New Zealand v West Indies, 3rd Test, Hamilton

Lucky to have a world-class bowling line-up - McCullum

Andrew McGlashan in Hamilton

December 18, 2013

Comments: 15 | Text size: A | A

Trent Boult acknowledges the crowd after claiming 10 wickets in the match, New Zealand v West Indies, 2nd Test, Wellington, 3rd day, December 13, 2013
Trent Boult has formed a valuable pairing with Tim Southee for New Zealand of late © AFP
Enlarge
Related Links

Brendon McCullum, the New Zealand Test captain, believes New Zealand are building a world-class bowling attack and feels lucky to have that firepower at his disposal as he aims to captain the team to their first series victory over a top-eight Test nation in eight years.

During the last 12 months, Tim Southee and Trent Boult - a pairing that first operated together during New Zealand's victory over Australia in Hobart - have formed a strong new-ball attack supplemented mainly by Neil Wagner's hit-the-deck approach as the third seamer although Doug Bracewell has also floated around the scene.

The spin department has been more fluid as New Zealand try to find a substitute for Daniel Vettori, and after brief stints with Todd Astle, Jeetan Patel and Bruce Martin, New Zealand appear to have settled on legspinner Ish Sodhi, who is raw but gifted. The emergence of Corey Anderson as an allrounder at No. 6 has helped give McCullum the leeway to embrace Sodhi and also use his main two quicks as attacking options.

The bowlers have also enjoyed feeding off the pressure built by large first-innings totals; in four out of the five home Tests so far this season New Zealand have posted over 400.

"In the last few Tests at home the blueprint we've played to has been good," McCullum said. "We've been able to get plenty of runs, which has been great for our bowlers because I think we do have potentially a world-class bowling line-up."

Southee and Boult have dovetailed with each other during the year. Boult had his day to remember at the Basin Reserve last week with a haul of 10 for 80 while in May, albeit in defeat but not through the fault of the bowlers, Southee took 10* in the match against England at Lord's.

"Consistency is what we're always after and if we look at our bowlers over the last 12 months those guys have been very consistent and turned in excellent performances," McCullum said. "Trent got the rewards in the last game and Tim got the rewards at Lord's, but throughout the year, even in trying conditions, those guys continue to run in and present us with good opportunities."

"It's a lucky situation for me as captain and our batting group is we've got bowlers capable of taking 20 wickets, even on surfaces which don't necessarily suit them at times. I can't talk highly enough of those guys and I know they're determined to back that up and make sure we get a series win."

It is still early in New Zealand's international season. After this Test in Hamilton there is a five-match one-day series followed by two Twenty20s before the visit of India and their strong batting line-up. Although Boult is not a regular in one-day cricket (that may soon change), Southee is part of all formats for New Zealand so can expect a hefty workload in the weeks ahead.

The immediate priority, however, is to not let this chance of a series victory slip away. New Zealand are not ranked at No. 8 in Test cricket without reason; they do not win many matches, although their recent home form has been far better than their current rating.

The pitch, the first Test surface prepared by groundsman, Andy Brown, who has taken on the main role at Seddon Park after being the long-time No. 2, did not have same strong tinge of green as the previous two in the series, but McCullum thought there was still enough life in the grass to make the first day interesting. He also said overhead conditions can play as much as a part as what's under foot, so he'll be looking up as well as down should he win the toss.

"As the boys have alluded to I'm not winning too many tosses at the moment and probably not expecting to win it tomorrow either. Last year, the wickets didn't tend to start to turn later so bowling first was a pretty calculated decision because we knew it wasn't going to break up. This year it seems to be a dollar each way.

"The important thing in Hamilton is the overhead conditions and the mugginess which is around. If there is some cloud cover then the ball can swing quite a lot. We've seen in previous Tests here that a lot of wickets can fall in one session. We've got be mindful of that with bat and ball."

After all the effort they have put in to finally register a win at home, and be in the position to take a series, it is that prospect of one crazy session - however unlikely it seems - undoing the good work, that is a valuable warning for New Zealand to heed.

*10.20amGMT, December 18: Southee's haul at Lord's was amended

Andrew McGlashan is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo

RSS Feeds: Andrew McGlashan

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by   on (December 19, 2013, 4:12 GMT)

@Risingteam. I am no hater of your country's cricket and if you remember I also said you may be or are a better team. But your whole point flat pitches vs england? 167/10 in dunedin vs england? Auclland test? Kane williamson 102* where morne morkel picked 6/26? How come Trent Boult and Neil Wagner kept testing pommies while Anderson the best swing bowler was not? I don't think that was flat putch stuff, was it? Sure Tamin Iqbal scored twin centuries but now look, the same old "we did that, we did this" and so on. I am not here to compare your team with mine. But I have been watching you for quite some time. Your sole purpose is to show you are better and New Zealand should stop playing cricket. Okay, we got this. This is not a place to fight, or believe me I have perfect counter arguments for you my friend.

And as for Mcbren's record there. Why did you bring "thrashed by banglas in odi's"? I don't think we were talking about odi's either, were we?

Posted by   on (December 19, 2013, 2:54 GMT)

I wanna correct something ... Kiwi Captain must say: Lucky to have backyard bowler. But they have enough to perform against WI.

Posted by NIPPY_89 on (December 18, 2013, 21:54 GMT)

The NZ bowling attack is good but not world class. In my opinion SA, ENG, AUS, PAK all have better bowling attacks than NZ. Let's not get ahead of ourselves Mr McCullum. With this young bowling attack perhaps one day they might become world class with more experiance. Who knows.

Posted by drnaveed on (December 18, 2013, 20:58 GMT)

' LUCKY TO HAVE A WORLD CLASS BOWLING LINE UP'. well McCullum , than what will you say about the SA bowling line up, which is supposed to be the best in the world at present,having variety and proving it time and again with the results they are giving .what have your world class bowlers done so far?.

Posted by lumis07 on (December 18, 2013, 20:12 GMT)

@TheRisingTeam When Bangladesh win a series in NZ then you can claim that they are better.

Posted by TheRisingTeam on (December 18, 2013, 19:36 GMT)

@Bond: Who scored back to back 100s in England? this flat track stuff is just a case of sour grapes mate but even if I agree with you for sake of argument, makes those 2 hat tricks against your team all the more special :D

Posted by KingAjmal on (December 18, 2013, 19:18 GMT)

lol New Zealand have good bowlers but certainly not world class. Poor youth team and poor crowd attendance needs improving for New Zealand.

Posted by TheRisingTeam on (December 18, 2013, 19:14 GMT)

@Dickson: I agree Bangladesh are the worst test team but your question is irrelevant. How many matches have New Zealand played compared to Bangladesh since the start of 2012 across all forms? exactly!

Posted by TheRisingTeam on (December 18, 2013, 19:12 GMT)

@Shane Bond:- flat track bully? right so that's why NZ prepared flat pitches when SA and England toured there :) if my memory serves me right I thought critics said Bangladesh cannot play on flat tracks. Nice excuses though :)

Since when has T20 become more important that ODIs? yes McCullum has hit more 6s but what's your point? How many matches has New Zealand played compared to Bangladesh in T20s? here's your answer nice try :)

Posted by   on (December 18, 2013, 18:21 GMT)

@TheRisingTeam, sorry, since when did losing or winning an ODI series affect your TEST ranking, am I missing something?

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Andrew McGlashanClose
Andrew McGlashan Assistant Editor Andrew arrived at ESPNcricinfo via Manchester and Cape Town, after finding the assistant editor at a weak moment as he watched England's batting collapse in the Newlands Test. Andrew began his cricket writing as a freelance covering Lancashire during 2004 when they were relegated in the County Championship. In fact, they were top of the table when he began reporting on them but things went dramatically downhill. He likes to let people know that he is a supporter of county cricket, a fact his colleagues will testify to and bemoan in equal quantities.
Tour Results
New Zealand v West Indies at Wellington - Jan 15, 2014
New Zealand won by 4 wickets (with 6 balls remaining)
New Zealand v West Indies at Auckland - Jan 11, 2014
New Zealand won by 81 runs
New Zealand v West Indies at Hamilton - Jan 8, 2014
West Indies won by 203 runs
New Zealand v West Indies at Nelson - Jan 4, 2014
New Zealand won by 58 runs (D/L method)
New Zealand v West Indies at Queenstown - Jan 1, 2014
New Zealand won by 159 runs
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days