New Zealand news

McCullum eyes opening spot in Tests

Cricinfo staff

July 23, 2010

Comments: 22 | Text size: A | A

Brendon McCullum takes off during his important innings, New Zealand v Australia, 1st Test, 4th day, Wellington, March 22, 2010
Brendon McCullum: "I wouldn't play conventionally. There are a lot of aggressive Test openers around now." © Getty Images
Enlarge

Having relinquished wicketkeeping duties in Test cricket in order to ease the strain on his body, Brendon McCullum is looking to reinvent his role in the New Zealand side by moving up the order as an unorthodox opener in the longest format.

"I wouldn't play conventionally. There are a lot of aggressive Test openers around now. It's probably something we haven't really looked at," McCullum told the Dominion Post in Wellington. "I'm not saying it's going to work, but I'm going to give it everything I've got to try and make it work."

McCullum's ambition is not without precedent - batsmen such as Virender Sehwag, Matthew Hayden, Tillakaratne Dilshan, Chris Gayle and Tamim Iqbal have reinvented the role of an opening batsman in Test matches with their attacking intent. McCullum has been a staple at the top of the order for New Zealand in the shorter versions of the game where he is recognized as a dangerous batsman, with averages of 29.01 in ODIs and 33.33 in Twenty20s at enviable strike rates. His Test record is less impressive with 2862 runs at 34.90 in 52 matches, most of the runs coming from the number seven spot.

In recent times, the Test opening slots have been a major problem area for New Zealand, having tried 14 different batsmen at the top since 2005 without much success. They are likely to maintain the opening combination of Tim McIntosh and BJ Watling for their next assignment in Bangladesh. McCullum is not fixated on opening the batting and is confident of making an impact from the number three position too.

"One, two or three are probably the same. I don't mind where. It won't be the stock-standard blunt the ball at the top of the order. I've got to stick to my strengths and if we're totally honest it probably hasn't worked in the past, the way we've been playing. Why not try something different?"

New Zealand will be without McCullum's services during the upcoming tri-series in Sri Lanka, also involving India. He will be missing from the starting line-up after 209 successive international appearances as he recovers from a clean-up surgery on his left knee. The break coincides with the birth of his second child.

"The last time I missed a game was for the birth of my boy [Riley, in 2004]. This isn't the reason I'm missing this tour but to have a girl and have an unbroken stretch in between is pretty cool," McCullum said.

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by DazzKeagsz on (July 30, 2010, 19:50 GMT)

I'm really not liking this whole form of thinking. McCullum is not a great test player. He never has been, but to me he has always been the best keeper in the world. I just think that if he stays in the middle order when he can keep, he is taking up an extra position which is unjustified, and likewise if he goes up the top of the order. A guy like Kane Williamson who has a load more talent with the bat should be batting at 3, and BJ Watling and McIntosh have been doing a decent enough job up the top.

While McCullum may have the right incentive of how NZ could possibly go at the top of the order, he doesn't come close to the skill, talent or technique of the likes of Sehwag, Gayle or Dilshan. While each of these players are aggressive, they still have good technique for the job at hand. McCullum has never had technique, and it's suited to the shorter format, but not Test and especially not against the new ball.

Posted by Freeeeee on (July 25, 2010, 12:06 GMT)

@ rickdolby : first stop abusing a whole country for one man's mistake. Tell me a team who's been winnin 2 test togeather in foriegn soil at present.. you can't.. because no teams winning.. just for abusing you are taking a whole country apart is nothing but arrogant..

Posted by mike5181 on (July 25, 2010, 10:44 GMT)

New Zealand has some very talented batsmen with Rhyder Taylor McCullem Guptill Williamson. They all have the potential to become truly world class batsmen in all forms of the game but sadly only Taylor is establishing himself as a good player. Id say in six months time New Zealand will have a very good batting side and a average bowling side.

Posted by   on (July 25, 2010, 3:07 GMT)

u ca\n.......u r fantastics.........go for it.........

Posted by Maestro_of_Cricket on (July 24, 2010, 16:37 GMT)

Totally agree there with rickdolby. But coming to the point, I don't think this is such a good idea. Batsmen going out attacking at the top in Tests doesn't make much of an impact on the match if they don't go on for a three figure score; which McCullum obviously won't do. So he'd better stay back at the middle order WITH the gloves or retire from Tests giving Watling the chance. NZ is not short of Test openers, Mr.McCullum.

Posted by jkumara on (July 24, 2010, 16:02 GMT)

How did you miss Sanath Jayasuriya? He was the inventor of agressive opening of the innings in ODIs and Tests....

Posted by kalinga_dis on (July 24, 2010, 12:17 GMT)

@Gupta.Ankur..stating that dilshan and mccullum are sloggers is extremely ridiculous.....better improve ur cricketing knowledge before making such a statement......they might not be successful to sehwags extent bt dilshan is defnitely not a slogger....he plays in his own unique way bt dat doesnt make him a slogger..i wud put both the intent of the players sehwag and dilshan into one category bt the former has better hand eye coordination which makes him a better player...footwork wise i wont both of dem anyway close to tendulkar or a sangakkara...

Posted by rickdolby on (July 24, 2010, 1:56 GMT)

sick of reading comments from one eyes indian fans on this site with articles that have nothing to do with your team always rubbishing teams players and talking up your own, you have a country twice the size of all the cricketing nations combined times alot and its embarrassing that you can hardly string a few wins 2getha outside your country with the amount of players you have to pick from.

Posted by Rag-Aaron on (July 23, 2010, 21:13 GMT)

I should be doubtful about this but that century Baz scored against Australia last year showed a lot of guts and self discipline. Good luck to him

Posted by   on (July 23, 2010, 20:55 GMT)

@Gupta.Ankur: Try to contain your arrogance. Sure India have a great team, but there'd be no game without opposition so please maintain at least a basic level of respect.

Back to the discussion at hand. I'd have to agree with @mnemoniny's comments. In test cricket you've got to earn periods of batting dominance through soaking up pressure at the beginning and end of each session. If all the batsmen can suck it up and do that - then bigger scores are in store for NZ.

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
ESPNcricinfo staffClose
Country Fixtures Country Results
Afghanistan v NZ A at Dubai (CA) - Nov 25
NZ A won by 105 runs
3rd Test: New Zealand v Pakistan at Sharjah
Nov 26-30, 2014 (10:00 local | 06:00 GMT | 01:00 EST | 00:00 CST | 22:00 PST)
Canterbury v Auckland at Christchurch
Nov 27, 2014 (16:30 local | 03:30 GMT | 22:30 EST | 21:30 CST | 19:30 PST)
Central D v Otago at Napier
Nov 28, 2014 (19:10 local | 06:10 GMT | 01:10 EST | 00:10 CST | 22:10 PST)
Auckland v Canterbury at Napier
Nov 29, 2014 (15:50 local | 02:50 GMT | 21:50 EST | 20:50 CST | 18:50 PST)
Central D v Northern D at Napier
Nov 29, 2014 (19:00 local | 06:00 GMT | 01:00 EST | 00:00 CST | 22:00 PST)
Ireland v NZ A at Dubai (CA)
Nov 29, 2014 (10:00 local | 06:00 GMT | 01:00 EST | 00:00 CST | 22:00 PST)
Complete fixtures » | Download Fixtures »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days