New Zealand v South Africa, 1st Test, Dunedin March 5, 2012

Kirsten focussed on thorough preparation

21

"We will not be scared of conditions and we will not be scared of what's dished up at us. We feel we've got enough skill in our team to be able to handle all conditions." If you close your eyes when you hear those Gary Kirsten sentences you can almost picture him saying them to a national team.

Not the one he now coaches, but the one he led to, among other achievements, a rare series win in New Zealand three years ago, India. He must have stood at the centre of the huddle, his schoolteacher frown firmly in place and the forefinger on his right hand pointing vigorously, issuing something similar to that instruction.

On Monday afternoon in Dunedin those words were said in relation to South Africa. New Zealand is hardly as different to them as it would have been to India but Kirsten's meticulous attention to adjustment will ensure that South Africa are prepared for anything. Their goal, although Kirsten won't explicitly say it, is to whitewash New Zealand to become the world's top ranked Test team and the only way to do that is to go in prepared.

"The concern, as it always is when you are coming to foreign conditions, is how quickly you can be ready and how quickly you can prepare," Kirsten said. "We know that in the first game if you have one bad session you can get yourselves into trouble very quickly. From a mental perspective we want to make sure we are ready for the start of the game and that we are not caught napping."

Superficial as it may sound, one of the most important things to get ready for, according to Kirsten, is the weather. Cricketers, especially South African cricketers, are used to playing in summer. Dunedin in March is closer to a Johannesburg winter. "I remember playing my last Test match here [in New Zealand] and it was 9 degrees on the last day. Getting used to that is not easy," he said, almost shivering at the thought. "We can talk about it but you've actually got to go out there and feel it to understand. And then, to know that you can make performances in those conditions."

South Africa will spend two days training in the chill to get used to the weather and keenly observing preparations for the pitch, which Kirsten saw for the first time in the middle of his press engagement. He grinned when asked if it looked different to what he had expected. A one-word answer, "Ja," confirmed that it did.

Although New Zealand seemed headed in the direction of greener pitches, the surface at the University Oval is a smooth brown and talk of slowing it down as much as possible is rife. It's a tactic that would leave New Zealand's batsmen less vulnerable to South Africa's fiery fast-bowlers but would also somewhat negate their own four-pronged pace attack.

Whatever the colour of the strip, Kirsten said South Africa will concentrate on the "processes," a new favourite buzzword in the team. It's a short way of saying that the No. 1 ranking is what they are after and all the Test cricket they play will be focussed on achieving that, just like every other team. The difference for South Africa is that they are closer than the majority of other teams and could be named the top-ranked Test side by the end of the month.

Instead of focus on the three wins they will need to get there, something which Kirsten and his team will be acutely aware of, he said they will ignore the short-term results. Instead, they will target victory, but in an indirect fashion, according to Kirsten. "We want to win games of cricket, obviously, anyone does because that's how you get measured," he said. "We know that if we do certain things right through a Test match, we will win more games than we lose."

Concentrating on those things, rather than anything the opposition does, is what Kirsten believes will allow South Africa to do that. He is drumming into his charges the introspective approach and advising them to work within their means, because that will be good enough.

"We know what our strengths are and we feel that if we can really play to our strengths against any team that we come up against, we are going to be a tough team to beat," he said. "It's been a great tour for us so far. We've played better as the games have gone along. It's a new format and we need to make sure that we are mentally ready and up for this new format."

Edited by Siddarth Ravindran

Firdose Moonda is ESPNcricinfo's South Africa correspondent

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • christy29 on March 6, 2012, 8:15 GMT

    quick. unleash the phantom!

  • on March 6, 2012, 5:32 GMT

    Ab is great!There is no one in the world like villiers at d moment!! Go ahead villiers..............

  • Eskimo on March 5, 2012, 20:37 GMT

    I hope NZ fans are aware of what bowling attack SA has. Keep in mind that SA's worst pace bowler (Morne Morkel) is as good as Eng's best pace bowler (James Anderson). Both have the same averages, go check for yourself if you don't believe me. SA's batting is good, but not great. Even though Taylor and Guptill are good players, they won't get chosen in the Top 6 batsman for SA. Don't mention Ryder, because a guy that doesn't use his feet is gonna get pummeled by any fast bowler who moves the ball (go ask the "great" Sehwag). The only thing NZ has that SA don't is a world-class spinner. Though Tahir is an attacking spinner, he is off form and all over the place, where Vettori is economical and will put alot of pressure on SA's batting order. Just watch how many wickets SA are gonna throw away because of that. Amla and De Villiers, in general, have always loved giving away their wickets on a platter. Still, I can't see NZ winning a test. Let's hope im wrong ;)

  • Lermy on March 5, 2012, 19:52 GMT

    Anything less than a total whitewash wil be failure to SA, given their line-up and their current dominance over NZ. I don't see anyone in the NZ batting lie-up with the possible exception of Williamson who have the technique and patience to deal with SAs pace attack. NZ need to wind the clock back to when we used pretty much the same settled team for every format of the game. We don't have the depth to go picking specialist teams. This just gives mediocre players more chances to fail when we need to give the few quality players we have as much experience as possible of high level cricket. Domestic cricket in NZ doesn't provide that experience. At this point in time NZ are further behind SA than Zimbabwe are behind them. SA are dominating NZ at home, something NZ failed to do in Zimbabwe recently!

  • on March 5, 2012, 18:23 GMT

    When someone asked me who my favourite batsman was, I'd said Gary Kirsten. My friends would laugh at me. We grew up during the times of Tendulkar, Mark Waugh, Saeed Anwar and Brian Lara. But for me it was always Kirsten. Perhaps not the most talented, but boy did he have the determination. And now a world cup winning coach. Success is 90% perspiration, 10% inspiration. Get in there Proteas.

  • Pratchett on March 5, 2012, 18:21 GMT

    Vetorri is absolutely brilliant. NO WAY Tahir is even fit to lace his boots! Dan is one of my favourite cricketers, but that won't stop me predicting a 0-2 victory for Gary's boys. Long may he continue to coach the Proteas! As for star performers - my money's on Amla, AB and Steyn

  • on March 5, 2012, 17:32 GMT

    Being a South African, it makes me really proud to see the Indian community's appreciation of Gary Kirsten. If anyone can bounce back from adversity, it's India. They, just like Sri Lanka did in the recent past, will make their comeback, or have possibly even started already... Just look at Virat's amazing knock to defy double centurions in the Sri Lanka camp a victory.

    Regardless, I'm happy Gary's back home leading our boys, and keeping it in the family. Go Proteas!

  • on March 5, 2012, 15:58 GMT

    2-0 to RSA with a rain-affected draw in there, too.

  • zn264 on March 5, 2012, 15:29 GMT

    Watch out SA batsmen; there will be another special on the Marto/Guptill combo and it's coming to a cricket ground near you! If you don't believe me, just ask Phill Hughes.

  • on March 5, 2012, 15:06 GMT

    Spelele I disagree with your comment that Tahir is better than Daniel vettori bro vettori is an allrounder. plus he is the left armer who can bowl arm bowl but tahir has only googly and one thing I want to tell you that tahir is a wasted talent of Pakistan.Man daniel vettori is the palyer of Kallis and Afridi caliper which means top ten allrounder in world cricket of this decade.

  • christy29 on March 6, 2012, 8:15 GMT

    quick. unleash the phantom!

  • on March 6, 2012, 5:32 GMT

    Ab is great!There is no one in the world like villiers at d moment!! Go ahead villiers..............

  • Eskimo on March 5, 2012, 20:37 GMT

    I hope NZ fans are aware of what bowling attack SA has. Keep in mind that SA's worst pace bowler (Morne Morkel) is as good as Eng's best pace bowler (James Anderson). Both have the same averages, go check for yourself if you don't believe me. SA's batting is good, but not great. Even though Taylor and Guptill are good players, they won't get chosen in the Top 6 batsman for SA. Don't mention Ryder, because a guy that doesn't use his feet is gonna get pummeled by any fast bowler who moves the ball (go ask the "great" Sehwag). The only thing NZ has that SA don't is a world-class spinner. Though Tahir is an attacking spinner, he is off form and all over the place, where Vettori is economical and will put alot of pressure on SA's batting order. Just watch how many wickets SA are gonna throw away because of that. Amla and De Villiers, in general, have always loved giving away their wickets on a platter. Still, I can't see NZ winning a test. Let's hope im wrong ;)

  • Lermy on March 5, 2012, 19:52 GMT

    Anything less than a total whitewash wil be failure to SA, given their line-up and their current dominance over NZ. I don't see anyone in the NZ batting lie-up with the possible exception of Williamson who have the technique and patience to deal with SAs pace attack. NZ need to wind the clock back to when we used pretty much the same settled team for every format of the game. We don't have the depth to go picking specialist teams. This just gives mediocre players more chances to fail when we need to give the few quality players we have as much experience as possible of high level cricket. Domestic cricket in NZ doesn't provide that experience. At this point in time NZ are further behind SA than Zimbabwe are behind them. SA are dominating NZ at home, something NZ failed to do in Zimbabwe recently!

  • on March 5, 2012, 18:23 GMT

    When someone asked me who my favourite batsman was, I'd said Gary Kirsten. My friends would laugh at me. We grew up during the times of Tendulkar, Mark Waugh, Saeed Anwar and Brian Lara. But for me it was always Kirsten. Perhaps not the most talented, but boy did he have the determination. And now a world cup winning coach. Success is 90% perspiration, 10% inspiration. Get in there Proteas.

  • Pratchett on March 5, 2012, 18:21 GMT

    Vetorri is absolutely brilliant. NO WAY Tahir is even fit to lace his boots! Dan is one of my favourite cricketers, but that won't stop me predicting a 0-2 victory for Gary's boys. Long may he continue to coach the Proteas! As for star performers - my money's on Amla, AB and Steyn

  • on March 5, 2012, 17:32 GMT

    Being a South African, it makes me really proud to see the Indian community's appreciation of Gary Kirsten. If anyone can bounce back from adversity, it's India. They, just like Sri Lanka did in the recent past, will make their comeback, or have possibly even started already... Just look at Virat's amazing knock to defy double centurions in the Sri Lanka camp a victory.

    Regardless, I'm happy Gary's back home leading our boys, and keeping it in the family. Go Proteas!

  • on March 5, 2012, 15:58 GMT

    2-0 to RSA with a rain-affected draw in there, too.

  • zn264 on March 5, 2012, 15:29 GMT

    Watch out SA batsmen; there will be another special on the Marto/Guptill combo and it's coming to a cricket ground near you! If you don't believe me, just ask Phill Hughes.

  • on March 5, 2012, 15:06 GMT

    Spelele I disagree with your comment that Tahir is better than Daniel vettori bro vettori is an allrounder. plus he is the left armer who can bowl arm bowl but tahir has only googly and one thing I want to tell you that tahir is a wasted talent of Pakistan.Man daniel vettori is the palyer of Kallis and Afridi caliper which means top ten allrounder in world cricket of this decade.

  • SafferBob on March 5, 2012, 13:12 GMT

    If NZ prepare slow tracks they remove their only chance of causing an upset. The SA bowlers can still bowl teams out on slow wickets. But preparing a bouncing greentop will also play into SA's hands, as I see it, NZ are between a rock and a hard place and can only hope for a couple of outstanding performances to rescue their effort. Good luck to both teams, I can't wait....

  • Spelele on March 5, 2012, 11:09 GMT

    If pitches which favour spin are prepared, Tahir will rip through NZ. Along with England, NZ are amongst the poorest non-subcontinent players of spin. We saw how a declining Harbhajan blew away this same NZ side the last time India were in NZ. Further, NZ lack an attacking spinner to trouble SA on those kinds of pitches (unless they call-up their Indian-born mercenary Nethula, which I don't see happening). While I have a lot of respect for Vettori, he just isn't at the same attacking level as Tahir. His defensive methods are accurately revealed in his poor record against SA, and his poor overall strike rate. He would struggle to make it to SA's second XI with the likes of Van Der Merwe, Botha, Robin etc. being weigh more attacking (and thus miles ahead of him). I admire the Kiwi 'we won't be pushovers' attitude but realistically speaking, NZ's chances are about 1/100, even if they prepare slow pitches. That tactic might still suit their batsmen's poor techniques against pace though.

  • on March 5, 2012, 10:59 GMT

    India is really missing him....! :(

  • Shongololo on March 5, 2012, 10:16 GMT

    If statistics count for anything, South Africa shiould take this at a canter. Our batsmen have averages well beyond their NZ counterparts, ditto our bowlers. Test cricket is the true test of a cricketer's skills, a team's combined skills, and I believe South Africa will win comfortably for the simple reason that, player-for-player, they are in a different league. NZ has Taylor and Vittori as world class performers (well, Taylor's not world class but the country's best bat by some distance) while South Africa has Smith, Kallis, Amla, de Villiers, Steyn and Morkel in the true 'world class' category...Philander excluded as he has yet to play enough cricket at this level to be deemed such.

    Regardless of the pitches thrown up by NZ, we should handle them better because, well, we have the better players.

    Of course, cricket is a funny old game...

  • Smahuta on March 5, 2012, 9:21 GMT

    South Africa is weaker in the shorter format. Expect another whitwewash in the tests as the kiwi batsmen struggle with pace and bounce. Its one thing bullying Zimbabwe around the park, lets hope vettori and taylor can at least make it so the games last more than 3 days.

  • TommytuckerSaffa on March 5, 2012, 9:16 GMT

    The Test series will be very different to the ODI/ T20 series. Kiwis has some much stronger and experienced players returning to the fold. Also their pride is hurting a bit so they will be keen to make a statement. I fear they might catch SA with their pants down in the first Test. Thank god we have Kirsten, thanks India!

  • Bigchops on March 5, 2012, 9:02 GMT

    this will be closer than everyone thinks, because Taylor is a world class performer and vettori is a very hard man to fluster..I believe NZ will target Philander as good as he has been he's raw and will be tested. Also SA don't have much of a spin attack .

  • BellCurve on March 5, 2012, 8:00 GMT

    A whitewash of NZ is nothing but a pipedream. SA can realisticly aim to be No1 at the end of their tour of England later this year.

  • JustOUT on March 5, 2012, 7:54 GMT

    Eagerly waiting for the TEST series to kick-off. I was reading some articles, the whether may play spoilsport.. hope its not true. All the 3 matches should be played fully. C'mon Proteas..

  • Robin001 on March 5, 2012, 7:41 GMT

    Oh man....it was so good when Gary Kirsten was the Coach of India.....i am sure he and SA will do really well. Bring back Gary !!!

  • Bruce_Robinson on March 5, 2012, 7:07 GMT

    I usually like your writing, Firdose, but you've horribly mangled Kirsten's words by stating that focussing on "processes" means trying to achieve the No. 1 spot in Test cricket. It means the exact opposite of focussing on a big picture ouctome. It's about doing all the little things right in order to create a favourable outcome, as explained by Kirsten in the next paragraph. Concerning this series, SA should have way too much in the tank for NZ who have looked more and more shell-shocked as the tour has progressed. Maybe Taylor, Vettori and Martin can shore them up in the Test series.

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • Bruce_Robinson on March 5, 2012, 7:07 GMT

    I usually like your writing, Firdose, but you've horribly mangled Kirsten's words by stating that focussing on "processes" means trying to achieve the No. 1 spot in Test cricket. It means the exact opposite of focussing on a big picture ouctome. It's about doing all the little things right in order to create a favourable outcome, as explained by Kirsten in the next paragraph. Concerning this series, SA should have way too much in the tank for NZ who have looked more and more shell-shocked as the tour has progressed. Maybe Taylor, Vettori and Martin can shore them up in the Test series.

  • Robin001 on March 5, 2012, 7:41 GMT

    Oh man....it was so good when Gary Kirsten was the Coach of India.....i am sure he and SA will do really well. Bring back Gary !!!

  • JustOUT on March 5, 2012, 7:54 GMT

    Eagerly waiting for the TEST series to kick-off. I was reading some articles, the whether may play spoilsport.. hope its not true. All the 3 matches should be played fully. C'mon Proteas..

  • BellCurve on March 5, 2012, 8:00 GMT

    A whitewash of NZ is nothing but a pipedream. SA can realisticly aim to be No1 at the end of their tour of England later this year.

  • Bigchops on March 5, 2012, 9:02 GMT

    this will be closer than everyone thinks, because Taylor is a world class performer and vettori is a very hard man to fluster..I believe NZ will target Philander as good as he has been he's raw and will be tested. Also SA don't have much of a spin attack .

  • TommytuckerSaffa on March 5, 2012, 9:16 GMT

    The Test series will be very different to the ODI/ T20 series. Kiwis has some much stronger and experienced players returning to the fold. Also their pride is hurting a bit so they will be keen to make a statement. I fear they might catch SA with their pants down in the first Test. Thank god we have Kirsten, thanks India!

  • Smahuta on March 5, 2012, 9:21 GMT

    South Africa is weaker in the shorter format. Expect another whitwewash in the tests as the kiwi batsmen struggle with pace and bounce. Its one thing bullying Zimbabwe around the park, lets hope vettori and taylor can at least make it so the games last more than 3 days.

  • Shongololo on March 5, 2012, 10:16 GMT

    If statistics count for anything, South Africa shiould take this at a canter. Our batsmen have averages well beyond their NZ counterparts, ditto our bowlers. Test cricket is the true test of a cricketer's skills, a team's combined skills, and I believe South Africa will win comfortably for the simple reason that, player-for-player, they are in a different league. NZ has Taylor and Vittori as world class performers (well, Taylor's not world class but the country's best bat by some distance) while South Africa has Smith, Kallis, Amla, de Villiers, Steyn and Morkel in the true 'world class' category...Philander excluded as he has yet to play enough cricket at this level to be deemed such.

    Regardless of the pitches thrown up by NZ, we should handle them better because, well, we have the better players.

    Of course, cricket is a funny old game...

  • on March 5, 2012, 10:59 GMT

    India is really missing him....! :(

  • Spelele on March 5, 2012, 11:09 GMT

    If pitches which favour spin are prepared, Tahir will rip through NZ. Along with England, NZ are amongst the poorest non-subcontinent players of spin. We saw how a declining Harbhajan blew away this same NZ side the last time India were in NZ. Further, NZ lack an attacking spinner to trouble SA on those kinds of pitches (unless they call-up their Indian-born mercenary Nethula, which I don't see happening). While I have a lot of respect for Vettori, he just isn't at the same attacking level as Tahir. His defensive methods are accurately revealed in his poor record against SA, and his poor overall strike rate. He would struggle to make it to SA's second XI with the likes of Van Der Merwe, Botha, Robin etc. being weigh more attacking (and thus miles ahead of him). I admire the Kiwi 'we won't be pushovers' attitude but realistically speaking, NZ's chances are about 1/100, even if they prepare slow pitches. That tactic might still suit their batsmen's poor techniques against pace though.