New Zealand v India, 2nd Test, Wellington, 3rd day

India second-best against resolute McCullum

Building on the chances he got in the field, Brendon McCullum scored his toughest hundred yet, ensuring India's substantial lead was wiped off, in spite of some diligent play

Abhishek Purohit in Wellington

February 16, 2014

Comments: 26 | Text size: A | A

Brendon McCullum and BJ Watling's record stand blunted India's bowlers, New Zealand v India, 2nd Test, 3rd day, Wellington, February 16, 2014
Brendon McCullum and BJ Watling survived tough spells of bowling and capitalised on the chances to ensure India batted again © Getty Images
Enlarge

'McCullum growing in stature as a Test player'

  • Brendon McCullum has grown in stature as a Test player, New Zealand batting coach Bob Carter has said. McCullum began the home summer with 113 against West Indies in Dunedin and then hit a game-changing 224 against India in the first Test in Auckland. He has followed that up with an unbeaten 114, rescuing the side from 94 for 5 in their second innings in Wellington.
  • "He is now using his defence," Carter said. "Brendon has really shown his defensive game has come forward. And as well as he still likes to attack. I think he is growing in stature as a Test player and I would like to see him play a lot more."
  • McCullum also battled pain in his arm and back during his innings, taking treatment on occasion. Carter said McCullum had been consistently putting his body on the line, and he preferred the captain was more cautious on the field.
  • "You see how he is in the field. I sort of prefer him to just run to the boundary and just knock the ball back but he sets our tone all the time," he said. "And you have seen him dive - he dived on about seven or eight occasions while he was fielding and sets that example to everybody.
  • "I think it has been a tough summer all round but the funny side of it is that Brendon had a little bit of a shoulder injury from shining the ball yesterday. He was trying to get it to swing a lot as well trying to get it changed a lot. And then he was joking today that his bottom hand was playing up. I prefer it to be his top hand actually."

For the second time in as many Tests, India were left applauding a Brendon McCullum century. MS Dhoni walked to the edge of the boundary at the end of the day's play, waited for McCullum, who was being congratulated by several India players, and clasped his counterpart's hand. You can talk all you want about strategies and execution and momentum. At times, you just have to admit that you threw everything you had at the opposition, and they still came out on top. In the absence of Ross Taylor, it was McCullum who extended New Zealand's glorious summer by another day.

In Auckland, McCullum was helped by India bowlers, who lost their lines and lengths after having New Zealand at 30 for 3. The only assistance he had in Wellington was the two dropped catches. He got nothing else from India. They tried to force him into playing a rash stroke by bowling restricting lines to leg-side fields. McCullum defended, without giving them a chance. They tried to force him into playing a rash stroke by bowling teasing lines to an open off-side field, especially with the second new ball. McCullum attacked, without giving them a chance.

Ravindra Jadeja was at New Zealand all day, doing the job he had failed to do in the first Test. His 26 overs went for 120 in the first innings in Auckland. He conceded 49 runs in 26 overs this time. He choked McCullum and BJ Watling with a leg-side field and a line from over the stumps. Both batsmen defended, and then defended some more. On the rare occasion that Jadeja was too short or too full, they made sure he was taken for boundaries. There was nothing in the pitch for the spinner, and New Zealand ensured they were not going to create anything for him on their own.

Jadeja's run squeeze meant India's fast bowlers had more reason to come hard, which they did. Zaheer Khan has been largely accurate with his lines in this series, but the intensity had been palpably lacking. He made up for it with an eight-over opening spell that yielded two wickets. He never let McCullum and Watling feel they were in. Over the stumps. Round the stumps. Moving midwicket back, moving square leg in. Seaming it in, seaming it out. It was a terrific display from the bowler. The batsmen needed luck to survive Zaheer today. They needed the ball to beat that outside edge, for there were plenty they were not going to middle. You could argue that McCullum and Watling deserved that luck for the way they denied themselves.

Mohammed Shami could have tested New Zealand more had he been more consistent. He is a bowler who will produce an unplayable one every now and then, and he did that today as well. However, he also dropped it short on occasion and when he did, McCullum and Watling were around to take toll.

Ishant Sharma had been awkward to handle in the first innings, and he made the ball kick and seam in again. McCullum and Watling were hit on the pads several times. Even after playing 195 balls and batting on 94, McCullum missed and took one on the leg off Ishant. Just when you were pondering over the replay with the ball-tracker, he walloped the next one for six and was raising his bat for another hundred.

"Him going from 94 to 100 with a six certainly caught me by surprise," said Bob Carter, the New Zealand batting coach. "Suddenly I was sitting down thinking about the ball that had just beaten him. All of a sudden he was hitting it for six."

What more could India have done against McCullum? Dhoni had men in catching positions through the day. Slips, gully, short mid-on, short midwicket, short leg. He tried in-and-out fields. He tried reducing and increasing the number of slips. He left third man vacant. He brought point in, he sent him back. He left cover and extra cover vacant with the second new ball. He still kept going with his specialist bowlers, not trying any part-timer.

But here was the king of indulgence starving himself, gorging in between, then returning to starve again. Alongside was a sidekick in perpetual hibernation. It was the day McCullum batted nearly six hours, and yet made only 114, despite going almost run a ball from fifty to hundred. It was a day to come out second-best despite giving it all. It was a day to hold a hand out to your opponent and say: "Well played, captain."

Abhishek Purohit is a sub-editor at ESPNcricinfo

RSS Feeds: Abhishek Purohit

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by   on (February 17, 2014, 21:31 GMT)

@Imran Haider , pathetic Indian bowling itself is the biggest assistance that even a mediocre batsman from even Afghanistan would hit triple century so what is so great about Mcullum's innings? That's how India's defective bowling machine has given every team all the chances to create records including this Kiwi team as once said by the great Sunil Gavaskar " Making runs against India is easiest for any team while facing lethal bowlers and scoring runs is what we have to do to win the matches"

Posted by satchander on (February 16, 2014, 21:33 GMT)

@ thozar: We are all worried about India even when NZ are 6 ahead with 5 wickets in hand because of India's perennial problem of losing or drawing matches from winning positions...We just don't have bowlers who are ruthless enough to dismantle sides when they are in position such as 94/5 !!!!! Hope that answers your question ....

Posted by satchander on (February 16, 2014, 21:29 GMT)

@Jimmyvida : Dude, that was not a catch for Dhoni...It went on 1 bounce to him and technically not a chance...much as I hate Dhoni as a test captain for losing 10 out of last 11 matches, I would not want to just go on and say he even dropped McCullum when actually he did not...

Posted by nyc_missile on (February 16, 2014, 19:47 GMT)

Mr.Purohit- Can you please point the blame to Captain MSD who can own 'How to lose/draw games from winning emphatic positions-101'. This player is responsible for destroying this team with his negativity,inferiority complex and pathetically defensive tactics.When the same group can nip out NZ for 190 in the 1st inns,its hard to believe their ability or skills in the 2nd inns in terms of replicating performances.Awful catching,lethargic fielding and atrocious captaincy are the reasons for this lame slip-up yet again.Finally,Ishant Sharma and Kohli must be made to run 20 laps around the ground & cut their fees by 50% for their casual,lousy mistake of dropping MC.

Posted by harmske on (February 16, 2014, 18:10 GMT)

@thozar - well said! nz are a solid team at home and our recent home record is pretty good. a decent opening pair and perhaps a little more squad depth in batting and we're a complete package at home. away form probably needs a lot more work.

Posted by Leggie on (February 16, 2014, 17:33 GMT)

@AshwinPandey: playing Steyn in the nets or scoring tons of runs in the IPL mean nothing when one enters into a Test match. It's a completely different ball game with a completely different mindset. In my view at least, IPL comes at a wrong time... does not provide our team members to learn batting or bowling for a long period of time playing the game of patience and tightening their technique. If you look at some of the Indian greats starting with Bedi, Gavaskar, Kapil, Sachin, Dravid, Sourav, Kumble and most recently Zaheer khan... they all spent a considerable amount of time in the English county honing their skills. The current crop of players are severely challenged for time, and with IPL played in the true Indian summer, I'm sure it's going to leave many of them tired and exhausted by the end of the season. T20 is like a good dessert and not a main course. Sadly, people are being fed with an overdose of desserts and surely over a period of time are going to fall sick.

Posted by   on (February 16, 2014, 16:02 GMT)

If BM scores another double century than Indian hopes to win overseas test will remain only a dream which they can never turn into reality. ... I wish NZ play out all three sessions today

Posted by Jimmyvida on (February 16, 2014, 16:02 GMT)

Did someone miss Dhoni's dropping Brendon. Everybody says Dhoni likes to stay far to catch balls down at his ankle. So why couldn't he catch Brendon? That was as simple a catch as you would expect behind the wicket. Did anybody see the kind of catches Watling took to dismiss Indian batsmen, even to dismiss Dhoni?

Posted by   on (February 16, 2014, 15:57 GMT)

Honestly speaking i expected more of IND . NZ are not a side to get beaten by

Posted by   on (February 16, 2014, 15:39 GMT)

Yes it was disappointing to see the bowlers time and again let the batsman off the hook and which shows that Indian bowlers lack intelligence. When you know a batsman is troubled by a certain delivery why not try again in the same spot, but Indian bowlers just did the opposite and then bowl a short pitch ball for the batsman to whack easily. Also time and again Dhoni lets the opposition away from trouble by inexplicably field placements and over bowling Jadeja. He should have changed Jadeja as soon as he had the danger man,Anderson, out and attacked the new batsman but continued with Jadeja to the team's disadvantage. Its is easy for a new batsman,Watling, to play spin then a fast bowler who has gotten him so many times in the series and his confidence is low. Dhoni must have thought oh I got them pinned down with Jadeja's bowling and can get more, but they decided that they had 3 days of Test match left to play and dropped anchor. Not smart enough, Dhoni, you cant do that and win.

Posted by thozar on (February 16, 2014, 15:12 GMT)

I am not sure why people are flaming India's performance in this test. People, India still hold all the aces here. NZ hold a mere 6 run lead and have only 5 wickets left, mostly that of tailenders. Baz or Watling could fall first ball on the 4th day and it is all over for NZ. We are winning this test even if NZ add another 100 runs which is highly improbable. That said, we need to get better at holding on to our catches. Till then, there is no point blaming the bowlers who gave it their all in this test.

Still, full marks to McCullum who has played very well taking full advantage of his reprieves. Whatever said and done, NZ have earned the respect of Indian fans. They almost won the series against England last year who were a top team at that time and now they are playing out of their skins and gonna draw a series against now #2 India. Well played NZ.

India will only get better. We need to find a better opener to partner Dhawan and we are all set.

Posted by AshwinPandey on (February 16, 2014, 15:05 GMT)

Please stop talking about hoping failures in England tour. There's still lot of time left for it and hope for the best. But IPL will provide our bowlers a learning chance. Bhuvaneshwar and Ishant in SRH can learn from Steyn. Dhawan in SRH could face Steyn at nets . So i think this is a very good thing for the Indians. And Pujara will have a good practise of facing Johnson (both in Kings XI Punjab). So hope, every individual will learn and make the best of the chances they get.

Posted by AshwinPandey on (February 16, 2014, 14:58 GMT)

@Chetan Asher, Abhishek Purohit has just produced a unbiased view. If couple of catches are dropped, it doesn't means that now if you dont get wicket, its all the problem of fielders. You should bowl wicket taking deliveries very often( which everyone wants to do). And also he didn't blamed Indian bowlers- "They needed the ball to beat that outside edge, for there were plenty they were not going to middle." Indians bowled tight lines but you have to mention the great partnership stand from McCullum and Watling.

Posted by HDG1978 on (February 16, 2014, 13:20 GMT)

Till India wins, I am not going to praise this young Indian team. Only India in world cricket can lose from this position. Won't be too surprised. Have stoppped expectig much from this team overall. India's bottom five have contributed more to Indian Test defeats than the batsmen. The lack of desire in Indian tailenders to grind it out while batting and make opposition bowlers earn their wickets and the perennial malaise of India's bowling to wipe out the opposition's tail means India lose and draw a large number of Tests that they should have won. And other teams win from similar positions (that India is in). If you expect India to win by giving the opposition's best batsmen 4 chances (Williamson dismissed twice off no balls in 1st inns and McCullum dropped twice in 2nd inns), they should stop dreaming and introspect instead on how the tide can turn. Sadly more defeats await India later this year in Eng and Aus. Hope Team India proves me wrong.

Posted by siddhartha87 on (February 16, 2014, 13:12 GMT)

India will be whitewashed in England again with this kind of performence

Posted by sudeep_sarkar on (February 16, 2014, 13:09 GMT)

Brandon Macullan is Sachin Tendulkar of N.Z...What a player...hats off..

Posted by yjreddyindia on (February 16, 2014, 12:54 GMT)

india should restrict newzealand under 400 otherwise it could be a little difficult in 4th innings.

Posted by   on (February 16, 2014, 12:26 GMT)

Indian media is so quick to make a mountain out of a molehill. The moment India bowled out NZ for a low score they started dreaming of blasting them by an inning defeat. All of a sudden Ishant and Shami were compared to the best in the world. The test of test cricket is consistency ! Look at Johnson what has he done in the last six test matches not one or two. We must admit that our bowling is weak, needs improvement. Over confidence can lead to problems like Ishant saying that he has been bowling so well in recent months. India, can still win but start eating once the food is in your mouth not before it. Be consistent, bowl a good line, go for excellent fielding and the win is yours. However, in cricket remember that you never win until you actually win it.Wait for that momemt, nothing before that : Good luck to both the teams

Posted by StreetView on (February 16, 2014, 12:22 GMT)

@ Chetan Asher Similarly it would be better if you are honest to Indian Cricket , by mentioning the failures of Rohit , not to your favorite IPL Team(s) (MI I guess) :P

Posted by   on (February 16, 2014, 12:09 GMT)

Match is still open. It can go either way.

Posted by   on (February 16, 2014, 11:59 GMT)

"The only assistance he had in Wellington was the two dropped catches. He got nothing else from India." Hilarious, what else do you need :)

Posted by   on (February 16, 2014, 11:36 GMT)

I agree with Rahul_78 with a small difference. India NEVER EVER had killer fast bowlers who could wipe the opposition tail in under 30 runs. Indian fast bowlers (the great Kapil Dev included) rarely bowled unplayable deliveries. Secondly, after the era of Madan Lal and Roger Binny, Indian tail-enders lost the art of putting a price on their wicket. Indian tail-enders should have supported Rahane to take the score to 500+ in the first innings. If NZ gain a lead of 150+, then India will collapse in 4th innings. A couple on unplayable balls, a dodgy decision, a freak dismissal (e.g. caught behind on leg-side), and Indian innings will unravel.

Posted by   on (February 16, 2014, 11:25 GMT)

What more could India have done - Virat Kohli / Ishant could have taken the catch to make errors our bowlers induced from the NZ batsmen. Once more, the batsmen muck up by fielding badly & Mr. Purohit only finds bowlers to blame. Purohit - remember you are there to provide a neutral view of what happened during the day, not just keep blaming India's bowlers because you love the incompetent, useless & over-hyped batsmen. In the first test - we lost to Specialist Batsman Murali Vijay - you wrote nothing against him. In the second test - McCullum is there thanks to Specialist Batsman Virat Kohli, you have not even mentioned his name in the entire article, where you are naming bowlers for not getting wickets ! BE HONEST TO INDIAN CRICKET, NOT YOUR SPONSORS (CSK & RCB I GUESS) !

Posted by Rahul_78 on (February 16, 2014, 9:54 GMT)

"At times, you just have to admit that you threw everything you had at the opposition, and they still came out on top." This has been the story of India's bowling overseas under Dhoni recently. What you need to admire is tireless effort of the 3 fast bowlers who were at it day in day out. Full marks for the efforts, intensity and execution. But and it is a big BUT India do not possess Steyn, Johnson or even Sreenath any more who would consistently get you 4-5 wickets overseas in second innings. This is a same team and same set of bowlers who conceded almost 450 against SAF in 4th innings. The attack lacks pace, aggression with short deliveries and yorkers to tail enders. This is why MSD seriously needs to do rethink and go for Yadav or Aaron or Pandey. Throw them in the deep end and let them float or sink. India might win this test but they are not going to win many with this bowling attack. This should be the final straw and lessons need to be learnt for future.

Posted by   on (February 16, 2014, 9:49 GMT)

While this report seems to suggest that Dhoni did a good job, the match report is critical of Dhoni's tactics calling him defensive. Make up your mind cricinfo!

Posted by   on (February 16, 2014, 9:25 GMT)

india toomarow all out anothar 90-130 runs elase 150-160 dificult for india

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Abhishek PurohitClose
Tour Results
New Zealand v India at Wellington - Feb 14-18, 2014
Match drawn
New Zealand v India at Auckland - Feb 6-9, 2014
New Zealand won by 40 runs
NZ XI v Indians at Whangarei - Feb 2-3, 2014
Match drawn
New Zealand v India at Wellington - Jan 31, 2014
New Zealand won by 87 runs
New Zealand v India at Hamilton - Jan 28, 2014
New Zealand won by 7 wickets (with 11 balls remaining)
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days