South Africa in New Zealand 2011-12

McCullum and Martin must take the lead

Five ways New Zealand can better their chances in the series against South Africa, as they prepare for the second Test, in Hamilton

Andrew Alderson

March 12, 2012

Comments: 29 | Text size: A | A

Brendon McCullum gets on top of the bounce, New Zealand v South Africa, 1st Test, Dunedin, 4th day, March 10, 2012
Brendon McCullum needs to be at the top of the order, taking the attack to South Africa © Getty Images
Enlarge

Open with Brendon McCullum
McCullum has advocated opening for years but - after a tantalisingly successful spell - now shifts to No. 3 to make way for Rob Nicol, just as he did in the limited-overs matches. Surely McCullum needs to be at his bristling, aggressive best facing the first ball. Psychologically it could give New Zealand an edge with his ethos for fearless leadership from the front. He has averaged 43.87 in 16 Test innings as an opener since taking the job fulltime in November 2010.

Nicol's opening success in the limited-overs matches in Zimbabwe has clouded the evidence. Yes, he opens for Canterbury, and has scores of 107, 3, 3, and 1 this season in four-day games. But why not slot him into the No. 5 position as a clean swap until Dean Brownlie returns?

McCullum and Martin Guptill have fashioned one of New Zealand's most successful opening combinations. In nine innings, against Pakistan, Zimbabwe and Australia, they average 43.55 runs per innings including two century stands. Compare them to John Wright and Bruce Edgar, who for years have been the New Zealand benchmark in the opening roles. They averaged 31.82 runs in 56 innings opening together, from 1978-86.

Hand Tarun Nethula a debut
Perhaps someone in New Zealand Cricket circles might suggest to Seddon Park groundsman Karl Johnson that a pitch which dries, roughs up and cracks on the fourth and fifth days is a thought for the second Test.

Nethula showed promise against South Africa in the one-dayer at Napier, and would have got more wickets than his 2 for 60 from 10 overs had it not been for some sloppy fielding off his bowling.

He has matured this season and in six first-class matches has tightened up his overs. The evidence is 20 wickets at 30.20 with an economy-rate of 3.41, including his 9 for 50 effort in the match against Otago. Yes, he and Vettori both take the ball away from the right-hander but Nethula at least offers a point-of-difference to the cannon fodder Tim Southee served up last week. Bringing in another pace bowler in the 130-140kph bracket might seem a trifle conservative when New Zealand came nowhere near taking 20 wickets in Dunedin.

If Nethula plays he will be New Zealand's first specialist legspinner since Brooke Walker in May 2002. However, in recent Tests and the two first-class matches this season Seddon Park has been more conducive to seam. Making a sudden change to the default conditions may be a tricky task.

Apply batting grit
Rain ruined what would have been a fascinating final day of the first Test, in Dunedin. New Zealand needed 264 runs off 98 overs with Ross Taylor and Brendon McCullum ensconced on a flat pitch against, arguably, the best bowling attack in the world. In reality the hosts' chances were slim, given that a 400-plus fourth-innings target has been chased down only four times in 2035 tests.

The origins of that situation are clear. The New Zealand batsmen did not make the most of the first innings and gave their bowlers too few runs to bowl at. After dismissing South Africa for 238 they only mustered 273 in reply, and 33 of those came from Trent Boult's wild swipes at No 10. Four other batsmen scored in the 30-48 bracket but failed to go on. The highest partnership of 65, for the third wicket between Taylor and McCullum, was perhaps the most disappointing. They had shown hints of how to get the better of their much-vaunted opposition by defending stoutly behind the ball but did not carry on.

Knead and stretch BJ Watling
Kruger van Wyk had a sound wicketkeeping debut. He made 36 runs, did not drop (or take) any catches, helped effect the run-out of Mark Boucher, gave away just two byes over two innings and undoubtedly contributed valuable intelligence on cricketers he played with at school and provincial level in South Africa.

However, Watling needs to be rushed back from his hip irritation after an excellent debut with the gloves against Zimbabwe in Napier. It was a bold punt from coach John Wright to select him as a wicketkeeper but with a maiden Test century, four catches in the second innings and the concession of just four byes (from a loose Trent Boult delivery) he deserves to return as soon as possible.

Watling proved capable keeping up to Daniel Vettori's spin or back to the pace quartet. He used his feet well with the bat, was at ease clipping balls off his legs and patient leaving deliveries outside off stump. He has not lost that form, and has scored three half-centuries and taken eight catches in four innings for Northern Districts in the Plunket Shield since the Napier Test.

Demand more Chris Martin magic
Provided he stays fit and gets suitable support from his bowling comrades, the 37-year-old Martin is the New Zealand player who can make the biggest difference in this series.

South Africa batsmen are his bunnies. Not many bowlers can claim that. He showed his skills again in the first innings in Dunedin with four wickets for 56 in 18 overs including those of Graeme Smith, Jacques Kallis and AB de Villiers. Of all Martin's wickets in Test cricket he has dismissed Smith (7) and Kallis (6) the most.

Martin has taken 48 of his 222 Test wickets (21.62%) and four of his 10 five-wicket bags against South Africa, despite playing just 11 of his 66 tests (16.67%) against them. His best bowling figures in a match, 11 for 180, came in New Zealand's first win in a home Test against South Africa, at Eden Park in 2004. He averages 25.25 with the ball against South Africa compared to 33.32 overall.

Edited by Dustin Silgardo

Andrew Alderson is cricket writer at New Zealand's Herald on Sunday

RSS Feeds: Andrew Alderson

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by StoneRose on (March 14, 2012, 16:53 GMT)

replacing Southee with a batsman should be the first and easiest improvement

Posted by beejaytee on (March 14, 2012, 7:03 GMT)

@stickywicketnick - Yep, it'd be good if NZ could shoehorn another southpaw into the line-up (my preference would be Flynn), but I think you're a bit harsh on Guppy. Having a tall front-foot player in with Baz or Kane can interupt a bowler's lengths, and we all know that Guptill has the ability to hit boundaries. I've thought for a while that he just needs to rotate strike more regularly. I think both he & Nicol should set their sights on hanging in past the 20 over mark & just getting to the non-striker's end by any means they can. I think the key to beating SA is frustrating & tiring their bowlers, especially Morkell & Philander, who both seem to leak runs towards the end of each spell.

Posted by beejaytee on (March 14, 2012, 6:51 GMT)

@sombrehombre - You're right. Unless Nicol makes a hundred, or gets a bowl as the second spinner and does better than anyone would expect, he'll have to make way for Brownlie. Which means Baz at the top of the order again. I don't think that's terrible, but it's not ideal. The only other option I see is to drop Kane, which seems unlikely and also very harsh on the youngster.

Posted by marts30 on (March 14, 2012, 1:28 GMT)

stickywicketnick: Come on, Kane deserves a little longer in the test side yet. He got run out for 5 vs Zimbabwe and got some decent starts in Aussie, where everyone except Dean and Dan struggled. Last 2 tests he has had 1 innings each... Look at Virat Kohli, supremely talented and averages similar after 8 tests, Jacques Kallis averaged 25 after his first THREE years ffs. Give him more time, there is just no use sending him back to domestic cricket.

Posted by WDSut on (March 14, 2012, 0:35 GMT)

Comparing the Guptill-McCullum opening partnership favourably with that of John Wright and Bruce Edgar is absurd. How statistics lie. (1) The standard of test bowling was way higher in Wright and Edgar's day (2) Wright and Edgar looked to bat responsibly and for the team in taking the shine off the ball. So number of runs on the board wasn't the first consideration. Please everyone get real on McCullum. He is a fine player, but he is not a promising young gun who can only get better. He's been playing international cricket for ages, and we're likely to keep seeing the same misjudgments that see his record as it is. There is no corner to turn... Guptill should never have been picked to play test cricket anyway. His first-class record is very average.

Posted by Sombrehombre on (March 13, 2012, 20:39 GMT)

Agree with beejaytee, I feel like McCullum has been doing a better job at three than opening. He is vulnerable to getting out exceedingly quickly and seeing one of NZs key players depart so early puts an astronomical dent in the teams confidence (and that horrible feeling as a fan...). Problem is, I cant see Nicol nailing down a place but the balance of the team looks better with Taylor batting at 4 and Williamson 5. Brownlie is not an opener and deserves to get shipped straight back in when he returns - so what to do, who to open?

Posted by   on (March 13, 2012, 20:22 GMT)

Sourav Mishra, wow.... really interesting comments mate. At least NZ players have guts and pride. I'd worry about your own team and how they perform before coming on to a NZ article and criticising ours.

Posted by   on (March 13, 2012, 18:37 GMT)

Newzealenders have rarely produced batsmen with consistent success at the Test level- Run a hot spot and u wil see that even the top order never middles the ball! Often they poke at the ball too much,get edgy and fall to spin easily.Cricketers known to be aggresive at first class level dont even have relatively high strike rates in international levels- often they get dismissed before scoring the big ones.

Posted by Tartanspringbok on (March 13, 2012, 13:30 GMT)

Five ways New Zealand can better their chances in the series against South Africa, as they prepare for the second Test, in Hamilton

1: Call up Morne van Wyk http://www.espncricinfo.com/south-africa-domestic-2011/content/player/47711.html

2: Call up Richard Levi http://www.espncricinfo.com/south-africa-domestic-2011/content/player/46148.html

3: Call up Dane Vilas http://www.espncricinfo.com/south-africa-domestic-2011/content/player/262456.html

4: Call up Jandre Coetzee http://www.espncricinfo.com/south-africa-domestic-2011/content/player/44667.html

5: Call up Ahmed Amla (Hashim's Brother) http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/content/player/43930.html

Posted by teo. on (March 13, 2012, 12:49 GMT)

see a few comments by "hamish"... what ever happened to the 2 Marshall brothers?? Hamish and the other?

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Andrew AldersonClose
Tour Results
New Zealand v South Africa at Wellington - Mar 23-27, 2012
Match drawn
New Zealand v South Africa at Hamilton - Mar 15-17, 2012
South Africa won by 9 wickets
New Zealand v South Africa at Dunedin - Mar 7-11, 2012
Match drawn
New Zealand v South Africa at Auckland - Mar 3, 2012
South Africa won by 5 wickets (with 40 balls remaining)
New Zealand v South Africa at Napier - Feb 29, 2012
South Africa won by 6 wickets (with 70 balls remaining)
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days