if the opening pair can't get runs against the indian pace attack in their own backyard then it probably is time for a switch around, and Fulton may be running out of time.

    @Bradmanesque - I would have thought Ryder would slot in the middle order, more of a number 5 than number 1. Having said that, Ryder at 5 would likely mean having to drop Anderson, which would be a tough call.

    @Alesana85 - Giving McCullum a pass because he is a good attacking captain is not a problem. Just look at Clarke vs Cook in the recent ashes series.

  • on February 5, 2014, 8:47 GMT

    tom latham for fulton is an easy choice, latham has more game nous and definetly is better at rotating strike and is our future not a stop gap player

  • kiwicricketnut on February 5, 2014, 8:33 GMT

    play ish sohdi no matter what happens in this series, indis should take him apart really but he must be perservered with for the long term, he's a quick learner, it wont be long before he starts tying quality batters in knots, even the great warne struggled more against indian batters than any others so we shouldn't expect too much from sohdi against these guys. as for rutherford and fulton i would rather see latham or guptill with mccullum having to be the other opener to accomadate ryder, latham is the obvious choice and he's in form but guptill is getting better too and he would save twenty runs an innings in the field so you can add that to his total, when you have good players like ryder, latham and guptill on the sidelines i would say fulton and rutherfords days are numbered. as for the bowling i'd like to see henry in the mix, i was impressed by him

  • D-Ascendant on February 5, 2014, 7:13 GMT

    Two-metre Peter's comeback fairytale was nice and all, but it's a bit old now. Time to welcome back JESSE.

  • pt_pt on February 5, 2014, 6:55 GMT

    The openers should be put on notice, make some runs in this test or you will be dropped. NZ have many players waiting to be given a chance, Ryder, Latham, Guptil and Devicich are all good enough to step in. Sodhi should be given more time and see how he goes after a few more tests.

  • alesana85 on February 5, 2014, 4:34 GMT

    I hope Brendon scores some runs in this series, same with Fulton & Rutherford. Rutherford like Martin Guptill seems to be a 4 or nothing batsman both guys need to learn how to accumulate more singles. Fulton & McCullum are seasoned cricketers due to score some runs...hopefully. Giving McCullum a pass because he is a good attacking captain should never happen especially if NZ has ambitions to be the best in the world, he's there as a batsman first so justify your place in the side as a batsman first. Tough ask for young Sodhi, but vital experience will be gained.

  • 22many on February 5, 2014, 3:56 GMT

    Suspect at 1, 2 , 5....cant rely on 3 and 4 every innings to keep winning matches ....time for all three to step up or step out...am prepared to give Hamish further time but father time is catching up with the other two.

  • Antony_Lucas on February 5, 2014, 3:05 GMT

    The sooner Latham is in there as the opener the better. Fulton is not a long term prospect. 2 Failures here for fulton should see either Ryder or Latham take that openers spot for the second test

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • Antony_Lucas on February 5, 2014, 3:05 GMT

    The sooner Latham is in there as the opener the better. Fulton is not a long term prospect. 2 Failures here for fulton should see either Ryder or Latham take that openers spot for the second test

  • 22many on February 5, 2014, 3:56 GMT

    Suspect at 1, 2 , 5....cant rely on 3 and 4 every innings to keep winning matches ....time for all three to step up or step out...am prepared to give Hamish further time but father time is catching up with the other two.

  • alesana85 on February 5, 2014, 4:34 GMT

    I hope Brendon scores some runs in this series, same with Fulton & Rutherford. Rutherford like Martin Guptill seems to be a 4 or nothing batsman both guys need to learn how to accumulate more singles. Fulton & McCullum are seasoned cricketers due to score some runs...hopefully. Giving McCullum a pass because he is a good attacking captain should never happen especially if NZ has ambitions to be the best in the world, he's there as a batsman first so justify your place in the side as a batsman first. Tough ask for young Sodhi, but vital experience will be gained.

  • pt_pt on February 5, 2014, 6:55 GMT

    The openers should be put on notice, make some runs in this test or you will be dropped. NZ have many players waiting to be given a chance, Ryder, Latham, Guptil and Devicich are all good enough to step in. Sodhi should be given more time and see how he goes after a few more tests.

  • D-Ascendant on February 5, 2014, 7:13 GMT

    Two-metre Peter's comeback fairytale was nice and all, but it's a bit old now. Time to welcome back JESSE.

  • kiwicricketnut on February 5, 2014, 8:33 GMT

    play ish sohdi no matter what happens in this series, indis should take him apart really but he must be perservered with for the long term, he's a quick learner, it wont be long before he starts tying quality batters in knots, even the great warne struggled more against indian batters than any others so we shouldn't expect too much from sohdi against these guys. as for rutherford and fulton i would rather see latham or guptill with mccullum having to be the other opener to accomadate ryder, latham is the obvious choice and he's in form but guptill is getting better too and he would save twenty runs an innings in the field so you can add that to his total, when you have good players like ryder, latham and guptill on the sidelines i would say fulton and rutherfords days are numbered. as for the bowling i'd like to see henry in the mix, i was impressed by him

  • on February 5, 2014, 8:47 GMT

    tom latham for fulton is an easy choice, latham has more game nous and definetly is better at rotating strike and is our future not a stop gap player

  • Harlequin. on February 5, 2014, 8:57 GMT

    Well if the opening pair can't get runs against the indian pace attack in their own backyard then it probably is time for a switch around, and Fulton may be running out of time.

    @Bradmanesque - I would have thought Ryder would slot in the middle order, more of a number 5 than number 1. Having said that, Ryder at 5 would likely mean having to drop Anderson, which would be a tough call.

    @Alesana85 - Giving McCullum a pass because he is a good attacking captain is not a problem. Just look at Clarke vs Cook in the recent ashes series.

  • mjs28 on February 5, 2014, 9:04 GMT

    Good on selectors for showing faith in FUlton and Rutherford. Teams need stability so players aren't thinking they will be dropped for a bad series. Fulton deserves another chance but Latham or Guptil are longer term options.

  • on February 5, 2014, 12:28 GMT

    McCullum cannot claim a specialist captaincy role in tests for much longer, he needs runs or otherwise he must relinquish his spot for the good of the team and focus on the shorter game. His track record as a non wicket keeper batsmen is as follows:

    Below par in tests OK in ODI's Great in T20