|Photos||Video & Audio||Blogs||Statistics||Archive||Shop||Mobile|
The Report by Sidharth Monga
October 28, 2011
On a pitch that seemed to have roughed up and become vicious, Sri Lanka came out of a testing session-and-a-half with the loss of just one wicket after they had fallen behind by 164 in the first innings. The 45 overs of Sri Lanka's innings was edgy stuff with almost every ball from the spinners misbehaving. It was one of those spells of play where it was just a matter of time before the one with your name showed up. Tharanga Paranavitana and Kumar Sangakkara, left-hand batsmen both, kept trying their best to negate the rough outside their off stumps, and were yet to meet the one with their name on it.
In comparison the first half of the day, important in its own right, seemed to be on sedatives. The ball hardly did anything for Sri Lanka except for some manageable reverse swing for Dhammika Prasad, and despite the early loss of Misbah-ul-Haq, Asad Shafiq and Adnan Akmal built towards a crucial lead. Shafiq showed he had learned his lesson from the first-Test go-slow, and batted purposefully along with Akmal.
Before Shafiq and Akmal, the day's play was definitely a morning walk. Misbah's early dismissal and the presence of a nightwatchman left Pakistan crawling as 11 runs came in the first half hour, including four byes, and 18 in the next half. Around this time Angelo Mathews at gully accepted a second offering from Ajmal, after which Shafiq and Akmal got busy.
Even as Chanaka Welegedara strung together a tight spell, Shafiq welcomed Suranga Lakmal with a pull and Rangana Herath with a six over long-on. At the opposite end, Akmal drove Welegedara for back-to-back boundaries either side of cover. The shots were played slightly away from the body and on the up. If you had just tuned in, you could tell his last name just from those two drives. Shafiq joined in the fun with a fore-handed four through covers to make it 14 off that over. Welegedara had bowled his previous eight for 15.
After that over it was down to accumulating almost in ODI-style, the absence of which they were criticised for in the first Test. The lunch break broke the flow a bit a bit, and when Shafiq tried to use Prasad's pace, he ended up steering straight to gully. After that the innings lost direction. The wickets kept falling, and Akmal didn't try a single big shot. When Tillakaratne Dilshan took the last wicket, he ended a period of nine runs in 11 overs.
Dilshan chose to play no further part in the day's play barring a top-order collapse. The beleaguered regulation openers came out to face the music. The first ball from Umar Gul shaped to swing into the left-hand Paranavitana, and then seamed away, just missing the edge. That set the template for the rest of Paranivatana's effort. He kept playing and missing, but he didn't play a release shot. If he got beaten in the flight, he somehow managed to avoid the edge; the bat-pads didn't make it to the fielders; and even when he ran poorly he somehow survived.
When Misbah introduced Mohammad Hafeez as early as the sixth over, it seemed inexplicable. The fast bowlers had given him good starts almost every time, they were causing trouble now too, and Junaid Khan wasn't injured either. Soon, though, the ball started turning and kicking. Abdur Rehman joined him from the other end. They kept firing the ball in the rough, the orthodox flighted delivery became a change-up. Hafeez soon bowled one with Lahiru Thirimanne's name on it: a flat offbreak that pitched middle and took off, past a forward-defensive from the batsman.
For 31.5 following overs, Sangakkara and Paranavitana had to face a similar test of variable turn and bounce. As the turn kept missing the edge, or the odd big explosion beat the keeper too with the batsman stranded, you could see Pakistan begin to feel edgy too. They have to bat last on this pitch, although it can be argued the Sri Lanka bowlers don't boast similar pedigree.
There were occasions when Pakistan came even closer. In the 20th over, with the score on 35, Pakistan felt they had Sangakkara caught down the leg side. The replays seemed inconclusive after the umpire had ruled in the batsman's favour. Four overs later there was no debate on the edge, but it didn't carry to gully. Paranavitana benefitted from the absence of short leg, forward first and backward on a later occasion. In the 32nd over he was caught ball-watching as Misbah dived at cover-point. The throw from substitute Shoaib Malik, though, came in wide. Still, if an anxious Ajmal had collected it Paranavitana would have been caught short.
"To survive, perchance to score" remained the policy until the faster bowlers came back. Between them the three spinners bowled 32 overs for 52 runs. An exceptionally testing spell of 10 overs in the middle of the final session brought just eight runs. Still, the batsmen refused to play rash shots, and will come back to fight on the fourth day.
Sidharth Monga is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfoFeeds: Sidharth Monga
© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.
In January 2005, Shane Watson made his Test debut. What does he have to show for a decade in the game?
Australia's new captain admirably turned things around for his side in Brisbane, leading in more departments than one
As ever, the West Indies board has taken the short-term view and removed supposedly troublesome players instead of recognising its own incompetence
In the semi-final against Sri Lanka in 2003, Adam Gilchrist walked back to the pavilion despite being given not out by the on-field umpire
Three Australia players made half-centuries on day one at the MCG; for each of them, the innings' meant different things
A look at some of cricket's most memorable strokes - and their makers
To consider banning it in the wake of Phillip Hughes' death may be knee-jerk, but to refuse to consider the pros and cons of a ban is unwise
Mohammed Shami bowls a few really good balls, but they are interspersed with far too many loose ones, an inconsistency that is unacceptable in Test cricket