New Zealand v Australia, 1st Test, Wellington, 3rd day March 21, 2010

Bollinger makes his mark on struggling New Zealand

14

New Zealand 157 (Vettori 46, Bollinger 5-28) & 187 for 5 (McIntosh 83) trail Australia 459 for 5 dec by 115 runs
Scorecard and ball-by-ball details

New Zealand didn't understand the fuss over Doug Bollinger during the one-day series, but they do now after he put Australia on track for a convincing victory in Wellington. After struggling through the limited-overs engagements and being attacked by the home batsmen, Bollinger has caused a lot of damage on a fine surface during the opening Test.

A career-best 5 for 28 helped floor New Zealand for 157 in their first innings, which ended 65 minutes into the third day and left them 302 behind, and Bollinger returned to cause more difficulties during the hosts' improved second effort. Despite Tim McIntosh's obdurate resistance with 83 in 276 minutes, the home side finished at 187 for 5, still needing 115 to make the tourists bat again.

Bollinger has played only seven Tests, but he was the attack's main man as he recorded the second five-wicket haul of his career and followed up with 2 for 30 off 13 overs. There were five breakthroughs in the day as he finished off the first innings and gave his side some inspiration when the visitors were becalmed in the second session.

Backing up after a demolition is not always easy for the bowlers, who expect to repeat their exploits despite their fatigue. The fast men didn't regain the same opportunities until Bollinger stepped up, dismissing BJ Watling and Peter Ingram (1) in the half hour before tea.

Watling, who made an unsuccessful challenge, was lbw to Bollinger for the second time in the game and walked off with 33 in 131 minutes, while Ingram flirted at Bollinger to give Brad Haddin an easy catch. Throughout the day he provided extra speed, bounce and a touch of swing to gain his rewards.

In the morning Bollinger, the third bowler used, struck twice in three balls, adding the victims to his two of the previous afternoon. Brendon McCullum left after trying a wild pull - he was well caught by Harris at fine-leg - and Bollinger then delivered a beautiful shorter ball angling away to brush Martin Guptill's edge.

Bollinger's fifth wicket came when Brent Arnel nicked his first delivery to Ricky Ponting at second slip. In celebration he attempted to kiss the team badge on his shirt - but smooched the sponsor's beer logo instead.

New Zealand resumed at a wobbly 108 for 4 and Daniel Vettori started the collapse of 45 for 6 when he edged the debutant Ryan Harris (2 for 42) to Ponting in the day's opening over. They made a better fight of their second innings thanks to the effort of McIntosh, who settled the team during a 70-run opening stand with Watling.

McIntosh, the left-hander, was a great man for the situation and was solid in defence before branching out a little as the afternoon wore on. For most of the time the going was slow, but it was exactly what New Zealand wanted, especially as wickets fell regularly after Watling departed. There were people in the crowd asleep, but they were allowed to dream of a lengthy second innings and possibly some rain over the final two days.

Shortly before his dismissal there were two McIntosh fours in a row off Mitchell Johnson, including a crisp cover drive, in a collection of 10 boundaries and a straight six off Nathan Hauritz. However, his resistance ended when he pushed defensively at Hauritz and inside-edged to Simon Katich at short leg.

New Zealand were 183 for 5 and Vettori found himself in a similar position to when he arrived yesterday. His side was in danger and needed a lot of runs. He had added 18 before stumps, while McCullum was 4 when bad light intervened.

Hauritz, the offspinner, delivered 22 overs in a row after lunch and gained some worrying turn at times. He produced one crucial ball to Ross Taylor that landed in a footmark outside off stump and spun back sharply while keeping low. Taylor, who had earlier hit Hauritz for a six and a four, didn't play a shot and was hit in front of off stump. The Australians challenged successfully after Asad Rauf initially gave it not out and it was another costly lapse on a bad day for New Zealand.

Peter English is the Australasia editor of Cricinfo

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • mlhgja on March 22, 2010, 3:37 GMT

    No team can expect to win getting bowled out for 157, but it's disappointing because the selections didn't help at all. Why not get rid of Ingram and Guptil who have looked dreadful in the ODIs? Why select 4 of the "same" type of ineffective bowlers - how about selecting the other McCullum, who can actually bat too? And surely, Hopkins must be close to getting a call up - especially after his double ton for Auckland today!

  • Sam57 on March 21, 2010, 23:59 GMT

    Ashik, how do you expect a team to improve if they can't play quality opposition? considering the size of the population in NZ and the fact theres only a very small ammount of interest in the sport here, I think they do quite well. how well do you think a team from Sydney would go against India or South Africa? because Sydney has a population very similair to NZ. Perhaps before you judge you should look at the facts and bring things into perspective a little.

  • on March 21, 2010, 23:43 GMT

    Stop trolling Ashik. Kiwi's are doing just fine.

  • on March 21, 2010, 22:44 GMT

    And Mister Imran, I hope they prove you wrong. (Clatter as a wicket falls). Sorry that was the clatter of the ball hitting the ad board...

  • on March 21, 2010, 22:43 GMT

    Nulla, Wagner is and I'm sure that he'll replace Martin, he's a leftie too. van Wyk definitely is, so with McCullum wanting to do more batting may turn into our keeper-batsman. Did Marshall apply when the IPL was giving out an amnesty? Because it'd be good to have him back, depending on where his form is.

  • KGL154 on March 21, 2010, 22:10 GMT

    bugger off Ashik..........in the last couple of years the NZ test side has lost Styris, Fleming, O'Brien, Oram & Bond (and probably others I can't think of). And unlike India we don't have a billion people to choose replacements from. This NZ side will eventually come good. Think how much better batsmen Taylor, Guptill & Ryder will be with some more test experience. To improve, we need more tests against the higher ranking teams, not fewer. A couple of fast bowlers would be nice too come to think of it.

  • on March 21, 2010, 13:57 GMT

    Newzealand shud not play test with the higher ranking teams.... it has been long since Newzealand have got test status.. but they have never been a more than average team........

    They shud play tests against Zimbabwe and the West Indies only.... they will even face an innings defeat against Bangladesh in Dhaka...

  • Clyde on March 21, 2010, 12:34 GMT

    Peter is doing much better here, and relating what happened. However, Taylor was not 'hit in front of off stump'. The whole point was that he was hit outside it.

  • mandi on March 21, 2010, 11:02 GMT

    dougie is become a now premanent inclusion for aussies,he need to keep it up,

  • Gupta.Ankur on March 21, 2010, 10:45 GMT

    Considering NZ's continuing poor batting performance and reluctance to travel abroad is cementing their position as poorest team in top-8.

    Now i think i understand the real reason for NZ not touring abroad............and esp the Sub-continent.They know they'll lose poorly.

  • mlhgja on March 22, 2010, 3:37 GMT

    No team can expect to win getting bowled out for 157, but it's disappointing because the selections didn't help at all. Why not get rid of Ingram and Guptil who have looked dreadful in the ODIs? Why select 4 of the "same" type of ineffective bowlers - how about selecting the other McCullum, who can actually bat too? And surely, Hopkins must be close to getting a call up - especially after his double ton for Auckland today!

  • Sam57 on March 21, 2010, 23:59 GMT

    Ashik, how do you expect a team to improve if they can't play quality opposition? considering the size of the population in NZ and the fact theres only a very small ammount of interest in the sport here, I think they do quite well. how well do you think a team from Sydney would go against India or South Africa? because Sydney has a population very similair to NZ. Perhaps before you judge you should look at the facts and bring things into perspective a little.

  • on March 21, 2010, 23:43 GMT

    Stop trolling Ashik. Kiwi's are doing just fine.

  • on March 21, 2010, 22:44 GMT

    And Mister Imran, I hope they prove you wrong. (Clatter as a wicket falls). Sorry that was the clatter of the ball hitting the ad board...

  • on March 21, 2010, 22:43 GMT

    Nulla, Wagner is and I'm sure that he'll replace Martin, he's a leftie too. van Wyk definitely is, so with McCullum wanting to do more batting may turn into our keeper-batsman. Did Marshall apply when the IPL was giving out an amnesty? Because it'd be good to have him back, depending on where his form is.

  • KGL154 on March 21, 2010, 22:10 GMT

    bugger off Ashik..........in the last couple of years the NZ test side has lost Styris, Fleming, O'Brien, Oram & Bond (and probably others I can't think of). And unlike India we don't have a billion people to choose replacements from. This NZ side will eventually come good. Think how much better batsmen Taylor, Guptill & Ryder will be with some more test experience. To improve, we need more tests against the higher ranking teams, not fewer. A couple of fast bowlers would be nice too come to think of it.

  • on March 21, 2010, 13:57 GMT

    Newzealand shud not play test with the higher ranking teams.... it has been long since Newzealand have got test status.. but they have never been a more than average team........

    They shud play tests against Zimbabwe and the West Indies only.... they will even face an innings defeat against Bangladesh in Dhaka...

  • Clyde on March 21, 2010, 12:34 GMT

    Peter is doing much better here, and relating what happened. However, Taylor was not 'hit in front of off stump'. The whole point was that he was hit outside it.

  • mandi on March 21, 2010, 11:02 GMT

    dougie is become a now premanent inclusion for aussies,he need to keep it up,

  • Gupta.Ankur on March 21, 2010, 10:45 GMT

    Considering NZ's continuing poor batting performance and reluctance to travel abroad is cementing their position as poorest team in top-8.

    Now i think i understand the real reason for NZ not touring abroad............and esp the Sub-continent.They know they'll lose poorly.

  • CSpiers on March 21, 2010, 10:38 GMT

    class act, more aggressive, consistent and accurate than all of the NZ test quicks put involved in this match put together

  • nulla on March 21, 2010, 10:16 GMT

    The kiwis seem to constantly struggle with their batting. In their domestic competition there are several ex-pat Soth Africans & a Zimbabwean ie Myburgh, van Wyk & de Grandhomme. Can anyone advise if these players are attempting to qualify residentially for NZ? Surely they would have to be given a go in an attempt to improve the Black Caps. Also, I see Hamish Marshall is back. Is he available for selection? I realise Kane Williamson is in top form now but he had a miserable start to the season. I'm sure the selectors were waiting to see if he suffered 2nd year blues.

  • RohnKenn on March 21, 2010, 10:16 GMT

    Dougie is all class,if i were to pick top pacers i would rank Dougie 1.He is just so phenomenal what to say,just trying to guess out what combination will the selectors pick when Hilfy and Siddle will be fit.

  • popcorn on March 21, 2010, 6:30 GMT

    Dougie,Dougie,Dougie!! How quickly the critics were to foolishly comment that Dougie was not hitting his straps ever since he came to NZ and played in the one dayers. And here is is, a 5 'fer!! in his debut Test against NZ!That was just the beginning! 2 wickets in the second innings, NZ following on,crippling the Kiwis! You are Class, Dougie!

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • popcorn on March 21, 2010, 6:30 GMT

    Dougie,Dougie,Dougie!! How quickly the critics were to foolishly comment that Dougie was not hitting his straps ever since he came to NZ and played in the one dayers. And here is is, a 5 'fer!! in his debut Test against NZ!That was just the beginning! 2 wickets in the second innings, NZ following on,crippling the Kiwis! You are Class, Dougie!

  • RohnKenn on March 21, 2010, 10:16 GMT

    Dougie is all class,if i were to pick top pacers i would rank Dougie 1.He is just so phenomenal what to say,just trying to guess out what combination will the selectors pick when Hilfy and Siddle will be fit.

  • nulla on March 21, 2010, 10:16 GMT

    The kiwis seem to constantly struggle with their batting. In their domestic competition there are several ex-pat Soth Africans & a Zimbabwean ie Myburgh, van Wyk & de Grandhomme. Can anyone advise if these players are attempting to qualify residentially for NZ? Surely they would have to be given a go in an attempt to improve the Black Caps. Also, I see Hamish Marshall is back. Is he available for selection? I realise Kane Williamson is in top form now but he had a miserable start to the season. I'm sure the selectors were waiting to see if he suffered 2nd year blues.

  • CSpiers on March 21, 2010, 10:38 GMT

    class act, more aggressive, consistent and accurate than all of the NZ test quicks put involved in this match put together

  • Gupta.Ankur on March 21, 2010, 10:45 GMT

    Considering NZ's continuing poor batting performance and reluctance to travel abroad is cementing their position as poorest team in top-8.

    Now i think i understand the real reason for NZ not touring abroad............and esp the Sub-continent.They know they'll lose poorly.

  • mandi on March 21, 2010, 11:02 GMT

    dougie is become a now premanent inclusion for aussies,he need to keep it up,

  • Clyde on March 21, 2010, 12:34 GMT

    Peter is doing much better here, and relating what happened. However, Taylor was not 'hit in front of off stump'. The whole point was that he was hit outside it.

  • on March 21, 2010, 13:57 GMT

    Newzealand shud not play test with the higher ranking teams.... it has been long since Newzealand have got test status.. but they have never been a more than average team........

    They shud play tests against Zimbabwe and the West Indies only.... they will even face an innings defeat against Bangladesh in Dhaka...

  • KGL154 on March 21, 2010, 22:10 GMT

    bugger off Ashik..........in the last couple of years the NZ test side has lost Styris, Fleming, O'Brien, Oram & Bond (and probably others I can't think of). And unlike India we don't have a billion people to choose replacements from. This NZ side will eventually come good. Think how much better batsmen Taylor, Guptill & Ryder will be with some more test experience. To improve, we need more tests against the higher ranking teams, not fewer. A couple of fast bowlers would be nice too come to think of it.

  • on March 21, 2010, 22:43 GMT

    Nulla, Wagner is and I'm sure that he'll replace Martin, he's a leftie too. van Wyk definitely is, so with McCullum wanting to do more batting may turn into our keeper-batsman. Did Marshall apply when the IPL was giving out an amnesty? Because it'd be good to have him back, depending on where his form is.