New Zealand v Australia, 1st Test, Wellington, 4th day

Solid McCullum stands firm in windy Wellington

The Bulletin by Peter English

March 22, 2010

Comments: 14 | Text size: A | A

New Zealand 157 & 369 for 6 (McCullum 94*, McIntosh 83, Vettori 77) lead Australia 459 for 5 dec by 67 runs
Scorecard and ball-by-ball details


Daniel Vettori is bowled after trying to sweep Nathan Hauritz, New Zealand v Australia, 1st Test, 4th day, Wellington, March 22, 2010
Daniel Vettori was bowled trying to sweep Nathan Hauritz, ending his valuable stand of 126 with Brendon McCullum © Getty Images
Enlarge

Brendon McCullum changed his tactics to produce a superb team innings that allowed New Zealand to take their battle with Australia into a fifth day. Standing up to a fierce wind gusting up to 120kph, McCullum smothered his attack-first mentality and overcame a distracted Australian side to finish unbeaten on 94.

Crucially, McCullum built on the work of Daniel Vettori, who produced a committed 77, and took the hosts further ahead during their follow-on. By stumps on a day curtailed by rain, light and regular interruptions caused by the gale, their advantage stood at 67. It is not much, but some more wet weather is predicted on the final morning, giving them a chance of saving the game.

The Australians started the day with a lead of 115 and needed five wickets but they managed only one. Mostly they wished they were inside, safe from the powerful gusts and resting after three consecutive days in the field. McCullum and Vettori kept them outside during a partnership of 126 - it was a sixth-wicket record for New Zealand against Australia - and both raised their highest scores in Trans-Tasman Tests.

McCullum, who is happiest when he's slashing boundaries, focussed successfully on batting for a long time and usually avoided the big shots that could have led to his departure. For much of the time it was an uncharacteristically gritty display, but he allowed himself some attractive flourishes.

The best shot came when he pulled Mitchell Johnson out of the ground behind square and forced a lengthy search for the ball. Unfortunately for the Australians they found it, as McCullum liked hitting it.

He cut Nathan Hauritz when he dropped short and eased the fast men through cover or point when they over-pitched. After lunch he thumped a drive to point that was prevented from reaching the rope by the gale, but he picked up 11 boundaries and the six during an impressive 178-ball performance.

McCullum's half-century came up with overthrows after he picked up a quick single, and he was the most comfortable man on the ground throughout the day. Vettori was almost immoveable as he showed he could have a long-term future at No. 6. After scoring 46 in the first innings Vettori, who has been promoted two spots in the order this season, delivered in another crucial situation.

Rain delayed the start and the hosts resumed their second innings on 187 for 5, knowing they didn't have much batting power after Vettori and McCullum. The pair was in control for most of the stand and the Australians were worn down by the interruptions and the unfamiliar weather.

The wind was so severe that the cameras for Hot Spot were taken down and the equipment for the projection tracking stopped working, which caused a problem when McCullum survived an lbw appeal on 52 from Hauritz. McCullum didn't play a shot to an offspinner and was hit a long way outside off stump, with Asad Rauf ruling it not out.

Australia called for a referral but some of the reference tools were unavailable and the original decision stayed, which seemed to be the right one. Ricky Ponting had a lengthy discussion with the umpires and the upshot was they didn't lose their challenge.

The Australians weren't at their best throughout, but their worst period was after lunch when Johnson dropped a caught-and-bowled opportunity above his head from Vettori on 60. Brad Haddin also failed to stump McCullum before his half-century when the batsman missed a ball from Hauritz and his back leg came out of the crease.

Just when everything seemed lined up for a Vettori century, he swept at Hauritz well outside leg stump and managed to play on. He opened the day with a smart drive in the first over and collected eight fours in all, half of which came behind point. A boundary through cover off Ryan Harris brought up a much-needed half-century and Vettori also employed a range of cunning deflections during his 119-ball stay.

Once Vettori exited, McCullum gained assistance from Daryl Tuffey, who was unbeaten on 23 when stumps were eventually called. Bad light and drizzle alternated to cause the disruptions in the afternoon and only 52 overs were delivered for the day.

The persistent gusts forced the players to hold on to their caps and sent a helmet sitting behind Haddin all the way to the boundary. Bails weighed down by lead blew off and the cameramen standing in the stands had ropes to grab when they wobbled. Before play the wind was so strong it ripped the covers from the hands of the groundsmen and moved the light roller.

The conditions helped the bowlers at the Vance Stand End, but were a severe hindrance for the men at the other one. Hauritz had to deliver into the wind most of the time and had satisfying figures of 3 for 119 from 49 overs. Doug Bollinger was unable to add an eighth wicket for the game while Johnson had brief moments of encouragement without success. Depending on what happens tomorrow, the Australians may look back at their mixed moods and conclude it was a day of missed opportunities.

Peter English is the Australasia editor of Cricinfo

RSS Feeds: Peter English

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by Julian017 on (March 22, 2010, 22:24 GMT)

***Lou Vincent is unavaliable because he is an English County player ***

Actually Vincent is available. He played in the domestic 20/20 and was available for selection against Bangladesh but was overlooked. He has since returned to England, but remains eligible for NZ selection.

Personally, I think the selectors made a huge error in not picking him. He has previous success against Australia in tests & ODI's, plus he was in good form with a hundred in the local 20/20 competition for Auckland.

Posted by cjude09 on (March 22, 2010, 19:07 GMT)

Mahendra_Ishant_Pathan if you knew anything you'd know that Scott Styris retired from Test Cricket in 2008. Lou Vincent is unavaliable because he is an English County player and lastly Jacob Oram retired last year from Test Cricket also. Get your facts right before saying who should be in the team.

Posted by JonnyBoy777 on (March 22, 2010, 18:11 GMT)

H Marshall- retired all but may play for ireland at next world cup Vincent is past it Sinclair averaged 60+ this year in first class and and 80+ a couple a years ago Styris- retired tests

Posted by BeGe on (March 22, 2010, 16:23 GMT)

@Mahendra_Ishant_Pathan - Oram and Styris have retired from test cricket.

Chris Crain? LOL. But I agree, the team is missing Oram. They need a seam bowling all rounder for the balance of the team. Franklin was meant to be Oram's replacement but his form has been poor.

Posted by Jambo22 on (March 22, 2010, 14:38 GMT)

Styris has retired from Tests and Vincent doesn't even play first-class cricket for Auckland any more, by the looks of things. (BTW, just because you've seen someone hit McGrath doesn't mean they should be in the national team indefinitely.) Oram has retired from Test cricket too. I would replace Ingram with Williamson and, when Ryder is fit, bring him in at 5 and drop everyone else down one spot (dropping Southee probably). The tail is way too long at the moment.

Posted by Mahendra_Ishant_Pathan on (March 22, 2010, 11:28 GMT)

I believe, scott styris should be playiing...he is better than lot of present NZ batsmen. Why is he not playing? I dont know much about sinclair but Lou vincent is a fantastic player. I have seen him hitting glenn macgrath all over the ground. Once oram and jesse recover from injuries, they can be a good batting unit.....they need more polayers like chris crain (what an allrounder he was)

Posted by   on (March 22, 2010, 8:07 GMT)

Sinclair? He has only one score in double figures in his last 6 innings, and his last domestic score was like 7. The last time he passed 50 was in 2004.

Posted by kimhughs on (March 22, 2010, 7:56 GMT)

Gupta, New Zealand's problems are not because McCallum and Vettori bat down the order. Their batting problems are because they do not have good enough players to bat up the order (I have always felt that this is a product of limited genuine fast bowlers in the domestic scene). McCallum and Vettori are doing their jobs as lower middle order batsmen.

As for New Zealand not playing overseas, you should be so lucky. New Zealand are the poor cousin of test cricket. They get limited opportunity to play overseas because no one of note wants to play them (if I recall last year NZ toured Sri Lanka, played in England, South Africa, UAE and they would have gone to Pakistan if the ICC hadn't prohibited tours there). As for the Zimbabwe thing, what is the point. New Zealand will never be a top test nation playing second tier ODIs against non-test nations. Will India every consider hosting them for a 3 test series in the near future?

Posted by   on (March 22, 2010, 7:40 GMT)

@JonnyBoy777 much rather have Hamish Marshall and Lou Vincent to be honest

Posted by JonnyBoy777 on (March 22, 2010, 7:02 GMT)

Yea true stuff vettori does rock ICC are the boss and Hope the kiwis succeed in saving the match

Posted by gameofcricket on (March 22, 2010, 6:48 GMT)

Actually Gupta.Ankur New Zealand plays where the ICC tells them to play. The reason vettori and McCullum play down the order is because thats here they are best suited. Vettori and his unorthodox technique definatly suit a older ball and tired bowlers.

Posted by JonnyBoy777 on (March 22, 2010, 6:06 GMT)

Again we must rely on mccullum and vettori. Nz cricket fans need to ease up on mccullum 2020 is not rewening his game the guy is a fantastic player.vettori shouldnt have to make 50+ every time he goes out to bat.BRING BACK James Marshall and Skippy (sinclair)

Posted by SachinAsh on (March 22, 2010, 5:22 GMT)

Hope Kiwis save this test match... Vettori rocks!~

Posted by Gupta.Ankur on (March 22, 2010, 5:17 GMT)

I wonder what Vettori and McCullum are doing down the order for NZ? Maybe the others in the line-up are just for taking the shine off the new-ball so that Vettori and mccullum could start off from the 15th over......

Well this has been the trend for many years with NZ and it might continue along with their reluctance to play overseas..........

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Peter EnglishClose
Tour Results
New Zealand v Australia at Hamilton - Mar 27-31, 2010
Australia won by 176 runs
New Zealand v Australia at Wellington - Mar 19-23, 2010
Australia won by 10 wickets
New Zealand v Australia at Wellington - Mar 13, 2010
New Zealand won by 51 runs
New Zealand v Australia at Auckland - Mar 11, 2010
Australia won by 6 wickets (with 17 balls remaining) (D/L method)
New Zealand v Australia at Hamilton - Mar 9, 2010
Australia won by 6 wickets (with 16 balls remaining)
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days