New Zealand v West Indies, 2nd Test, Wellington, 2nd day

New Zealand dominate rain-hit day

The Report by Abhishek Purohit

December 12, 2013

Comments: 33 | Text size: A | A

West Indies 158 for 4 (Edwards 55, Samuels 50*) trail New Zealand 441 (Taylor 129, Watling 65, Best 4-110) by 283 runs
Scorecard and ball-by-ball details


BJ Watling punches square through the off side, New Zealand v West Indies, 2nd Test, Wellington, 2nd day, December 12, 2013
BJ Watling batted with the tail to stretch New Zealand's total to 441 © Getty Images
Enlarge

New Zealand were not as consistent with the ball as they would have wanted to be but they still prised out four West Indies wickets after nearly a session was lost to rain in Wellington. The efforts of BJ Watling and Trent Boult with the bat earlier meant they still had a buffer of 283 runs at stumps with the last specialist batting pair in the middle. West Indies started reasonably well against the new ball, after copping plenty of damage on the field, but New Zealand kept finding the wicket-taking delivery to end the day clearly in front.

The West Indies openers Kirk Edwards and Kieran Powell survived over an hour to add 46 despite several close shaves. Edwards was hit by Boult on the pad without offering a stroke as early as the first over but the ball would have gone over the stumps. Both batsmen were beaten several times. Powell edged a couple but he also played softly so that the ball didn't carry to the slips. The pair made sure they didn't go after good deliveries and waited for width. New Zealand didn't make the batsmen play nearly enough, and it was only in the 15th over that the breakthrough came.

Southee, who hadn't quite found his rhythm in his opening spell, struck Powell in front as the batsman missed a flick in the first over of his second spell. Corey Anderson showed his value again as a bowler, generating movement and nip to have Darren Bravo edge early to second slip.

Edwards, meanwhile, had grown in confidence and was beginning to time his drives through the off side. Marlon Samuels often got himself into awkward positions with his habit of walking across outside off but also counterattacked with several fours. The pair had taken West Indies past 100 when Anderson produced another wicket, Edwards getting a leading edge to cover on 55.

Another New Zealand bowler came back to pick up a wicket in the first over of his second spell. Boult had Shivnarine Chanderpaul reaching out to scoop a drive to cover-point. Immediately after Chanderpaul left, the legspinner Ish Sodhi was brought on. He dropped it short frequently, and Samuels helped himself to easy boundaries to motor to a half-century in 55 balls. New Zealand tried more spin in the form of Kane Williamson, but even his two overs proved expensive, Narsingh Deonarine cashing in this time. The stand grew to 39 by stumps, but Watling and Boult's hitting had given New Zealand quite a headstart.

The same story had played out in the morning after rain delayed the start by an hour and 15 minutes. Another day, another dropped catch from West Indies, and another New Zealand batsman making them pay. Had Tino Best not made a total misjudgment at deep midwicket, Boult would have been gone for 3 to Shane Shillingford, and New Zealand would have been dismissed for 386. Instead, Best palmed the slog over the boundary, and the final pair of Boult and Watling proceeded to thrash 58 runs at over a run a ball. By the time Watling missed a slog off Shannon Gabriel to be bowled for 65, New Zealand had surged to 441, an addition of 134 runs in 25.1 overs to their overnight 307 for 6. On day one, West Indies had put down Ross Taylor on zero and watched him make 129.

New Zealand's progress was largely down to Watling, who showed his versatility by constantly doing what the situation demanded. On the first evening, he had stonewalled to 8 off 47 as stumps approached. This morning, he and Southee came out positive, attacking anything either too short and wide or too full.

After Southee fell, New Zealand were to string together another useful stand, of 49 between Sodhi and Watling. Sodhi was extremely competent for a No. 9. Watling, seeing that Sodhi was in no trouble, turned the strike over as regularly as one would alongside a specialist batsman.

Shaking off their initial waywardness, West Indies targeted the fuller lengths they had largely missed on the first day. Gabriel, especially, was unlucky not to break through, going past the edge on a few occasions. However, having batted with so much calm, Sodhi suddenly had a loose waft at a wide one from Best to depart for 27.

Soon began the entertainment from Boult. He charged Shillingford thrice, cleanly striking a boundary down the ground each time, the last one sailing for six. Soon, the partnership had tallied 50 off just 47 balls. Boult would remain unbeaten on 38 off 27, but it would be two-and-a-half hours before he would get a crack at West Indies, as the rain came down again after the end of New Zealand's innings.

Abhishek Purohit is a sub-editor at ESPNcricinfo

RSS Feeds: Abhishek Purohit

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by   on (December 12, 2013, 22:08 GMT)

i said before the game start WI will lose because they will be short a bowler,as long as Sammy plays, well it's coming to pass. WI cricketers should finish at least college before they represent the region. clearly they lack intelligence, that goes for the selectors as well .

Posted by   on (December 12, 2013, 21:17 GMT)

It was fun to watch Sammy get upset when others drop catches off his bowling but he is a culprit himself.

Posted by cricketcrumnz on (December 12, 2013, 20:22 GMT)

Black caps have too many half ass batters and too many all rounders that can sorta bat and sorta bowl . BRING BACK RYDER NZCB are fools if they don't

Posted by CricketCoachDB on (December 12, 2013, 19:29 GMT)

Sodhi has real potential as an all-rounder, the lad can seriously bat. Anderson has a great "golden arm". I've heard great things about both these lads potential in the last few years from Kiwi's who've watched them from a young age. Very promising for the future.

Posted by lee_man on (December 12, 2013, 18:31 GMT)

People should not be so quick to rush to judgement about the WI's apparent lack of consistency in the batting department. Taylor would have failed in both matches had the catches been held. Darren Bravo failed in the first innings of this test because NZ held their catches.

My beef with the WI team is that they always seem to be concentrating more on the cold weather than on playing cricket. They just need to man up!! I hate the way they slink around the field, dropping catches and misfielding whenever the weather is cold. They behave the exact way whenever they are playing during the early summer weeks in England.

Posted by TrickyKid on (December 12, 2013, 17:28 GMT)

Great to see Watling and Anderson doing well. They are the quiet achievers in the NZ team.

Posted by 22many on (December 12, 2013, 17:22 GMT)

@kiwicricetnut. BMac did try opening again...the day after scoring his ton. Sure not really opening but close enough to it...near new ball...first couple of over on the second day...got one that moved slightly and he got knocked over. Na he is not an opener. .never was. I am just happy to see him as captain as he and others wanted.....Read an interesting article by Ian Snook in Stuff.co.nz an opinion piece. Don't know what he ate for lunch but it certainly didn't agree with him.

Posted by mngc1 on (December 12, 2013, 17:13 GMT)

People remember selectively. For instance when this test is finished they will remember Best took 4 wickets but ignore the fact that he dropped 2 catches that were costly. They will also remember how badly Gabriel bowled in the first test but forget that 3 catches were dropped off of him in this first inning. And Edwards made a half century but dropped Taylor at 0. These make a difference to the result and the team selection for the next match.

Posted by   on (December 12, 2013, 16:56 GMT)

I predict that the West Indies would score 338 and be led by 103 runs and New Zealand will dominate in their second innings. However, the final day will tell who is the winner

Posted by 12thUmpire on (December 12, 2013, 15:12 GMT)

Very disappointing of Chanders! He failed to review as was expected by his fans. He hasn't quite clarified whether he ALSO reviews LBWs or ONLY LBWs.

Because he didn't have to bat long, it is expected he will field full-time rather than rely on sub. Hope there won't be another let-down on this fielding expectations!

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Abhishek PurohitClose
Tour Results
New Zealand v West Indies at Wellington - Jan 15, 2014
New Zealand won by 4 wickets (with 6 balls remaining)
New Zealand v West Indies at Auckland - Jan 11, 2014
New Zealand won by 81 runs
New Zealand v West Indies at Hamilton - Jan 8, 2014
West Indies won by 203 runs
New Zealand v West Indies at Nelson - Jan 4, 2014
New Zealand won by 58 runs (D/L method)
New Zealand v West Indies at Queenstown - Jan 1, 2014
New Zealand won by 159 runs
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days