New Zealand v South Africa, 3rd Test, Wellington, 5th day March 27, 2012

Williamson finds the missing fight

ESPNcricinfo staff
New Zealand's batsmen had shown promise against South Africa's strong bowling attack but none displayed the temperament to play a long innings, until Williamson's battling hundred
30

Kane Williamson did what no other New Zealand batsman managed in this series. He crossed the three-figure mark and showed the temperament required to play South Africa's hostile attack, something the New Zealand line-up had lacked through the three Tests.

His hundred was far from flawless: he was dropped twice and survived a close call when the third umpire decided a catch by Alviro Petersen, at point, was not taken cleanly. The century was a fighting one. Williamson drove well, cut well, pulled well, but, more importantly, stayed at the crease well. He wore a few, got hit where it hurts and saw some of the senior batsmen come and go, but he stuck it out.

"I'm not quite sure Kane has realised what he has done just yet," Brendon McCullum said, "but in terms of New Zealand cricket history it will go down as one of the gutsier innings and one of the more fighting efforts on the last day against this sort of attack."

It was the kind of fighting effort New Zealand could have done with earlier in the series, which they have lost 0-1. Their totals may give the impression of a fragile, inexperienced line-up, but all of New Zealand's batsmen showed, at one point or another in the series, that they do have the ability to make it at Test level. They showed the ability to face some of the best bowlers in the world, but it was their mental game that let them down. They got in, they staved off South Africa's attack for a while and then gave it away.

Apart from McCullum and Ross Taylor, none of New Zealand's top-order batsmen had played more than 20 Tests coming into the series, yet everyone from Rob Nicol to Kruger van Wyk showed promise. In each case, though, that promise was stubbed out because, at some stage, the batsman lost concentration. When they got into positions of strength, they did not know how to stay there but Williamson gave them a small glimpse of how to play a long innings.

"I turn [a big ask] into small tasks, and take it one over at a time," Williamson said. "There's two of you so you can kind of halve the job, and all of a sudden one session, which might be 36 overs, becomes a lot simpler in terms of the thinking around it. We were just counting down the overs and splitting them in half."

Williamson remained at the crease for 75.5 overs, 44.4 of them with Nos. 7 and 8, van Wyk and Doug Bracewell. He said he never felt safe at the crease as South Africa attacked in waves, the biggest of which came early in his innings, after South Africa were disappointed that the umpires allowed Williamson to continue when they thought he had been caught at point. "It comes and goes a little bit," Williamson said of South Africa's aggression. "As you start getting underway and gathering a little bit of momentum, the opposition side tend not to say as much, and then if there's a debatable catch they come at you a little bit harder. They came quite hard after the catching incident, which is to be expected. It's about trying to weather that and fight through it."

Williamson used various tactics to deal with the pressure South Africa exerted: he blocked out a lot of what was said to him, and sometimes saw the lighter side of things, particularly when Dale Steyn was fuming after the debatable catch. "We decided to enjoy it, take it one ball at a time and experience it," Williamson said.

That sort of attitude will have to be applied more regularly if New Zealand hope to have sustained competitive spells against teams ranked higher than them. McCullum said New Zealand had identified the areas they needed to work on in what will be a busy Test year. "You have to bat for long and you have to make some really good decisions along the way," he said. "We haven't been able to do it through this series but we now know what we have to do to get better as a batting group."

Edited by Dustin Silgardo

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • beejaytee on March 29, 2012, 0:57 GMT

    Great knock, dropped catches and all. NZ batsmen, take note! High time for NZ to finally (finally!) start batting like they are playing a five day game. I think NZ put too much emphasis on winning Tests. If they really want to move up the ranks, they need to stop *losing* Tests. 3-day wins are great, and the bowling is looking the best it has since Bond's retirement (maybe even further back), but it wasn't the (admittedly excellent) SA bowlers who made the difference in this series. It was the stodgy, boring (AB's last 50 notwithstanding), and utterly effective top-order batting. In the modern Test arena, if a team can bat two sessions without losing a wicket, a loss is almost off the cards. AFTER reaching that point, go for the win. In fact, you could almost say the reverse is also true, since SA are far too conservative. They should plan like NZ if they want the #1 ranking - they've got the players to actually pull off all-out attack. NZ don't.

  • on March 28, 2012, 22:02 GMT

    @gazzafanatic. SAs attack may not be the best since the WI quartet but I think its definately the most hostile and fearsome since then. I also think you are a bit harsh on the Eng attack. Yes they are predominately swing bowlers but its unfair to call them rank in the sub-continent. They actually performed fairly well v Pak in the UAE. It was their batsmen who were rank! I also don't know why you bother to mention the Aussies. Pattinson looks a genuine prospect, if injury doesn't ruin his career like injury has ruined R Harris career. Hard to comment on Cummins but I'd guess hes in the same basket as Pattinson. Harris, Siddle and Hilfenhaus are workman like bowlers. They would be excellent as 3rd or 4th bowlers but as long as they are the leaders of the attack Aus has no right to be considered as one of the best attacks going around. I understand you are talking about pace attacks but the best 3 bowling units going around are SA, Eng and Pak.

  • gazzafanatic on March 28, 2012, 16:22 GMT

    England on the other hand, have swing bowlers only (except Finn...), and I honestly think Australia has more varied fast bowling stock to form a unit capable of competing with SA (around the world...unlike Eng, whose seamers are rank outside of swinging conditions). If anyone disagrees, I will happily show you both the stats..and support that with logic to prove you wrong. (SA are short a spinner of quality of course...I am talking seam attack only)

  • gazzafanatic on March 28, 2012, 16:18 GMT

    A lot of people misunderstand the hype between the SA attack - comparing them to SA attacks of old , the great Aus & WI attacks ...and current Aus & ENg attacks. The comparisons to the former are nonsensical given how new the current crop is as a unit, and can only be made over time. What does stand out, and no one can dispute ,is the ABILITY to be the most COMPLETE seam unit over a SUSTAINED period of time. Steyn is THE best fast bowler (and proponent of swing) in the world (no one can honestly challenge that) who, going through a 'bad patch' has shown to be extremely economical and great support for Philander. Philander shows the potential to be the best seam bowler in the world (any disputes?), and Morkel is one of the most uncomfortable bowlers to face for his pace and bounce. Each of these is in the top 2 or 3 of their respective 'trades' of fast bowling...and now Morkel is beginning to show some discipline alongside the other two

  • on March 28, 2012, 9:24 GMT

    Its worrying how much expectation is on Williamson. At 21 after only 12 test people are talking about Crowes 17 centuries and Flemings 7172 runs. The worst part is I can't help doing it myself.

  • Spelele on March 28, 2012, 7:21 GMT

    @JG2704 continued: Why on earth does the fact that SA has "drawn 2 of the last 3 away series" cast doubt on the perfectness of their away record or otherwise? The point is that SA has not lost an away series since 2007 (a record England and others can only dream about). Full stop. Let us also not forget that those "last 3 tours" included a tour to the UAE (where England were whitewashed!) and to India (where nobody from outside the sub-continent has drawn, never mind won a series in a long time). I gather England were whitewashed in the ODIs there not so long ago? Not a bad record after all for SA when viewed in this light is it? The point is that SA has had rough away tours in alien conditions and has handled them far better than any other nation can claim (especially Eng). And yes, I have every right to point out that this is yet another AWAY series which SA has not lost, considering how mediocre other sides (esp. the so called number ones) have fared in away series in recent times.

  • Spelele on March 28, 2012, 7:07 GMT

    @JG2704: The true number one will be decided when SA tour England. We knew this even before this series. Winning it 3 -0 was consequently irrelevant as most people would have still questioned SA's number one status and would have still seen the tour of Eng as the deciding one. There was no need to gamble and try to be number 1 now as this could only realistically happen if England messed up in Srilanka (which they look like doing at this point mind you). SA abandoned any thoughts of chasing the number one status when the first test was ended prematurely by bad weather. There was no need to continue chasing this on an uncertain anticipation that Eng might lose to SL; especially since (such efforts notwithstanding) the cricketing world would have regarded the Eng tour as the determinative one. The remote possibility of being a disputed number one was not proportional to the risk of drawing the series. SA would not have achieved much by winning it 2 - 0. Smith made the right decision.

  • christy29 on March 28, 2012, 5:37 GMT

    you know what? this attack isn't the best in years. it isn't even the best in the world right now. so what they can bowl fast australia, pakistan and england's are better. new zealand is just making excuses

  • SixFourOut on March 28, 2012, 1:50 GMT

    New Zealand Lack test quality batsmen, yet they have one waiting in the wings and not being used. JESSE RYDER, I think he is the best test batsmen in the country and given time will make mountains of runs. Stop it with these hopeless make shift openers, put Macullum in to open and make Ryder part of the line up. Wagner will be eligible soon too. The problem is NZ have always had a really strong7, 8,9,10 in there line up in fact half their runs came after the fifth wicket when Cairns or Oram and Vettori, Macullum made runs. Now they have a long tail and look worse than ever. They need more spin out of Guptil/Williamson and with Wagner's ability to bat a bit it will strengthen the tail now that Martin is close to retiring. It must be: Guptil - Macullum - Williamson - Taylor - Ryder - Brownlie - Watling - Vettori - Wagner - Bracewell - Gillespie...... That's a good pace attack and a long batting line up with the class of Taylor and Ryder. Boult to come in if a bowler loses form

  • JG2704 on March 27, 2012, 22:55 GMT

    @Spelele ctd - Actually I'd have been really gutted Smith hadn't pushed on quicker and declared earlier. With the 3 pacemen you have at your disposal I'd have strongly fancied bowling out a NZ side where Vetori bats at 6

  • beejaytee on March 29, 2012, 0:57 GMT

    Great knock, dropped catches and all. NZ batsmen, take note! High time for NZ to finally (finally!) start batting like they are playing a five day game. I think NZ put too much emphasis on winning Tests. If they really want to move up the ranks, they need to stop *losing* Tests. 3-day wins are great, and the bowling is looking the best it has since Bond's retirement (maybe even further back), but it wasn't the (admittedly excellent) SA bowlers who made the difference in this series. It was the stodgy, boring (AB's last 50 notwithstanding), and utterly effective top-order batting. In the modern Test arena, if a team can bat two sessions without losing a wicket, a loss is almost off the cards. AFTER reaching that point, go for the win. In fact, you could almost say the reverse is also true, since SA are far too conservative. They should plan like NZ if they want the #1 ranking - they've got the players to actually pull off all-out attack. NZ don't.

  • on March 28, 2012, 22:02 GMT

    @gazzafanatic. SAs attack may not be the best since the WI quartet but I think its definately the most hostile and fearsome since then. I also think you are a bit harsh on the Eng attack. Yes they are predominately swing bowlers but its unfair to call them rank in the sub-continent. They actually performed fairly well v Pak in the UAE. It was their batsmen who were rank! I also don't know why you bother to mention the Aussies. Pattinson looks a genuine prospect, if injury doesn't ruin his career like injury has ruined R Harris career. Hard to comment on Cummins but I'd guess hes in the same basket as Pattinson. Harris, Siddle and Hilfenhaus are workman like bowlers. They would be excellent as 3rd or 4th bowlers but as long as they are the leaders of the attack Aus has no right to be considered as one of the best attacks going around. I understand you are talking about pace attacks but the best 3 bowling units going around are SA, Eng and Pak.

  • gazzafanatic on March 28, 2012, 16:22 GMT

    England on the other hand, have swing bowlers only (except Finn...), and I honestly think Australia has more varied fast bowling stock to form a unit capable of competing with SA (around the world...unlike Eng, whose seamers are rank outside of swinging conditions). If anyone disagrees, I will happily show you both the stats..and support that with logic to prove you wrong. (SA are short a spinner of quality of course...I am talking seam attack only)

  • gazzafanatic on March 28, 2012, 16:18 GMT

    A lot of people misunderstand the hype between the SA attack - comparing them to SA attacks of old , the great Aus & WI attacks ...and current Aus & ENg attacks. The comparisons to the former are nonsensical given how new the current crop is as a unit, and can only be made over time. What does stand out, and no one can dispute ,is the ABILITY to be the most COMPLETE seam unit over a SUSTAINED period of time. Steyn is THE best fast bowler (and proponent of swing) in the world (no one can honestly challenge that) who, going through a 'bad patch' has shown to be extremely economical and great support for Philander. Philander shows the potential to be the best seam bowler in the world (any disputes?), and Morkel is one of the most uncomfortable bowlers to face for his pace and bounce. Each of these is in the top 2 or 3 of their respective 'trades' of fast bowling...and now Morkel is beginning to show some discipline alongside the other two

  • on March 28, 2012, 9:24 GMT

    Its worrying how much expectation is on Williamson. At 21 after only 12 test people are talking about Crowes 17 centuries and Flemings 7172 runs. The worst part is I can't help doing it myself.

  • Spelele on March 28, 2012, 7:21 GMT

    @JG2704 continued: Why on earth does the fact that SA has "drawn 2 of the last 3 away series" cast doubt on the perfectness of their away record or otherwise? The point is that SA has not lost an away series since 2007 (a record England and others can only dream about). Full stop. Let us also not forget that those "last 3 tours" included a tour to the UAE (where England were whitewashed!) and to India (where nobody from outside the sub-continent has drawn, never mind won a series in a long time). I gather England were whitewashed in the ODIs there not so long ago? Not a bad record after all for SA when viewed in this light is it? The point is that SA has had rough away tours in alien conditions and has handled them far better than any other nation can claim (especially Eng). And yes, I have every right to point out that this is yet another AWAY series which SA has not lost, considering how mediocre other sides (esp. the so called number ones) have fared in away series in recent times.

  • Spelele on March 28, 2012, 7:07 GMT

    @JG2704: The true number one will be decided when SA tour England. We knew this even before this series. Winning it 3 -0 was consequently irrelevant as most people would have still questioned SA's number one status and would have still seen the tour of Eng as the deciding one. There was no need to gamble and try to be number 1 now as this could only realistically happen if England messed up in Srilanka (which they look like doing at this point mind you). SA abandoned any thoughts of chasing the number one status when the first test was ended prematurely by bad weather. There was no need to continue chasing this on an uncertain anticipation that Eng might lose to SL; especially since (such efforts notwithstanding) the cricketing world would have regarded the Eng tour as the determinative one. The remote possibility of being a disputed number one was not proportional to the risk of drawing the series. SA would not have achieved much by winning it 2 - 0. Smith made the right decision.

  • christy29 on March 28, 2012, 5:37 GMT

    you know what? this attack isn't the best in years. it isn't even the best in the world right now. so what they can bowl fast australia, pakistan and england's are better. new zealand is just making excuses

  • SixFourOut on March 28, 2012, 1:50 GMT

    New Zealand Lack test quality batsmen, yet they have one waiting in the wings and not being used. JESSE RYDER, I think he is the best test batsmen in the country and given time will make mountains of runs. Stop it with these hopeless make shift openers, put Macullum in to open and make Ryder part of the line up. Wagner will be eligible soon too. The problem is NZ have always had a really strong7, 8,9,10 in there line up in fact half their runs came after the fifth wicket when Cairns or Oram and Vettori, Macullum made runs. Now they have a long tail and look worse than ever. They need more spin out of Guptil/Williamson and with Wagner's ability to bat a bit it will strengthen the tail now that Martin is close to retiring. It must be: Guptil - Macullum - Williamson - Taylor - Ryder - Brownlie - Watling - Vettori - Wagner - Bracewell - Gillespie...... That's a good pace attack and a long batting line up with the class of Taylor and Ryder. Boult to come in if a bowler loses form

  • JG2704 on March 27, 2012, 22:55 GMT

    @Spelele ctd - Actually I'd have been really gutted Smith hadn't pushed on quicker and declared earlier. With the 3 pacemen you have at your disposal I'd have strongly fancied bowling out a NZ side where Vetori bats at 6

  • JG2704 on March 27, 2012, 22:53 GMT

    @Spelele they won the series 1-0 which means than Eng just have to (and I say just have to when we're struggling so badly) draw with SL to level the points with SA.Had SA won by 2-0 then we'd have had to have beaten SL to go top and being that SL look like winning the 1st test it looks like the best we'll get is a draw. So if I was a SA fan I'd be a bit miffed with his captaincy when they realistically could have made an educated gamble and won the match which in reality would have made them officially number 1 and when things are so tight at the top - not to mention Aus coming up behind them - every match could be crucial. PS re SA's perfect away record since 2007 (meaning 2006) - you mean unbeaten right? Exc NZ they've drawn 2 of the last 3 away series.PS you say AWAY series like it's huge and I know Eng are awful in UAE/SL but it is NZ. I think most SA fans would have hoped for a 3-0 win even if rain scuppered one test.

  • Jeremybc on March 27, 2012, 20:23 GMT

    I think that, although NZ have under performed at times in this series, that we are still a team on the up. I honestly think that this is the most aggressive bowling attack since the west indies - they were smashing us and we had fight - just not quite enough.

  • on March 27, 2012, 17:41 GMT

    I would give a lot of credit to van Wyk and Bracewell for hanging on with Kane. Great batting against one of the deadliest pace quartet in modern era.

  • waitara on March 27, 2012, 16:07 GMT

    Yes, the weather and dropped catches cost SA the game, but declaring with a lead of 388, 5 hours to play, our best batsman (capable of scoring very quickly) being operated on, and this great bowling attack? This was such a conservative declaration by Smith, it has to be seen as poor. Maybe Smith thought Baz might be able to blast 175 (so we have Baz to thank for the draw)?? Williamson has been a special talent since he emerged on the first class scene. Why people do not see that is beyond me. Look at how he scores 1s and 2s and 3s with ease? He is a class above. The lack of "noise" about him is actually good, because NZ's press is often too quick to idolize players for what, on a world scale, are not great performances, which helps no one. But the cricinfo guys are also reserved on Williamson.

    Can anyone shed light on the circumstances of his captain declaring when he was on 284 for Northern in November? I mean, 300 would have been a monumental mielstone in NZ cricket.

  • zn264 on March 27, 2012, 15:48 GMT

    Very tough series, congrats to SA, you played the better cricket 70% of the time and deserve the series win. NZ did manage to hold their own for the odd sesssion or two and a few players have shown some promise, others have wilted under pressure. I loved watching Dale bowl, that guy is something else, and AB is my new hero...mainly because he can't catch hahaha no seriously the guy has more class when it comes to batting than anyone in in all formats of the game! PS Kane we all knew you had it in ya, shot cus.

  • 2.14istherunrate on March 27, 2012, 13:42 GMT

    Like so many test captains Smith mistimed his declaration by miles. Any amount of time would have been valuable and those prelunch overs were telling, as NZ slid towards defeat. His other miscalcualtion was in selection. Kallis out did not mean they should have replaced his bowling by dropping a spinner, and the afternoon and evening cruelly exposed that- Tahir at any time after 66-3 would have been a godsend to him, if just to break the rhythm which Duminy tried to do and failed. In the end Philander had a normal day for a bowler, and steyn huffed and puffed but could not blow the house down. Great spectacle though, and Williamson's knock was a testimony to a proper technique and a selectivity which moarked him out from the rest. he was also lucky but they say the cameras never lie. My lasting impressions of the series though remain of the Hunters and the Hunted-great entertainment, particularly from Steyn.

  • WarVdm on March 27, 2012, 12:51 GMT

    Congrats to Williamson, what a gutsy and patient innings! The sort of Test Match batting that New Zealand traditionally lack. Seems like he could be a great batting prospect, not just for New Zealand, but for world cricket. Having said that, some complacent fielding and a "benifit of the doubt goes to the batsman decision" both went his way. Not his fault, he just made it work for him and made SA pay.

  • Spelele on March 27, 2012, 12:47 GMT

    @JG2704: I have to disagree. I totally support Smith on this one. It is so easy for us to criticize his tactics (as none of us have ever been a Test captain). SA had already won the series (an AWAY series at that)!. There was consequently no need to chase the game. SA have kept their perfect away record since 2007. There was no need to give NZ a sniff. They would never have gone for it anyways against this SA attack. To declare earlier would only have, at best, displayed arrogance and lack of respect for the opposition. In any event, this draw had less to do with lack of sufficient time to bowl the Kiwis out, but more to do with poor catching. SA had all the opportunities in the world over that 80 or so over period, but simply failed to take them. How is this Smith's fault? This guy deserves more respect (especially from SA fans); he always takes all the flack (even in situations of series victories like this one!). Let's just all enjoy another away series win from the boys folks :)

  • RandyOZ on March 27, 2012, 12:20 GMT

    The age old saying, catches win matches, was so true today. AB's drop was an absolute sitter although I must admit I thought Petersen had Williamson. Great innings by the kid and again great bowling by SA. Morkel seems to have now settled his spot from de Lange for England.

  • Mervo on March 27, 2012, 11:54 GMT

    It had very little to do with Williamson, who was blessed with so much luck. It had everything to do with the terrible weather that denied SA 3-0 result.

  • on March 27, 2012, 11:27 GMT

    @FatBoys, please don't put pressure on Williamson. Let him enjoy his space before he become Captain and overtakes Martin Crowe Records. One of the reasons why i am staunchly supporting Williamson over other young talents such as Kohli, Akmal, Chandimal, (Darren) Bravo is that he seems to have cool head over his shoulders.

    If Cricket is a gentleman's game, then we need likes of Williamson to succeed at highest level. So please don't burden him with your expectations in statistics.

  • FatBoysCanBat on March 27, 2012, 11:11 GMT

    @Nrs Veda: The "red colour" on Williamson's bat is not just from this innings or series. This is the bat with which he scored 284* for Northern Districts against Wellington back in November last year

  • bobbo2 on March 27, 2012, 11:11 GMT

    Well done NZ. As a loyal fan I think we did well in this test. The reality is that SA is far superior over 5 days, But we did well considering

  • FatBoysCanBat on March 27, 2012, 10:57 GMT

    Initially I was convinced that the catch was out until they showed the final camera angle where you could see Petersen's hands come apart and then him dragging the ball across the turf [for half a second] with his right hand to link with his left hand. The third umpire got it spot on. In regards to Williamson...this was the type knock that many of his followers have expected of him since he was a schoolboy. I remember playing a Gillette Cup match [New Zealand secondary school Tournament] against him when I was 17 when he made 130 odd off about 90 balls and we came to learn that this was his 27th hundred since starting high school. In today's innings he was up against the most sustained aggressive fast bowling since the West Indies in the mid 1980's to early 1990's. This kid has a massive future for New Zealand and this is just the beginning. He is already tipped as our next captain and many see him surpassing Martin Crowe's record for most Test centuries and Fleming's record for runs.

  • JM_RSA on March 27, 2012, 10:52 GMT

    Dissapointed that NZ wasnt finished off. The drop catches cost the SA a test match win. I guess SA is not there yet, still lacking the killer instict.

  • on March 27, 2012, 10:35 GMT

    Watched the innings at later stages of games. This Innings should be classified as one of best ever knocks played by a batsman in Test Cricket in past 10 years. South Africa bowling was more than formidable and the way with which Kane Williamson handled their bowling is incredible. And if you watch his bat, it is full of red colour, which indicates South African bowlers were consistently hitting on and around off-middle stump area.

    If properly groomed, Kane Williamson will go down as one of the greatest players to have played game in international arena or atleast for New Zealand. Let us wait and see.

  • GCKelly on March 27, 2012, 10:31 GMT

    There's a lot of Tendulkar when watching Williamson bat. He is very still at the crease and effortlessly flows into his shots, which, he has plenty of. NZ really needs to look after both him and Bracewell, they are the future.

  • gimme-a-greentop on March 27, 2012, 9:55 GMT

    Well played to young Williamson, sure he had a bit of luck but you still got to make it count and he showed good temperament in the face of some world class fast bowling. The reality, however, is that New Zealand would have been well beaten had the game been played over 5 days so there is small consolation in that effort. NZ really need to learn how to bat in Test cricket, hopefully they would have learned a bit from SA. Good luck to the Kiwis for the rest of the year.

  • JG2704 on March 27, 2012, 9:29 GMT

    Obviously as an England fan I'm happy with the result and the rain helping us. However if I was a SA fan I'd be a bit peeved with Smith.I feel he could have opened with AB and played at an ODI/T20 tempo and declared much sooner. You would have to wonder what might have happened had the team had an extra hour or more to bowl at them.

  • JustOUT on March 27, 2012, 9:16 GMT

    Good on Kane to tackle such a hostile attack. Over all good tour for SA.

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • JustOUT on March 27, 2012, 9:16 GMT

    Good on Kane to tackle such a hostile attack. Over all good tour for SA.

  • JG2704 on March 27, 2012, 9:29 GMT

    Obviously as an England fan I'm happy with the result and the rain helping us. However if I was a SA fan I'd be a bit peeved with Smith.I feel he could have opened with AB and played at an ODI/T20 tempo and declared much sooner. You would have to wonder what might have happened had the team had an extra hour or more to bowl at them.

  • gimme-a-greentop on March 27, 2012, 9:55 GMT

    Well played to young Williamson, sure he had a bit of luck but you still got to make it count and he showed good temperament in the face of some world class fast bowling. The reality, however, is that New Zealand would have been well beaten had the game been played over 5 days so there is small consolation in that effort. NZ really need to learn how to bat in Test cricket, hopefully they would have learned a bit from SA. Good luck to the Kiwis for the rest of the year.

  • GCKelly on March 27, 2012, 10:31 GMT

    There's a lot of Tendulkar when watching Williamson bat. He is very still at the crease and effortlessly flows into his shots, which, he has plenty of. NZ really needs to look after both him and Bracewell, they are the future.

  • on March 27, 2012, 10:35 GMT

    Watched the innings at later stages of games. This Innings should be classified as one of best ever knocks played by a batsman in Test Cricket in past 10 years. South Africa bowling was more than formidable and the way with which Kane Williamson handled their bowling is incredible. And if you watch his bat, it is full of red colour, which indicates South African bowlers were consistently hitting on and around off-middle stump area.

    If properly groomed, Kane Williamson will go down as one of the greatest players to have played game in international arena or atleast for New Zealand. Let us wait and see.

  • JM_RSA on March 27, 2012, 10:52 GMT

    Dissapointed that NZ wasnt finished off. The drop catches cost the SA a test match win. I guess SA is not there yet, still lacking the killer instict.

  • FatBoysCanBat on March 27, 2012, 10:57 GMT

    Initially I was convinced that the catch was out until they showed the final camera angle where you could see Petersen's hands come apart and then him dragging the ball across the turf [for half a second] with his right hand to link with his left hand. The third umpire got it spot on. In regards to Williamson...this was the type knock that many of his followers have expected of him since he was a schoolboy. I remember playing a Gillette Cup match [New Zealand secondary school Tournament] against him when I was 17 when he made 130 odd off about 90 balls and we came to learn that this was his 27th hundred since starting high school. In today's innings he was up against the most sustained aggressive fast bowling since the West Indies in the mid 1980's to early 1990's. This kid has a massive future for New Zealand and this is just the beginning. He is already tipped as our next captain and many see him surpassing Martin Crowe's record for most Test centuries and Fleming's record for runs.

  • bobbo2 on March 27, 2012, 11:11 GMT

    Well done NZ. As a loyal fan I think we did well in this test. The reality is that SA is far superior over 5 days, But we did well considering

  • FatBoysCanBat on March 27, 2012, 11:11 GMT

    @Nrs Veda: The "red colour" on Williamson's bat is not just from this innings or series. This is the bat with which he scored 284* for Northern Districts against Wellington back in November last year

  • on March 27, 2012, 11:27 GMT

    @FatBoys, please don't put pressure on Williamson. Let him enjoy his space before he become Captain and overtakes Martin Crowe Records. One of the reasons why i am staunchly supporting Williamson over other young talents such as Kohli, Akmal, Chandimal, (Darren) Bravo is that he seems to have cool head over his shoulders.

    If Cricket is a gentleman's game, then we need likes of Williamson to succeed at highest level. So please don't burden him with your expectations in statistics.